Skip to main content

Causes of death in older peritoneal dialysis patients—can we depend on registry reports?

Abstract

Objectives

Despite significant improvements in renal management the mortality associated with dialysis care remains high. Many renal registries report mortality statistics on an annual basis. The objectives of this study were (1) to establish the accuracy of the registered cause of death (CoD) against that determined by a panel of physicians; and (2) to test the feasibility of using the HEMO study CoD classification system in patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD).

Setting

Single centre tertiary-care hospital.

Patients and methods

Patients were selected from those aged ≥ 65 years who died while receiving PD. The CoD was identified from that registered with the local renal registry, and from clinical records.

Main outcome measures

(1) Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPV), negative predictive values (NPV) and kappa score comparing registered and extracted CoD. (2) The proportions of deaths in seven categories using two classification systems.

Results

A total of 51 patient charts were reviewed. The agreement between the registered and extracted CoD was poor for all causes of death except malignancy. Kappa scores ranged from 0.55 to 1.0 for different causes. PPV were poor for all except malignancy. Comparison of the CoD was highly dependent on the classification method used (e.g., death secondary to infection was 4% and 25% for CORR and HEMO, respectively).

Conclusions

The registered CoD for patients who die while on PD is often inaccurate. Different policies for classifying deaths can have a significant effect on the final reports, which show the proportion of deaths attributed to different diseases. Standardization across registries is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2002 CORR Preliminary report: preliminary statistics on renal failure and solid organ transplantation in Canada. 2002. Ottawa, Ontario

  2. Woo KT (1993) The Singapore renal registry: an overview. Singapore Med J 34(2):157–163

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Feest TG, Rajamahesh J, Byrne C, Ahmad A, Ansell D, Burden R, et al (2005) Trends in adult renal replacement therapy in the UK: 1982–2002. QJM 98(1):21–28

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. USRDS 2004 Annual data report. Am J Kidney Dis 2005; 45(1 Pt 2):8–280

    Google Scholar 

  5. Erek E, Suleymanlar G, Serdengecti K (2002) Nephrology, dialysis and transplantation in Turkey. Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(12):2087–2093

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conte F, Cappelli G, Casino F, Postorino M, Quintaliani G, Salomone M, et al (2004) Italian Registry of Dialysis and Transplantation: 1996–2001 experience. G␣Ital Nefrol 21(6):561–567

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jager KJ, van Dijk PC, Dekker FW, Stengel B, Simpson K, Briggs JD (2003) The epidemic of aging in renal replacement therapy: an update on elderly patients and their outcomes. Clin Nephrol 60(5):352–360

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/providers/esrd.asp. 3–3-2005

  9. Rocco MV, Yan G, Gassman J, Lewis JB, Ornt D, Weiss B, et al (2002) Comparison of causes of death using HEMO Study and HCFA end-stage renal disease death notification classification systems. The National Institutes of Health-funded Hemodialysis. Health Care Financing Administration. Am J Kidney Dis 39(1):146–153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li SQ, Cass A, Cunningham J (2003) Cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease: assessing concordance of death certificates with registry reports. Aust N Z J Public Health 27(4):419–424

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Perneger TV, Klag MJ, Whelton PK (1993) Cause of death in patients with end-stage renal disease: death certificates vs registry reports. Am J Public Health 83(12):1735–1738

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Modelmog D, Rahlenbeck S, Trichopoulos D (1992) Accuracy of death certificates: a population-based, complete-coverage, one-year autopsy study in East Germany. Cancer Causes Control 3(6):541–546

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grubb GS, Fortney JA, Saleh S, Gadalla S, el Baz A, Feldblum P, et al (1988) A comparison of two cause-of-death classification systems for deaths among women of reproductive age in Menoufia, Egypt. Int J Epidemiol 17(2):385–391

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lloyd-Jones DM, Martin DO, Larson MG, Levy D (1998) Accuracy of death certificates for coding coronary heart disease as the cause of death. Ann Intern Med 129(12):1020–1026

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Muhlhauser I, Sawicki PT, Blank M, Overmann H, Richter B, Berger M (2002) Reliability of causes of death in persons with Type I diabetes. Diabetologia 45(11):1490–1497

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Goraya TY, Jacobsen SJ, Belau PG, Weston SA, Kottke TE, Roger VL (2000) Validation of death certificate diagnosis of out-of-hospital coronary heart disease deaths in Olmsted County, Minnesota. Mayo Clin Proc 75(7):681–687

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maitra S, Jassal SV, Shea J, Chu M, Bargman JM (2001) Increased mortality of elderly female peritoneal dialysis patients with diabetes—a descriptive analysis. Adv Perit Dial 17:117–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lakkireddy DR, Gowda MS, Murray CW, Basarakodu KR, Vacek JL (2004) Death certificate completion: how well are physicians trained and are cardiovascular causes overstated?. Am J Med 117(7):492–498

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarbjit V. Jassal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maitra, S., Sekercioglu, N., Baloch, S. et al. Causes of death in older peritoneal dialysis patients—can we depend on registry reports?. Int Urol Nephrol 39, 345–350 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9032-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-006-9032-6

Keywords

  • Renal registries
  • Mortality
  • Peritoneal dialysis
  • Agreement statistics
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Positive and negative predictive values