Skip to main content
Log in

Differences between urban and natural populations of dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion damaranum): a case of urban warfare?

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urbanisation creates novel environments, not only through (abiotic) microhabitat alterations, but also due to changes in (biotic) inter- and intraspecific interactions. Where sheltering sites in urban habitats are limited, intra or interspecific interactions may increase, resulting in increased competition and changes in predation risk in urban areas compared to natural habitats. The Knysna Dwarf Chameleon (Bradypodion damaranum) occurs in both urban and natural settings, is extremely ornamented, and individuals have been observed with multiple wounds and scars. We therefore hypothesised that urban populations may have adapted to the physical features of urban habitats, and that this would be detectable through ornament size and bite force, as well as the presence of scarring. We quantified these traits from urban and natural populations from two separate localities (the towns of George and Knysna, South Africa). Our results showed that female and male B. damaranum from urban populations had a higher number of injuries and that urban males were more likely to be injured than males from natural habitats. Bite force was only recorded at one locality (Knysna), but both sexes in urban habitats had higher bite force when accounting for casque height as compared to those from the natural habitats. Urban chameleons also had less developed ornamentation but wider and/or higher heads compared to populations in natural habitats. Urban habitats had significantly lower tree density than natural habitats, and this may be a factor in driving the morphological differences between populations, whereby reduced ornamentation confers an advantage for remaining cryptic to predators in the open habitat but compromises the ability for signalling conspecifics with encounters escalating to physical contests.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Matthew Adair, Jessica da Silva, Azraa Ebrahim, Juan-Jacques Forgus, Devon Main, Jody Taft, and Bettine van Vuuren for assistance with field work and logistics, and Colleen Seymour for assistance with statical approaches and R coding. Research was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Dimensions of Biodiversity Program (Grant no. 136381). Permission to carry out this work was granted by CapeNature (CN44-59-11927) and South African National Parks under a research agreement. Ethical clearance was granted by the University of Witwatersrand (2019/10/56/B) and the University of Johannesburg (2019/10/10).

Funding

Research was funded by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Dimensions of Biodiversity Program (Grant no. 136381).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Funding for this study was generated by Krystal A. Tolley and Graham J. Alexander. All authors contributed to the study conception and design, and carried out field work for data collection. Melissa A. Petford and Krystal A. Tolley carried out analyses and wrote the initial drafts of the manuscript, and all authors contributed to the text, and edited all versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa A. Petford.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Ethical clearance was granted by the University of Witwatersrand (2019/10/56/B) and the University of Johannesburg (2019/10/10).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petford, M.A., Herrel, A., Alexander, G.J. et al. Differences between urban and natural populations of dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion damaranum): a case of urban warfare?. Urban Ecosyst 27, 577–589 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01474-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01474-1

Keywords

Navigation