Downsizing for downtown: limb lengths, toe lengths, and scale counts decrease with urbanization in western fence lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis)
Urbanization-induced habitat loss and alteration causes significant challenges for the survival of many species. Identifying how species respond to urbanization can yield insights for the conservation of wildlife, but research on reptiles has been narrowly-focused. We compared morphology among four populations of western fence lizards (Sceloporus occidentalis) to determine whether a common native species affected by urbanization exhibits morphological differences consistent with habitat use. We quantified habitat differences across four sites in Los Angeles County, California, USA that varied in level of urbanization, measured how lizards used microhabitats, and assessed variation in body size, limb length, toe length, and scalation of lizards collected from each site. Urban and suburban populations of fence lizards mostly used human-made substrates while lizards from more natural areas mostly used natural woody substrates. Lizards from the most urban site also exhibited the widest breadth of substrates used, indicating that urban sites might offer more variable microhabitats. Urban lizards had reduced limb lengths and toe lengths consistent with how they used microhabitats and other habitat characteristics (e.g., percent impervious surface cover). Urban lizards also had fewer dorsal scales, which might be associated with changes in ambient temperature (e.g., urban heat island effect), given that lizards with fewer and larger scales typically have reduced evaporative water loss. Our results uniquely differ from past studies on lizard responses to urbanization, indicating that work on diverse taxa is necessary to assess the potential varied pathways of morphological adaptations to urban environments.
KeywordsBehavior Phenotypic change HIREC Urban evolution Reptile Thermal ecology
We thank Lauren Chan, Maria Florencia-Caruso, Kris Kaiser, and Stevie Kennedy-Gold for help in collecting specimens, Jane Li for geospatial analyses, and Kristin Winchell, Lindsey Swierk, and members of the Urban Nature Research Center at the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County for comments on earlier drafts. This work was funded by a Postdoctoral Research Fellowship in Biology from the National Science Foundation (DBI-1611562 to BJP), the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (R25GM055052 awarded to T. Hasson and MG), and the Urban Nature Research Center.
- Badyaev AV, Young RL, Oh KP, Addison C (2008) Evolution on a local scale: developmental, functional, and genetic bases of divergence in bill form and associated changes in song structure between adjacent habitats. Evolution 62:1951–1964. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00428.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fick SE, Hijmans RJ (2017) Worldclim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areasGoogle Scholar
- Hellmich WC (1951) On ecotypic and autotypic characters, a contribution to the knowledge of the evolution of the genus Liolaemus (Iguanidae). Evolution 5:359–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1951.tb02794.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kaliontzopoulou A, Carretero MA, Llorente GA (2010) Intraspecific ecomorphological variation: linear and geometric morphometrics reveal habitat-related patterns within Podarcis bocagei wall lizards. J Evol Biol 23:1234–1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.01984.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kokko H, Sutherland WJ (2001) Ecological traps in changing environments: ecological and evolutionary consequences of a behaviourally mediated Allee effect. Evol Ecol Res 3:537–551Google Scholar
- Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Losos JB (2009) Lizards in an evolutionary tree: ecology and adaptive radiation of anoles. California University Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
- Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sheldahl LA, Martins EP (2000) The territorial behavior of the western fence lizard, Sceloporus occidentalis. Herpetologica 56:469–479Google Scholar
- Sinervo B, Hedges R, Adolph SC (1991) Decreased sprint speed as a cost of reproduction in the lizard Sceloporus occidentalis: variation among populations. J Exp Biol 336:323–336Google Scholar