Abstract
Purpose
To compare the outcome of epididymectomy and vasectomy reversal (VR) in patients with postvasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) who required surgical treatment.
Methods
A total of 50 patients with PVPS who underwent epididymectomy or VR between January 2000 and January 2010 were included retrospectively. Of these, 36 (72.0 %) patients completed the study questionnaire. These 36 patients completed the questionnaire either during attendance at the outpatient clinic or during a telephone interview. Twenty patients (22 cases) underwent epididymectomy, and sixteen patients (17 cases) underwent VR. Analyses were performed for (1) preoperative clinical findings, (2) preoperative and postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) scores, (3) patency and pregnancy rate in VR group, and (4) patient satisfaction with surgical treatment.
Results
The mean age was 48.28 ± 11.27 years, and the mean period of follow-up was 3.58 years (0.15–10.03). The mean VAPS score was 6.78 ± 0.93 preoperatively and 1.13 ± 0.72 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The difference in the mean preoperative and postoperative VAPS scores was 6.00 ± 1.34 (3–8) in the epididymectomy group and 5.50 ± 1.03 (4–8) in the VR group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.227). No significant difference in satisfaction with surgical outcome was observed between the epididymectomy and the VR groups (p = 0.124).
Conclusions
In PVPS patients requiring surgical treatment, no significant difference was observed between the epididymectomy and VR groups in either the reduction in pain or the degree of patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Selection of the optimal surgical procedure may be dependent on specific patient characteristics.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schwingl PJ, Guess HA (2000) Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril 73:923–936
Lee KM, Park NC, Yan BQ (2003) Surgical outcome of 153 vasovasostomies on 10 years or more after vasectomy. Korean J Urol 44:109–114
Tandon S, Sabanegh E (2008) Chronic pain after vasectomy: a diagnostic and treatment dilemma. BJU Int 102:166–171
Davis BE, Noble MJ, Weigel JW, Foret JD, Mebust WK (1990) Analysis and management of chronic testicular pain. J Urol 143:936–939
Schmidt SS, Free MJ (1978) The bipolar needle for vasectomy. I. Experience with the first 1000 cases. Fertil Steril 29:676–680
Shapiro EI, Silber SJ (1979) Open-ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and postvasectomy orchialgia. Fertil Steril 32:546–550
Selikowitz SM, Schned AR (1985) A late post-vasectomy syndrome. J Urol 134:494–497
Christiansen CG, Sandlow JI (2003) Testicular pain following vasectomy: a review of postvasectomy pain syndrome. J Androl 24:293–295
Ahmed I, Rasheed S, White C, Shaikh NA (1997) The incidence of post-vasectomy chronic testicular pain and the role of nerve stripping (denervation) of the spermatic cord in its management. Br J Urol 79:269–270
Lee HS, Seo JT (2012) Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility. World J Mens Health 30:108–113
Calleary JG, Masood J, Hill JT (2009) Chronic epididymitis: is epididymectomy a valid surgical treatment? Int J Androl 32:468–472
Lee JY, Lee TY, Park HY, Choi HY, Yoo TK, Moon HS et al (2011) Efficacy of epididymectomy in treatment of chronic epididymal pain: a comparison of patients with and without a history of vasectomy. Urology 77:177–182
Padmore DE, Norman RW, Millard OH (1996) Analyses of indications for and outcomes of epididymectomy. J Urol 156:95–96
McCormack M, Lapointe S (1988) Physiologic consequences and complications of vasectomy. CMAJ 138:223–225
Choe JM, Kirkemo AK (1996) Questionnaire-based outcomes study of nononcological post-vasectomy complications. J Urol 155:1284–1286
Easley S, MacLennan GT (2006) Vasitis and epididymitis nodosa. J Urol 175:1502
Hori S, Sengupta A, Shukla CJ, Ingall E, McLoughlin J (2009) Long-term outcome of epididymectomy for the management of chronic epididymal pain. J Urol 182:1407–1412
Siu W, Ohl DA, Schuster TG (2007) Long-term follow-up after epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain. Urology 70:333–335 (discussion 5–6)
Sweeney P, Tan J, Butler MR, McDermott TE, Grainger R, Thornhill JA (1998) Epididymectomy in the management of intrascrotal disease: a critical reappraisal. Br J Urol 81:753–755
Chen TF, Ball RY (1991) Epididymectomy for post-vasectomy pain: histological review. Br J Urol 68:407–413
Myers SA, Mershon CE, Fuchs EF (1997) Vasectomy reversal for treatment of the post-vasectomy pain syndrome. J Urol 157:518–520
Nangia AK, Myles JL, Thomas AJ (2000) Vasectomy reversal for the post-vasectomy pain syndrome: a clinical and histological evaluation. J Urol 164:1939–1942
Huang HC, Hsieh ML, Huang ST, Tsui KH, Lai RH, Chang PL (2002) Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: ten-years’ experience in a single institute. Chang Gung Med J 25:453–457
Heidenreich A, Olbert P, Engelmann UH (2002) Management of chronic testalgia by microsurgical testicular denervation. Eur Urol 41:392–397
Devine CJ Jr, Schellhammer PF (1978) The use of microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for orchialgia. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 70:149–151
Levine LA, Matkov TG (2001) Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord as primary surgical treatment of chronic orchialgia. J Urol 165:1927–1929
Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Chan DY, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1999) Laparoscopic testicular denervation for chronic orchalgia. J Urol 162:733–735 (discussion 5–6)
Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ (2001) Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 8:1153–1157
Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J (2003) Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 15:441–446
Sweeney CA, Oades GM, Fraser M, Palmer M (2008) Does surgery have a role in management of chronic intrascrotal pain? Urology 71:1099–1102
West AF, Leung HY, Powell PH (2000) Epididymectomy is an effective treatment for scrotal pain after vasectomy. BJU Int 85:1097–1099
Acknowledgments
This work was accepted by the Program Abstract Review Committee of the American Urological Association (AUA) and presented at Annual Meeting of AUA, Washington, DC, on May 14–19, 2011.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, J.Y., Cho, K.S., Lee, S.H. et al. A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol 46, 531–537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0517-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0517-9