Abstract
Introduction
The gold standard for treatment of large and complex renal stones is percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, in patients with significant comorbididties, this option may be suboptimal. We reviewed our experiences with ureterorenoscopy and Holmium laser lithotripsy (UL) for the primary management of large and complex intrarenal calculi.
Materials and methods
Forty-three patients with large (2 cm or greater in diameter) renal or staghorn calculi were treated with primary UL. Seven patients were morbidly obese, three had solitary kidneys, two had horseshoe kidneys, three had hepatitis C virus, and three were self-pay and refused admission to the hospital. We calculated the total amount of stone burden, location and composition of calculi, number or ureterorenoscopic procedures necessary, and operative time.
Results
In 42/44 renal units (95.5%), complete ureterorenoscopic fragmentation of the stone burden was accomplished. The mean number of procedures necessary to clear all stone burden was 2.07 (range 1–5). The mean stone size was 3.63 cm (range 2–9 cm). The mean operative time was 107.4 min per procedure (range 30–230 min). Two patients were treatment failures and required intervention following ureteroscopy. In both, SWL cleared the remaining stone burden. No patient required PCNL, and one patient was admitted for urosepsis.
Conclusion
This series demonstrates that ureterorenoscopy and Holmium laser lithotripsy is an effective and safe primary treatment modality for the treatment of large complex kidney stones. It is an attractive alternative to PCNL, particularly in those with comorbid conditions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Segura JW, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Williams HJ, Barrett DM, Benson RC, May GR, Bender CE (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney Stones: review of 1,000 cases. J Urol 134:1077
Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV et al (2001) Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal show wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithias––initial results. J Urol 166:2072
Wu CF, Shee JJ, Line WY et al (2004) Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy for treating larger proximal ureteral stones. J Urol 172:1899
American Urologic Association Staghorn Guideline Update, March 2004
Hyams ES, Munver R, Bird GV et al (2010) Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 24:1583
Grasso M, Conlin M, Bagley D (1998) Retrograde ureteropyeloscopic treatment of 2 cm or greater upper urinary tract and minor staghorn calculi. J Urol 160:346
Renner CH, Rassweiler J (1999) Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron 81:71
Kupeli B, Biri H, Sinik Z et al (1998) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower calyceal calculi. Eur Urol 34:203
Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steel B et al (1994) Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 151:663
Okeke A, Lam JS, Gupta M (2004) Use of ureteral access sheath to facilitate removal of large stone burden during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 63(3):574
Al-Kohlany KM, Shokeir AA, Mosbah A et al (2005) Treatment of complete staghorn stones: a prospective randomized comparison of open surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 173:469
Busby JE, Low RK (2004) Ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 31:1
Klingler JC, Kramer G, Lodde M et al (2003) Stone treatment and coagulopathy. Eur Urol 43(1):75
Marcovich R, Smith A (2003) Renal pelvic stones: choosing shock wave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol 29:195
Pearle MS, Nakada SY, Womack JS, Kryger JV (1998) Outcomes of contemporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 160(3 Pt 1):669
Lallas CD, Delvecchio FC, Evans BR et al (2004) Management of nephropleural fistula after supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 64:241
Ng CS, Herts BR, Streem SB (2005) Percutaneous access to upper pole renal stones: role of prone 3-dimensional computerized tomography in inspiratory and expiratory phase. J Urol 173:124
Preminger GH, Kennedy TJ (1987) Ureteral stone extraction utilizing non-deflectable flexible fiberoptic ureteroscopes. J Endourol 1:31
Johnson GB, Grasso M (2004) Exaggerated primary endoscope deflection: initial clinical experience with prototype flexible ureteroscopes. BJU Int 93:109
Dretler SP (1994) Ureteroscopic fragmentation followed by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a treatment alternative for selected large or staghorn calculi. J Urol 151:842
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pevzner, M., Stisser, B.C., Luskin, J. et al. Alternative management of complex renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol 43, 631–638 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9880-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9880-y