Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Basiliximab induction in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens

  • Nephrology - Original Article
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The use of basiliximab induction increased significantly in recent years based on its superior efficacy and excellent safety profile demonstrated in studies with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. However, its clinical utility in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens is still uncertain.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of 366 low immunological risk recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants. Of them, 134 received basiliximab and tacrolimus (TAC-IL2-RA), 100 received basiliximab and delayed tacrolimus(dTAC-IL2-RA), and 132 patients received tacrolimus without basiliximab(TAC-No). The endpoints were the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, and patient and graft survivals at 1 year.

Results

The incidence of acute rejection was higher in dTAC-IL2-RA compared to TAC-IL-2RA and TAC-No Groups (33 vs.14.9 vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001). Inferior creatinine clearance was observed in dTAC-IL2-RA Group compared to TAC-IL2-RA and TAC-No Groups at months 1 (41.6 vs. 49.9 vs. 44.8 mL/min, p = 0.004), 3 (49.8 vs. 57.2 vs. 53.5 mL/min, p = 0.017), and 6 (53.1 vs. 61.8 vs. 57.0 mL/min, p = 0.001). Patients who received basiliximab (TAC-IL2-RA and dTAC-IL2-RA Groups) had lower incidence of posttransplant diabetes (24 vs.18 vs. 39.3 %, p = 0.009). Patient and graft survivals were similar among the groups.

Conclusions

In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, the use of basiliximab induction was not associated with lower rejection rates and did not allow delayed tacrolimus introduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meier-Kriesche HU, Schold JD, Srinivas TR, Kaplan B (2004) Lack of improvement in renal allograft survival despite a marked decrease in acute rejection rates over the most recent era. Am J Transplant 4(3):378–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McKeage K, McCormack PL (2010) Basiliximab: a review of its use as induction therapy in renal transplantation. BioDrugs 24(1):55–76. doi:10.2165/11203990-000000000-00000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nashan B, Moore R, Amlot P, Schmidt AG, Abeywickrama K, Soulillou JP (1997) Randomised trial of basiliximab versus placebo for control of acute cellular rejection in renal allograft recipients. CHIB 201 international study group. Lancet 350(9086):1193–1198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Charpentier B, Thervet E (1998) Placebo-controlled study of a humanized anti-TAC monoclonal antibody in dual therapy for prevention of acute rejection after renal transplantation. Transplant Proc 30(4):1331–1332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vincenti F, Kirkman R, Light S, Bumgardner G, Pescovitz M, Halloran P et al (1998) Interleukin-2-receptor blockade with daclizumab to prevent acute rejection in renal transplantation. Daclizumab triple therapy study group. N Engl J Med 338(3):161–165. doi:10.1056/NEJM199801153380304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Nair MP, Nampoory MR, Johny KV, Costandi JN, Abdulhalim M, El-Reshaid W et al (2001) Induction immunosuppression with interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (basiliximab and daclizumab) in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 33(5):2767–2769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jorge S, Guerra J, Silva S, Santana A, Mil-Homens C, Prata MM (2008) Induction immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: does basiliximab make the difference? Transplant Proc 40(3):693–696. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2008.02.029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandrini S (2005) Use of IL-2 receptor antagonists to reduce delayed graft function following renal transplantation: a review. Clin Transplant 19(6):705–710. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00417.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mourad G, Rostaing L, Legendre C, Garrigue V, Thervet E, Durand D (2004) Sequential protocols using basiliximab versus antithymocyte globulins in renal-transplant patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and steroids. Transplantation 78(4):584–590

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. González E, Gutiérrez E, Hernández Y, Roselló G, Gutiérrez MJ, Martínez EG et al (2005) Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function. Transplant Proc 37(9):3736–3737. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.09.176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gavela Martínez E, Avila Bernabeu AI, Sancho Calabuig A, Beltrán Catalán S, Escudero Quesada V, Pallardó Mateu LM (2009) Use of basiliximab induction in low-immunological risk renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppression. Transplant Proc 41(6):2337–2338. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.06.063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lim WH, Chadban SJ, Campbell S, Dent H, Russ GR, McDonald SP (2010) Interleukin-2 receptor antibody does not reduce rejection risk in low immunological risk or tacrolimus-treated intermediate immunological risk renal transplant recipients. Nephrology (Carlton) 15(3):368–376. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1797.2009.01259.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. van Gelder T, Silva HT, de Fijter JW, Budde K, Kuypers D, Tyden G et al (2008) Comparing mycophenolate mofetil regimens for de novo renal transplant recipients: the fixed-dose concentration-controlled trial. Transplantation 86(8):1043–1051. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e318186f98a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Willoughby LM, Schnitzler MA, Brennan DC, Pinsky BW, Dzebisashvili N, Buchanan PM et al (2009) Early outcomes of thymoglobulin and basiliximab induction in kidney transplantation: application of statistical approaches to reduce bias in observational comparisons. Transplantation 87(10):1520–1529. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e3181a484d7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Folkmane I, Bicans J, Amerika D, Chapenko S, Murovska M, Rosentals R (2001) Low rate of acute rejection and cytomegalovirus infection in kidney transplant recipients with basiliximab. Transplant Proc 33(7–8):3209–3210

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

CNPq (National Research Council for Scientific and Technological Development).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tainá Veras de Sandes-Freitas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Sandes-Freitas, T.V., Felipe, C.R., de Franco, M.F. et al. Basiliximab induction in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens. Int Urol Nephrol 45, 537–546 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0298-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0298-6

Keywords

Navigation