Skip to main content
Log in

Rhabdomyolysis with acute kidney injury in deceased donors is not a contraindication for kidney donation

  • Urology – Case Report
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Deceased patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) from rhabdomyolysis can be considered as potential kidney donors.

Methods

We performed a retrospective chart review from January 2005 to January 2011 of three donors with AKI from rhabdomyolysis and the four recipients of the donated kidneys. Three donors had AKI from rhabdomyolysis as evidenced by elevated serum creatinine levels, myoglobinuria, and plasma creatinine kinase levels greater than five times the upper limit of normal. All grafts were maintained on pulsatile machine perfusion (MP) prior to transplantation. In one of the patients, serial venous perfusate myoglobin levels were measured from the donor kidney while on MP.

Results

Three of the four recipients had delayed graft function, but all had normalized creatinine function after 1 month. One recipient had a creatinine of 1.2 after 79 months, the longest documented follow-up of this kind. Although we measured venous perfusate myoglobin levels from one of the grafts, we found the levels to decrease with increasing time spent on MP.

Conclusion

Potential donors with AKI secondary to rhabdomyolysis should not be restricted from the donor pool. MP may play a role in minimizing the effects of AKI in these types of donors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Holt SG, Moore KP (2001) Pathogenesis and treatment of renal dysfunction in rhabdomyolysis. Intensive Care Med 27(5):803–811

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bagley WH, Yang H, Shah KH (2007) Rhabdomyolysis. Intern Emerg Med 2(3):210–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rodríguez-Capote K et al (2009) Utility of urine myoglobin for the prediction of acute renal failure in patients with suspected rhabdomyolysis: a systematic review. Clin Chem 55(12):2190–2197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Russ PD, Dillingham M (1991) Demonstration of CT hyperdensity in patients with acute renal failure associated with rhabdomyolysis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15(3):458–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Huerta-Alardin AL, Varon J, Marik PE (2005) Bench-to-bedside review: rhabdomyolysis—an overiew for clinicians. Crit Care 9(2):158–169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanholder R et al (2000) Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 11(8):1553–1561

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reha WC et al (1989) Rhabdomyolysis: need for high index of suspicion. Urology 34(5):292–296

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Visweswaran P, Guntupalli J (1999) Rhabdomyolysis. Crit Care Clin 15(2):415–428

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Knochel JP (1982) Rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuria. Annu Rev Med 33:435–443

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Thomusch O et al (2006) Successful transplantation of kidneys from a donor with myoglobinuric acute renal failure. Am J Transplant 6(10):2500–2501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mekeel KL et al Deceased donor kidney transplantation from donors with acute renal failure due to rhabdomyolysis. Am J Transplant 9(7):70–1666

  12. The US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. 2008 OPTN/SRTR Annual Report: Transplant Data 1998-2007. 2008. http://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/ar2008/

  13. Anil Kumar MS et al (2006) Successful transplantation of kidneys from deceased donors with acute renal failure: three-year results. Transplantation 82(12):1640–1645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsuoka L et al (2006) Pulsatile perfusion reduces the incidence of delayed graft function in expanded criteria donor kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 6(6):1473–1478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szust J, Olson L, Cravero L (1999) A comparison of OPO pulsatile machine preservation practices and results. J Transpl Coord 9(2):97–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schold JD et al (2005) Are we frozen in time? Analysis of the utilization and efficacy of pulsatile perfusion in renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 5(7):1681–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Stratta RJ et al (2007) Influence of pulsatile perfusion preservation on outcomes in kidney transplantation from expanded criteria donors. J Am Coll Surg 204(5):873–884

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taylor MJ, Baicu SC (2010) Current state of hypothermic machine perfusion preservation of organs: the clinical perspective. Cryobiology 60(3 Suppl):S20–S35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaetano Ciancio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, S., Ayyathurai, R., Eldefrawy, A. et al. Rhabdomyolysis with acute kidney injury in deceased donors is not a contraindication for kidney donation. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 1107–1111 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0185-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-012-0185-1

Keywords

Navigation