Forest ethnography: An approach to study the environmental history and political ecology of urban forests

Submission to “The Structure-Function Continuum: Understanding urban transformation through socio-ecological flows,” a special issue of Urban Ecosystems

Abstract

A landscape succession paradigm has shaped much of our understanding about the processes of forest emergence and transformation in the United States. Drawing heavily from theory and method in environmental history, this paradigm has focused attention on the role of landscape-scale shifts in land use and land cover in the production of forests. The geography of cities is patchy, dynamic and heterogeneous, with change and differences occurring at much smaller scales (e.g. Jacobs 1961; Clay 1973) compared to coarse scale of stand replacing successions affecting rural forests (Grove et al. Ecosyst Health and Sustain 2(9):e01239, 2016; Pickett et al. Urban Ecosyst 20(1):1–14, 2017). Therefore, trying to understand how urban forests came to be, as well as what they are, requires a research approach that is specific to the land use dynamics of cities and attentive to the social life of urban forests. In response to this methodological gap, this paper describes a research approach called “forest ethnography,” which we are piloting in Baltimore, Maryland as part of the Baltimore Ecosystem Study (BES), one of the National Science Foundation’s urban Long-term Ecological Research Programs (LTER). As we describe, we propose that an urban forest ethnography approach can contribute to our understanding of both forest environmental history and urban political ecology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Notes

  1. 1.

    Matthew Baker, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, led the forest patch analyses for (Avins 2013), which was supported by the City of Baltimore’s Office of Sustainability.

References

  1. Agar M (1980) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Angelo H, Wachsmuth D (2015) Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism. Inter J Urban Reg Research 39(1):16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Avins M (2013) Baltimore’s forest patches: Emerald assets for ecosystem services, Baltimore Green Space. http:baltimoregreenspace.org/downloads/ForestPatchesWeb.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017

  4. Baltimore City, Department of Planning (1992) Baltimore City supplement to the state forest conservation manual. http://planning.baltimorecity.gov/sites/default/files/RStateForestConservationManual_0.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2017

  5. Baltimore City Open GIS Data: Real Property (2017) http://gis-baltimore.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/b41551f53345445fa05b554cd77b3732_0. Accessed 5/4/2017

  6. Baltimore City Open GIS Data (2015) URL: https://gis.baltimorecity.gov/egis/rest/services/opengisdata/treecanopy/MapServer. Accessed 5/4/2017

  7. Bankoff G (2013) “Deep forestry”: Shapers of the Philippine forests. Environ Hist 18(3):523–556. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/emt037

  8. Baviskar A (2003a) Between violence and desire: space, power, and identity in the making of metropolitan Dehli. Inter Social Science J 55(175):89–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.5501009

  9. Baviskar A (2003b) For a cultural politics of natural resources. Econ Polit Wkly 28:5051–5055

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bromley DW (1992) The commons, common property, and environmental policy. Environ Resour Econ 2(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boone CG, Buckley GL, Grove JM, Sister C (2009) Parks and People: An Environmental Justice Inquiry in Baltimore, Maryland. Ann Assoc of Am Geogr 99(4):767–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boone CG, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Schwartz K, Buckley GL (2010) Landscape, vegetation characteristics, and group identity in an urban and suburban watershed: why the 60s matter. Urban Ecosyst 13(3):255–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Boone CG, Fragkias M, Buckley GL, Grove JM (2014) A long view of polluting industry and environmental justice in Baltimore. Cities 36:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bond W, Keeley J (2005) Fire as a global “herbivore”: the ecology and evolution of flammable ecosystems. Trends in Ecol Evol 20:387–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Braun B (2002) The Intemperate Rainforest: Nature, Culture, and Power on Canada’s West Coast. Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  16. Chowdhury RR, Larson K, Grove M, Polsky C, Cook E, Onsted J, Ogden L (2011) A Multi-Scalar Approach to Theorizing Socio-Ecological Dynamics at Urban Residential Landscapes. Cities and the Environment 4(1):article 6

  17. Chuang W-C, Boone CG, Locke DH, Grove JM, Buckley GL, Whitmer A, Zhang S (2018) Tree canopy change and neighborhood stability: A comparative analysis of Washington, D.C. and Baltimore, MD. Urban For Urban Greening

  18. Clay G (1973) Close-Up: How to read the American city. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  19. Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Amer Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cronon W (1983) Changes in the land: Indian, colonists and the ecology of New England. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New York

  22. Crooks JB (1968) Politics and Progress: The Rise of Urban Progressivism in Baltimore, 1895–1921. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cronon W (1992) Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  24. Du Bois WEB, Eaton I (1996) The Philadelphia Negro: A Social Study. Univ. of Penn Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  25. Escobar A (2008) Territories of difference: place, movements, life, redes. Duke University Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  26. Emery MR, Hurley PT (2016) Ethnobiology in the city: Embracing the urban ecological moment. J Ethnobiol 36(4):807–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Euchner CC (1991) The Politics of Urban Expansion: Baltimore and the Sewerage Question, 1859–1905. Maryland Historical Magazine 86:3 (1991): 270–91

  28. Feeny D, Berkes F, McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1990) The tragedy of the commons: Twenty-two years later. Hum Ecol 18(1):1–19

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Foster D (1992) Land-use history (1730-1990) and vegetation dynamics in central New England, USA. J Ecol 80(4):753–771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Foster D, Swanson F, Aber J, Burke I, Brokaw N, Tilman D, Knapp A (2003) The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. Bioscience 53(1):77–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Foster D, Motzkin G, O’Keefe J, Boose E, Orwig D, Fuller J, Hall B (2004) The environmental and human history of New England. In: Forests in time: the environmental consequences of 1,000 years of change in New England. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 43–100

    Google Scholar 

  32. Girão LC, Lopes AV, Tabarelli M, Bruna EM (2007) Changes in tree reproduction traits reduce functional diversity in a fragmented atlantic forest landscape. PLoS One 2:e908. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000908

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Grabbatin B, Hurley PT, Halfacre A (2011) “I Still Have the Old Tradition”: The co-production of sweetgrass basketry and coastal development. Geoforum 42(6):638–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50(7):571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Groffman PM, Pouyat RV, Cadenasso ML et al (2006) Land use context and natural soil controls on plant community composition and soil nitrogen and carbon dynamics in urban and rural forests. For Ecol Manag 236:177–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Groffman PM, Cavender-Bares J, Bettez ND, Grove JM, Hall SJ, Heffernan JB, Hobbie SE, Larson KL, Morse JL, Neill C, Nelson K, O'Neil-Dunne J, Ogden L, Pataki DE, Polsky C, Chowdhury RR, Steele MK (2014) Ecological homogenization of urban USA. Front Ecol Environ 12:74–81. https://doi.org/10.1890/120374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Grove JM (1996) The Relationship between patterns and processes of social stratification and vegetation of an urban - rural watershed. Dissertation, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies

  38. Grove JM, Locke DH, O’Neil-Dunne JPM (2014) An Ecology of Prestige in New York City: Examining the Relationships Among Population Density, Socio-economic Status, Group Identity, and Residential Canopy Cover. Environ Manag 54(3):402–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0310-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Grove JM, Pickett STA, Burch WRJ, Machlis G (2015) The Baltimore School of Urban Ecology: Space, Scale, and Time for the Study of Cities. Yale Univ Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  40. Grove JM, Childers DL, Galvin M, Hines S, Muñoz-Erickson T, Svendsen ES (2016) Linking science and decision making to promote an ecology for the city: practices and opportunities. Ecosyst Health and Sustain 2(9):e01239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Grove JM, Ogden LA, Pickett STA, Boone CG, Buckley GL, Locke DH, Lord C (2018) The legacy effect: understanding how segregation and environmental injustice unfold over time in Baltimore. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 108(2):524–537

  42. Harvey D (1978) The urban process under capitalism: a framework for analysis. Inter J Urban Reg Research 2(1–4):103–131

    Google Scholar 

  43. Harvey D (1987) The urbanization of capital: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization. Science Soc 51(1):121–125

    Google Scholar 

  44. Heynen N, Kaika M, Swyngedouw E (2006) In the Nature of Cities: Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  45. Heynen N (2014) Urban political ecology I: The urban century. Prog Hum Geogr 38(4):598–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heynen N (2016) Urban political ecology II: The abolitionist century. Prog Hum Geogr 40(6):839–845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Heynen N (2017) Urban political ecology III: The feminist and queer century. Prog Hum Geogr. doi: 10.177/0309132517693336

  48. Hirsch E, O’Hanlon M (1995) The anthropology of landscape: Perspectives on place and space. Oxford Univ Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  49. Huang G, Zhou W, Cadenasso ML (2011) Is everyone hot in the city? Spatial pattern of land surface temperatures, land cover and neighborhood socioeconomic characteristics in Baltimore, MD. J Environ Manag 92:1753–1759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hurley PT, Halfacre AC, Levine NS, Burke MK (2008) Finding a “Disappearing” Nontimber Forest Resource: Using Grounded Visualization to Explore Urbanization Impacts on Sweetgrass Basketmaking in Greater Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina. The Prof Geographer 60(4):556–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Hurley PT, Maccaroni M, Williams A (2017) Resistant actors, resistant landscapes? A historical political ecology of a forested conservation object in exurban southeastern Pennsylvania. Landsc Res 42(3):291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Hurley PT, Taylor LE (2016) From swamp to ridgeline: Exploring exurbia in southeastern Pennsylvania and the Sierra Nevada foothills of California. In A Comparative Political Ecology of Exurbia (31–49). Springer, New York

  53. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  54. Johns Hopkins University Libraries (2017) Residential Security Map of Baltimore, Maryland. http://jhir.library.jhu.edu/handle/1774.2/32621 Accessed 5/4/2017

  55. Jorgensen A, Tylecote M (2007) Ambivalent landscapes—wilderness in the urban interstices. Landsc Res 32(4):443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kang W, Minor ES, Park C-R, Lee D (2015) Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18:857–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. King KL, Locke DH (2013) A comparison of three methods of measuring local urban tree canopy cover. Arboricult Urban For 39(2):62–67

    Google Scholar 

  58. Knigge L, Cope M (2006) Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Enviro & Planning A 38(11):2021–2037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kohn E (2013) How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  60. Konijnendijk CC, Richard RM, Kenney A, Randrup TB (2006) Defining urban forestry—a comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban For Urban Green 4(3–4):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kosek J (2006) Understories: The political life of forests in New Mexico. Duke Univ Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kowarik I (2005) Wild urban woodlands: Towards a conceptual framework. In: Kowarik I, Körner S (eds) Wild Urban Woodlands: New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kowarik I, Körner S (2005) New perspectives for urban forestry. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lachmund J (2013) Greening Berlin. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  65. Li TM (2014) Land’s end: Capitalist relations on an indigenous frontier. Duke Univ Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  66. Livesley SJ, McPherson EG (2016) Calfapietra C (2016) The urban forest and ecosystem services: Impacts on urban water, heat, and pollution cycles at the tree, street, and city scale. J Environ Qual 45:119–124. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2015.11.0567

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Loughner CP, Allen DJ, Zhang D-L, Pickering KE, Dickerson RR, Landry L (2012) Roles of urban tree canopy and buildings in urban heat island effects: Parameterization and preliminary results. J Appl Meteorol and Clim 51:1775–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Lord C, Norquist K (2010) Cities as emergent systems: Race as a rule in organized complexity. Environ Law 40:551–597

    Google Scholar 

  69. MacFaden SW, O’Neil-Dunne JPM, Royar AR, Lu JWT, Rundle AG (2012) High-resolution tree canopy mapping for New York City using LIDAR and object-based image analysis. J Appl Remote Sensing:6. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.6.063567

  70. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  71. Neumann RP (2002) Imposing wilderness: Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Univ. of Cal Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  72. Ocejo RE (2013) Ethnography and the city: Readings on doing urban fieldwork. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ogden L (2011) Swamplife: People, gators, and mangroves entangled in the Everglades. Univ. of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  74. Olson SH (1997) Baltimore: The building of an American city. Johns Hopkins, University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  75. O’Neil-Dunne JPM, MacFaden SQ, Royar A (2014) A versatile, production-oriented approach to high-resolution tree-canopy mapping in urban and suburban landscapes using GEOBIA and data fusion. Remote Sens 6(12):12837–12865. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61212837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Peluso N (1992) Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  77. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Costanza R (2001) Urban ecological systems: Linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Review Ecol Syst 32(1):127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Rosi-Marshall EJ, Belt KT, Groffman PM, Grove JM, Irwin EG, Kaushal SS, LaDeau SL, Nilon CH, Swan CM, Warren PS (2017) Dynamic heterogeneity: a framework to promote ecological integration and hypothesis generation in urban systems. Urban Ecosyst 20(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Pickett STA, White PS (1985) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  80. Pietila A (2010) Not in my neighborhood: How bigotry shaped a great American city. Ivan R Dee, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  81. Pincetl S (2012) Nature, urban development and sustainability – What elements are needed for a more comprehensive understanding? Cities 29(2):S32–S37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Pinho P, Correia O, Lecoq M et al (2016) Evaluating green infrastructure in urban environments using a multi-taxa and functional diversity approach. Environ Res 147:601–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.12.025

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Polsky C, Grove JM, Knudson C et al (2014) Assessing the homogenization of urban land management with an application to US residential lawn care. PNAS 111(12):4432–4437

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Power G (1983) Apartheid Baltimore style: The residential segregation ordinances of 1910–1913. Maryland Law Review 42:289–328

    Google Scholar 

  85. Rademacher A (2011) Reigning the river: Urban ecologies and political transformation in Kathmandu. Duke Univ Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  86. Rademacher A (2015) Urban political ecology. Annu Rev Anthropol 44:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Sandberg LA, Bardekjian A, Butt S (2014) Urban forests, trees and greenspace: A political ecology perspective. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  88. Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Smith ML, Zhou W, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Band LE (2010) Evaluation of the National Land Cover Database for Hydrologic Applications in Urban and Suburban Baltimore, Maryland. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46(2):429–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2009.00412.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Smith N (1984) Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. Univ. of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  91. Swyngedouw E, Heynen N (2003) Urban political ecology, justice, and the politics of scale. Antipode 35(3):898–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Sze J (2006) Noxious New York: The racial politics of urban health and environmental justice. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  93. Tallis M, Taylor G, Sinnett D, Freer-Smith P (2011) Estimating the removal of atmospheric particulate pollution by the urban tree canopy of London, under current and future environments. Landsc Urban Plan 103:129–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Troy A, Grove JM, O'Neill-Dunne J (2012) The relationship between tree canopy and crime rates across an urban-rural gradient in the greater Baltimore region. Landsc Urban Plan 106:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Troy A, Grove JM (2008) Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landsc Urban Plan 87:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Tsing AL (2005) Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  97. Tsing AL (2015) The mushroom at the end of the world: On the possibility of life in capitalist ruins. Princeton Univ Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  98. West P (2006) Conservation is our government now: The politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea. Duke Univ Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  99. West P (2012) From modern production to imagined primitive: The social world of coffee from Papua New Guinea. Duke Univ. Press, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  100. Williams R (1973) The country and the city. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  101. Willis P (2000) The ethnographic imagination. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  102. Wolcott HF (2008) Ethnography: A way of seeing, 2nd Edition. AltaMira Press, Lantham

  103. Yeip R (2015) Baltimore’s demographic divide. Wall Street Journal, published May 1, 2015. http://graphics.wsj.com/baltimore-demographics/

  104. Zhou W, Huang G, Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML (2011) 90 years of forest cover change in the urbanizing Gwynns Falls watershed, Baltimore, Maryland: spatial and temporal dynamics. Landsc Ecol 26:6450659

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura A. Ogden.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ogden, L.A., Aoki, C., Grove, J.M. et al. Forest ethnography: An approach to study the environmental history and political ecology of urban forests. Urban Ecosyst 22, 49–63 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-018-0744-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Urban forests
  • Dynamic heterogeneity
  • Political ecology
  • Urban ethnography
  • Baltimore, MD