Abstract
Purpose
To determine whether the bladder neck mucosal eversion (BNM-eversion) during radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) reduces the risk of bladder neck stricture (BNS) and of peri-anastomotic extravasation (PAE) in postoperative cystography.
Methods
Two hundred and eleven patients with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent RRP and were prospectively randomized into patients with BNM-eversion (group I) and without BNM-eversion (group II). All patients underwent an evaluation of PAE by retrograde cystography on postoperative day 8. We assessed BNS after 6 months.
Results
Ninety-two patients with and 113 patients without BNM-eversion were included. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, including age, TNM-classification, Gleason score, PSA, prostate volume, and blood loss in both groups. A complete follow-up of 6 months for BNS was available for 188 patients (89.1 %). Sixteen BNS out of 188 patients were recorded, 4.7 % (n = 4) in group I and 11.7 % (n = 12) in group II (p = 0.09). Data from 205 out of 211 patients were available for the evaluation of the extravasation by cystography. Peri-anastomotic extravasation was detectable in 11.96 %, (11/205) in group I and in 21.24 % (24/205) in group II (p = 0.08).
Conclusion
BNM-eversion does not have a positive influence on the prevention of bladder neck strictures. Peri-anastomotic extravasation detected by cystography does not correlate with a formation of bladder neck stricture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batzler WU, Giersiepen K (2008) Krebs in Deutschland 2003-2004. Häufigkeiten und Trends. http://wwwekrmeduni-erlangende/GEKID/Doc/kid2008pdf (cited;6. volume)
Popken G, Sommerkamp H, Schultze-Seemann W, Wetterauer U, Katzenwadel A (1998) Anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Incidence, findings and treatment. Eur Urol 33:382–386
Borboroglu PG, Sands JP, Roberts JL, Amling CL (2000) Risk factors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. Urology 56:96–100
Huang G, Lepor H (2006) Factors predisposing to the development of anastomotic strictures in a single-surgeon series of radical retropubic prostatectomies. BJU Int 97:255–258
Walsh PC, Lepor H, Eggleston JC (1983) Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate 4:473–485
Hardy KJ (1990) A view of the development of intestinal suture. Part I. From legend to practice. Aust N Z J Surg 60:299–304
Neckell T, Welter E, Neckell M (1996) Singlelayer digestive sutures (manual and mechanical). Observations after 20 years. Chirurgia 45:311–312
Schumacher I, Lorenz D (1991) Historical development of the intestinal suture. Chirurgia. 62:71–74
Webb DR, Sethi K, Gee K (2009) An analysis of the causes of bladder neck contracture after open and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 103:957–963
Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris experience. J Urol 163:418–422
Msezane LP, Reynolds WS, Gofrit ON, Shalhav AL, Zagaja GP, Zorn KC (2008) Bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: evaluation of incidence and risk factors and impact on urinary function. J Endourol 22:97–104
Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166:2101–2108
Park R, Martin S, Goldberg JD, Lepor H (2001) Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: insights into incidence, effectiveness of intervention, effect on continence, and factors predisposing to occurrence. Urology 57:742–746
Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM et al (2010) Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol 183:1366–1372
Catalona WJ, Carvalhal GF, Mager DE, Smith DS (1999) Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. J Urol 162:433–438
Fenig DM, Slova D, Lepor H (2006) Postoperative blood loss predicts the development of urinary extravasation on cystogram following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 175:146–150 (discussion 50)
Hanson GR, Odom E, Borden LS Jr, Neil N, Corman JM (2008) Post-operative drain output as a predictor of bladder neck contracture following radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40:351–354
Yildirim A, Basok EK, Ilhan AI, Basaran A, Rifaioglu MM, Tokuc R (2008) The impact of urinary drainage on the development of anastomotic stricture after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 40:667–673
Gillitzer R, Thomas C, Wiesner C et al (2010) Single center comparison of anastomotic strictures after radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 76:417–422
Hong SK, Yu JH, Han BK et al (2007) Association of prostate size and tumor grade in Korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 70:91–95
Rodriguez E Jr, Skarecky D, Narula N, Ahlering TE (2008) Prostate volume estimation using the ellipsoid formula consistently underestimates actual gland size. J Urol 179:501–503
Poon M, Ruckle H, Bamshad RB, Tsai C, Webster R, Lui P (2000) Radical retropubic prostatectomy: bladder neck preservation versus reconstruction. J Urol 163:194–198
Shelfo SW, Obek C, Soloway MS (1998) Update on bladder neck preservation during radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on pathologic outcome, anastomotic strictures, and continence. Urology 51:73–78
Selli C, De Antoni P, Moro U, Macchiarella A, Giannarini G, Crisci A (2004) Role of bladder neck preservation in urinary continence following radical retropubic prostatectomy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 38:32–37
Walsh PC (1998) Anatomic radical prostatectomy: evolution of the surgical technique. J Urol 160:2418–2424
Lepor H, Nieder AM, Fraiman MC (2001) Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable. Urology 58:425–429
Little JS Jr, Bihrle R, Foster RS (1995) Early urethral catheter removal following radical prostatectomy: a pilot study. Urology 46:429–431
Patel R, Lepor H (2003) Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61:156–160
Tiguert R, Rigaud J, Fradet Y (2004) Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 63:513–517
Ischia JJ, Lindsay S (2005) Is a cystogram necessary after radical prostatectomy? ANZ J Surg. 75:825–827
Altinova S, Serefoglu EC, Ozdemir AT, Atmaca AF, Akbulut Z, Balbay MD (2009) Factors affecting urethral stricture development after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 41:881–884
Gomez CA, Soloway MS, Civantos F, Hachiya T (1993) Bladder neck preservation and its impact on positive surgical margins during radical prostatectomy. Urology 42:689–694
Gallo L, Perdona S, Autorino R et al (2007) Vesicourethral anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does the number of sutures matter? Urology 69:547–551
Harpster LE, Brien J (2007) Initial results using a running vesicourethral anastomosis following open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 177:118–122 (discussion 22)
Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Kneib TG, Steiner MS (1998) Preservation of putative continence nerves during radical retropubic prostatectomy leads to more rapid return of urinary continence. Urology 51:960–967
Teber D, Erdogru T, Cresswell J, Gozen AS, Frede T, Rassweiler JJ (2008) Analysis of three different vesicourethral anastomotic techniques in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 26:617–622
Licht MR, Klein EA, Tuason L, Levin H (1994) Impact of bladder neck preservation during radical prostatectomy on continence and cancer control. Urology 44:883–887
Lee YH, Chiu AW, Huang JK (2005) Comprehensive study of bladder neck contracture after transurethral resection of prostate. Urology 65:498–503 (discussion)
Besarani D, Amoroso P, Kirby R (2004) Bladder neck contracture after radical retropubic prostatectomy. BJU Int 94:1245–1247
Breyer BN, Davis CB, Cowan JE, Kane CJ, Carroll PR (2010) Incidence of bladder neck contracture after robot-assisted laparoscopic and open radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106:1734–1738
Srougi M, Paranhos M, Leite KM, Dall’Oglio M, Nesrallah L (2005) The influence of bladder neck mucosal eversion and early urinary extravasation on patient outcome after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective controlled trial. BJU Int 95:757–760
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Gita M. Schoeppler and Alexander Buchner contributed equally to the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schoeppler, G.M., Zaak, D., Clevert, DA. et al. The impact of bladder neck mucosal eversion during open radical prostatectomy on bladder neck stricture and urinary extravasation. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 1403–1410 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0186-0