First, we propose a weighted extension of the D&P Shapley value and then study several equivalences between the potentializability and other properties. On the basis of these equivalences and consistency, we also propose two axiomatizations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Calvo and J. C. Santos, “Potential in cooperative TU-games,” Math. Soc. Sci., 34, 175–190 (1997).
J. Derks and H. Peters, “A Shapley value for games with restricted coalitions,” Int. J. Game Theory, 21, 351–360 (1993).
S. Hart and A. Mas-Colell, “Potential, value and consistency,” Econometrica, 57, 589–614 (1989).
Y. A. Hwang and Y. H. Liao, “Potential approach and characterizations of a Shapley value in multichoice games,” Math. Soc. Sci., 56, 321–335 (2008).
F. Klijn, M. Slikker, and J. Zazuelo, “Characterizations of a multichoice value,” Int. J. Game Theory, 28, 521–532 (1999).
K. M. Ortmann, “Preservation of differences, potential, conservity,” Working Paper, Univ. Bielefeld, No. 236 (1995).
K. M. Ortmann, “Conservation of energy in nonatomic games,” Working Paper, Univ. Bielefeld, No. 237 (1995).
L. S. Shapley, “A value for n-person game,” Ann. Math. Stud., Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 28, 307–317 (1953).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Published in Ukrains’kyi Matematychnyi Zhurnal, Vol. 68, No. 1, pp. 131–141, January, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, YH. The D&P Shapley Value: a Weighted Extension. Ukr Math J 68, 144–157 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-016-1214-5
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11253-016-1214-5