Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of renal functional outcomes in exactly matched pairs between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using warm ischemia and open partial nephrectomy using cold ischemia using diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid renal scintigraphy

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare renal functional outcomes in patients with a small renal mass undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using warm ischemia (wRAPN) or open partial nephrectomy using cold ischemia (cOPN).

Methods

This study included 185 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy and were assessed by preoperative and postoperative diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid renal scintigraphy. Variables associated with postoperative operated-side glomerular filtration rate decrement (ΔGFR) were assessed using multivariate analysis. Exact 1:1 propensity score matching was performed using variables related to ΔGFR. Furthermore, 30 patients who underwent wRAPN were matched with 30 patients who underwent cOPN, and their differences in ΔGFR were calculated.

Results

Patients who underwent cOPN were older (p = 0.025) and had shorter ischemia time (p < 0.001) than patients who underwent wRAPN. Multivariate analysis showed that surgical method, preoperative operated-side GFR and RENAL nephrometry score were significantly associated with operated-side ΔGFR. After propensity score matching, postoperative 3-month (14.8 vs. 7.3 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.057) and 1-year operated-side ΔGFR (11.4 vs. 2.8 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.031) was higher after wRAPN than after cOPN in patients with ischemia time ≥25 min, but did not differ in patients with ischemia time <25 min. Within the matched pairs, cOPN resulted in lower operated-side ΔGFR than wRAPN in patients with ischemia time ≥25 min (−6.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.047). Moreover, total GFR decrement was slightly lower with cOPN than with wRAPN (−7.2 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.086).

Conclusions

cOPN was superior to wRAPN in patients with a small renal mass and ischemia time ≥25 min. However, wRAPN yielded renal functional outcomes comparable to those of cOPN when ischemia time was <25 min.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volpe A et al (2004) The natural history of incidentally detected small renal masses. Cancer 100(4):738–745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ljungberg B et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67(5):913–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Campbell SC et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 182(4):1271–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rai BP et al (2012) Surgical management for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (UUT-TCC): a systematic review. BJU Int 110(10):1426–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Touijer K et al (2010) The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol 57(2):214–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kwon T et al (2015) Renal function is associated with nephrometry score after partial nephrectomy: a study using diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (DTPA) renal scanning. Ann Surg Oncol 22(Suppl 3):1594–1600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Volpe A et al (2015) Renal ischemia and function after partial nephrectomy: a collaborative review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(1):61–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson RH et al (2007) The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 177(2):471–476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Porpiglia F et al (2012) The effects of warm ischaemia time on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in patients with normal contralateral kidney. World J Urol 30(2):257–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel AR, Eggener SE (2011) Warm ischemia less than 30 minutes is not necessarily safe during partial nephrectomy: every minute matters. Urol Oncol 29(6):826–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Russo P (2010) Partial nephrectomy for renal cancer (part II): the impact of renal ischaemia, patient preparation, surgical approaches, management of complications and utilization. BJU Int 105(11):1494–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bi L et al (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8(10):e75050

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang X et al (2013) Comparison of peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted vs. laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 112(8):1133–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma V, Margreiter M (2013) Partial nephrectomy: Is there still a need for open surgery? Curr Urol Rep 14(1):1–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Song C et al (2011) Followup of unilateral renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 186(1):53–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laviana AA, Hu JC (2014) Current controversies and challenges in robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomies. World J Urol 32(3):591–596

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghani KR et al (2014) Practice patterns and outcomes of open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the nationwide inpatient sample. J Urol 191(4):907–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers CG et al (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy with cold ischemia and on-clamp tumor extraction: recapitulating the open approach. Eur Urol 63(3):573–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shikanov S et al (2010) Microparticulate ice slurry for renal hypothermia: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in a porcine model. Urology 76(4):1012–1016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weld KJ et al (2007) Feasibility of laparoscopic renal cooling with near-freezing saline irrigation delivered with a standard irrigator aspirator. Urology 69(3):465–468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Simmons MN, Fergany AF, Campbell SC (2011) Effect of parenchymal volume preservation on kidney function after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 186(2):405–410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Porter J (2015) Renal ischemia during partial nephrectomy: Does every minute still count? Eur Urol 68(1):75–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee S et al (2011) Open versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: effect on clinical outcome. J Endourol 25(7):1181–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simhan J et al (2012) Perioperative outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy for moderately and highly complex renal lesions. J Urol 187(6):2000–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Simone G et al (2015) Indications, techniques, outcomes, and limitations for minimally ischemic and off-clamp partial nephrectomy: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol 68(4):632–640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ficarra V et al (2012) Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 61(2):395–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Choung-Soo Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoo, S., Lee, C., Lee, C. et al. Comparison of renal functional outcomes in exactly matched pairs between robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using warm ischemia and open partial nephrectomy using cold ischemia using diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid renal scintigraphy. Int Urol Nephrol 48, 687–693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1220-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-016-1220-4

Keywords

Navigation