Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The surgical results of the pubovaginal sling procedure using Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS) for stress urinary incontinence

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the surgical results and complications of the Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS) procedure in women with stress urinary incontinence. Patients and methods: A total of 72 women with urethral hypermobility underwent the pubovaginal sling procedure using IVS with a mean age of 50.35±9.07 years. Average Body Mass Index, mean parity and daily mean pad usage was 29.2±3.5, 3.7±1.74 and 2.9±1.76, respectively. Preoperative urge incontinence was observed in 61.12% of the patients. The mean follow-up was 13.87±2.4 months. The operative time, postoperative urge symptoms, de novo detrusor instability and complications were all documented. Results: The mean operating time was 25 min (18–40 min). Though postoperative first monthly controls proved 95.8% total dryness, the cure and improvement rates declined to 45.4% and 24.2% in 66 patients who completed 1 year of follow-up. The overall success and patient satisfaction rates were 69.6% and 87.5% respectively. De novo detrusor instability was observed in five patients (6.9%) whereas detrusor instability persisted in 25% of the patients. Bladder perforation and prolonged urinary retention developed in 11.1% of the patients. No signs of hematoma, infection and erosion were detected. Conclusion: IVS is an easy procedure with low complication rates and it takes about 25 min. In spite of lower cure rates than the alternative surgical techniques, patient satisfaction rates seemed to be similar. Low cure rates may be due to either from inappropriate patient selection or from the biochemical and biomechanical properties of the polypropylene mesh. For this reason, randomized controlled trials and animal experiments should be evaluated for a further decision on the success rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Petros PE, Ulmsten U and Papadimitriou J (1990). The Autogenic Neoligament procedure: a technique for planned formation of an artificial neo-ligament. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 153: 43–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Petros PE and Ulmsten UI (1993). An integral theory and its method for the diagnosis and management of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 153: 7–31

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ulmsten U and Petros P (1995). Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS). An ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol 29: 75–82

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Falconer C, Ekman-Ordeberg G and Malmström A (1996). Clinical outcome and changes in connective tissue metabolism after intravaginal slingplasty in stress incontinence women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7: 133–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Petros PP (1996). The intravaginal slingplasty operation. a minimally invasive technique for cure of urinary incontinence in the female. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 36: 453–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Petros PE (1997). New ambulatory surgical methods using an anatomical classification of urinary dysfunction improve stress, urge and abnormal emptying. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 8: 270–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Merlin T, Arnold E and Petros P (2001). A systematic review of tension-free urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence: intravaginal slingplasty and tension-free vaginal tape. BJU International 88: 871–880

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Law NW and Ellis H (1991). A comparison of polypropylene mesh and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene patch for the repair of contaminated abdominal wall defects – an experimental study. Surgery 109: 652–655

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kassardjian ZG (2004). Sling procedures for urinary incontinence in women. BJU International 93: 665–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Petros PP (1999). Medium – term follow up of the intravaginal slingplasty operation indicates minimal deterioration of urinary continence with time. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 39: 354–356

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsson CG, Kuuva N and Falconer C (2001). Long-term results of the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urolgynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12: 5–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haab F, Sananes S and Amarenco G (2001). Results of tension-free vaginal tape procedure for the treatment of type II stress urinary incontinence at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. J Urol 165: 159–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Peschers UM, Tunn R and Buczkowski M (2000). Tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Clin Obstet Gynecol 43: 670–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pifarotti P, Meschia M, Gattei U et al. Multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Proceedings of the ICS Congress Abstract 2004; 66

  15. Lim YN, Rane A, Barry C et al. The suburethral slingplasty evaluation study in North Queensland (suspend): a randomized controlled trial. Proceedings of the ICS Congress Abstract 2004; 67

  16. Krause H, Goh J, Forward M et al. Biomechanical properties of meshes. Proceedings of the ICS Congress Abstract 2004; 19

  17. Krause H, Goh J, Khoo SK et al. Biocompatible properties of surgical mesh using an animal model. Proceedings of the ICS Congress Abstract 2004; 20

  18. Samli MM, Demirbas M and Guler C (2004). Early tissue reactions in the rat bladder wall after contact with three different synthetic mesh materials. BJU International 93: 617–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dora CD, Dimarco DS and Zobitz ME (2004). Time dependent variations in biomechanical properties of cadaveric fascia, porcine dermis, porcine small intestine submucosa, polypropylene mesh and autologous fascia in the rabbit model: implications for sling surgery. J Urol 171: 1970–1973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falconer C, Soderberg M and Blomgren B (2001). Influence of different sling materials on connective tissue metabolism in stress urinary incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dsyfunct 12: 19–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deval B, Levardon M and Samain E (2003). A French multicenter clinical trial of SPARC for stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 44: 254–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boustead GB (2002). The tension-free vaginal tape for treating female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Interantional 89: 687–693

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Clemens JQ and Faeber GJ (2000). Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology 56: 589–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Glavind K and Sander P (2004). Erosion, defective healing and extrusion after tension-free urethropexy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 15: 179–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Staskin DR and Plzak L (2002). Synthetic slings: pros and cons. Curr Urol Rep 3: 414–417

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lobel B, Manunta A and Rodriguez A (2001). The management of female stress urinary incontinence using the sling procedure. BJU International 88: 832–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erem Kaan Basok.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Basok, E.K., Yildirim, A., Atsu, N. et al. The surgical results of the pubovaginal sling procedure using Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS) for stress urinary incontinence. Int Urol Nephrol 38, 507–512 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-8575-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-8575-2

Keywords

Navigation