Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Renal cell carcinoma: The influence of new diagnostic imaging techniques on the size and stage of tumors diagnosed over the past 26 years

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have analyzed data collected over a 26-year period for influences of new diagnostic imaging techniques (ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging) on the size, stage, and other parameters of renal cell carcinomas at the time of first diagnosis. We reviewed retrospectively the records of 203 patients who underwent operations at our institutions from 1973 to 1999. All the patients suffered from renal cell carcinoma. With this study we attempted to answer four questions regarding changes over this time span: (1) have new imaging techniques lead to a reduction in the median diameter of the tumor upon first diagnosis, (2) has the tumor stage decreased due to earlier diagnosis, (3) is there any correlation between tumor size and tumor stage, and (4) are the patient's early diagnoses at a younger age? Other parameters such as infiltration of the renal pelvis and the cell type were also examined. The tumor size and stage at the time of diagnosis and treatment are positively correlated, and both decrease significantly over the time span examined. There is also a strong association between tumor size and infiltration of the renal pelvis. The median age of the patients did not significantly change over time. The wider use of improved imaging techniques has significantly changed the clinical appearance of the renal cell carcinoma. The question is whether these techniques have also affected the prognosis of the disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G Vallancien L Torres E Gurfinkel et al. (1990) ArticleTitleIncidental detection of renal tumors by abdominal ultrasonography Eur Urol (Switzerland) 18 IssueID2 94–96 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D3s7ms1Y%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. WY Siow SK Yip LG Ng PH Tan WS Cheng KT Foo (2000) ArticleTitleRenal cell carcinoma: incidental detection and pathological staging R Coll Surg Edinb 45 IssueID5 291–295 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fls1Ogtw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. LG Luciani R Cestari C Tallarigo (2000) ArticleTitleIncidental renal cell carcinoma age and stage characterization and clinical implications: study of 1092 patients (1982–1997) Urology 56 IssueID1 58–62 Occurrence Handle10869624 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czovFyhsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(00)00534-3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. JP Sweeney JA Thornhill R Graiger TE McDermott MR Butler (1996) ArticleTitleIncidentally detected renal cell carcinoma: pathological features, survival trends and implications for treatment Br J Urol 78 IssueID3 351–353 Occurrence Handle8881940 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD3snivFY%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebert T, Owusu G, Strotmann P et al. Do we need screening for renal cell carcinoma (RCC)? J Urol suppl. 1999; 161: 169, abstract 651

  6. SJ Smith MA Bosniak AJ Megibow et al. (1989) ArticleTitleRenal cell carcinoma: earlier discovery and increased detection Radiology 170 699–703 Occurrence Handle2644658 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaC38bjtlU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y Homma K Kawabe T Kitamura (1995) ArticleTitleIncreased incidental detection and reduced mortality in renal cancer: recent retrospective analysis at eight institutions Int J Urol 2 IssueID2 77–80 Occurrence Handle7553292 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymD2MrptVY%3D Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF02253060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. JW Konnak HB Grossman (1985) ArticleTitleRenal cell carcinoma as an incidental finding J Urol 134 IssueID6 1094–1096 Occurrence Handle4057398 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD3sjltlc%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. IM Thompson M Peek (1988) ArticleTitleImprovement in survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: the role of the serendipitously detected tumor J Urol 140 IssueID3 487–490 Occurrence Handle3411657 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieA3Mjgs1Q%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. MR Licht AC Novick M Goormastic (1994) ArticleTitleNephron sparing surgery in incidental versus suspected renal cell carcinoma J Urol 152 IssueID1 39–42 Occurrence Handle8201682 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB28%2FmtFI%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O Nativ S Edmond G Raviv et al. (1997) ArticleTitleThe impact of tumor size on clinical outcome in patients with localized renal cell carcinoma treated by radical nephrectomy J Urol 158 IssueID3 Pt 1 729–732 Occurrence Handle9258069 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiH3c3mvFU%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. W Frank P Guinan D Stuhldreher et al. (1993) ArticleTitleRenal cell carcinoma: the size variable J Surg Oncol 54 IssueID3 163–166 Occurrence Handle8412171 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuD3MjotVE%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. F Erdogan A Demirel O Polat (2004) ArticleTitlePrognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma Int J Clin Pract 58 IssueID4 333–336 Occurrence Handle15161115 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c3mt1Wiuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1368-5031.2004.00008.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. J Miller C Fischer R Freese M Altmannsberger W Weidner (1999) ArticleTitleNephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma – is tumor size a suitable parameter for indication? Urology 54 IssueID6 988–993 Occurrence Handle10604695 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FmvVWqtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00347-7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. BC Leibovich ML Blute JC Cheville CM Lohse AL Weaver H Zincke (2004) ArticleTitleNephron sparing surgery for appropriately selected renal cell carcinoma between 4 and 7 cm results in outcome similar to radical nephrectomy J Urol 171 IssueID3 1066–1070 Occurrence Handle14767272 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.ju.0000113274.40885.db

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavros Touloupidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Touloupidis, S., Papathanasiou, A., Kalaitzis, C. et al. Renal cell carcinoma: The influence of new diagnostic imaging techniques on the size and stage of tumors diagnosed over the past 26 years. Int Urol Nephrol 38, 193–197 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-4762-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-4762-4

Keywords

Navigation