Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The lack of correlation between mast cells and microvessel density with pathologic feature of renal cell carcinoma

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The growth of solid tumors requires angiogenesis. Evidence indicates that mast cells (MCs) play an important role in tumor angiogenesis but results are not definitive. The aim of this study is to investigate the possible effects of angiogenesis and the presence of MCs on the prognosis of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

Patients and methods

The study involved 40 patients with RCC (24 men and 16 women who were treated with radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2006, at our institution. The routine mast cell tryptase staining method was used to assess the MCs in both normal tissue and tumoral tissue. The immunohistochemical staining for CD34 antigen was used for determination of microvessel density. The relation between MC count and tumor status such as tumor stage, size, grade, and other clinicopathologic parameters in RCC were evaluated in this study.

Results

We found no relationship between the number of MCs and patient age, sex, tumor stage, grade, size. No association was noted between angiogenesis and either patient sex or age, tumor size, stage, and grade. No statistically significant correlation was found between the number of MCs and microvessel density in RCC (P-value = 0.45) but the max value of MCs and MVD were in clear cell carcinoma.

Conclusions

The MC count was not associated with tumor status such as tumor stage, size, grade, and other clinicopathologic parameters, however, MCs may be related to tumor angiogenesis and acceleration of tumor growth in RCC and therefore need further evaluation in RCC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirkali Z, Tuzel E, Mungan MU (2001) Recent advances in kidney cancer and metastatic disease. BJU Int 88:818–824. doi:10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02442.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkali Z, Lekili M (2003) Renal cell carcinoma new prognostic factors? Curr Opin Urol 13:433–438

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nativ O, Sabo E, Reiss A, Wald M, Madjar S, Moskovitz B (1998) Clinical significance of tumor angiogenesis in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma. Urology 51:693–696. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00019-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dekel Y, Koren R, Kugel V, Livne PM, Gal R (2002) Significance of angiogenesis and microvascular invasion in renal cell carcinoma. Pathol Oncol Res 8:129–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Craft PS, Harris AL (1994) Clinical prognostic significance of tumor angiogenesis. Ann Oncol 5:305–311

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fox SD (1997) Tumor angiogenesis and prognosis. Histopathology 30:294–301. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2559.1997.d01-606.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patard JJ, Tazi H, Bensalah K et al (2004) The changing evolution of renal tumours: a single center experience over a two decade period. Eur Urol 45:490–493. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2003.12.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Weidner N, Semple JP, Welch WR, Folkman J (1991) Tumor angiogenesis and metastasis-correlation in invasive breast carcinoma. N Engl J Med 324:1–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weidner N, Carroll PR, Flax J, Blumendfeld W, Folkman J (1993) Tumor angiogenesis correlates with metastasis in invasive prostate carcinoma. Am J Pathol 143:401–409

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Macchiarini P, Fontanini G, Hardin MJ, Squartini F, Angeletti CA (1992) Relation of neovascularization to metastasis of non-small lung cancer. Lancet 340:145–146. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)93217-B

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bochner BH, Cote RJ, Weidner N et al (1995) Angiogenesis in bladder cancer: relationship between microvessel density and tumor prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 87:1603–1612. doi:10.1093/jnci/87.21.1603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshino S, Kato M, Okada K (1995) Prognostic significance of microvessel count in low stage renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 2:156–160. doi:10.1111/j.1442-2042.1995.tb00445.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MacLennan GT, Bostwick DG (1995) Microvessel density in renal cell carcinoma. Lack of prognostic significance. Urology 46:27–30. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80153-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribatti D, Crivellato E, Roccaro M, Ria R, Vacca A (2004) Mast cell contribution to angiogenesis related to tumor progression. Clin Exp Allergy 34:1660–1664. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2004.02104.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirkali Z, Yorukoglu K, Ozkara E, Kazimoglu H, Mungan U (2001) Proliferative activity, angiogenesis and nuclear morphometry in renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 8:697–703. doi:10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00405.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozer E, Yorukoglu K, Kirkali Z (2001) Tumor angiogenesis in superficial bladder cancer. Urol Integr Invest 6:70–78

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ehara T, Shigematsu H (2003) Mast cells in kidney. Nephrology 8:130–138. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1797.2003.00153.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Slaton JW, Inoue K, Perrotte P et al (2001) Expression levels of genes that regulate metastasis and angiogenesis correlate with advanced pathological stage of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Pathol 158:735–743

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tuna B, Yorukoglu K, Unlu M, Mun (2006) Association of mast cells with microvessel density in renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol 50(3):530–534. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2005.12.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yildiz E, Ayan S, Goze F, Gokce G, Gultekin EY (2008) Relation of microvessel density with microvascular invasion, metastasis and prognosis in renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 101(6):758–764. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07318.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdolreza Mohammadi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohseni, M.G., Mohammadi, A., Heshmat, A.S. et al. The lack of correlation between mast cells and microvessel density with pathologic feature of renal cell carcinoma. Int Urol Nephrol 42, 109–112 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9577-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-009-9577-2

Keywords

Navigation