Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 609–618 | Cite as

Six decades of urban green change in a neotropical city: a case study of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico

  • Richard Lemoine-Rodríguez
  • Ian MacGregor-Fors
  • Carlos Muñoz-RoblesEmail author
Article

Abstract

The process of expansion of human settlements commonly occurs without proper urban planning, which can directly affect green areas located within cities and adjacent areas. This study focuses on: (1) a spatiotemporal analysis to quantify the growth of the city of Xalapa (1950s to 2010s), (2) changes in woody vegetation cover within the boundaries of the city, and (3) land use and landscape changes and urban sprawl by decade from the 1980s to 2010s. To achieve this, we used digital images (i.e., ortho-photos, SPOT images), which were classified and integrated into a geographic information system. Based on the processed imagery, we delimited the urban polygon of the city, and quantified its woody vegetation cover changes and land use changes in areas surrounding the city for each decade of study. We found that over the past six decades, the city of Xalapa has grown in similar proportions per decade, mostly concentrated southward, fitting strongly and significantly to quadratic and linear growth patterns. Urban sprawl increased over the study period, Shannon’s relative entropy increasing from 0.58 to 0.73. Woody cover within the city occupied a similar proportion (19–29%) of total city area throughout the study period because of the addition of patches of woody vegetation from formerly outlying areas, despite infill urbanization replacing preexisting urban green areas. Land use change in the area surrounding the city went from a transition through different uses (e.g., woody vegetation to cropland to urban; 1980s–2000s), to a direct change from woody vegetation to urban use (2000s–2010s), and exhibited landscape fragmentation over the period of study. Our results show that an integrated combination of remotely-sensed data and landscape metrics can be used to monitor urban patterns and processes, and that the results obtained can be incorporated into urban planning and management.

Keywords

Urbanization Urban expansion Vegetation cover Landscape change Urban ecology 

References

  1. (CONAPO) Consejo Nacional de Población (2004) Informe de ejecución 2003–2004 del Programa Nacional de Población 2001–2006. (Performance report 2003–2004 of the population national program 2001–2006) Consejo Nacional de Población, México, D.F. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  2. (INEGI) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (1956) Fotografía aérea. (Aerial photography) Scale 1:50,000Google Scholar
  3. (INEGI) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (1980) Fotografía aérea. (Aerial photography) Scale 1:80,000Google Scholar
  4. (INEGI) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (1996) Orto-fotografías digitales. (Digital ortho-photography) Scale 1:75,000Google Scholar
  5. (INEGI) Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática (2010) Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda 2010. (National census of population and housing) Estados Unidos Mexicanos. Información por Municipios. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  6. (UN) United Nations (2012) World urbanization prospects: The 2011 Revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population DivisionGoogle Scholar
  7. (UNDP) United Nations Development Programme (1996) Human development report. Oxford University Press. New York, 145 pGoogle Scholar
  8. (USAID) United States Agency for International Development (2010) Urbanization in Latin America and the Caribbean: Trends and challengesGoogle Scholar
  9. Álvarez de la Torre G (2011) Estructura y temporalidad urbana de las ciudades intermedias en México. (Structure and urban temporality of intermediate cities in Mexico) Frontera Norte 23:91–123 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  10. Ávila-Sánchez H (2009) Periurbanización y espacios rurales en la periferia de las ciudades. (Peri-urbanization and rural areas on the periphery of the cities). Estudios agrarios 41:93–123 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  11. Benítez BG (2011) Crecimiento de la población y expansión urbana de la ciudad de Xalapa, Veracruz y sus efectos sobre la vegetación y agroecosistemas. (Population growth and urban expansion of the city of Xalapa, Veracruz and its effects on vegetation and agroecosystems). PhD thesis. Colegio de Postgraduados-Instituto de Enseñanza e Investigación en Ciencias Agrícolas, Veracruz, México. 129 p. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  12. Benz U, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. Photogramm Eng Rem S 58:239–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhatta B (2009) Analysis of urban growth pattern using remote sensing and GIS: a case study of Kolkata, India. Int J Remote Sens 30:4733–4746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bhatta B, Saraswati S, Bandyopadhyay D (2010) Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Appl Geogr 30:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Capitanachi MC, Utrera E & Smith CB (2004) El Bosque Urbano de Xalapa, Veracruz. (The urban forest of Xalapa, Veracruz) Instituto de Ecología A.C., Universidad Veracruzana, Sistema de Investigación del Golfo de México (CONACYT), Xalapa, Veracruz, México. ISBN 968-834-662-4 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  16. Castillo-Campos G (1991) Vegetación y flora del municipio de Xalapa, Veracruz. (Vegetation and flora of the municipality of Xalapa, Veracruz). Instituto de Ecología A.C., Xalapa, Veracruz. México. 148 pp [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  17. Challenger A (1998) Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México. Pasado, presente y futuro. (Utilization and conservation of the terrestrial ecosystems of Mexico. Past, present, and future) Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y uso de la Biodiversidad. UNAM. Agrupación Sierra Madre, S. C. México, D.F. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  18. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dredge D (1995) Sustainable rapid urban growth. Habitat Int 19:317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. ERMEXS/SEMAR (2011) Estación de Recepción México de la Constelación SPOT/Secretaría de Marina Armada de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
  21. Ewing R (1997) Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable. J Am Plan Assoc 63:107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon C, Manson RH, Sundberg J, Cruz-Angón A (2007) Biodiversity, profitability, and vegetation structure in coffee agroecosystems of Central Veracruz. Mexico Agr Ecosyst Environ 118:256–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasse JE, Lathrop RG (2003) Land resource impact indicators of urban sprawl. Appl Geogr 23:159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jensen JR (2005) Introductory digital image processing. Perspective. Pearson Education Inc., SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar JM, Garg PK, Khare D (2008) Monitoring and modelling of urban sprawl using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Int J Appl Earth Obs 10:26–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz-Llave (2002) Actualización del programa de ordenamiento urbano de la zona conurbada de Xalapa, Banderilla, Coatepec, Emiliano Zapata y San Andrés Tlalnelhuayocan, Xalapa-Enríquez, Veracruz. (Update of the urban planning program of the metropolitan area of Xalapa, Banderilla, Coatepec, Emiliano Zapata and San Andrés Tlalnelhuayocan, Xalapa-Enríquez, Veracruz.) Gobierno del Estado de Veracruz, Veracruz, México. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  28. López E, Bocco G, Mendoza M, Duhau E (2001) Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe. A case in Morelia city, Mexico Landscape Urban Plan 55:271–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacGregor-Fors I, Morales-Pérez L, Schondube JE (2011) Does size really matter? Species-area relationships in human settlements. Divers Distrib 17:112–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Main MB, Roka FM, Noss RF (1999) Evaluating costs of conservation. Conserv Biol 13:1262–1272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGarigal K, Marks BJ (1995) FRAGSTATS: Spatial Pattern Analysis Program for Quantifying Landscape Structure. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OregonGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban Habitats 3:25–48Google Scholar
  34. Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) of Japan and the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) (2011) ASTER Global Digital Elevation Map, Ver. 2. http://asterweb.jpl.nasa.gov/gdem.asp
  35. Perea JA, Meroño EJ, Aguilera JM (2009) Clasificación orientada a objetos en fotografías aéreas digitales para la discriminación de usos del suelo. (Object-oriented classification in digital aerial photographs for the discrimination of land uses). Interciencia 34:612–616 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  36. Pisanty I, Mazari M & Ezcurra E (2009) El reto de la conservación de la biodiversidad en zonas urbanas y periurbanas 719–759. (The challenge of the conservation of biodiversity in urban and periurban areas) In: Capital natural de México, vol. II: Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. CONABIO. México D.F. 821 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  37. Plan de Desarrollo Municipal Xalapa (2005) Xalapa de Enríquez, Veracruz. Diagnostico Xalapa y sus regiones. (Analysis of Xalapa and its regions) Gobierno Municipal de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  38. PNUMA (Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente), SEDESU (Secretaría de Desarrollo Sustentable) y CONCYTEQ (Centro Queretano de Recursos Naturales del Consejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Querétaro) (2008) Perspectivas del medio ambiente urbano: GEO zona metropolitana Querétaro. (Perspectives of the urban environment: GEO metropolitan area of Queretaro) Poder Ejecutivo del Estado de Querétaro. Querétaro, Querétaro. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  39. Poelmans L, Van Rompaey A (2009) Detecting and modelling spatial patterns of urban sprawl in highly fragmented areas: a case study in the Flanders-Brussels region. Landscape Urban Plan 93:10–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rodriguez VJ (2002) Distribución Territorial de la Población de América Latina y el Caribe: Tendencias, Interpretaciones y Desafíos para las Políticas Públicas. (Territorial distribution of population of Latin America and the Caribbean: Trends, interpretations and challenges for public policy) Santiago: CEPAL/CELADE, Serie Población y Desarrollo. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  41. Rzedowski J. (1978) La vegetación de México. (The vegetation of Mexico) Editorial Limusa. México, D.F. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  42. Rzedowski J (1996) Análisis preliminar de la flora vascular de los bosques mesófilos de montaña de México. (Preliminary analysis of the vascular flora of Mexican cloud forests) Acta Bot Mex 35:25–44. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  43. Sorensen M, Barzetti V, Keipi K & Williams J (1998) Manejo de las áreas verdes urbanas (documentos de buenas prácticas). (Management of urban green areas; good practice documents). División de Medio Ambiente del Departamento de Desarrollo Sostenible del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo. Washington, D.C. Estados Unidos de América. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  44. Soto-Esparza M. & Gómez-Columna M (1993) Consideraciones climáticas de la ciudad de Xalapa. 81–98. (Climate aspects of the city of Xalapa) In: López-Moreno, I. R. 1993. Ecología urbana aplicada a la ciudad de Xalapa. (Urban ecology applied to the city of Xalapa ) Instituto de Ecología A. C., H. Ayuntamiento de Xalapa y Programa MAB-UNESCO. Xalapa, Veracruz, México. [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  45. Sun H, Forsythe W, Waters N (2007) Modeling urban land use change and urban sprawl: Calgary, Alberta, Canada. Netw Spat Econ 7:353–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tewolde MG, Cabral P (2011) Urban sprawl analysis and modeling in Asmara, Eritrea. Remote Sens 3:2148–2165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas RW (1981) Information Statistics in Geography, Geo Abstracts, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom, 42 pGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams-Linera G, Manson HR, Isunza-Vera E (2002) La fragmentación del bosque mesófilo de montaña y patrones de uso del suelo en la región oeste de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. (the fragmentation of the cloud forest patterns of land use in the Western region of Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico). Madera Bosques 8:73–89 [In Spanish]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. World Bank (2009) World development report 2009: reshaping economic geography. Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Lemoine-Rodríguez
    • 1
  • Ian MacGregor-Fors
    • 1
  • Carlos Muñoz-Robles
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Red de Ambiente y SustentabilidadInstituto de EcologíaVeracruzMexico
  2. 2.Instituto de Investigación de Zonas Desérticas, UASLP. Altair 200San Luis PotosíMexico

Personalised recommendations