Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 447–458 | Cite as

Human land use as a driver of plant community composition in wetlands of the Chicago metropolitan region

  • Dennis Skultety
  • Jeffrey W. Matthews
Article

Abstract

Anthropogenic alteration of the landscape has facilitated plant community change and non-native species invasion in urban areas. We used species occurrence data from over 2000 wetlands within the Chicago metropolitan region to classify urban wetlands into community types and examined non-native species composition across community types. Non-native species were widespread across the region, occurring in over 99% of wetlands. On average, 35% of the plant species in individual wetlands were non-native. A single non-native species, Phalaris arundinacea, was present in 74% of wetlands. Six wetland community types were identified (wet meadows, marshes, forested wetlands, farmed wetlands/mudflats, roadside marshes, and an undetermined wetland type), with each having aggressively spreading non-natives amongst the most common plant species. We conducted canonical correspondence analysis to evaluate the contribution of surrounding land cover, roads, and location of wetlands to plant community composition in these wetlands, and found that similar changes to the landscape have resulted in similar combinations of native and non-native species. Differences in species composition reflected spatial gradients in land use from urban to rural areas across the region, as well as proximity to major roads. Anthropogenic drivers have resulted in profound and pervasive changes to wetland communities across the region, creating novel habitats and ultimately novel community types.

Keywords

Invasive plants Non-native species Novel ecosystem Roads Urbanization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Illinois Department of Transportation for funding the original wetland delineations and the staff of the Illinois Natural History Survey who conducted the wetland delineations. Thanks to Jennifer Fraterrigo, Jonathan Greenberg, George Geatz, Adrianna Krzywicka, Edward Price and three anonymous reviewers for their helpful feedback on this manuscript.

Supplementary material

11252_2018_730_MOESM1_ESM.docx (11 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 10 kb)

References

  1. Alpert P, Bone E, Holzapfel C (2000) Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol 3(1):52–66.  https://doi.org/10.1078/1433-8319-00004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angel J (2011) Illinois climate normals. Illinois State Water Survey, Prairie Research Institute: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://www.isws.illinois.edu/atmos/statecli/newnormals/newnormals.htm. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  3. Aronson J, Murcia C, Kattan GH, Moreno-Mateos D, Dixon K, Simberloff D (2014) The road to confusion is paved with novel ecosystems: a reply to Hobbs et al. Trends Ecol Evol 29(12):646–647.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Aronson MFJ, Handel SN, La Puma IP, Clemants SE (2015) Urbanization promotes non-native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region. Urban Ecosyst 18(1):31–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0382-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B (2014) Rgdal: bindings for the geospatial data abstraction library. R package version 0.9–1. http://cran.r-project.org/package=rgdal
  6. Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P (2011) Numerical ecology with R. Springer, New York.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowman Cutway H, Ehrenfeld JG (2009) Exotic plant invasions in forested wetlands: effects of adjacent urban land use type. Urban Ecosyst 12(3):371–390.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-009-0088-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowman Cutway H, Ehrenfeld JG (2010) The influence of urban land use on seed dispersal and wetland invasibility. Plant Ecol 210(1):153–167.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-010-9746-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brauer J, Geber MA (2002) Population differentiation in the range expansion of a native maritime plant, Solidago sempervirens L. Int J Plant Sci 163(1):141–150.  https://doi.org/10.1086/324047 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brisson J, de Blois S, Lavoie C (2010) Roadside as invasion pathway for common reed (Phragmites australis). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 3(04):506–514.  https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-09-050.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Choi YD, Bury C (2003) Process of floristic degradation in urban and suburban wetlands in northwestern Indiana, USA. Nat Areas J 23:320–331Google Scholar
  12. Cowardin LM, Carter V, Golet FC, LaRoe ET (1979) Classification of wetlands and deepwater habitats of the United States. U.S. Department of the Interior, fish and wildlife service: Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-29–31Google Scholar
  13. Cunningham MA, Snyder E, Yonkin D, Ross M, Elsen T (2008) Accumulation of deicing salts in soils in an urban environment. Urban Ecosyst 11(1):17–31.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-007-0031-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Cáceres M, Legendre P (2009) Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90(12):3566–3574.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1823.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Early Detection & Distribution Mapping System (2015) Status of invasive plants in Illinois. Center for Invasive Species and Ecosystem Health, University of Georgia. http://www.eddmaps.org/tools/statereport.cfm?id=us_il. Accessed 5 Jan 2017
  16. Environmental Laboratory (1987) Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual. Technical Report Y-87-1. US Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, MSGoogle Scholar
  17. ESRI (2014) ArcGIS 10.2.2 for desktop. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. ESRI, Tom Tom North America (2013) U.S. and Canada detailed streets, data & maps for ArcGIS, 2013 - Street Map North America. ESRI, RedlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. Forman R, Alexander L (1998) Roads and their major ecological effects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29(1):207–231.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Forman RTT, Sperling D, Bissonette JA, Clevenger AP, Cutshall CD, Dale VH, Fahrig L, France R, Goldman CR, Heanue K, Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Turrentine T, Winter TC (2003) Road ecology: science and solutions. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Foxcroft LC, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Mac Fadyen S (2004) Reconstructing 50 years of Opuntia stricta invasion in the Kruger National Park, South Africa: environmental determinants and propagule pressure. Divers Distrib 10(5-6):427–437.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2004.00117.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Galatowitsch SM, Anderson NO, Ascher PD (1999) Invasiveness in wetland plants in temperate North America. Wetlands 19(4):733–755.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03161781 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Galatowitsch SM, Whited DC, Lehtinen R, Husveth J, Schik K (2000) The vegetation of wet meadows in relation to their land-use. Environ Monit Assess 60(2):121–144.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006159028274 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gavier-Pizarro GI, Radeloff VC, Stewart SI, Huebner CD, Keuler NS (2010) Housing is positively associated with invasive exotic plant species richness in New England, USA. Ecol Appl 20(7):1913–1925.  https://doi.org/10.1890/09-2168.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gelbard JL, Belnap J (2003) Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17(2):420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01408.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. González-Moreno P, Diez JM, Ibáñez I, Font X, Vilà M (2014) Plant invasions are context-dependent: multiscale effects of climate, human activity and habitat. Divers Distrib 20(6):720–731.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallett L, Standish R, Hulvey K, Gardner M, Suding KN, Starzomski B, Murphey S, Harris JA (2013) Towards a conceptual framework for novel ecosystems. In: Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM (eds) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, pp 16–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118354186.ch3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hansen MJ, Clevenger AP (2005) The influence of disturbance and habitat on the presence of non-native plant species along transport corridors. Biol Conserv 125(2):249–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hebbali A (2017) Olsrr: tools for building OLS regression models. R package version 0.4.0. http://cran.r-project.org/package=olsrr
  30. Hijmans RJ (2014) Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling. R Packag Version 2:3–12 http://cran.r-project.org/package=raster Google Scholar
  31. Hobbs RJ, Arico S, Aronson J, Baron JS, Bridgewater P, Cramer VA, Epstein PR, Ewel JJ, Klink CA, Lugo AE, Norton D, Ojima D, Richardson DM, Sanderson EW, Valladares F, Vilà M, Zamora R, Zobel M (2006) Novel ecosystems: theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15(1):1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-822X.2006.00212.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hobbs RJ, Higgs E, Harris JA (2009) Novel ecosystems: implications for conservation and restoration. Trends Ecol Evol 24(11):599–605.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM (2013) Defining novel ecosystems. In: Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Hall CM (eds) Novel ecosystems: intervening in the new ecological world order. John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, pp 58–60.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118354186.ch6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobbs RJ, Higgs ES, Harris JA (2014) Novel ecosystems: concept or inconvenient reality? A response to Murcia et al. Trends Ecol Evol 29(12):645–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Hodkinson DJ, Thompson K (1997) Plant dispersal: the role of man. J Appl Ecol 34(6):1484–1496.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2405264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogan DM, Walbridge MR (2007) Urbanization and nutrient retention in freshwater riparian wetlands. Ecol Appl 17(4):1142–1155.  https://doi.org/10.1890/06-0185 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Hutchinson T, Vankat J (1997) Invasibility and effects of Amur honeysuckle in southwestern Ohio forests. Conserv Biol 11(5):1117–1124.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Iverson LR (1988) Land-use changes in Illinois, USA: the influence of landscape attributes on current and historic land use. Landsc Ecol 2(1):45–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Joly M, Bertrand P, Gbangou RY, White MC, Dubé J, Lavoie C (2011) Paving the way for invasive species: road type and the spread of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Environ Manag 48(3):514–522.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9711-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kalwij JM, Milton SJ, McGeoch MA (2008) Road verges as invasion corridors? A spatial hierarchical test in an arid ecosystem. Landsc Ecol 23(4):439–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9201-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kentula ME, Gwin SE, Pierson SM (2004) Tracking changes in wetlands with urbanization: sixteen years of experience in Portland, Oregon, USA. Wetlands 24(4):734–743.  https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)0240734:TCIWWU2.0.CO;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kercher SM, Zedler JB (2004) Flood tolerance in wetland angiosperms: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive species. Aquat Bot 80(2):89–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2004.08.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knight KS, Kurylo JS, Endress AG, Stewart JR, Reich PB (2007) Ecology and ecosystem impacts of common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica): a review. Biol Invasions 9(8):925–937.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-007-9091-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159(8-9):1974–1983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2011.02.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lelong B, Lavoie C, Jodoin Y, Belzile F (2007) Expansion pathways of the exotic common reed (Phragmites australis): a historical and genetic analysis. Divers Distrib 13(4):430–437.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00351.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maheu-Giroux M, de Blois S (2006) Landscape ecology of Phragmites australis invasion in networks of linear wetlands. Landsc Ecol 22:285–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthews JW, Spyreas G (2010) Convergence and divergence in plant community trajectories as a framework for monitoring wetland restoration progress. J Appl Ecol 47(5):1128–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01862.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Matthews JW, Peralta AL, Soni A, Baldwin P, Kent AD, Endress AG (2009) Local and landscape correlates of non-native species invasion in restored wetlands. Ecography 32(6):1031–1039.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05863.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maurer DA, Zedler JB (2002) Differential invasion of a wetland grass explained by tests of nutrients and light availability on establishment and clonal growth. Oecologia 131(2):279–288.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-002-0886-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890.Google Scholar
  51. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127(3):247–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meunier G, Lavoie C (2012) Roads as corridors for invasive plant species: new evidence from smooth bedstraw (Galium mollugo). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5(01):92–100.  https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-11-00049.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Minor ES, Gardner RH (2011) Landscape connectivity and seed dispersal characteristics inform the best management strategy for exotic plants. Ecol Appl 21(3):739–749.  https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0321.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Minor ES, Tessel SM, Engelhardt KAM, Lookingbill TR (2009) The role of landscape connectivity in assembling exotic plant communities: a network analysis. Ecology 90(7):1802–1809.  https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1015.1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mohlenbrock RH (2002) Vascular flora of Illinois: a field guide, 3rd edn. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale and EdwardsvilleGoogle Scholar
  56. Moore P (1982) Coastal plants take to the road. Nature 297(5867):537–538.  https://doi.org/10.1038/297537b0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Moore TLC, Hunt WF (2012) Ecosystem service provision by stormwater wetlands and ponds - a means for evaluation? Water Res 46(20):6811–6823.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.11.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Morse NB, Pellissier PA, Cianciola EN, Brereton RL, Sullivan MM, Shonka NK, Wheeler TB, McDowell WH (2014) Novel ecosystems in the Anthropocene: a revision of the novel ecosystem concept for pragmatic applications. Ecol Soc 19:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Murcia C, Aronson J, Kattan GH, Moreno-Mateos D, Dixon K, Simberloff D (2014) A critique of the ‘novel ecosystem’ concept. Trends Ecol Evol 29(10):548–553.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.07.006 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Oksanen J, Blanchet F, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara R, Simpson G, Solymos P, Stevens H, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0–10. http://cran.r-project.org/package=vegan
  61. Pincetl S (2015) Cities as novel biomes: recognizing urban ecosystem services as anthropogenic. Front Ecol Evol 3:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Price AL, Fant JB, Larkin DJ (2014) Ecology of native vs. introduced Phragmites australis (common reed) in Chicago-area wetlands. Wetlands 34(2):369–377.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-013-0504-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Price EPF, Spyreas G, Matthews JW (in press) Biotic homogenization of regional wetland plant communities within short time-scales in the presence of an aggressive invader. J Ecol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12883
  64. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  65. Reinelt L, Horner R, Azous A (1998) Impacts of urbanization on palustrine (depressional freshwater) wetlands—research and management in the Puget sound region. Urban Ecosyst 2(4):219–236.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009532605918 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saltonstall K (2002) Cryptic invasion by a non-native genotype of the common reed, Phragmites australis, into North America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99(4):2445–2449.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.032477999 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Saltonstall K (2003) Genetic variation among north American populations of Phragmites australis: implications for management. Estuaries 26(2):444–451.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02823721 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schwartz MW, Thorne JH, Viers JH (2006) Biotic homogenization of the California flora in urban and urbanizing regions. Biol Conserv 127(3):282–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.05.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Scott NE, Davison AW (1982) De-icing salt and the invasion of road verges by maritime plants. Watsonia 14:41–52Google Scholar
  70. Scott NE, Davison AW (1985) The distribution and ecology of coastal species on roadsides. Vegetatio 62(1-3):433–440.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Seastedt TR, Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (2008) Management of novel ecosystems: are novel approaches required? Front Ecol Environ 6(10):547–553.  https://doi.org/10.1890/070046 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shih JG, Finkelstein SA (2008) Range dynamics and invasive tendencies in Typha latifolia and Typha angustifolia in eastern North America derived from herbarium and pollen records. Wetlands 28(1):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1672/07-40.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Skultety D, Matthews JW (2017) Urbanization and roads drive non-native plant invasion in the Chicago metropolitan region. Biol Invasions 19(9):2553–2566.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-017-1464-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swink F, Wilhelm GS (1994) Plants of the Chicago region, 4th edn. Indiana Academy of Science, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  75. Thiele J, Schuckert U, Otte A (2008) Cultural landscapes of Germany are patch-corridor-matrix mosaics for an invasive megaforb. Landsc Ecol 23(4):453–465.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-008-9202-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thomas SM, Moloney KA (2015) Combining the effects of surrounding land-use and propagule pressure to predict the distribution of an invasive plant. Biol Invasions 17(1):477–495.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-014-0745-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tiner RW (2017) Wetland indicators: a guide to wetland formation, identification, delineation, classification, and mapping. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  78. Truitt AM, Granek EF, Duveneck MJ, Goldsmith KA, Jordan MP, Yazzie KC (2015) What is novel about novel ecosystems: managing change in an ever-changing world. Environ Manag 55(6):1217–1226.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0465-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (2010) Regional supplement to the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0). In: Wakely JS, Lichvar RW, Noble CV, Berkowitz JF (eds) ERDC/EL TR-10-16. US Army Corps of Engineers, VicksburgGoogle Scholar
  80. U.S. Geological Survey (2014) 2011 National Land Cover Dataset. USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science Center, Sioux FallsGoogle Scholar
  81. Vilà M, Ibáñez I (2011) Plant invasions in the landscape. Landsc Ecol 26(4):461–472.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9585-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2007) Long-distance dispersal of plants by vehicles as a driver of plant invasions. Conserv Biol 21(4):986–996.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00722.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. von der Lippe M, Kowarik I (2008) Do cities export biodiversity? Traffic as dispersal vector across urban-rural gradients. Divers Distrib 14(1):18–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2007.00401.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. von der Lippe M, Bullock JM, Kowarik I, Knopp T, Wichmann MC (2013) Human-mediated dispersal of seeds by the airflow of vehicles. PLoS One 8(1):e52733.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052733 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilcox DA (1986) The effects of deicing salts on vegetation in Pinhook bog, Indiana. Can J Bot 64(4):865–874.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b86-113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wilhelm G, Rericha L (2017) Flora of the Chicago region: a floristic and ecological synthesis. Indiana Academy of Science, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
  87. Zedler JB (2009) Feedbacks that might sustain natural, invaded, and restored states in herbaceous wetlands. In: Hobbs RJ, Suding KN (eds) New models for ecosystem dynamics and restoration. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 236–258Google Scholar
  88. Zedler JB, Kercher S (2004) Causes and consequences of invasive plants in wetlands: opportunities, opportunists, and outcomes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 23(5):431–452.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352680490514673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Illinois Natural History SurveyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resources and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations