Skip to main content
Log in

Local Anesthesia During Transrectal Ultrasonography-guided Prostate Biopsy: does it have any Effect on Sexual Function?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

TRUS (Trans Rectal Ultra Sonographic)-guided biopsy of the prostate is the procedure of choice for prostate cancer diagnosis in urological clinical practice. TRUS-guided biopsies are associated with pain and anxiety and may interfere with sexual function and potency. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether local anesthesia during TRUS-guided prostate biopsies has any effect on the sexual behavior of patients and to compare the periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine to simple sonographic gel application in a randomized prospective trial.

Patients and Methods

A total of 62 consecutive patients were included in the study randomized in two groups; Group A (n = 30, control group) and Group B (n = 32, lidocaine infiltration group). Interviews regarding their sexual status were conducted at the time they were informed of the need for biopsy, at the time of biopsy and at two scheduled interviews following the biopsy.

Results

Similar results of sexual dysfunction were observed between the two groups. About 6% of patients experienced some degree of dysfunction in anticipation of biopsy (P > 0.02 between the two groups) that was resolved by the end of the follow-up period. In total, only one Group B patient continued to show sexual dysfunction at the time of the last interview compared to two patients in Group A.

Conclusions

Local infiltration with lidocaine does not seem to play a role in sexual dysfunction following prostate biopsies. Psychological factors influence patients and the urologist should be ready to inform and reassure both the patient and his family.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clements R, Aideyan OU, Griffiths GJ et al (1993) Side effects and patients acceptability of transrectal biopsy of the prostate. Clin Rad 47:125–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Collins GN, Lloyd SN, Hehir M et al (1993) Multiple transrectal ultrasound-guided prostatic biopsies – true morbidity and patient acceptance. Br J Urol 71:460–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gustafsson O, Theorell T, Norming U et al (1995) Psychological reactions in men screened for prostate cancer. Br J Urol 75:631–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zisman A, Leibovici D, Kleinmann J et al (2001) The impact of prostate biopsy on patient well-being: A prospective study of pain, anxiety and erectile dysfunction. J Urol 165:445–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Adamakis I, Mitropoulos D, Haritopoulos K et al (2004) Pain during transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy: a randomized prospective trial comparing periprostatic infiltration with lidocaine with the intrarectal instillation with lidocaine–prilocain cream. World J Urol 22: 281–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G et al (1997) The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology 49:822–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD et al (1999) Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile function. Int J Impot Res 11:319–326

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Issa MM, Bux S, Chun T et al (2000) A randomized prospective trial of intrarectal lidocaine for pain control during transrectal prostate biopsy: The Emory University experience. J Urol 164:397–399

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollabaugh RS, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS (1997) Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 49:426–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Walker AE, Schelvan C, Rockall AG et al (2002) Does pericapsular lignocaine reduce pain during transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsy of the prostate? Br J Urol 90:883–886

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Roos IAG (2003) Reacting to the diagnosis of prostate cancer: patient learning in a community of practice. Patient Educ Couns 49:219–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schover LR, Fouladi RT, Warneke CL et al (2002) Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer 95:1773–1785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fossa SD, Waehre H, Kurth KH et al (1997) Influence of urological morbidity on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer. Eur Urol 31(suppl 3):3–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Konstantinos N. Haritopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stravodimos, K.G., Haritopoulos, K.N., Alamanis, C. et al. Local Anesthesia During Transrectal Ultrasonography-guided Prostate Biopsy: does it have any Effect on Sexual Function?. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 893–896 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9063-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9063-z

Keywords

Navigation