Abstract
Purpose
To investigate the diagnostic value of the nuclear matrix protein 22 (NMP-22) in residual tumors after complete transurethral resection (TUR) of bladder cancer.
Methods
A total of 160 patients diagnosed with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before the initial TUR, the patients were evaluated using urine cytology and the NMP-22 Bladder Chek™. After 4–6 weeks, all patients underwent a second TUR, urine cytology and NMP-22 Bladder Chek™ evaluation.
Results
The mean patient age was 59.8 ± 1.0 years. Of the 160 patients, 81 (50.6 %) had positive NMP-22 findings and 53 (33.1 %) had positive urine cytology findings. In 101 (63.1 %) patients, at least one marker was positive. There was no correlation between the positivity ratio of the NMP-22 and the degree of risk group (p = 0.156); however, in the high-risk group, the malignant cytology ratio was higher (p < 0.001). In 60 patients (37.5 %), there were tumors in the second TUR. NMP-22 results of 40 of these patients (66.7 %) were positive, and for 28 (46.7 %), the cytology results were positive. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the NMP-22 alone was 66.7, 81, 67.8, and 80.2 %, respectively; for the cytology, it was 46.7, 98, 93.3, and 75.4 %, respectively; and for the NMP-22 and cytology combined, it was 73.3, 79, 67.7, and 83.2 %, respectively.
Conclusions
NMP-22 Bladder Chek™ test has limited efficacy in detecting residual tumors before a second TUR. The combination of this test with cytology has no additional benefit.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babjuk M, Böhle A, Burger M, et al (2014) Guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1 and CIS). European Association of Urology. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/05%20Nonmuscle%20Invasive%20BC_TaT1_LR.pdf
Tomasini JM, Konety BR (2013) Urinary markers/cytology: what and when should a urologist use. Urol Clin N. Am 40:165–173
Schips L, Augustin H, Zigeuner RE et al (2002) Is repeated transurethral resection justified in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer? Urology 59:220–223
Grimm MO, Steinhoff C, Simon X et al (2003) Effect of routine repeat transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer: a long-term observational study. J Urol 170:433–437
Divrik T, Yildirim U, Eroglu AS et al (2006) Is a second transurethral resection necessary for newly diagnosed pT1 bladder cancer? J Urol 175:1258–1261
Herr HW (1999) Thevalue of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumors. J Urol 162:74–76
Vrooman OP, Witjes JA (2008) Urinary markers in bladder cancer. Eur Urol 53:909–916
Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VR et al (1998) The World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Am J Surg Pathol 22:1435–1448
Lotan Y, Shariat SF (2008) Impact of risk factors on the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 point-of-care test for bladder cancer detection. BJU Int 101:1362–1367
Xylinas E, Kluth LA, Rieken M et al (2014) Urine markers for detection and surveillance of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 32:222–229
Moonen PM, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA (2005) Urinary NMP22® BladderChek® test in the diagnosis of superficial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 48:951–956
Gupta NP, Sharma N, Kumar R (2009) Nuclear matrix protein 22 as adjunct to urine cytology and cystoscopy in follow-up of superficial TCC of urinary bladder. Urology 73:592–596
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balci, M., Tuncel, A., Guzel, O. et al. Use of the nuclear matrix protein 22 Bladder Chek test™ in the diagnosis of residual urothelial cancer before a second transurethral resection of bladder cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 473–477 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0921-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-015-0921-4