Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Penile Metastases of Extragenitourinary Cancers

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The aim of present study is to evaluate the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in different types of penile metastases. Materials and methods: In this report, we present three cases of penile metastases that have been developed secondary to extragenitourinary malignancies. Two of them did not have any primary malignancy history.Results: Penile biopsies were performed in all patients and metastatic penile tumours were found due to extragenitourinary malignancies. Penile MRI was performed before biopsies. The findings of MRI were correlated with histopathologic diagnosis. Moreover, penile MRI was found to be more sensitive in the evaluation of the lesions than ultrasonography.Conclusion: MRI can be accepted as a reliable non-invasive method for the evaluation of the extent of penile metastases and involvement of tunica albuginea or urethral.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. JK Burgers RA Badalement JR Drago (1992) ArticleTitlePenile cancer: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, staging Urol Clin North Am 19 247–256 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B2crmtFU%3D Occurrence Handle1574815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. DF Lynch SuffixJr CA Pettaway (2002) Tumors of the penis PC Walsh AB Retik ED Vaughan SuffixJr AJ Wein (Eds) Campbell’s Urology Saunders Philadelphia 2945–2981

    Google Scholar 

  3. G Escribano A Allona FJ Burgos et al. (1987) ArticleTitleCavernosography in diagnosis of metastatic tumors of the penis: 5 new cases and a review of the literature J Urol 138 1174–1177 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BieD3snisVQ%3D Occurrence Handle3312640

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. FS Haddad A Kovac A Kivirand B Sonkin (1985) ArticleTitleCavernosography in diagnosis of penile metastases secondary to bladder cancer Urology 26 585–586 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0090-4295(85)90369-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BimD2s7os1M%3D Occurrence Handle4071872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. F Nakayama S Sheth CI Caskey UM Hamper (1997) ArticleTitlePenile metastasis from prostate cancer: Diagnosis with sonography J Ultrasound Med 16 751–753 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FisVGmtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9360239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. R Andresen HEH Wegner S Dieberg (1997) ArticleTitlePenile metastasis of sigmoid carcinoma: Comparative analysis of different imaging modalities Br J Urol 79 477–478 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2czjvVA%3D Occurrence Handle9117237

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. SM Sagar S Retsas (1992) ArticleTitleMetastases to the penis from malignant melanoma: Case report and review of the literature Clin Oncol 4 130–131 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0936-6555(05)80985-9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3cjotFE%3D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. TN Lau CJ Wakeley P Goddard (1999) ArticleTitleMagnetic resonance imaging of penile metastases: A report on five cases Austral Radiol 43 378–381 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czptVOgsw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N Dobos HL Nisenbaum L Axel KV Arsdalen JE Tomaszewski (2001) ArticleTitlePenile leiomyosarcoma: Sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging findings J Ultrasound Med 20 553–557 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3ktFemsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11345115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Murad Basar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kendi, T., Batislam, E., Basar, M.M. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Penile Metastases of Extragenitourinary Cancers. Int Urol Nephrol 38, 105–109 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-0256-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-005-0256-7

Keywords

Navigation