Skip to main content

Clinical cause of presumed acute tubular necrosis requiring renal replacement therapy and outcome of critically ill patients: post hoc analysis of a prospective 7-year cohort study

International Urology and Nephrology volume 44, pages 1779–1789 (2012)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Acute kidney injury (AKI) secondary to acute tubular necrosis (ATN) is common in critically ill patients, and causes significant morbidity and mortality. The underlying etiology of ATN can be divided into pure ischemic, pure nephrotoxic, and mixed causes. This post-hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study aimed to investigate whether the cause (pure vs. mixed) of ATN affects the short- and long-term outcome of critically-ill patients.

Methods

A total of 425 critically-ill patients with AKI secondary to clinically diagnosed ATN were divided into three groups according to the cause of ATN. Of these patients, 215 had mixed ATN, 203 had pure ischemic ATN, and seven had pure nephrotoxic ATN. All patients had one episode of AKI only. No patient had pre-existing chronic kidney disease. Patients were followed throughout their hospital stay (mortality rate, recovery of renal function at discharge) and up to 7 years thereafter.

Results

The three patient groups differed in their demographic and clinical characteristics. The in-hospital mortality rates were 55% in the presumably mixed-cause ATN group, 39% in the pure ischemic group, and 29% in the pure nephrotoxic group. Complete renal recovery at discharge was documented in five out of five surviving patients with nephrotoxic ATN (100%) and in 92 out of 124 surviving patients with pure ischemic ATN (74%), but only in 29 out of 97 patients with mixed ATN (30%). None of the surviving patients was lost during the 7-year follow-up. At the end of the observation period, 60% of the survivors of pure ATN, compared with 22% of the survivors of mixed ATN, were alive. After 7 years, 6% of the living patients with pure ATN had mild-to-moderate chronic kidney disease, whereas 38% of the mixed group patients had advanced CKD or end-stage renal disease.

Conclusions

The cause of presumed ATN has a profound impact on short- as well as long-term outcomes of critically-ill patients with AKI requiring renal replacement therapy. The challenge for intensivists is to avoid further injury to the kidneys of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Star RA (1998) Treatment of acute renal failure. Kidney Int 54:1817–1831

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bellomo R, Ronco C, Kellum JA et al (2004) Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the second international consensus conference of the acute dialysis quality initiative (ADQI) Group. Crit Care 8:R204–R212

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R (2008) A comparison of the RIFLE and AKIN criteria for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23:1569–1574

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoste EA, Clermont G, Kersten A et al (2006) RIFLE criteria for acute kidney injury are associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients: a cohort analysis. Crit Care 10:R73

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ostermann M, Chang RW (2011) Challenges of defining acute kidney injury. QMJ 104:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R et al (2005) Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA 294:813–818

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cruz DN, Bolgan I, Perazella MA et al (2007) North East Italian Prospective Hospital Renal Outcome Survey on Acute Kidney Injury (NEiPHROS-AKI): targeting the problem with the RIFLE Criteria. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:418–425

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bagshaw SM, George C, Bellomo R (2007) Changes in the incidence and outcome for early acute kidney injury in a cohort of Australian intensive care units. Crit Care 11:R68

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ympa YP, Sakr Y, Reinhart K et al (2005) Has mortality from acute renal failure decreased? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Med 118:827–832

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liano F, Felipe C, Tenorio MT et al (2007) Long-term outcome of acute tubular necrosis: a contribution to its natural history. Kidney Int 71:679–686

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgera S, Kraft AK, Siebert G et al (2002) Long-term outcomes in acute renal failure patients treated with continuous renal replacement therapies. Am J Kidney Dis 40:275–279

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brivet FG, Kleinknecht DJ, Loirat P et al (1996) Acute renal failure in intensive care units—causes, outcome, and prognostic factors of hospital mortality; a prospective, multicenter study. French Study Group on Acute Renal Failure. Crit Care Med 24:192–198

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S (2002) Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis 39:930–936

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Parikh CR, Coca SG (2010) Acute kidney injury: defining prerenal azotemia in clinical practice and research. Nat Rev Nephrol 6:641–642

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tillyard A, Keays R, Soni N (2005) The diagnosis of acute renal failure in intensive care: mongrel or pedigree? Anaesthesia 60:903–914

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. El Shahawy MA, Agbing LU, Badillo E (2000) Severity of illness scores and the outcome of acute tubular necrosis. Int Urol Nephrol 32:185–191

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ et al (2008) Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 359:7–20

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Schiffl H, Lang SM, Fischer R (2002) Daily hemodialysis and the outcome of acute renal failure. N Engl J Med 346:305–310

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tumlin JA, Finkel KW, Murray PT et al (2005) Fenoldopam mesylate in early acute tubular necrosis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am J Kidney Dis 46:26–34

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Callister ME, Evans TW (2002) Pulmonary versus extrapulmonary acute respiratory distress syndrome: different diseases or just a useful concept? Curr Opin Crit Care 8:21–25

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Esson ML, Schrier RW (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of acute tubular necrosis. Ann Intern Med 137:744–752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen HH, Ibels LS (1982) Acute renal failure. Multivariate analysis of causes and risk factors. Am J Med 73:211–218

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S et al (2004) Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: the PICARD experience. Kidney Int 66:1613–1621

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Santos WJ, Zanetta DM, Pires AC et al (2006) Patients with ischaemic, mixed and nephrotoxic acute tubular necrosis in the intensive care unit—a homogeneous population? Crit Care 10:R68

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weisberg LS, Allgren RL, Genter FC et al (1997) Cause of acute tubular necrosis affects its prognosis. The Auriculin Anaritide Acute Renal Failure Study Group. Arch Intern Med 157:1833–1838

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liano F, Gallego A, Pascual J et al (1993) Prognosis of acute tubular necrosis: an extended prospectively contrasted study. Nephron 63:21–31

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schiffl H (2006) Renal recovery from acute tubular necrosis requiring renal replacement therapy: a prospective study in critically ill patients. Nephrol Dial

  28. Mehta R, Kellum JA, Shah SV et al (2007) Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care 11:R31

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. National Kidney Foundation (2002) K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39(Suppl 1):S1–266

    Google Scholar 

  30. Faulhaber-Walter R, Hafer C, Jahr N et al (2009) The Hannover dialysis outcome study: comparison of standard versus intensified extended dialysis for treatment of patients with acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Nephrol Dial Transplant 24:2179–2186

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Uehlinger DE, Jakob SM, Ferrari P et al (2005) Comparison of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:1630–1637

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R et al (2007) Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:431–439

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abdulkader RC, Liborio AB, Malheiros DM (2008) Histological features of acute tubular necrosis in native kidneys and long-term renal function. Ren Fail 30:667–673

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Heyman SN, Brezis M, Reubinoff CA et al (1988) Acute renal failure with selective medullary injury in the rat. J Clin Invest 82:401–412

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Venkatachalam MA, Griffin KA, Lan R et al (2010) Acute kidney injury: a springboard for progression in chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298:F1078–F1094

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Quartin AA, Schein RM, Kett DH et al (1997) Magnitude and duration of the effect of sepsis on survival. Department of Veterans Affairs Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Studies Group. JAMA 277:1058–1063

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhandari S, Turney JH (1996) Survivors of acute renal failure who do not recover renal function. QJM 89:415–421

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hsu CY, Chertow GM, McCulloch CE et al (2009) Nonrecovery of kidney function and death after acute on chronic renal failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 4:891–898

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stevens PE, Tamimi NA, Al Hasani MK et al (2001) Non-specialist management of acute renal failure. QJM 94:533–540

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Davidman M, Olson P, Kohen J et al (1991) Iatrogenic renal disease. Arch Intern Med 151:1809–1812

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. KfH Nierenzentrum München-Laim, Elsenheimerstr. 63, 80687, München, Germany

    H. Schiffl

  2. Medizinische Klinik-Campus Innenstadt der LMU München, München, Germany

    H. Schiffl & R. Fischer

Authors
  1. H. Schiffl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Fischer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Schiffl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schiffl, H., Fischer, R. Clinical cause of presumed acute tubular necrosis requiring renal replacement therapy and outcome of critically ill patients: post hoc analysis of a prospective 7-year cohort study. Int Urol Nephrol 44, 1779–1789 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-9994-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-011-9994-x

Keywords

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Acute tubular necrosis
  • Mortality
  • Renal recovery