Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effectiveness of pneumatic lithotripsy (PL) with ureteroscopy in the treatment of large ureteral stones.

Methods

We reviewed, retrospectively, the records of 156 patients (122 male, 34 female) who had ureteral calculi larger than 10 mm that were treated with PL. Of these patients, 41 (26.3%) were treated primarily with PL and 115 (73.7%) were treated secondarily after unsuccessful extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). The mean stone diameter was 12.87 mm (range 10–20.5 mm). Results were evaluated 3 months after treatment by excretory urography and/or ultrasonography.

Results

The overall stone-free and fragmentation rates (FRs) were 85.2 and 92.3%, respectively. Corresponding values were 60 and 84% for upper ureteral stones, 79.5 and 89.7% for middle ureter stones and 94.5 and 95.6% for lower ureteral stones, respectively. The main complications were migration of a complete stone or of fragments (7.1%), urosepsis (4.5%) and ureteral perforation (1.3%).

Conclusions

Although SWL is generally accepted as the first treatment option for ureteral stones because of its non-invasive nature, PL with ureteroscopy seems to be a good alternative with the advantage of higher success rates and quick stone clearance. Especially when we take the importance of quick stone removal into account for larger ureteral stones, which are more likely to have obstruction, impaction, or infection, we believe that PL may be chosen as the first line treatment rather than SWL for stones larger than 10 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hofbauer J, Hobarth K, Marberger M (1992) Lithoclast: new and inexpensive mode of intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Endourol 6:429–432

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kupeli B, Biri H, Isen K, Onaran M, Alkibay T, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli (1998) Treatment of ureteral stones: comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and endourologic alternatives. Eur Urol 34:474–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Naqui SA, Khalogi M, Zafar MN, Rizwi SA (1994) Treatment of ureteric stones. Comparison of laser and pneumatic lithotripsy. Br J Urol 74:694–698

    Google Scholar 

  4. Denstedt JD, Clayman RV (1990) Electrohydraulic lithotripsy of renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 143:13–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Merberger M, Hofbaur J, Tuerk C, Hobart K, Albrecth W (1994) The management of ureteric stones. Eur Urol 25:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs GI, Chaussy CG, Stenal A (1988) Current management concepts in the treatment of ureteral stones. J Endourol 2:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  7. Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Dretler SP, Kahn RI, Lingeman JE, Macaluso JN Jr (1997) Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. The American Urological Association. J Urol 158(5):1915–1921

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33(3):185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bierkens AF, Hendrikx AJ, De La Rosette JJ, Stultiens GN, Beerlage HP, Arends AJ, Debruyne FM (1998) Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness. Br J Urol 81(1):31–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kupeli B, Alkibay T, Sınık Z, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli (2000) What is the optimal treatment for lower ureteral stones larger than 1 cm? Int J Urol 7:167–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yinghao S, Linghu W, Sangxi Q, Guogiang L, Chuanliang XU, XU G, Yongjiang MA (2000) Treatment of urinary calculi with ureteroscopy and swiss lithoclast pneumatic lithotripter: Report of 150 cases. J Endourol 14:281–283

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulze H, Haupt G, Piergiovanni M, Wisard M, Von Niederhausern W, Senge T (1993) The Swiss Lithoclast: A new device for endoscopic stone disintegration. J Urol 149:15–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Denstedt JD, Eberwein PM, Singh RR (1992) The Swiss Lithoclast: A new device for intracorporeal lithotripsy. J Urol 148:1088–1090

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Puppo P, Ricciotti G, Bozzo W, Introini C (1999) Primary endoscopic treatment of ureteric calculi. Eur Urol 36: 48–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ilker NY, Alican Y, Simsek F, Turkeri LN, Akdas A (1994) Ureteral extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy utilizing Dornier MFL 5000. J. Endourol 8:13–14

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Farsi HMA, Mosli HA, Alzimaity M, Bahnassy AA, Ibrahim MA (1994) In situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for primary ureteric calculi. Urology 43:776–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Murthy P, Gurunadha HS, Meherwade S, Srinivasa P, Srisvastava A, Sasidharan K (1997) Ureteroscopic lithotripsy using mini-endoscope and swiss lithoclast: Experience in 147 cases. J Endourol 11: 327–330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Sozen S, Kupeli B, Tunc L, Senocak C, Alkibay T, Karaoglan U, Bozkirli I (2003) Management of ureteral stones with pneumatic lithotripsy: report of 500 patients. J Endourol 17(9): 721–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lam JS, Greene TD, Gupta M (2002) Treatment of proximal ureteral calculi: Holmium: YAG laser ureterolithotripsy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 167: 1972–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vassar GJ, Chan KF, Teichman JM (1999) Holmium:YAG lithotripsy: photothermal mechanism. J. Endourol 13:181–190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nathaniel MF (2001) Potential Applications of the Erbium:YAG Laser in Endourology. J of Endourol 15(9): 889–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jeon SS, Hyun J-H, Lee K-S (2005) A comparison of holmium:YAG laser with Lithoclast lithotripsy in ureteral calculi fragmentation. Int J Urol 12: 544–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dretler SP, Keating MA, Riley J (1987) An algorithm for the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 136:1190–1192

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lapu AN, Fuchs GJ, Chaussy CG (1988) Treatment of ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: UCLA experience. Urology 32:217–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eden CG, Mark IR, Gupta RR, Eastman J, Shrotri NC, Tiptaft RC (1998) Intracorporeal or extracorporeal lithotripsy for distal ureteral calculi? Effect of size and multiplicity on success rates. J Endouro 12:307–312

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tawfiek ER, Bagley DH (1998) Ureteroscopic evaluation and treatment of chronic unilateral hematuria. J Urol 160(3Pt1):700–702

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhong W, Zeng G, Cai Y, Dai Q, Hu J, Wei H (2003) Treatment of lower urethral calculi with extracorporeal shock – wave lithotripsy and pneumatic ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a comparision of effectiveness and complications. Chin Med J (Eng) 116(7):1001–1003

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aridogan JA, Zeren S, Bayazit Y, Soyupak B, Doran S (2005) Complications of pneumatic ureterolithotripsy in the early postoperative period. J. Endourol 19(1):50–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urology, gazi university, cukurambar mah. 38. cad. 3/21, Balgat, Ankara, 06520, Turkey

    Lutfi Tunc, Bora Kupeli, Cagri Senocak, Turgut Alkibay, Sinan Sözen, Ustunol Karaoglan & Ibrahim Bozkirli

Authors
  1. Lutfi Tunc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bora Kupeli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cagri Senocak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Turgut Alkibay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sinan Sözen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ustunol Karaoglan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ibrahim Bozkirli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lutfi Tunc.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tunc, L., Kupeli, B., Senocak, C. et al. Pneumatic lithotripsy for large ureteral stones: is it the first line treatment?. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 759–764 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9084-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9084-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation