International Urology and Nephrology

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 1121–1124 | Cite as

Condom perforation during transrectal ultrasound guided (TRUS) prostate biopsies: a potential infection risk

  • Junaid Masood
  • Stelios Voulgaris
  • Olisa Awogu
  • Choudhary Younis
  • Andrew J. Ball
  • Tom W. Carr
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsies are amongst the most common outpatient diagnostic procedures performed in urology practice. Of concern appear to be recent reports of infectious complications following this procedure in which contamination of the biopsy equipment was the likely source. This study looks at the rate of condom perforation during prostate biopsy and we look to highlight the potential problems, which may arise as a result of inadequate cleansing of the equipment between cases during a busy prostate biopsy clinic

Material and methods

All patients attending for prostate biopsies over a three-month period in our institution were included in the study. All condoms (latex) used were made by the same manufacturer and were checked prior to the procedure and found to have no leaks. The biopsy gun was inserted through an externally placed needle guide, as is standard practice in many departments in the UK. After the end of each procedure the condom was removed from the rectal probe and filled once again with water to assess for perforations. Two experienced surgeons carried out all the procedures.

Results

10 out of 107 patients were found to have at least one perforation in the condom. In some of the condoms there were multiple perforations.

Discussion

We have demonstrated a significant condom perforation rate (9%) amongst patients undergoing prostate biopsies. This raises the serious issue of hygiene and cross infection, particularly with blood borne communicable diseases such as hepatitis and HIV unless strict disinfection and sterilization protocols are followed between patients. Perforation of the condoms used during TRUS guided prostate biopsy and hence faecal and blood contamination of the biopsy equipment could potentially have far-reaching implications for urologists and the infection control community. Although the risk of cross infection is probably small this serious issue needs addressing.

References

  1. 1.
    Crundwell MC, Cooke PW, Wallace DM (1999) Patients’ tolerance of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsy: an audit of 104 cases. BJU Int 83:792–795PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Puig J, Darnell A, Bermudez P, Malet A, Serrate G, Bare M, Prats J (2006) Transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary? Eur Radiol 16(4):939–943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gillespie J, Arnold KE, Kainer MA, Jensen B, Arduino M, Hageman J, Srinivasan A (2006) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections associated with transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies— Georgia, 2005. CDC-MMRW 55(28):776–777Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hutchinson J, Runge W, Mulvey M, Norris G, Yetman M, (2004) Valkova N et al Burkholderia cepacia infections associated with intrinsically contaminated ultrasound gel: the role of microbial degradation of parabens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 25:291–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Amis S, Ruddy M, Kibbler CC, Economides DL, Maclean AB (2000) Assessment of condoms as probe covers for transvaginal sonography. J Clin Ultrasound 28(6):295–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rutula WA, Weber DJ (2004) Disinfection and sterilization in health care facilities: what clinicians need to know. Clin Infect Dis 39:702–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spaulding EH (1968) Chemical disinfection of medical and surgical materials chapter 32). In: Lawrence CA, Block SS (eds) Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, PA, pp 517–531Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Carey RF, Herman WA, Retta SM, Rinaldi JE, Herman BA, Athey TW (1992) Effectiveness of latex condoms as a barrier to human immunodeficiency virus sized particles under conditions of simulated use. Sex Transm Dis 19(4):239–244Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junaid Masood
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stelios Voulgaris
    • 1
  • Olisa Awogu
    • 1
  • Choudhary Younis
    • 1
  • Andrew J. Ball
    • 1
  • Tom W. Carr
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologySouthend University HospitalEssexUK
  2. 2.EssexUK

Personalised recommendations