Skip to main content
Log in

A practical solution that bypasses the altruism versus incentives debate

  • Urology – Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Roger W. Evans’, Paul Terasaki’s and Barry Jacobs’ testimony can be found in Hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and the Environment of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, 98th Congress, 1st session, on H.R. bill 4080. Serial no. 98-70, 1984, 50–72:59

  2. Sheehy E, Conrad SL, Brigham LE et al (2003) Estimating the number of potential organ donors in the United States. N Engl J Med 349(7):667–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Klarenbach S, Garg AX, Vlaicu S (2006) Living organ donors face financial barriers: a national reimbursement policy is needed. CMAJ 174(6):797–798

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaston RS, Danovitch GM, Epstein RA, Kahn JP, Matas AJ, Schnitzler MA (2006) Limiting financial disincentives in live organ donation: a rational solution to the kidney shortage. Am J Transplant 6(11):2548–2555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. www.stoporgantraffickingnow.org

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bahar Bastani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest preparing this manuscript.

Human rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bastani, B., Fry-Revere, S. A practical solution that bypasses the altruism versus incentives debate. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 1515–1517 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1061-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-1061-6

Keywords

Navigation