Sacred sites, biodiversity and urbanization in an Indian megacity

Abstract

In an era of rapid urban growth, conserving biodiverse urban green spaces is challenging, especially in developing countries. Culturally protected areas including sacred sites are known to contribute to biodiversity conservation in semi-urban and rural areas, but their role in dense urban settings is critically understudied. We, therefore, assessed biodiversity patterns of two types of Hindu places of worship (temples, kattes) and underlying environmental parameters in the Indian megacity of Bengaluru. We analyzed how variables of the urban matrix (age of development, housing density) and type of sacred sites related to biodiversity measures (species abundance, richness, beta diversity), differentiated for cultivated, spontaneous (i.e., wild growing), native and non-native plant species. Native species prevailed in cultivated (66%) and spontaneous (93%) species assemblages, and urbanization parameters significantly related to some biodiversity measures. Beta diversity was highest in sacred sites located in the newest quarters, while abundance of cultivated and non-native species increased with decreasing housing density. Higher richness in low density (i.e., wealthier) quarters demonstrates ‘luxury effect’ for sacred sites. Plots in temples showed higher diversity measures than in kattes, likely due to different management practices. While results demonstrate effects of urbanization on biodiversity measures for temples and kattes, these sites still function as habitats for native species in Bengaluru – and not as foci for invasive alien species as noticed for other urban green spaces. We conclude that urban sacred sites allow people to benefit from multiple ecosystems services and thus play an important role in the urban green infrastructure of quickly growing megacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Abendroth S, Kowarik I, Müller N, von der Lippe M (2012) The green colonial heritage: Woody plants in parks of Bandung, Indonesia. Landsc Urban Plan 106:12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aronson MF, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NS, Cilliers S, Clarkson B, Dobbs C (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B 281(1780):20133330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronson MF, Handel SN, La Puma IP, Clemants SE (2015) Urbanization promotes non-native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 18(1):31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arshad HSH, Routray JK (2018) From socioeconomic disparity to environmental injustice: the relationship between housing unit density and community green space in a medium city in Pakistan. Local Environ 23(5):536–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrett GW, Barrett TL (2001) Cemeteries as repositories of natural and cultural diversity. Conserv Biol 15:1820–1824. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00410.x

  6. Bhagwat S, Rutte C (2006) Sacred groves: potential for biodiversity management. Front Ecol Environ 4:519–524. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[519:SGPFBM]2.0.CO;2

  7. Bhagwat SA, Kushalappa CG, Williams PH, Brown ND (2005) The role of informal protected areas in maintaining biodiversity in the Western Ghats of India. Ecol Soc 19:1853–1862. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00248.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bonthoux S, Brun M, Di Pietro F et al (2014) How can wastelands promote biodiversity in cities? A review. Landsc Urban Plan 132:79–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boughton EH, Quintana-Ascencio PF, Nickerson D, Bohlen PJ (2011) Management intensity affects the relationship between non-native and native species in subtropical wetlands. Appl Veg Sci 14:210–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2010.01116.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Census of India (2011) Provisional population totals paper 1 of 2011: Karnataka. Directorate of Census Operations, Government of India, New Delhi

  11. Cohen-Cline H, Turkheimer E, Duncan GE (2015) Access to green space, physical activity and mental health: a twin study. J Epidemiol Community Health 69(6):523–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. De Lacy P, Shackleton CM (2017a) Aesthetic and spiritual ecosystem services provided by urban sacred sites. Sustainability 9:1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. De Lacy P, Shackleton CM (2017b) Woody plant species richness, composition and structure in urban sacred sites, Grahamstown, South Africa. Urban Ecosyst 20(5):1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0669-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eicher Goodearth Pvt. Ltd (2002) Bangalore city map: a map book covering 480 sq. kms of Bangalore, including Yelahanka, Whitefield and Putenhalli. Eicher Goodearth Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi

  15. Fischer LK, Rodorff V, von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2016) Drivers of biodiversity patterns in parks of a growing south American megacity. Urban Ecosyst 19:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0537-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Frascaroli F, Bhagwat S, Guarino R, Chiarucci A, Schmid B (2016) Shrines in Central Italy conserve plant diversity and large trees. Ambio 45:468–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0738-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Frosch B, Deil U (2011) Forest vegetation on sacred sites of the Tangier Peninsula (NW Morocco) - discussed in a SW-Mediterranean context. Phytocoenologia 41:153–181. https://doi.org/10.1127/0340-269X/2011/0041-0503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fuentes N, Saldana A, Kühn I, Klotz S (2015) Climatic and socio-economic factors determine the level of invasion by alien plants in Chile. Plant Ecol Divers 8:371–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2014.984003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gao H, Ouyang Z, Chen S, van Koppen CSA (2013) Role of culturally protected forests in biodiversity conservation in Southeast China. Biodivers Conserv 22:531–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-012-0427-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gaston KJ (2010) Valuing common species. Science 327(5962):154–155

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gopal D, Nagendra H, Manthey M (2015) Vegetation in Bangalore’s slums: composition, species distribution, density, diversity, and history. Environ Manag 55:1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0467-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gopal D, von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2018) Sacred sites as habitats of culturally important plant species in an Indian megacity. Urban For Urban Green 32:113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2018.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Grove JM, Locke DH, O’Neil-Dunne JP (2014) An ecology of prestige in New York City: examining the relationships among population density, socio-economic status, group identity, and residential canopy cover. Environ Manag 54(3):402–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hollander M, Wolfe DA, Chicken E (2015) Nonparametric statistical methods. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hope D, Gries C, Zhu W, Fagan WF, Redman CL, Grimm NB, Nelson AL, Martin C, Kinzig A (2003) Socioeconomics drive urban plant diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8788–8792

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Irwin EG, Bockstael NE (2007) The evolution of urban sprawl: evidence of spatial heterogeneity and increasing land fragmentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:20672–20677. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705527105

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson W, Ormsby A (2017) Urban sacred natural sites–a call for research. Urban Ecosyst 20(3):675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jaganmohan M, Vailshery LS, Mundoli S, Nagendra H (2018) Biodiversity in sacred urban spaces of Bengaluru, India. Urban For Urban Green 32:64–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jim CY, Chen WY (2006) Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ Manag 38(3):338–349

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kehimkar I (2000) Common Indian wild flowers. Oxford University Press, Mumbai, India

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kent M (2011) Vegetation description and data analysis: a practical approach, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons, Sussex, UK

    Google Scholar 

  33. Keswani K (2017) The practice of tree worship and the territorial production of urban space in the Indian neighbourhood. J Urban Des 22(3):370–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kindt R, Coe R (2005) Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kowarik I, Buchholz S, von der Lippe M, Seitz B (2016) Biodiversity functions of urban cemeteries: evidence from one of the largest Jewish cemeteries in Europe. Urban For Urban Green 19:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krishen P (2006) Trees of Delhi. Penguin Books, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kurian DJ (2004) Plants that heal. Oriental Watchman Publishing House, Pune, India

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George PS, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skånes H, Steffen W, Stone GD, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin BB, Fuller RA (2013) Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world’s cities? J Appl Ecol 50:1161–1168. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Luck GW, Smallbone LT, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12:604–620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9244-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23:1143–1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9253-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Muthulingam U, Thangavel S (2012) Density, diversity and richness of woody plants in urban green spaces: a case study in Chennai metropolitan city. Urban For Urban Green 11:450–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nagendra H (2016) Nature in the city: Bengaluru in the past, present and future. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  44. Nagendra H, Gopal D (2011) Tree diversity, distribution, history and change in urban parks: studies in Bangalore, India. Urban Ecosyst 14:211–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-010-0148-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Nagendra H, Sudhira HS, Katti M, Schewenius M (2013) Sub-regional assessment of India: effects of urbanization on land use, biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_6

    Google Scholar 

  46. National Institute of Urban Affairs (2008) Urban poverty reduction strategy for Bangalore. New Delhi

  47. Neginhal S (2006) Golden trees, greenspaces, and urban forestry. Self published, Bangalore, India

    Google Scholar 

  48. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, et al (2015) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.2-1. R Development Core Team, Vienna. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (accessed 17 March 2017)

  49. Pauchard A, Aguayo M, Pena E, Urrutia R (2006) Multiple effects of urbanization on the biodiversity of developing countries: the case of a fast-growing metropolitan area (Concepcion, Chile). Biol Conserv 127:272–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Pearse WD, Cavender-Bares J, Hobbie SE, Avolio ML, Bettez N, Roy Chowdhury R, Darling LE, Groffman PM, Grove JM, Hall SJ, Heffernan JB, Learned J, Neill C, Nelson KC, Pataki DE, Ruddell BL, Steele MK, Trammell TLE (2018) Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in north American urban yards. Ecosphere 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2105

  51. R Development Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing, reference index version 3.1.3. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL: http://www.R-project.org/. (accessed 17 March 2017)

  52. Ramalho CE, Hobbs RJ (2012) Time for a change: dynamic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 27:179–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.10.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rupprecht CDD, Byrne JA, Ueda H, Lo AY (2015) ‘It’s real, not fake like a park’: residents’ perception and use of informal urban green-space in Brisbane, Australia and Sapporo, Japan. Landsc Urban Plan 143:205–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Serret H, Raymond R, Foltête JC, Clergeau P, Simon L, Machon N (2014) Potential contributions of green spaces at business sites to the ecological network in an urban agglomeration: the case of the Ile-de-France region, France. Landsc Urban Plan 131:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Shanahan DF, Lin BB, Bush R, Gaston KJ, Dean JH, Barber E, Fuller RA (2015) Toward improved public health outcomes from urban nature. Am J Public Health 105(3):470–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sharma GP, Esler KJ, Blignaut JN (2010) Determining the relationship between invasive alien species density and a country’s socio-economic status. S Afr J Sci 106:1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v106i3/4.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Shwartz A, Turbé A, Simon L, Julliard R (2014) Enhancing urban biodiversity and its influence on city-dwellers : an experiment. Biol Conserv 171:82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Front Ecol Environ 14:94–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sudhira HS, Nagendra H (2013) Local assessment of Bangalore: graying and greening in Bangalore – impacts of urbanization on ecosystems, ecosystem services and biodiversity. In: Elmqvist T, Fragkias M, Goodness J et al (eds) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities: a global assessment. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, pp 75–91

    Google Scholar 

  60. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Subrahmanya MHB (2007) Bangalore. Cities 24:379–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Tomasetto F, Duncan RP, Hulme PE (2013) Environmental gradients shift the direction of the relationship between native and alien plant species richness. Divers Distrib 19:49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2012.00939.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York. isbn:0-387-95457-0

  63. Verschuuren B, Wild R, McNeely J, Oviedo G (2010) Sacred natural sites: conserving nature and culture. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wang HF, MacGregor-Fors I, Lopez-Pujol J (2012) Warm-temperate, immense, and sprawling: plant diversity drivers in urban Beijing, China. Plant Ecol 213:967–992. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0058-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Weber F, Kowarik I, Säumel I (2014) A walk on the wild side: perceptions of roadside vegetation beyond trees. Urban For Urban Green 13:205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.10.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Woods CL, Cardelus CL, Scull P et al (2017) Stone walls and sacred forest conservation in Ethiopia. Biodivers Conserv 26(1):209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1239-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Yılmaz H, Kuşak B, Akkemik Ü (2017) The role of Aşiyan cemetery (İstanbul) as a green urban space from an ecological perspective and its importance in urban plant diversity. Urban For Urban Green 33:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2017.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, Saveliev AA, Smith GM (2009) Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Gesellschaft von Freunden der TU Berlin and Technische Universität Berlin funded this study. We thank H.S. Sudhira and Harini Nagendra for sharing map data of Bengaluru for different time periods; and HN and Leonie Fischer for their valuable inputs during the course of this research.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Divya Gopal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gopal, D., von der Lippe, M. & Kowarik, I. Sacred sites, biodiversity and urbanization in an Indian megacity. Urban Ecosyst 22, 161–172 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0804-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Unconventional greenspaces
  • Native species
  • Urban greenery
  • Biodiversity conservation
  • Religious site