The carbon footprints of home and in-center peritoneal dialysis in China
- 138 Downloads
The provision of healthcare itself is associated with abundant greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study aims to determine the carbon footprints of peritoneal dialysis (PD) with the different modalities and treatment regimes.
A total of 68 subjects performed with PD treatment were enrolled in this study. Emissions factors were applied to data that were collected for energy consumption, travel, and procurement.
The carbon footprints generated by the provision of PD treatment for the individual patient were calculated and normalized to a 2-l PD dialysate volume. The fixed emissions were higher in patients who received PD therapy in center than at home, mostly attributing to the consumption of electricity. Conversely, PD treatment performed in center yielded less variable emissions than that of at home, which resulted from reduced constituent percentage of waste disposal and transportation. Collectively, packaging consumption mostly contributed to the total carbon footprints of PD.
This study for the first time demonstrates the delivery of PD is associated with considerable GHG emissions, which is mainly attributed to packaging materials, transportation, electricity, and waste disposal. These results suggest that carbon reduction strategies focusing on packaging consumption in PD treatment are likely to yield the greatest benefits.
KeywordsGreenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Carbon footprints Peritoneal dialysis
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 4.Baillie J (2012) Surveys show support for green ‘activities’. Health Estate 66(3):17–20Google Scholar
- 15.BSI (British Standards Institute) (2011) PAS 2050: 2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. British Standards Institute, London. http://shop.bsigroup.com/upload/Shop/Download/PAS/PAS2050.pdf
- 16.Kyoto protocol reference manual on accounting of emissions and assigned amount. http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/08_unfccc_kp_ref_manual.pdf
- 17.University of Bath (2009) Inventory of carbon and energy (ICE). http://www.circularecology.com/embodied-energy-and-carbon-footprint-database.html
- 18.Yanming J (2011) The provincial power industry carbon emissions situation and trend analysis in China. Electr Power Technol Econ 10(23):56–60Google Scholar
- 19.The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) (2012) Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69554/pb13773-ghg-conversion-factors-2012.pdf
- 31.The Revision of China’s Energy and Coal Consumption Data: A preliminary analysis (2015). http://www.theenergycollective.com/hao-tan/2292551/revision-china-s-energy-and-coal-consumption-data-preliminary-analysis
- 32.Kenway SJ PA, CookS, Seo S, Inman M, GregoryA (2008) Energy use in the provision and consumption of urban water in Australia and New Zealand. CSIRO: water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship. https://publications.csiro.au/rpr/download?pid=csiro:EP116078&dsid=DS1