Skip to main content

Sodium bicarbonate infusion for prevention of acute kidney injury: No evidence for superior benefit, but risk for harm?

Abstract

The best “treatment” of acute kidney injury (AKI) is prevention. Patients who are at high risk of AKI should have an assessment of their volume status and receive appropriate volume expansion. The most effective type of intravenous fluid remains unclear. Innumerable studies have compared sodium bicarbonate and isotonic saline and have combined fluid hydration with pharmacological interventions, particularly N-acetyl-cysteine. However, abundant systematic reviews and meta-analyses have provided conflicting conclusions and have recognized a significant degree of heterogeneity between studies and publication bias. Most studies comparing intravenous sodium bicarbonate and saline were small. They often enrolled patients with a low risk for AKI, yielding low serious events (renal replacement therapy), and used different protocols for administration of fluids. Based on current literature, intravenous sodium bicarbonate does not seem to be more efficient than saline for the prevention of contrast-media-induced AKI, cardiac surgery-associated AKI, pigment nephropathy or septic AKI. However, some cohort studies or prospective randomized trials did track and report serious adverse events, such as higher rates of AKI or higher in-hospital mortality. At present, it should be concluded that the use of intravenous sodium bicarbonate administration to prevent AKI should be evaluated further in multicenter randomized double-blind trials rather than adopted into routine clinical practice.

Introduction

Hospital-acquired acute kidney injury (AKI) presents a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations from minimal reductions in glomerular filtration rate to oligo-anuric AKI. It arises from multiple causes in a variety of clinical settings, and it is potentially reversible.

Hospital-acquired AKI is a common condition, and its incidence is rising in critically ill patients. There is solid evidence, that AKI is an independent poor prognostic marker, even under the condition of RRT, and not merely a reflection of the severity of the underlying disease. Even small increases in serum creatinine have important implications on both short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. AKI, severe enough to require RRT, occurs in 4–5 % of patients. This subgroup of AKI patients generally has a dismal prognosis with mortality rates of more than 40 %. Moreover, survivors develop chronic kidney disease (CKD), worsening pre-existing renal function impairment or need of chronic dialysis and have a 10-year survival rate of approximately 20 % [13].

Currently, there are no effective pharmacologic drugs that reverse the course of established AKI. The management of established AKI is supportive in nature, with RRT as the mainstay of treatment for renal failure. New approaches to current RRT failed to show an additional mortality benefit [4]. If the rising prevalence of AKI in critically ill patients is most likely due to more aggressive diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in an aged patient population with a high burden of comorbid disorders, then prevention of AKI is of paramount importance to improve patient outcome.

Prevention of AKI by sodium bicarbonate: proposed mechanisms

The renoprotective mechanisms, by which sodium bicarbonate might prevent AKI beyond its volume expanding effects, are poorly defined. Reactive oxygen species-mediated tubular injury appears to play an important role in the pathogenesis of human AKI. A reduction in oxidative stress on renal tubular cells may be a key mechanism of sodium bicarbonate. Bicarbonate is able to slow the Haber–Weiss reaction that generates free radicals. Bicarbonate may also directly scavenge peroxynitrite as well as other reactive species generated from nitric oxide. Urinary alkalinization, as a direct effect of intravenous sodium bicarbonate administration, may reduce the pH-dependent generation of met-hemoglobin containing tubular casts, ferrous-ion catalyzed production of free radicals as wells as proteinuria oxidative damage. Thus, attenuation of oxidative stress through urine alkalinization with sodium bicarbonate may attenuate AKI [5, 6].

Experimental data have shown that higher tubular pH could be protective in the presence of hemoglobinuria and myoglobinuria, especially through inhibition of hydroxyl radical generation [7]. Sodium bicarbonate administration helped prevent AKI in models of ischemic [8] or doxorubicin-induced AKI [9] or contrast-medium-induced nephropathy [10].

Sodium bicarbonate and human AKI: scientific evidence

Today, prophylactic sodium bicarbonate infusion has been used in four forms of human AKI: contrast-medium-induced nephropathy, cardiac surgery-associated AKI, pigment nephropathy and septic AKI.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN)

Pathophysiology of CIN

Contrast-induced nephropathy is defined as an acute impairment of renal function and is measured as a 25 % increase of serum creatinine from baseline or a 0.5 mg/dl increase in absolute values, usually after 48–72 h of intravenous contrast administration. CIN is one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired AKI; its occurrence is associated with a significantly higher risk of in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

Contrast media (CM) act on distinct anatomic sites within the kidneys and exert adverse effects via multiple mechanisms. First, they cause a direct cytotoxic effect on the renal proximal tubular cells, enhance cellular damage by reactive oxygen species and increase resistance to renal blood flow. Second, they exacerbate renal vasoconstriction, especially important in patients with CKD, particularly in the deeper proportion of the outer medulla. CM-mediated vasoconstriction is the result of a direct action of CM on vascular smooth muscle and from vasoconstrictors such as adenosine and endothelin. Third, the osmotic property of CM in the tubular lumen decreases water reabsorption leading to buildup of interstitial pressure. This, along with the increased salt and water load to the distal tubules, reduces GFR and causes local compression of the vasa recta. All mechanisms contribute to worsening medullary hypoxemia and renal vasoconstriction in patients who are already volume depleted [11].

Prevention of contrast-induced AKI by sodium bicarbonate: clinical evidence

Despite a multitude of prospective controlled clinical trials (PCTs) and meta-analyses, the benefit of sodium bicarbonate over sodium chloride with or without N-acetyl-cysteine (NAC) remains unclear. The first trial of sodium bicarbonate versus saline in the prevention of CIN by Merten et al. [12] demonstrated a significantly lower rate of CIN in the sodium bicarbonate group and advocated its widespread use. Subsequent trials comparing sodium bicarbonate and sodium chloride found inconclusive results or indicated no additional effect, be it superiority or inferiority of sodium bicarbonate compared to hydration with isotonic saline [1334]. However, the majority of these investigations had design limitations, such as enrollment of small number of patients, the use of surrogate primary endpoints defined by small increments in serum creatinine concentration, which are associated with, but not necessarily causally related to patient-centered outcomes. The inclusion of low-risk patients with intact baseline kidney function yielded low event rates (need for RRT, in-hospital mortality) and reduced generalizability. Moreover, hydration protocols were variable (dose and duration of sodium bicarbonate administration), and the use of NAC varied substantially between studies. Most, but not all studies used low osmolar or iso-osmolar CM. Clinical settings included predominantly elective or emergency coronary angiography in patients at low risk or high risk (diabetes, CKD).

Numerous early single-center clinical studies and meta-analyses showed a significant risk reduction of CIN by intravenous sodium bicarbonate compared to intravenous saline with or without NAC, even though there was no difference in the need for dialysis or in-hospital mortality [13, 14, 1619]. However, the majority of the meta-analyses recognized significant heterogeneity and publication bias and clearly demonstrated that the benefit of sodium bicarbonate was limited to small-sized trials of low methodological quality. This subgroup of trials may have been underpowered to detect differences between groups [20]. Generally spoken, early reports probably overestimated the magnitude of any benefit, whereas larger, later reported trials had neutral results [21]. The meta-analysis conducted by Hoste et al. [22] found a protective effect of sodium bicarbonate with borderline significance on the risk of CIN, especially in patients who underwent emergency coronary procedures and in patients with CKD. However, sodium bicarbonate was not effective in a mix of patients who underwent coronary and non-coronary procedures.

The beneficial effects of sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of CIN have not been sustained in recent trials in patients with CKD undergoing percutaneous coronary or peripheral angiographic interventions. Most of the recent published studies [2332] found no superiority of intravenous sodium bicarbonate. Amazingly, a multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of prophylactic use of saline infusion versus sodium bicarbonate infusion for the prevention of CIN in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary angiography and/or intervention found that prophylactic hydration with isotonic saline before coronary procedures may reduce the incidence of CIN in diabetic patients not selected according to renal function to a greater extent than sodium bicarbonate [33]. The latest published meta-analyses including 19 clinical trials (10 PCTs showing better CIN prevention with sodium bicarbonate, 9 PCTS with no difference in renal outcome) demonstrated that sodium bicarbonate-based hydration is superior to sodium chloride in patients undergoing exposure to low osmolar CM, but not in those receiving iso-osmolar agents [34].

The conclusions of recent meta-analyses were that the potential benefit, if any, of bicarbonate-based intravenous fluid administration over normal saline was likely to be very small in clinical practice.

Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury (CSA-AKI)

Pathophysiology of CSA-AKI

Acute kidney injury develops in up to 30 % of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with up to 3 % of patients requiring dialysis. CSA-AKI is independently associated with substantial short- and long-term morbidity and mortality.

The pathogenetic features of CSA-AKI are complex and multifactorial. Cardio-pulmonary bypass (CPB) contributes to CSA-AKI by activating a systemic inflammatory response altering regional blood flow and vasomotor tone in the kidneys. This CPB-induced systemic inflammatory response syndrome is the result of direct contact of blood cells with the artificial surfaces of the bypass circuit. CPB decreases the effective renal perfusion, thereby contributing to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Furthermore, small microemboli formed during CPB can damage renal capillaries directly. Hemolysis and release of free hemoglobin during CPB is a well-recognized nephrotoxic mechanism. Increased levels of free red blood cell constituents together with exhaustion of their scavengers result in a variety of serious sequelae such as increased vascular resistance, altered coagulation activity, platelet dysfunction and renal tubular damage [35].

CSA-AKI and sodium bicarbonate infusion

A double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial with 100 patients undergoing cardiac surgery found that intravenous sodium bicarbonate administration led to a significant reduction in postoperative AKI [36].

Contrary to the positive findings of this pilot study, a recent international multicenter double-blind PCT by the same group of investigators including 350 high-risk patients showed that more patients receiving sodium bicarbonate developed CSA-AKI (unadjusted p = 0.032). Based on these findings, the trial was terminated before planned recruitment was complete. However, a key limitation of this study was that a greater proportion of patients receiving sodium bicarbonate had CKD prior to surgery compared to those receiving saline. After multivariable adjustment, a non-significant unfavorable group difference affecting patients receiving intravenous bicarbonate was found for the primary end-point. A greater postoperative increase in urinary NGAL was observed compared with control patients. The incidence of postoperative AKI requiring RRT was similar, but in-hospital mortality was increased in patients receiving sodium bicarbonate compared with controls (6.3 vs. 1.7 %, p = 0.031). In the multicenter PCT, the authors used slightly larger doses of bicarbonate (5.1 vs. 4 mmol/kg during 24 h). Whether or not the difference in intravenous sodium bicarbonate dose used in these studies might have a negative impact on renal outcomes remains unknown [37].

Moreover, a phase II b multicenter double-blind PCT conducted in New Zealand and Australia enrolled 427 patients at risk for CAS-AKI scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery. Preoperative alkalinization of blood and urine using sodium bicarbonate infusions did not result in significant different in CAS-AKI (within 5 days), in the need for RRT, in the hours on ventilation, ICU or hospital length of stay, or mortality [38]. The study was stopped prematurely before full enrollment (based on preliminary results communicated to the investigators from another concomitant similar trial). Moreover, a high proportion of the study patients underwent valvular surgery either alone or combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. These patient groups could be expected to have more microembolic events and greater hemolysis.

Finally, Heringlake et al. [39] reported the absence of superiority of intravenous bicarbonate for the prevention of CSA-AKI in comparison with saline. These authors retrospectively compared a cohort of 280 patients who received 4 mmol sodium bicarbonate per kilogram to a control cohort. The proportion of patients experiencing an increase in serum creatinine by 25 % was similar in both groups (43.1 % sodium bicarbonate vs. 32.9 % control group, difference not significant). This cohort study had the advantage of including almost all patients admitted to their center, which increases external validity of the results.

The results of these studies provide most current and best available evidence to suggest that preoperative sodium bicarbonate does not reliably reduce AKI following cardiac surgery in patients at high risk.

Heme pigment nephropathy

Pigment nephropathy implies AKI due to the nephrotoxic effect of the heme pigments myoglobin, hemoglobin and bilirubin.

The pathogenesis of heme pigment nephropathy is complex, and due to a combination of multiple factors, and facilitated by hypovolemia and acidosis. The main mechanisms are renal vasoconstriction, renal cytokine production, direct cytotoxic effects of heme proteins and formation of obstructive casts with Tamm-Horsfall protein [40].

Pigment nephropathy and sodium bicarbonate

Aggressive hydration is effective to prevent or to treat pigment nephropathy. Currently, it is not known whether or not alkalinization of the urine is beneficial once a brisk diuresis with saline or diuretics is established. Theoretically, alkalinization of the urine has been advocated to increase the solubility of heme proteins in tubular fluid, with the goal of achieving a urine pH of more than 6.5. Alkalinization may also reduce the production of reactive oxygen species, thus reducing the oxidant stress. These proposed effects of sodium bicarbonate infusion are exclusively generated from animal studies [7, 41].

While many articles on rhabdomyolysis treatment focus on management of established AKI, only two systematic reviews have been published focusing on the therapies used to prevent AKI in patients with rhabdomyolysis. The European Renal Best Practice and Renal Disaster Relief Task Force addressed the prevention of AKI in crush victims following mass disaster [42]. Sharman and Troutman conducted a systematic literature review to evaluate evidence-based recommendations for the prevention of rhabdomyolysis-associated AKI [40]. Twenty-seven studies met the inclusion criteria. With the exception of seven level 2 b studies (low quality-randomized clinical trials, cohort studies), most studies were level 4 (case series, poor quality cohort or case control studies).

There was no standardized definition of the syndrome, generally accepted diagnosis and grading system. The number of participating patients was mostly small to very small. Ten of the 27 articles did not provide information on the type of fluid used. There were no controlled studies comparing fluid administration plus sodium bicarbonate (without the use of diuretics) to fluid administration. One level 2 b and two level 4 studies concluded that there was no difference in the rates of development of AKI between patients receiving sodium bicarbonate or not receiving sodium bicarbonate. However, documentation of urinary pH was not provided. Moreover, with the exception of one report (number of patients 382), the populations were very small (24 and 10, respectively). Therefore, these studies might not have been adequately powered to detect differences between patient groups. Of clinical importance, in one level 2 b study, a greater percentage of patients receiving bicarbonate developed AKI compared with those not receiving bicarbonate. The authors of the systematic review recommend that intravenous sodium bicarbonate should be administered only to correct systemic acidosis, and the amount of and rate of sodium bicarbonate should be individualized based on the patients` size and medical condition.

Prevention of septic AKI by sodium bicarbonate: clinical evidence

Administration of sodium bicarbonate to patients at risk for septic AKI was associated with frequent major electrolyte abnormalities compared to sodium chloride administration and early protocol cessation [6]. Twenty-five patients with SIRS, oliguria and elevated serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (sNGAL) received either intravenous sodium bicarbonate (13 patients) or sodium chloride (12 patients). Adverse events (serum bicarbonate greater than 30 mmol/L in the sodium bicarbonate group, serum chloride greater than 111 mmol/L) occurred in 7 patients. There was no difference between the two groups in occurrence of AKI, requirement of RRT, hospital length of stay or mortality.

Prevention of AKI by sodium bicarbonate infusion: harms

Retrospective cohort analyses suggested that intravenous sodium bicarbonate was associated with an increased risk of CIN [43] or pigment nephropathy [44, 45]. The multicenter trial of prophylactic perioperative sodium bicarbonate administration to prevent AKI following open heart surgery found a non-significant increase in AKI and a possible increase in in-hospital mortality [37]. Whether or not some patients as those with clinically latent congestive heart failure and/or left ventricular dysfunction, may have had adverse cardiac events, if they were given large volumes of sodium bicarbonate inducing volume overload, hypokalemia or alkalemia, remains unknown. However, cardiac surgery patients receiving sodium bicarbonate had lower mean arterial blood pressure values after induction of anesthesia, and they required more fluids and vasopressors and spent more time in hospital [39].

Conclusions

The prevention of AKI is a crucial consideration in the management of hospitalized patients, particularly in elderly and critically ill patients as they are prone to a variety of renal insults during their hospital stay. Intravenous sodium bicarbonate has been used for the prevention of AKI for more than 35 years [46]. Given the long and widespread practice of sodium bicarbonate administration to patients at risk for AKI, one would hope that the evidence to support its use is well substantiated by a wealth of publications. To the contrary, there is overwhelming evidence that this common practice has no additional benefit (compared to saline), but adds to in-hospital mortality and mortality. These conclusions contradict recently published renal [5] or radiological [47] guidelines recommending intravenous administration of sodium bicarbonate for prevention of AKI.

Actually, the principal intervention with documented effectiveness for the prevention of contrast-induced AKI, pigment nephropathies and septic AKI is fluid administration. At present, it should be concluded that the use of sodium bicarbonate to prevent AKI should be evaluated further rather than adopted into routine clinical practice. There is an urgent need for large-scale PCTs. The Preserve study is such a multicenter randomized double-blind trial that use a 2 × 2 factorial design to compare intravenous isotonic sodium bicarbonate with intravenous saline and oral NAC with oral placebo for the prevention and 90-day morbidity and mortality in 8,680 patients undergoing coronary and non-coronary angiography [48].

References

  1. Dennen P, Douglas IS, Anderson R (2010) Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit: an update and primer for the intensivist. Crit Care Med 38:261–275

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldstein SL, Chawla L, Ronco C, Kellum JA (2014) Renal recovery. Crit Care 18:301

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schiffl H, Lang SM, Fischer R (2012) Long-term outcome of survivors of ICU acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy: a ten year prospective cohort study. Clin Kidney J 5:297–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schiffl H (2014) No added mortality benefit from current approaches to renal replacement therapy in ICU patients. EMJ 1:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO). Acute Kidney injury Work Group (2012) kdigo clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int 2(Suppl):1–138

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schneider AG, Bellomo R, Reade M, Peck L, Young H, Eastwood GM, Garcia M, Moore E, Harley N (2013) Safety evaluation of a trial of lipocalin-directed sodium bicarbonate infusion for renal protection in at-risk critically ill patients. Crit Care Resusc 15:126–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zager RA, Gamelin LM (1989) Pathogenetic mechanisms in experimental hemoglobinuric acute renal failure. Am J Physiol 256:F446–F455

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkins JL (1986) Effect of sodium bicarbonate preloading on ischemic renal failure. Nephron 44:70–74

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Baroni EA, Costa RS, Volpini R, Coimbra TM (1999) Sodium bicarbonate treatment reduces renal injury, renal production of transforming growth factor-beta, and urinary transforming growth factor-beta excretion in rats with doxorubicin-induced nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis 34:328–337

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vattimo M, dos Santos JG (2013) Protective effect of sodium bicarbonate on radiological contrast medium-induced nephropathy in rats. Rev Esc Enferm USP 47:722–727

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammed NM, Mahfouz A, Achkar K, Rafie IM, Hajar R (2013) Contrast-induced nephropathy. Heart Views 14:106–116

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merten GJ, Burgess WP, Gray LV, Holleman JH, Roush TS, Kowalchuk GJ, Bersin RM, Van MA, Simonton CA III, Rittase RA, Norton HJ, Kennedy TP (2004) Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with sodium bicarbonate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 291:2328–2334

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meier P, Ko DT, Tamura A, Tamhane U, Gurm HS (2009) Sodium bicarbonate-based hydration prevents contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis. BMC Med 7:23–27

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown JR, Block CA, Malenka DJ, O’Connor GT, Schoolwerth AC, Thompson CA (2009) Sodium bicarbonate plus N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis: a meta-analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2:1116–1124

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pakfetrat M, Nikoo MH, Malekmakan L, Tabandeh M, Roozbeh J, Nasab MH, Ostovan MA, Salari S, Kafi M, Vaziri NM, Adl F, Hosseini M, Khajehdehi P (2009) A comparison of sodium bicarbonate infusion versus normal saline infusion and its combination with oral acetazolamide for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized, double-blind trial. Int Urol Nephrol 41:629–634

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kunadian V, Zaman A, Spyridopoulos I, Qiu W (2011) Sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of published clinical trials. Eur J Radiol 79:48–55

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Joannidis M, Druml W, Forni LG, Groeneveld AB, Honore P, Oudemans-Van Straaten HM, Ronco C, Schetz MR, Woittiez AJ (2010) Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the working group for nephrology, ESICM. Intensive Care Med 36:392–411

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kanbay M, Covic A, Coca SG, Turgut F, Akcay A, Parikh CR (2009) Sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of 17 randomized trials. Int Urol Nephrol 41:617–627

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hogan SE, L’Allier P, Chetcuti S, Grossman PM, Nallamothu BK, Duvernoy C, Bates E, Moscucci M, Gurm HS (2008) Current role of sodium bicarbonate-based preprocedural hydration for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Am Heart J 156:414–421

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Brar SS, Hiremath S, Dangas G, Mehran R, Brar SK, Leon MB (2009) Sodium bicarbonate for the prevention of contrast induced-acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1584–1592

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zoungas S, Ninomiya T, Huxley R, Cass A, Jardine M, Gallagher M, Patel A, Vasheghani-Farahani A, Sadigh G, Perkovic V (2009) Systematic review: sodium bicarbonate treatment regimens for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Ann Intern Med 151:631–638

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoste EA, De Waele JJ, Gevaert SA, Uchino S, Kellum JA (2010) Sodium bicarbonate for prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25:747–758

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hafiz AM, Jan MF, Mori N, Shaikh F, Wallach J, Bajwa T, Allaqaband S (2012) Prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with stable chronic renal disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions: randomized comparison of two preventive strategies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:929–937

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Vasheghani-Farahani A, Sadigh G, Kassaian SE, Khatami SM, Fotouhi A, Razavi SA, Mansournia MA, Kazemisaeid A, Soleimani A, Pourhosseini HR, Alidoosti M, Hajizeinali AM, Hoseini K, Nematipour E (2010) Sodium bicarbonate in preventing contrast nephropathy in patients at risk for volume overload: a randomized controlled trial. J Nephrol 23:216–223

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vasheghani-Farahani A, Sadigh G, Kassaian SE, Khatami SM, Fotouhi A, Razavi SA, Mansournia MA, Yamini-Sharif A, Amirzadegan A, Salarifar M, Sadeghian S, Davoodi G, Borumand MA, Esfehani FA, Darabian S (2009) Sodium bicarbonate plus isotonic saline versus saline for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 54:610–618

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Boucek P, Havrdova T, Oliyarnyk O, Skibova J, Pecenkova V, Pucelikova T, Sarkady D (2013) Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in diabetic patients with impaired renal function: a randomized, double blind trial of sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride-based hydration. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 101:303–308

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beyazal H, Caliskan Z, Utac C (2014) Comparison of effects of isotonic sodium chloride with diltiazem in prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Ren Fail 36:351–355

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Brar SS, Shen AY, Jorgensen MB, Kotlewski A, Aharonian VJ, Desai N, Ree M, Shah AI, Burchette RJ (2008) Sodium bicarbonate vs sodium chloride for the prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography: a randomized trial. JAMA 300:1038–1046

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gomes VO, Lasevitch R, Lima VC, Brito FS Jr, Perez-Alva JC, Moulin B, Arruda A, Oliveira D, Caramori P (2012) Hydration with sodium bicarbonate does not prevent contrast nephropathy: a multicenter clinical trial. Arq Bras Cardiol 99:1129–1134

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shavit L, Korenfeld R, Lifschitz M, Butnaru A, Slotki I (2009) Sodium bicarbonate versus sodium chloride and oral N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in advanced chronic kidney disease. J Interv Cardiol 22:556–563

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Alessandri N, Lanzi L, Garante CM, Tersigni F, Sergiacomi R, Petrassi M, Di MA, Tufano F (2013) Prevention of acute renal failure post-contrast imaging in cardiology: a randomized study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 17(Suppl 1):13–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thayssen P, Lassen JF, Jensen SE, Hansen KN, Hansen HS, Christiansen EH, Junker A, Ravkilde J, Thuesen L, Veien KT, Jensen LO (2014) Prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine or sodium bicarbonate in patients with ST-segment-myocardial infarction: a prospective, randomized, open-labeled trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 7:216–224

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Koc F, Ozdemir K, Altunkas F, Celik A, Dogdu O, Karayakali M, Gul EE, Erkorkmaz U, Kadi H, Akpek M, Kaya MG (2013) Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing coronary angiography and/or intervention: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Investig Med 61:872–877

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Jang JS, Jin HY, Seo JS, Yang TH, Kim DK, Kim TH, Urm SH, Kim DS, Kim DK, Seol SH, Kim DI, Cho KI, Kim BH, Park YH, Je HG, Ahn JM, Kim WJ, Lee JY, Lee SW (2012) Sodium bicarbonate therapy for the prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ J 76:2255–2265

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mao H, Katz N, Ariyanon W, Blanca-Martos L, Adybelli Z, Giuliani A, Danesi TH, Kim JC, Nayak A, Neri M, Virzi GM, Brocca A, Scalzotto E, Salvador L, Ronco C (2013) Cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury. Cardiorenal Med 3:178–199

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Bellomo R, Devarajan P, Story D, Matalanis G, Reade MC, Bagshaw SM, Seevanayagam N, Seevanayagam S, Doolan L, Buxton B, Dragun D (2009) Sodium bicarbonate to prevent increases in serum creatinine after cardiac surgery: a pilot double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 37:39–47

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Haase M, Haase-Fielitz A, Plass M, Kuppe H, Hetzer R, Hannon C, Murray PT, Bailey MJ, Bellomo R, Bagshaw SM (2013) Prophylactic perioperative sodium bicarbonate to prevent acute kidney injury following open heart surgery: a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 10:e1001426

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McGuinness SP, Parke RL, Bellomo R, Van Haren FM, Bailey M (2013) Sodium bicarbonate infusion to reduce cardiac surgery-associated acute kidney injury: a phase II multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. Crit Care Med 41:1599–1607

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Heringlake M, Heinze H, Schubert M, Nowak Y, Guder J, Kleinebrahm M, Paarmann H, Hanke T, Schon J (2012) A perioperative infusion of sodium bicarbonate does not improve renal function in cardiac surgery patients: a prospective observational cohort study. Crit Care 16:R156

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Scharman EJ, Troutman WG (2013) Prevention of kidney injury following rhabdomyolysis: a systematic review. Ann Pharmacother 47:90–105

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zager RA (1989) Studies of mechanisms and protective maneuvers in myoglobinuric acute renal injury. Lab Invest 60:619–629

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Sever MS, Vanholder R (2012) Recommendation for the management of crush victims in mass disasters. Nephrol Dial Transplant 27(Suppl 1):i1–67

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. From AM, Bartholmai BJ, Williams AW, Cha SS, Pflueger A, McDonald FS (2008) Sodium bicarbonate is associated with an increased incidence of contrast nephropathy: a retrospective cohort study of 7977 patients at mayo clinic. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 3:10–18

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ward MM (1988) Factors predictive of acute renal failure in rhabdomyolysis. Arch Intern Med 148:1553–1557

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brown CV, Rhee P, Chan L, Evans K, Demetriades D, Velmahos GC (2004) Preventing renal failure in patients with rhabdomyolysis: do bicarbonate and mannitol make a difference? J Trauma 56:1191–1196

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Eneas JF, Schoenfeld PY, Humphreys MH (1979) The effect of infusion of mannitol-sodium bicarbonate on the clinical course of myoglobinuria. Arch Intern Med 139:801–805

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Owen RJ, Hiremath S, Myers A, Fraser-Hill M, Barrett BJ (2014) Canadian Association of Radiologists consensus guidelines for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: update 2012. Can Assoc Radiol J 65:96–105

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Weisbord SD, Palevsky PM (2006) Acute renal failure in the intensive care unit. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 27:262–273

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut Schiffl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schiffl, H. Sodium bicarbonate infusion for prevention of acute kidney injury: No evidence for superior benefit, but risk for harm?. Int Urol Nephrol 47, 321–326 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0820-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-014-0820-0

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Prevention
  • Sodium bicarbonate
  • Isotonic saline