Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcome of epididymectomy and vasectomy reversal (VR) in patients with postvasectomy pain syndrome (PVPS) who required surgical treatment.

Methods

A total of 50 patients with PVPS who underwent epididymectomy or VR between January 2000 and January 2010 were included retrospectively. Of these, 36 (72.0 %) patients completed the study questionnaire. These 36 patients completed the questionnaire either during attendance at the outpatient clinic or during a telephone interview. Twenty patients (22 cases) underwent epididymectomy, and sixteen patients (17 cases) underwent VR. Analyses were performed for (1) preoperative clinical findings, (2) preoperative and postoperative visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) scores, (3) patency and pregnancy rate in VR group, and (4) patient satisfaction with surgical treatment.

Results

The mean age was 48.28 ± 11.27 years, and the mean period of follow-up was 3.58 years (0.15–10.03). The mean VAPS score was 6.78 ± 0.93 preoperatively and 1.13 ± 0.72 postoperatively (p < 0.001). The difference in the mean preoperative and postoperative VAPS scores was 6.00 ± 1.34 (3–8) in the epididymectomy group and 5.50 ± 1.03 (4–8) in the VR group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.227). No significant difference in satisfaction with surgical outcome was observed between the epididymectomy and the VR groups (p = 0.124).

Conclusions

In PVPS patients requiring surgical treatment, no significant difference was observed between the epididymectomy and VR groups in either the reduction in pain or the degree of patient satisfaction with surgical outcome. Selection of the optimal surgical procedure may be dependent on specific patient characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schwingl PJ, Guess HA (2000) Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril 73:923–936

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee KM, Park NC, Yan BQ (2003) Surgical outcome of 153 vasovasostomies on 10 years or more after vasectomy. Korean J Urol 44:109–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tandon S, Sabanegh E (2008) Chronic pain after vasectomy: a diagnostic and treatment dilemma. BJU Int 102:166–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Davis BE, Noble MJ, Weigel JW, Foret JD, Mebust WK (1990) Analysis and management of chronic testicular pain. J Urol 143:936–939

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt SS, Free MJ (1978) The bipolar needle for vasectomy. I. Experience with the first 1000 cases. Fertil Steril 29:676–680

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shapiro EI, Silber SJ (1979) Open-ended vasectomy, sperm granuloma, and postvasectomy orchialgia. Fertil Steril 32:546–550

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Selikowitz SM, Schned AR (1985) A late post-vasectomy syndrome. J Urol 134:494–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Christiansen CG, Sandlow JI (2003) Testicular pain following vasectomy: a review of postvasectomy pain syndrome. J Androl 24:293–295

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed I, Rasheed S, White C, Shaikh NA (1997) The incidence of post-vasectomy chronic testicular pain and the role of nerve stripping (denervation) of the spermatic cord in its management. Br J Urol 79:269–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee HS, Seo JT (2012) Advances in surgical treatment of male infertility. World J Mens Health 30:108–113

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Calleary JG, Masood J, Hill JT (2009) Chronic epididymitis: is epididymectomy a valid surgical treatment? Int J Androl 32:468–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JY, Lee TY, Park HY, Choi HY, Yoo TK, Moon HS et al (2011) Efficacy of epididymectomy in treatment of chronic epididymal pain: a comparison of patients with and without a history of vasectomy. Urology 77:177–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Padmore DE, Norman RW, Millard OH (1996) Analyses of indications for and outcomes of epididymectomy. J Urol 156:95–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCormack M, Lapointe S (1988) Physiologic consequences and complications of vasectomy. CMAJ 138:223–225

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Choe JM, Kirkemo AK (1996) Questionnaire-based outcomes study of nononcological post-vasectomy complications. J Urol 155:1284–1286

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Easley S, MacLennan GT (2006) Vasitis and epididymitis nodosa. J Urol 175:1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hori S, Sengupta A, Shukla CJ, Ingall E, McLoughlin J (2009) Long-term outcome of epididymectomy for the management of chronic epididymal pain. J Urol 182:1407–1412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Siu W, Ohl DA, Schuster TG (2007) Long-term follow-up after epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain. Urology 70:333–335 (discussion 5–6)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sweeney P, Tan J, Butler MR, McDermott TE, Grainger R, Thornhill JA (1998) Epididymectomy in the management of intrascrotal disease: a critical reappraisal. Br J Urol 81:753–755

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen TF, Ball RY (1991) Epididymectomy for post-vasectomy pain: histological review. Br J Urol 68:407–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Myers SA, Mershon CE, Fuchs EF (1997) Vasectomy reversal for treatment of the post-vasectomy pain syndrome. J Urol 157:518–520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nangia AK, Myles JL, Thomas AJ (2000) Vasectomy reversal for the post-vasectomy pain syndrome: a clinical and histological evaluation. J Urol 164:1939–1942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang HC, Hsieh ML, Huang ST, Tsui KH, Lai RH, Chang PL (2002) Microsurgical vasectomy reversal: ten-years’ experience in a single institute. Chang Gung Med J 25:453–457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Heidenreich A, Olbert P, Engelmann UH (2002) Management of chronic testalgia by microsurgical testicular denervation. Eur Urol 41:392–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Devine CJ Jr, Schellhammer PF (1978) The use of microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord for orchialgia. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 70:149–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Levine LA, Matkov TG (2001) Microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord as primary surgical treatment of chronic orchialgia. J Urol 165:1927–1929

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cadeddu JA, Bishoff JT, Chan DY, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR, Jarrett TW (1999) Laparoscopic testicular denervation for chronic orchalgia. J Urol 162:733–735 (discussion 5–6)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ (2001) Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 8:1153–1157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Holdgate A, Asha S, Craig J, Thompson J (2003) Comparison of a verbal numeric rating scale with the visual analogue scale for the measurement of acute pain. Emerg Med (Fremantle) 15:441–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sweeney CA, Oades GM, Fraser M, Palmer M (2008) Does surgery have a role in management of chronic intrascrotal pain? Urology 71:1099–1102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. West AF, Leung HY, Powell PH (2000) Epididymectomy is an effective treatment for scrotal pain after vasectomy. BJU Int 85:1097–1099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was accepted by the Program Abstract Review Committee of the American Urological Association (AUA) and presented at Annual Meeting of AUA, Washington, DC, on May 14–19, 2011.

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seung Wook Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.Y., Cho, K.S., Lee, S.H. et al. A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome. Int Urol Nephrol 46, 531–537 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0517-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-013-0517-9

Keywords

Navigation