Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation

  • Urology – Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine whether the bladder neck mucosal eversion (BNM-eversion) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) reduces the risk of bladder neck stricture (BNS) and of peri-anastomotic extravasation (PAE) in postoperative cystography.

Methods

Two hundred and eleven patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent RRP and were prospectively randomized into patients with BNM-eversion (group I) and without BNM-eversion (group II). All patients underwent an evaluation of PAE by retrograde cystography on postoperative day 8. We assessed BNS after 6 months.

Results

Ninety-two patients with and 113 patients without BNM-eversion were included. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, including age, TNM-classification, Gleason score, PSA, prostate volume, and blood loss in both groups. A complete follow-up of 6 months for BNS was available for 188 patients (89.1 %). Sixteen BNS out of 188 patients were recorded, 4.7 % (n = 4) in group I and 11.7 % (n = 12) in group II (p = 0.09). Data from 205 out of 211 patients were available for the evaluation of the extravasation by cystography. Peri-anastomotic extravasation was detectable in 11.96 %, (11/205) in group I and in 21.24 % (24/205) in group II (p = 0.08).

Conclusion

BNM-eversion does not have a positive influence on the prevention of bladder neck strictures. Peri-anastomotic extravasation detected by cystography does not correlate with a formation of bladder neck stricture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batzler WU, Giersiepen K (2008) Krebs in Deutschland 2003-2004. Häufigkeiten und Trends. http://wwwekrmeduni-erlangende/GEKID/Doc/kid2008pdf (cited;6. volume)

  2. Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U, Katzenwadel A (1998) Anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Incidence, findings and treatment. Eur Urol 33:382–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borboroglu PG, Sands JP, Roberts JL, Amling CL (2000) Risk factors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Urology 56:96–100

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang G, Lepor H (2006) Factors predisposing to the development of anastomotic strictures in a single-surgeon series of radical retropubic prostatectomies. BJU Int 97:255–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy KJ (1990) A view of the development of intestinal suture. Part I. From legend to practice. Aust N Z J Surg 60:299–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Neckell T, Welter E, Neckell M (1996) Singlelayer digestive sutures (manual and mechanical). Observations after 20 years. Chirurgia 45:311–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schumacher I, Lorenz D (1991) Historical development of the intestinal suture. Chirurgia. 62:71–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Webb DR, Sethi K, Gee K (2009) An analysis of the causes of bladder neck contracture after open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 103:957–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163:418–422

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Msezane LP, Reynolds WS, Gofrit ON, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC (2008) Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol 22:97–104

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166:2101–2108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Park R, Martin S, Goldberg JD, Lepor H (2001) Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence. Urology 57:742–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol 183:1366–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162:433–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fenig DM, Slova D, Lepor H (2006) Postoperative blood loss predicts the development of urinary extravasation on cystogram following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:146–150 (discussion 50)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanson GR, Odom E, Borden LS Jr, Neil N, Corman JM (2008) Post-operative drain output as a predictor of bladder neck contracture following radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40:351–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yildirim A, Basok EK, Ilhan AI, Basaran A, Rifaioglu MM, Tokuc R (2008) The impact of urinary drainage on the development of anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40:667–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C et al (2010) Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 76:417–422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hong SK, Yu JH, Han BK et al (2007) Association of prostate size and tumor grade in Korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 70:91–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rodriguez E Jr, Skarecky D, Narula N, Ahlering TE (2008) Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. J Urol 179:501–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad RB, Tsai C, Webster R, Lui P (2000) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction. J Urol 163:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shelfo SW, Obek C, Soloway MS (1998) Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence. Urology 51:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Selli C, De Antoni P, Moro U, Macchiarella A, Giannarini G, Crisci A (2004) Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:32–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160:2418–2424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lepor H, Nieder AM, Fraiman MC (2001) Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 58:425–429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Little JS Jr, Bihrle R, Foster RS (1995) Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Urology 46:429–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Patel R, Lepor H (2003) Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61:156–160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tiguert R, Rigaud J, Fradet Y (2004) Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 63:513–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ischia JJ, Lindsay S (2005) Is a cystogram necessary after radical prostatectomy? ANZ J Surg. 75:825–827

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Altinova S, Serefoglu EC, Ozdemir AT, Atmaca AF, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD (2009) Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 41:881–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gomez CA, Soloway MS, Civantos F, Hachiya T (1993) Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Urology 42:689–694

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gallo L, Perdona S, Autorino R et al (2007) Vesicourethral anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does the number of sutures matter? Urology 69:547–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Harpster LE, Brien J (2007) Initial results using a running vesicourethral anastomosis following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 177:118–122 (discussion 22)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS (1998) Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 51:960–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Teber D, Erdogru T, Cresswell J, Gozen AS, Frede T, Rassweiler JJ (2008) Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 26:617–622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H (1994) Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 44:883–887

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee YH, Chiu AW, Huang JK (2005) Comprehensive study of bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of prostate. Urology 65:498–503 (discussion)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Besarani D, Amoroso P, Kirby R (2004) Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 94:1245–1247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Breyer BN, Davis CB, Cowan JE, Kane CJ, Carroll PR (2010) Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106:1734–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Srougi M, Paranhos M, Leite KM, Dall’Oglio M, Nesrallah L (2005) The influence of bladder neck mucosal eversion and early urinary extravasation on patient outcome after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective controlled trial. BJU Int 95:757–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gita M. Schoeppler.

Additional information

Gita M. Schoeppler and Alexander Buchner contributed equally to the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schoeppler, G.M., Zaak, D., Clevert, DA. et al. The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 1403–1410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0

Keywords

Navigation