Abstract
Objective
Surgical complications in kidney transplantation often demand reoperation and therefore may severely affect graft survival. Major complications can be divided into ureteral and vascular related. Reoperation for ureteral complications is supposed to worsen graft survival, but vascular complications or anastomosis technique has not been evaluated for this issue.
Patients and methods
Between 1994 and 2004 260 patients underwent kidney transplantation. All ureterovesical junctions were performed in extravesical technique with ureteral stenting in 132/260 (50.7%) patients. Arterial end-to-side anastomosis was performed routinely except for 13/260 (5%) with end-to-end anastomosis. Mean follow-up was 43 months (0–121) including serum creatinine and ultrasound inter alia.
Results
Graft failure rate was 8.1% 12 months and 12.7% 60 months postoperatively. Of the patients, 29/260 (11.5%) underwent reoperation within 30 days after transplantation (stenosis or leakage of the ureterovesical junction: n = 8; vascular complications: n = 10; thrombectomy for graft vein thrombosis: n = 1; evacuation of hematoma: n = 6; nephrectomy for complete graft ischemia: n = 4). Reoperation for vascular-related complications significantly enhances the risk of graft failure (P < 0.05, Cox proportional hazard) compared to urological complications. Arterial end-to-end anastomosis was also found to have a negative impact on graft survival. No correlation between routine ureteral stenting and ureteral stenosis or leakage was found.
Conclusion
Our data emphasize the importance of vascular complications compared to ureteral ones in kidney transplantation. Resolving ′non-urological′ problems successfully, kidney transplantation is a safe procedure in urological hands.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Suthanthiran M, Strom TB (1994) Renal transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:365–376
Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL, Ojo AO, Ettenger RE, Agodoa LY et al (1999) Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N Engl J Med 341:1725–1730
Wong W, Venetz JP, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Pascual M (2005) 2005 immunosuppressive strategies in kidney transplantation: which role for the calcineurin inhibitors? Transplantation 80:289–296
Kashi SH, Lodge JP, Giles GR, Irving HC (1992) Ureteric complications of renal transplantation. Br J Urol 70:139–143
Shoskes DA, Hanbury D, Cranston D, Morris PJ (1995) Urological complications in 1, 000 consecutive renal transplant recipients. J Urol 153:18–21
van Roijen JH, Kirkels WJ, Zietse R, Roodnat JI, Weimar W, Ijzermans JN (2001) Long-term graft survival after urological complications of 695 kidney transplantations. J Urol 165:1884–1887
Krol R, Cierpka L, Ziaja J, Pawlicki J, Budzinski G (2003) Surgically treated early complications after kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc 35:2241–2242
Aydin C, Berber I, Altaca G, Yigit B, Titiz I (2004) The outcome of kidney transplants with multiple renal arteries. BMC Surg 4:4
Englesbe MJ, Punch JD, Armstrong DR, Arenas JD, Sung RS, Magee JC (2004) Single-center study of technical graft loss in 714 consecutive renal transplants. Transplantation 78:623–626
Droupy S, Eschwege P, Hammoudi Y, Durrbach A, Charpentier B, Benoit G (2006) Consequences of iliac arterial atheroma on renal transplantation. J Urol 175:1036–1039
Bruno S, Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P (2004) Transplant renal artery stenosis. J Am Soc Nephrol 15:134–141
Basaran O, Moray G, Emiroglu R, Alevli F, Haberal M (2004) Graft and patient outcomes among recipients of renal grafts with multiple arteries. Transplant Proc 36:102–104
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fechner, G., von Pezold, C., Hauser, S. et al. Impairment of long-term graft function after kidney transplantation by intraoperative vascular complications. Int Urol Nephrol 40, 869–873 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9387-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-008-9387-y