Skip to main content
Log in

Co-Coatomically Supplemented Modules

  • Published:
Ukrainian Mathematical Journal Aims and scope

It is shown that if a submodule N of M is co-coatomically supplemented and M/N has no maximal submodule, then M is a co-coatomically supplemented module. If a module M is co-coatomically supplemented, then every finitely M-generated module is a co-coatomically supplemented module. Every left R-module is co-coatomically supplemented if and only if the ring R is left perfect. Over a discrete valuation ring, a module M is co-coatomically supplemented if and only if the basic submodule of M is coatomic. Over a nonlocal Dedekind domain, if the torsion part T(M) of a reduced module M has a weak supplement in M, then M is co-coatomically supplemented if and only if M/T (M) is divisible and T P (M) is bounded for each maximal ideal P. Over a nonlocal Dedekind domain, if a reduced module M is co-coatomically amply supplemented, then M/T (M) is divisible and T P (M) is bounded for each maximal ideal P. Conversely, if M/T (M) is divisible and T P (M) is bounded for each maximal ideal P, then M is a co-coatomically supplemented module.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. Aizade, G. Bilhan, and P. F. Smith, “Modules whose maximal submodules have supplements,” Comm. Algebra, 29, 2389–2405 (2001).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. E. Büyükaşık, Weakly and CofinitelyWeak Supplemented Modules over Dedekind Ring: PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylül University (2005).

  3. E. Büyükaşık and C. Lomp, “Rings whose modules are weakly supplemented are perfect. Applications to certain ring extensions,” Math. Scand., 105, 25–30 (2009).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Büyükaşık and D. Pusat-Yılmaz, “Modules whose maximal submodules are supplements,” Hacet. J. Math. Stat., 39, No. 4, 477–487 (2010).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Clark, C. Lomp, N. Vanaja, and R. Wisbauer, Lifting Modules, Birkhäuser-Verlag (2006).

  6. I. Kaplansky, “Modules over Dedekind rings and valuation rings,” Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 72, 327–340 (1952).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Y. Lam, Lectures on Modules and Rings, Springer (1999).

  8. P. F. Smith, “Finitely generated supplemented modules are amply supplemented,” Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 25, 69–80 (2000).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Wisbauer, Foundations of Modules and Rings, Gordon & Breach (1991).

  10. H. Zöschinger, “Komplementierte moduln über Dedekindringen,” J. Algebra, 29, 42–56 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. H. Zöschinger, “Moduln die in jeder Erweiterung ein Komplement haben,” Math. Scand., 35, 267–287 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Zöschinger and F. Rosenberg, “Koatomare moduln,” Math. Z., 170, 221–232 (1980).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Published in Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal, Vol. 69, No. 7, pp. 867–876, July, 2017.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alizade, R., Güngӧr, S. Co-Coatomically Supplemented Modules. Ukr Math J 69, 1007–1018 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-017-1411-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-017-1411-x

Navigation