Abstract
Background
Nitric oxide (NO), synthesized from ls-arginine by the enzyme endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), is a potent vasodilator and has been implicated in mediating insulin-induced uptake and metabolism of glucose in skeletal muscle. Polymorphisms of the eNOS gene have been associated with altered eNOS activity and NO levels. Although several factors have been demonstrated for new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation (NODAT), determining a genetic susceptibility for all patients requires further study. In our study, we evaluated the relationship between eNOS gene intron 4 polymorphism and NODAT in kidney allograft recipients.
Methods
A total of 82 consecutive patients who received their first kidney transplantation and maintained graft function for at least a 12-month post-transplant period and who used triple therapy including cyclosporin A (CsA) for maintenance immunosuppression were included. PCR–RFLP was used for genetic analyses.
Results
Nine of 82 patients (11%) developed NODAT. Concerning the prevalence of eNOS intron 4 gene polymorphism, a significantly higher percentage of 4a allele carriers developed NODAT than non-carriers [6/26 (23.1%) versus 3/56 (5.4%), P = 0.02]. Compared with non-diabetics, NODAT patients were older (P = 0.04), had higher rate of hepatitis C (P < 0.05) and higher body mass index at the time of transplantation (P = 0.03). In regression analyses, having a 4a allele of the eNOS gene intron 4 polymorphism (P = 0.02) and HCV seropositivity (P = 0.03) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of NODAT.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that carrying a 4a allele of the eNOS gene intron 4 polymorphism is associated with NODAT. This may help us to further understand the individual risk for development of NODAT in kidney allograft recipients under CsA treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Phuong-Thu T, Phuong-Chi T, Gerald SL, Alan HW (2007) New onset diabetes mellitus after solid organ transplantation. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 36:873–890
Cosio FG, Pesavento TE, Kim S, Osei K, Henry M, Ferguson RM (2002) Patient survival after renal transplantation: IV. Impact of post-transplant diabetes. Kidney Int 62:1140–1146
Kasiske BL, Synder JJ, Gilbertson D, Matas AJ (2003) Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 3:178–185
Vincenti F, Friman S, Scheuermann E et al (2007) DIRECT (Diabetes Incidence after Renal Transplantation: Neoral C Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus) investigators, results of an international, randomized trial comparing glucose metabolism disorders and outcome with cyclosporine versus tacrolimus. Am J Transplant 6:1506–1514
Balon TW, Nadler JL (1997) Evidence that nitric oxide increases glucose transport in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 82:359–363
Higaki Y, Hirshman MF, Fujii N, Goodyear LJ (2001) Nitric oxide increases glucose uptake through a mechanism that is distinct from the insulin and contraction pathways in rat skeletal muscle. Diabetes 50:241–247
Duplain H, Burcelin R, Sartori C et al (2001) Insulin resistance, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension in mice lacking endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circulation 104:342–345
Shankar RR, Wu Y, Shen H, Zhu JS, Baron AD (2000) Mice with gene disruption of both endothelial and neuronal nitric oxide synthase exhibit insulin resistance. Diabetes 49:684–687
Tsukada T, Yokoyama K, Arai T, Takemoto F, Hara S, Yamada A, Kawaguchi Y, Hosoya T, Igari J (1998) Evidence of association of the ecNOS gene polymorphism with plasma NO metabolite levels in humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245:190–193
Salvarani C, Casali B, Nicoli D, Farnetti E, Macchioni P, Catanoso MG, Chen Q, Bajocchi G, Boiardi L (2003) Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 48:3219–3223
Galanakis E, Kofteridis D, Stratigi K et al (2008) Intron 4 a/b polymorphism of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene is associated with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a genetically homogenous population. Hum Immunol 69:279–283
Rittig K, Holder K, Stock J et al (2008) Endothelial NO-synthase intron 4 polymorphism is associated with disturbed in vivo nitric oxide production in individuals prone to type 2 diabetes. Horm Metab Res 40:13–17
Grimbert S, Valensi P, Levy-Marchal C et al (1996) High prevalence of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic hepatitis C, a case-control study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 20:544–548
Caronia S, Taylor K, Pagliaro L et al (1999) Further evidence for an association between non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 30:1059–1063
Mason AL, Lau JY, Hoang N et al (1999) Association of diabetes mellitus and chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Hepatology 29:328–333
Fabrizi F, Messa P, Martin P, Takkouche B (2008) Hepatitis C virus infection and post-transplant diabetes mellitus among renal transplant patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Artif Organs 31:675–682
van Hooff JP, Christiaans MH, van Duijnhoven EM (2004) Evaluating mechanisms of post-transplant diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant 19(Suppl 6):8–12
Mathew JT, Rao M, Job V, Ratnaswamy S, Jacob CK (2003) Post-transplant hyperglycaemia: a study of risk factors. Nephrol Dial Transplant 18:164–171
Rao M, Jakob JK, Shastry JCM (1992) Post-transplant diabetes mellitus—a retrospective study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 7:1039–1042
Kamar N, Mariat C, Delahousse M et al (2007) Diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation: a French multicentre observational study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 22:1986–1993
Acknowledgments
This study was granted and supported by the Turkish Society of Hypertension and Kidney Diseases.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ergün, I., Keven, K., Sengül, S. et al. Endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene intron 4 polymorphism predicts new onset diabetes mellitus after transplantation in kidney allograft recipients treated with cyclosporin A. Int Urol Nephrol 43, 543–548 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9786-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-010-9786-8