Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Is the presence of venous reflux really significant in the diagnosis of varicocele?

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

We have attempted to determine the incidence of venous reflux detected by color Doppler in varicoceles of various grades evaluated during a physical examination.

Patients and methods

The data of patients referred to our outpatient clinic between 1997 and 2007 with the diagnosis of varicocele due to complaints of scrotal pain, palpable swelling or infertility were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of venous reflux was compared with the grade of varicoceles during a physical examination.

Results

A total of 802 male patients with a mean age of 27.1 years (range 16–52 years) were included in this study. Of these, physical examination reviewed that ten (1.2%), 72 (9.0%), 433 (54.0%) and 287 (35.8%) patients had grade 0, 1, 2 or 3 varicoceles, respectively, on the left side and that 607 (75.7%), 73 (9.1%), 108 (13.5%) and 14 (1.7%) patients had grade 0, 1, 2 or 3 varicoceles, respectively, on the right side. Color Doppler examination revealed venous reflux in three (30.0%) grade 0 testicular units, 63 (87.5%) grade 1 testicular units, 400 (92.4%) grade 2 testicular units and 273 (95.1%) grade 3 testicular units on the left side and venous reflux in 99 (16.3%) grade 0 testicular units, 54 (73.6%) grade 1 testicular units, 88 (81.5%) grade 2 testicular units and 12 (85.7%) grade 3 testicular units on the right side. Physical examination did not reveal any statistically significant correlation between the incidence of venous reflux and the grade of the clinically evident varicoceles for both sides.

Conclusions

For assessing the severity of clinically evident varicoceles, the clinician should not use venous reflux as the sole predictor because of its high incidence in all grades of varicoceles. Additional measurements, such as flow volume, duration and velocity of reflux, are recommended as diagnostic tools for assessing the severity of varicocele more accurately.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cornud F, Belin X, Amar E et al (1999) Varicocele: strategies in diagnosis and treatment. Eur Radiol 9(3):536–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Meacham R, Townsend R, Rademacher D et al (1994) The incidence of varicoceles in the general population when evaluated by physical examination, grey-scale sonography, and colour Doppler sonography. J Urol 151:1535–1538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown JS, Dubin L, Becker M et al (1967) Venography in the subfertile man with varicocele. J Urol 98(3):388–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubin L, Amelar RD (1971) Etiologic factors in 1294 consecutive cases of male infertility. Fertil Steril 22(8):469–474

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Chiou RK, Anderson JC, Wobig RK et al (1997) Color Doppler ultrasound criteria to diagnose varicoceles: correlation of a new scoring system with physical examination. Urology 50(6):953–956

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hoekstra T, Witt M (1995) The correlation of internal spermatic vein palpability with ultrasonographic diameter and reversal of venous flow. J Urol 153:82–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dhabuwala C, Kumar A, Kerkar P et al (1989) Patterns of Doppler recordings and its relationship to varicocele in infertile men. Int J Androl 12:430–438

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aydos K, Baltaci S, Salih M et al (1993) Use of color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of varicoceles. Eur Urol 24(2):221–225

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocakoc E, Serhatlioglu S, Kiris A et al (2003) Color Doppler sonographic evaluation of inter-relations between diameter, reflux and flow volume of testicular veins in varicocele. Eur J Radiol 47(3):251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Marsman JW (1985) Clinical versus subclinical varicocele: venographic findings and improvement of fertility after embolization. Radiology 155(3):635–638

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jarow JP, Ogle SR, Eskew LA (1996) Seminal improvement following repair of ultrasound detected subclinical varicoceles. J Urol 155(4):1287–1290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kocakoc E, Kiris A, Orhan I et al (2002) Incidence and importance of reflux in testicular veins of healthy men evaluated with color duplex sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 30(5):282–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Turek P, Lipshultz L (2005) The varicocele controversies II. Diagnosis and treatment. AUA Update Series 14:112–119

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Ankara, Ibni Sina Hastanesi, Samanpazari, Ankara, 06100, Turkey

    Ali E. Zumrutbas, Berkan Resorlu, Mesut Yesil & Onder Yaman

Authors
  1. Ali E. Zumrutbas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Berkan Resorlu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mesut Yesil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Onder Yaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali E. Zumrutbas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zumrutbas, A.E., Resorlu, B., Yesil, M. et al. Is the presence of venous reflux really significant in the diagnosis of varicocele?. Int Urol Nephrol 40, 983–987 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9397-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9397-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation