Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Peritoneal dialysis can be an option for unplanned chronic dialysis: initial results from a developing country

  • Nephrology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

Starting dialysis in an unplanned manner is frequent situation in dialysis center even for patients with regular nephrology follow-up. Peritoneal dialysis (PD) appears as an option for unplanned initiation of chronic dialysis, offering the advantage of not using central venous catheters and preserving of residual renal function. Since July 2014, we have offered PD as urgent start for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients.

Methods

It was a prospective study that aimed to evaluate the mortality rate in hospitalized patients who started unplanned urgent PD in the first 90 days. It was used high-volume PD right after (<48 h) PD catheter placement, and it was kept until metabolic and fluid controls were achieved. After hospital discharge, patients were treated with intermittent PD on alternate days at the dialysis unit until family training.

Results

Thirty-five patients were included from July 2014 to January 2015. Age was 57.7 ± 19.2 years, diabetes was the main etiology of CKD (40.6 %), and uremia was the main dialysis indication (54.3 %). Metabolic and fluid controls were achieved after five sessions of high-volume PD, and patients remained in intermittent PD for 23.2 ± 7.2 days receiving 11.5 ± .3.1 intermittent PD sessions. Peritonitis and mechanical complications occurred in 14.2 and 25.7 %, respectively. Mortality rate was 20 %, and technique survival was 85.7 %. The chronic PD program presented a growth of 41.1 %.

Conclusion

The concept of unplanned start on chronic PD may be feasible, safe, complementary alternative to hemodialysis and a tool to increase the PD penetration rate among incident patients starting dialysis therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chaudhary K, Sangha H, Khanna R (2011) Peritoneal dialysis first: rationale. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:447–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Korevaar JC, Feith GW, Dekker FW (2003) Effect of starting with hemodialysis compared with peritoneal dialysis in patients new on dialysis treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Kidney Int 64:2222–2228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vonesh EF, Snyder JJ, Foley RN et al (2006) Mortality studies comparing peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: what do they tell us? Kidney Int 70:S3–S11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Heaf JG, Lokkegaard H, Madsen M (2002) Initial survival advantage of peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17:112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perl J, Wald R, McFarlane P et al (2011) Hemodialysis vascular access modifies the association between dialysis modality and survival. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:1113–1121

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivarsen P, Povlsen JV (2014) Can peritoneal dialysis be applied for unplanned initiation of chronic dialysis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 29:2201–2206. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch M, Kohnle M, Trapp R et al (2012) Comparable outcome of acute unplanned peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27:375–380

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lobbedez T, Lecouf A, Ficheux M et al (2008) Is rapid initiation of peritoneal dialysis feasible in unplanned dialysis patients? A single-centre experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:3290–3294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Silva TN, de Marchi D, Mendes ML, Barretti P, Ponce D (2014) Approach to prophylactic measures for central venous catheter-related infections in hemodialysis: a critical review. Hemodial Int 18(1):15–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mendes ML, de Castro JH, Barreti P, Silva TN, Ponce D (2014) Effective use of alteplase for occluded tunneled venous catheter in hemodialysis patients. Artif Organs 38:399–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Povlsen JV (2009) Unplanned start on assisted peritoneal dialysis. Contrib Nephrol 163:261–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39:S1–S266

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sirivongs D, Praderm L, Chan-on C (2011) Experiences on bedside Tenckhoff catheter implantation. J Med Assoc Thai 94(Suppl 4):S58–S63

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabriel DP, Nascimento GVR, Caramori JT, Martim LC, Barretti P, Balbi AL (2007) High volume peritoneal dialysis for acute renal failure. Perit Dial Int 27:277–282

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ponce D, Balbi AL (2011) Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: a viable alternative. Perit Dial Int 31:387–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ponce D, Berbel MN, Almeida CTP, Goes CR, Balbi AL (2012) High volume peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: indications and limitations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7(6):887–894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ponce D, Buffarah MB, Goes C, Balbi A (2015) Peritoneal dialysis in acute kidney injury: trends in the outcome across time periods. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126436

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Panochia N, Tazza L, Stazzio ED et al (2016) Mortality in hospitalized chronic kidney disease patients starting unplanned urgent haemodialysis. Nephrology 21:62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Danish Nephrology Registry, Annual Report 2011. www.nephrology.dk. Accessed 2 July 2013

  20. Casaretto A, Rosario R, Kotzker WR, Pagan-Rosario Y, Groenhoff C, Guest S (2012) Urgent-start peritoneal dialysis: report from a U.S. private nephrology practice. Adv Perit Dial 28:102–105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Alkatheeri AM, Blake P, Gray D, Jain A (2015) Success of urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in a large Canadian renal program. Perit Dial Int (pii: pdi.2014.00148)

  22. Soucie JM, McClellan WM (1996) Early death in dialysis patients: risk factors and impact on incidence and mortality rates. J Am Soc Nephrol 7:2169–2175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khan IH, Catto GR, Edward N, MacLeod AM (1995) Death during the first 90 days of dialysis: a case control study. Am J Kidney Dis 25:276–280

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Collins AJ, Foley RN, Gilbertson DT, Chen SC (2009) The state of chronic kidney disease, ESRD, and morbidity and mortality in the first year of dialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:S5–S11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendelssohn DC, Malmberg C, Hamandi B (2009) An integrated review of ‘unplanned’ dialysis initiation: reframing the terminology to ‘suboptimal’ initiation. BMC Nephrol 10:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwenger V, Morath C, Hofmann A, Hoffmann O, Zeier M, Ritz E (2006) Late referral—a major cause of poor outcome in the very elderly dialysis patient. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:962–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmidt RJ, Domico JR, Sorkin MI, Hobbs G (1998) Early referral and its impact on emergent first dialyses, health care costs, and outcome. Am J Kidney Dis 32:278–283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen SC, Hwang SJ, Tsai JC et al (2010) Early nephrology referral is associated with prolonged survival in hemodialysis patients even after exclusion of lead-time bias. Am J Med Sci 339:123–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kessler M, Frimat L, Panescu V, Briançon S (2003) Impact of nephrology referral on early and midterm outcomes in ESRD: EPidémiologie de l’Insuffisance REnale chronique terminale en Lorraine (EPIREL): results of a 2-year, prospective, community-based study. Am J Kidney Dis 42:474–485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Baxter Helthycare Corporation funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Botucatu School of Medicine, Distrito de Rubião Junior, São Paulo, 18600090, Brazil

    Dayana Bitencourt Dias, Vanessa Banin, Marcela Lara Mendes, Pasqual Barretti & Daniela Ponce

Authors
  1. Dayana Bitencourt Dias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vanessa Banin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marcela Lara Mendes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Pasqual Barretti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Daniela Ponce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniela Ponce.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dias, D.B., Banin, V., Mendes, M.L. et al. Peritoneal dialysis can be an option for unplanned chronic dialysis: initial results from a developing country. Int Urol Nephrol 48, 901–906 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1243-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1243-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation