Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Confluences and land cover as agents of change: habitat change modifies the movement and assemblage stability of headwater fishes

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interspersed inputs of wood and sediment bring about morphological change at confluences and the extent to which these processes are modified by anthropogenic disturbance has ramifications for stream fish assemblages. In this study, we used a 2X2 design and mark-recapture methods to assess the influences of confluence size (> 0.6, < 0.6) and upstream land cover (dominantly forested or urban) on reach-scale habitat change, the movement rate of three functional groups of stream fishes, and fish assemblage change at four headwater confluences in a Gulf Coastal Plain drainage in the southeastern United States. We found little evidence to suggest that confluence size contributed to differences in upstream mainstream and downstream mainstem habitat characteristics. Land cover did cause reach-scale, dissimilarities in channel morphology, streamflow, and physical complexity. Therefore, we suggest that physical complexity affected fluvial geomorphic processes and regulated base flow, thus influencing the magnitude of reach-scale habitat change. Accordingly, greater movement by water-column specialists in our urban reaches suggest that land cover indirectly modified this functional group’s ecological response to reach-scale habitat change. Furthermore, our results indicated that the degree of intra-reach, assemblage change was likely a corollary of channel morphology stability. Our understanding of the extent to which land cover alters the geomorphic and ecological gradients associated with headwater confluences will be critical to ensure the conservation of sensitive species whose fitness is dependent on the integrity of these habitats.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from FigShare (https://figshare.com/authors/Joshua_Hubbell/10065745).

Code availability

The code used in the analyses in this study is available from FigShare (https://figshare.com/authors/Joshua_Hubbell/10065745).

References

  • Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Dorai-Raj S (2004) Ecological correlates of fish movement in a network of Virginia streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61:857–869. https://doi.org/10.1139/F04-096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (2004) Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:257–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angermeier PL, Karr JR (1984) Relationships between woody debris and fish habitat in a small warmwater stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 113(6):716–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bangs BL, Falcy MR, Scheerer PD, Clements S (2013) Comparison of three methods for marking a small floodplain minnow. Anim Biotelemetry 1:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2050-3385-1-18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baras E (1992) Etude des stratØgies d’occupation du temps et de l’espace chez le barbeau fluviatile, Barbus barbus (L.). [Time and space utilisation strategies in the common barbel, Barbus barbus (L.)]. Cahiers d’Ethologie 12(2–3):318

  • Belica LAT, Rahel FJ (2008) Movements of creek chubs, Semotilus atromaculatus, among habitat patches in a plains stream. Ecol Freshw Fish 17:258–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2007.00277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Dunne T (1997) Stochastic forcing of sediment supply to channel networks from landsliding and debris flow. Water Resour Res 33(12):2849–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda L, Veldhuisen C, Black J (2003) Debris flows as agents of morphological heterogeneity at low-order confluences, Olympic Mountains, Washington. Geol Soc Am Bull 115:1110–1121. https://doi.org/10.1130/B25265.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda LE, Cundy TW (1990) Predicting deposition of debris flows in mountain channels. Can Geotech 27:409–417. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda LEE, Poff NL, Miller D, Dunne T, Reeves G, Pess G, Pollock M (2004) The network dynamics hypothesis: how channel networks structure riverine habitats. Bioscience 54:413–427. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0413:TNDHHC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boddy NC, Booker DJ, McIntosh AR (2019) Confluence configuration of river networks controls spatial patterns in fish communities. Landsc Ecol 34(1):187–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown DK, Echelle AA, Propst DL, Brooks JE, Fisher WL (2001) Catastrophic wildfire and number of populations as factors influencing risk of extinction for Gila trout (Oncorhynchus gilae). Western North Am Nat 61:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) A practical information-theoretic approach. Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd ed. Springer, New York

  • Campbell Grant EH, Lowe WH, Fagan WF (2007) Living in the branches: Population dynamics and ecological processes in dendritic networks. Ecol Lett 10:165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Catalano MJ, Chipps SR, Bouchard MA, Wahl DH (2001) Evaluation of injectable fluorescent tags for marking centrarchid fishes: retention rate and effects on vulnerability to predation. N Am J Fish Manag 21(4):911–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart CN, Gido KB, McKinstry MC (2015) Fish community distributions and movements in two tributaries of the San Juan River, USA. Trans Am Fisheries Soc 144:1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/00028487.2015.1054515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cathcart CN, Gido KB, McKinstry MC, MacKinnon PD (2018) Patterns of fish movement at a desert river confluence. Ecol Freshw Fish 27:492–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12364

  • Clark SR, Schaefer JF (2016) Ecological influences on the local movement dynamics of the blackspotted topminnow, Fundulus olivaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:557–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-016-2073-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins KW (1962) An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples with special emphasis on lotic waters. Am Midl Nat 67:477–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/2422722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dala-Corte RB, Becker FG, Melo AS (2017) The importance of metacommunity processes for longterm turnover of riffle-dwelling fish assemblages depends on spatial position within a dendritic network. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 74(1):101–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolloff CA, Warren ML (2003) Fish relationships with large wood in small streams. Am Fish Soc Symp 37:179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR (1992) Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 169–175

  • Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–762. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.266.5186.753

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan WF (2002) Connectivity, fragmentation, and extinction risk in dendritic metapopulations. Ecology 83:3243–3249. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658%282002%29083%5B3243%3ACFAERI%5D2.0.CO%3B2

  • Fraser DF, Gilliam JF, Daley MJ, Le AN, Skalski GT (2001) Explaining leptokurtic movement distributions: intrapopulation variation in boldness and exploration. Am Nat 158:124–135. https://doi.org/10.1086/321307

  • Gorman OT, Karr JR (1978) Habitat structure and stream fish communities. Ecology 59(3):507–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenouillet G, Pont D, Hérissé C (2004) Within-basin fish assemblage structure: the relative influence of habitat versus stream spatial position on local species richness. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 61(1):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman GD, Sabo JL (2010) Incorporating environmental variation into models of community stability: examples from stream fish. In: American Fisheries Society Symposium, vol 73. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 407–426 (Symposium 73)

  • Gurnell A, Tockner K, Edwards P, Petts G (2005) Effects of deposited wood on biocomplexity of river corridors. Front Ecol Environ 3:377–382. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295%282005%29003%5B0377%3AEODWOB%5D2.0.CO%3B2

  • Hardison EC, O’Driscoll MA, DeLoatch JP, Howard RJ, Brinson MM (2009) Urban land use, channel incision, and water table decline along coastal plain streams, North Carolina. J Am Water Resour Assoc 45:1032–1046. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00345

  • He S, Mayden RL, Wang X, Wang W, Tang KL, Chen WJ, Chen Y (2008) Molecular phylogenetics of the family Cyprinidae (Actinopterygii: Cypriniformes) as evidenced by sequence variation in the first intron of S7 ribosomal protein-coding gene: Further evidence from a nuclear gene of the systematic chaos in the family. Mol Phylogenet Evol 46:818–829

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt NP, Angermeier PL (2008) Evidence for fish movement from spatial analysis of stream network topology. J North Am Benthol Soc 27:304–320. https://doi.org/10.1899/07-096.1

  • Hitt NP, Angermeier PL (2011) Fish community and bioassessment responses to stream network position. J North Am Benthol Soc 30(1):296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DL, Bird SA, Hassan MA (1998) Spatial and temporal evolution of small coastal gravel-bed streams: influence of forest management on channel morphology and fish habitats. Gravel-bed River Environ 365–392.

  • Hubbell J, Warren, ML, Schaefer JF, Sterling K, Flood PJ (2020) Fragmentation alters ecological gradients and headwater fish assemblage composition relative to land use in a dendritic river system. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 77:1281–1291. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2019-0080

  • Hupp CR (2000) Hydrology, geomorphology and vegetation of Coastal Plain rivers in the southeastern USA. Hydrol Process 14:2991–3010. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1085%28200011/12%2914%3A16/17<2991%3A%3AAID-HYP131>3.0.CO%3B2-H

  • Johnson AM, Rodine JR (1984) Debris flow. In: Brunsden D, Prior DB (ed.) Slope Instability. Wiley & Sons. Sussex, England

  • Johnston CE (2000) Movement patterns of imperiled blue shiners (Pisces: Cyprinidae) among habitat patches. Ecol Freshw Fish 9(3):170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiffney PM, Greene CM, Hall JE, Davies JR (2006) Tributary streams create spatial discontinuities in habitat, biological productivity, and diversity in mainstem rivers. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:2518–2530. https://doi.org/10.1139/f06-138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott J, Mueller M, Pander J, Geist J (2020) Seasonal and diurnal variation of downstream fish movement at four small‐scale hydropower plants. Ecol Freshw Fish 29:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/eff.12489

  • Koed A, Baktoft H, Bak BD (2006) Causes of mortality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta) smolts in a restored river and its estuary. River Res Appl 22(1):69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leal CG, Pompeu PS, Gardner TA, Leitão RP, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Mac Nally R (2016) Multi-scale assessment of human-induced changes to Amazonian instream habitats. Landsc Ecol 31:1725–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-016-0358-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1966) The strategy of model building in population biology. Am Sci 54(4):421–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Eugenio EC (2018) A review and comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based inferences in beta regression and zero-or-one-inflated beta regression. Stat Meth Med Res 27:1024–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonzarich DG, Lonzarich MR, Warren ML Jr (2000) Effects of riffle length on the short-term movement of fishes among stream pools. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1508–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews WJ, Marsh-Matthews E, Cashner RC, Gelwick F (2013) Disturbance and trajectory of change in a stream fish community over four decades. Oecologia 173(3):955–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Near TJ, Bossu CM, Bradburd GS, Carlson RL, Harrington RC, Hollingsworth PR Jr, Etnier DA (2011) Phylogeny and temporal diversification of darters (Percidae:Etheostomatinae). Syst Biol 60:565–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Near TJ, Kim D (2021) Phylogeny and time scale of diversification in the fossil-rich sunfishes and black basses (Teleostei: Percomorpha: Centrarchidae). Mol Phylogenet Evol 161:107156

  • Neufeld K, Blair S, Poesch M (2015) Retention and stress effects of visible implant tags when marking Western Silvery Minnow and its application to other cyprinids (Family Cyprinidae). North Am J Fish Manage 35:1070–1076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Padgham M, Webb JA (2010) Multiple structural modifications to dendritic ecological networks produce simple responses. Ecol Model 221:2537–2545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennock CA, Bender D, Hofmeier J, Mounts JA, Waters R, Weaver VD, Gido KB (2018) Can fishways mitigate fragmentation effects on Great Plains fish communities? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 75(1):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkin JS, Gido KB (2012) Fragmentation alters stream fish community structure in dendritic ecological networks. Ecol Appl 22:2176–2187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads BL (1987) Changes in stream channel characteristics at tributary junctions. Phys Geogr 8:346–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice SP, Greenwood MT, Joyce CB (2001) Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organization of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:824–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley JW (2009) Assessing morphological adjustments of stream channels in the Piedmont area of Georgia. Thesis, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA. M.Sc

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JH, Angermeier PL (2004) A comparison of injectable fluorescent marks in two genera of darters: Effects on survival and retention rates. North Am J Fish Manage 24:1017–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts JH, Angermeier PL (2007) Spatiotemporal variability of stream habitat and movement of three species of fish. Oecologia 151:417–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez MA (2002) Restricted movement in stream fish: the paradigm is incomplete, not lost. Ecology 83:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roni P, Quinn TP (2001) Effects of wood placement on movements of trout and juvenile coho salmon in natural and artificial stream channels. Trans Am Fish Soc 130:675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross ST, Matthews WJ, Echelle AA (1985) Persistence of stream fish assemblages: effects of environmental change. Am Nat 126(1):24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer J (2001) Riffles as barriers to interpool movement by three cyprinids (Notropis boops, Campostoma anomalum and Cyprinella venusta). Freshw Biol 46:379–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneid BP, Anderson CJ, Feminella JW (2017) The influence of low-intensity watershed development on the hydrology, geomorphology, physicochemistry and macroinvertebrate diversity of small coastal plains streams. Ecol Eng 108:380–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalski GT, Gilliam JF (2000) Modeling diffusive spread in a heterogeneous population: a movement study with stream fish. Ecology 81:1685–1700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TA, Kraft CE (2005) Stream fish assemblages in relation to landscape position and local habitat variables. Trans Am Fish Soc 134:430–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stow AJ, Sunnucks P, Briscoe DA, Gardner MG (2001) The impact of habitat fragmentation on movement of Cunningham’s skink (Egernia cunninghami): Evidence from allelic and genotypic analyses of microsatellites. Molec Ecol 10:867–878

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, Cooke SJ (2012) Meta-analyses of the effects of river flow on fish movement and activity. Environ Rev 20(4):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornbrugh DJ, Gido KB (2010) Influence of spatial positioning within stream networks on fish assemblage structure in the Kansas River basin, USA. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 67(1):143–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Geological Survey (2006) The national hydrography dataset plus. Retrieved from http://www.horizon-systems.com/NHDPlus/index.php. Accessed 1 May 2015

  • Utz RM, Hilderbrand RH, Raesly RL (2010) Regional differences in patterns of fish species loss with changing land use. Biol Conserv 143:688–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker RH, Adams GL (2016) Ecological factors influencing movement of creek chub in an intermittent stream of the Ozark Mountains, Arkansas. Ecol Freshw Fish 25:190–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Bannerman R (2001) Impacts of urbanization on stream habitat and fish across multiple spatial scales. Environ Manage 28:255–266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warren ML Jr, Pardew MG (1998) Road crossings as barriers to small-stream fish movement. Trans Am Fish Soc 127:637–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiens JA (2002) Riverine landscapes: taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshw Biol 47(4):501–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JM, Dodd HR, Finn DS (2020) A low-water crossing impacts Northern Hog Sucker Hypentelium nigricans movement in an Ozark stream. J Freshw Ecol 35:157–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Andrew Coombes, Sarah Barrett, Austin Grieshober, Matthew Aiken, William McFarland, and Brian Kreiser for their assistance with field collections.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Department of Agriculture (USDA) US Forest Service and The University of Southern Mississippi Department of Biological Sciences.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, 39406, USA

    Joshua P. Hubbell & Jacob F. Schaefer

Authors
  1. Joshua P. Hubbell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jacob F. Schaefer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceived and designed the investigation: JPH, JFS. Performed field and/or laboratory work: JPH. Analyzed the data: JPH. Contributed materials, reagents, and/or analysis tools: JPH. Wrote and edited the paper: JPH, JFS.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua P. Hubbell.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

All sampling protocols were approved by the University of Southern Mississippi’s Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC 09-007).

Consent to participate

Not Applicable.

Consent for publication

Not Applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare there are no competing interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hubbell, J.P., Schaefer, J.F. Confluences and land cover as agents of change: habitat change modifies the movement and assemblage stability of headwater fishes. Urban Ecosyst 25, 1297–1312 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01229-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01229-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation