Abstract
Purpose
To analyze the rate of incidental renal carcinoma in patients with no upper urinary tract symptoms (UUTS) or hematuria depending on the sonography reports and medical records of the patients and to determine whether there is a need for routine US screening for RCC.
Materials and methods
We reviewed the reports of 18.686 consecutive urinary US examinations performed in our department between March 1995 and February 2008. A total of 18.203 urinary US examinations formed the study group. Patients with UUTS, patients with presumed diagnosis of or previously diagnosed renal masses, and patients with hematuria were excluded.
Results
There were 11,654 male and 6,549 female patients with a mean age of 55 years. Ultrasonography revealed incidental solid renal masses in 0.44% of the patients. Seven of the 81 patients with incidentally detected renal masses could not be followed up. Thirty-eight of the remaining 74 patients had masses that were proved to be benign with other imaging techniques. Thirty-six of the 74 patients with preoperative diagnosis of renal tumor underwent surgery, and the histopathological diagnosis was renal cell carcinoma in all patients. One patient expired in the postoperative 18th month due to the progression of the metastatic disease. The rest of the patients with malignant renal tumor are disease free and are still under follow-up.
Conclusion
The rate of incidental renal cancer in patients without UUTS is found to be 0.20%. We believe that scanning for incidental renal masses is not obligatory except for the patients with symptoms suggestive of renal carcinoma.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Malaeb BS, Martin DJ, Littooy FN et al (2005) The utility of screening renal ultrasonography: identifying renal cell carcinoma in an elderly asymptomatic population. BJU Int 95:977–981
Wünsch-Filho V (2002) Insights on diagnosis, prognosis and screening of renal cell carcinoma. Sao Paulo Med J 120:163–164
Aslaksen A, Halvorsen OJ, Göthlin JH (1990) Detection of renal and renal pelvic tumours with urography and ultrasonography. Eur J Radiol 11:54–58
McDonald MM, Swagerty D, Wetzel L (2006) Assessment of microscopic hematuria in adults. Am Fam Physician 73:1748–1754
Heidenreich A, Ravery V (2004) Preoperative imaging in renal cell cancer. World J Urol 22:307–315
Schlomer B, Figenshau RS, Yan Y, Venkatesh R, Bhayani SB (2006) Pathological features of renal neoplasms classified by size and symptomatology. J Urol 176:1317–1320
Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC et al (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170:2217–2220
Scoll BJ, Wong YN, Egleston BL et al (2009) Age, tumor size and relative survival of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma: a surveillance, epidemiology and end results analysis. J Urol 181:506–511
Rais-Bahrami S, Guzzo TJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR, Allaf ME (2009) Incidentally discovered renal masses: oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with delayed surgical intervention. BJU Int 103:1355–1358
Jaffe JS, Ginsberg PC, Gill R, Harkaway RC (2001) A new diagnostic algorithm for the evaluation of microscopic hematuria. Urology 57:889–894
Sanchez-Martin FM, Rodriguez FM, Urdaneta-Pignalosa G, Rubio-Briones J, Villavicencio-Mavrich H (2009) Small renal masses: incidental diagnosis, clinical symptoms, and prognostic factors. Adv Urol. 2008:310694. Epub Jan 21
Wolf JS Jr (1998) Evaluation and management of solid and cystic renal masses. J Urol 159:1120–1133
Hugosson J, Aus G, Becker C et al (2000) Would prostate cancer detected by screening with prostate-specific antigen develop into clinical cancer if left undiagnosed? A comparison of two population-based studies in Sweden. BJU Int 85:1078–1084
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haliloglu, A.H., Gulpinar, O., Ozden, E. et al. Urinary ultrasonography in screening incidental renal cell carcinoma: is it obligatory?. Int Urol Nephrol 43, 687–690 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9843-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9843-3