Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 6, pp 1221–1228 | Cite as

Soil lead contamination decreases bee visit duration at sunflowers

Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

Legacies of lead contamination present challenges in the management of urban greenspaces for beneficial insect conservation. In particular, the sublethal effects of lead contamination on bee foraging behavior could negatively impact plant-pollinator interactions and the sustainability of urban agriculture. It is difficult, however, to distinguish between differences in foraging behavior caused by lead contamination directly as compared to differences resulting from variation in floral traits, which can also be affected by contamination. We compared the foraging behavior of bees, specifically the number of visits and visit duration, at sunflowers grown in lead-contaminated and uncontaminated soils. We also measured soil lead contamination’s effects on sunflower morphological traits. While the number of visits a sunflower head received was not affected by soil lead contamination, bee visit duration was shorter at sunflowers grown in lead contaminated soil. This effect of lead contamination on visit duration was not mediated by sunflower floral traits, which were themselves affected by lead contamination. The inability of bees to distinguish between sunflowers grown in contaminated vs. uncontaminated soil prior to visitation suggests a possible bioaccumulation pathway for lead in bees.

Keywords

Foraging behavior Lead contamination Pollination Structural equation modeling Urban agriculture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Nicole Hoekstra and Chelsea Gordon for their assistance in the field and Rachel McLaughlin for reviewing videos. Charles Goebel and Robert Gates provided guidance in statistical analyses and Riccardo Bommarco provided helpful comments on the manuscript. Funding support provided by the National Science Foundation Early Career Development Program (CAREER-1253197) to M.M.G.

Supplementary material

11252_2017_674_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (69 kb)
Online Resource 1(PDF 69 kb)

References

  1. Adesodun JK, Atayese MO, Agbaje TA, Osadiaye BA, Mafe OF, Soretire AA (2010) Phytoremediation potentials of sunflowers (Tithonia diversifolia and Helianthus annuus) for metals in soils contaminated with zinc and lead nitrates. Water Air Soil Pollut 207:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al Naggar YA, Naiem E-SA, Seif AI, Mona MH (2013) Honey bees and their products as a bio-indicator of environmental pollution with heavy metals. Mellifera 13:10–20Google Scholar
  3. Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD, Turner R (1971) Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Adv Ecol Res 7:1–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargańska Ż, Ślebioda M, Namieśnik J (2016) Honey bees and their products: Bioindicators of environmental contamination. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boonyapookana B, Parkplan P, Techapinyawat S, DeLaune RD, Jugsujinda A (2005) Phytoaccumulation of lead by sunflower (Helianthus annuus), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), and vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides). J Environ Sci Health A 40:117–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bromenshenk JJ, Carlson S, Simpson J, Thomas J (1985) Pollution monitoring of Puget sound with honey bees. Science 227:632–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown SL, Chaney RL, Hettiarachchi GM (2016) Lead in urban soils: a real or perceived concern for urban agriculture? J Environ Qual 45:26–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. California Office of Environmental Health (2010) Risk assessment – soil and soil gas. OEHHA. http://oehha.ca.gov/risk/chhsltable.html. Accessed 09 April 2015
  9. Citak D, Silici S, Tuzen M, Soylak M (2012) Determination of toxic and essential elements in sunflower honey from Thrace region, Turkey. Int J Food Sci Technol 47:107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cutright T, Gunda N, Kurt F (2010) Simultaneous hyperaccumulation of multiple heavy metals by Helianthus annuus grown in a contaminated sandy-loam soil. Int J Phytorem 12:562–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devillers J, Pham-Delègue M-H (2002) Honey bees: estimating the environmental impact of chemicals. Taylor and Francis, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Di N, Hladun KR, Zhang K, Liu T-X, Trumble JT (2016) Laboratory bioassays on the impact of cadmium, copper and lead on the development and survival of honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) larvae and foragers. Chemosphere 152:530–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An {R} companion to applied regression, Second edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  14. Free JB, Williams IH, Pinsent R, Townshend A, Basi MS, Graham CL (1983) Using foraging honeybees to sample an area for trace-metals. Environ Int 9:9–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gall JE, Boyd RS, Rajakaruna N (2015) Transfer of heavy metals through terrestrial food webs: a review. Environ Monit Assess 187:201. doi:10.1007/s10661-015-4436-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gardiner MM, Burkman CE, Prajzner SP (2013) The value of urban vacant land to support arthropod biodiversity and ecosystem services. Environ Entomol 42:1123–1136CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardiner MM, Prajzner SP, Burkman CE, Albro S, Grewal PS (2014) Vacant land conversion to community gardens: influences on generalist arthropod predators and biocontrol services in urban greenspaces. Urban Ecosyst 17:101–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hladun KR, Parker DR, Trumble JT (2011) Selenium accumulation in the floral tissues of two Brassicaceae species and its impact on floral traits and plant performance. Environ Exp Bot 74:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hladun KR, Parker DR, Tran KD, Trumble JT (2013) Effects of selenium accumulation on phytotoxicity, herbivory, and pollination ecology in radish (Raphanus sativus L.) Environ Pollut 172:70–75CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jarup L (2003) Hazards of heavy metal contamination. Br Med Bull 68:167–182CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Jennings AA, Petersen EJ (2006) Variability of North American regulatory guidance for heavy metal contamination of residential soil. J Environ Eng Sci 5:485–508Google Scholar
  23. Kastori R, Plesnicar M, Sakac Z, Pankovic D, Arsenijevic-Maksimovic I (1998) Effect of excess lead on sunflower growth and photosynthesis. J Plant Nutr 21:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kevan PG (1999) Pollinators as bioindicators of the state of the environment: species, activity and diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohrman H, Chamberlain CP (2014) Heavy metals in produce from urban farms in the San Francisco Bay Area. Food Addit Contam, Part B 7:127–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leita L, Muhlbachova G, Cesco S, Barbattini R, Mondini C (1996) Investigation of the use of honey bees and honey bee products to assess heavy metals contamination. Environ Monit Assess 43:1–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150Google Scholar
  28. Meindl GA, Ashman T-L (2013) The effects of aluminum and nickel in nectar on the foraging behavior of bumblebees. Environ Pollut 177:78–81CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Meindl GA, Ashman T-L (2014) Nickel accumulation by Streptanthus polygaloides (Brassicaceae) reduces floral visitation rate. J Chem Ecol 40:128–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Meindl GA, Ashman T-L (2015) Effects of floral metal accumulation on floral visitor communities: introducing the elemental filter hypothesis. Am J Bot 102:379–389CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Mitchell RJ, Karron JD, Holmquist KG, Bell JM (2004) The influence of Mimulus ringens floral display size on pollinator visitation patterns. Funct Ecol 18:116–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mogren CL, Trumble JT (2010) The impacts of metals and metalloids on insect behavior. Entomol Exp Appl 135:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mok H-F, Williamson VG, Grove JR, Burry K, Barker SF, Hamilton AJ (2014) Strawberry fields forever? Urban agriculture in developed countries: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parmentier L, Meeus I, Cheroutre L, Mommaerts V, Louwye S, Smagghe G (2014) Commercial bumblebee hives to assess an anthropogenic environment for pollinator support: a case study in the region of Ghent (Belgium). Environ Monit Assess 186:2357–2367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Perugini M, Manera M, Grotta L, Abete MC, Tarasco R, Amorena M (2011) Heavy metal (Hg, Cr, Cd, and Pb) contamination in urban areas and wildlife reserves: honeybees as bioindicators. Biol Trace Elem Res 140:170–176Google Scholar
  36. Pisa LW et al (2015) Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22:68–102Google Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team (2016) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  38. Rosseel Y (2012) Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw 48:1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ruschioni S, Riolo P, Minuz RL, Stefano M, Cannella M, Porrini C, Isidoro N (2013) Biomonitoring with honeybees of heavy metals and pesticides in nature reserves of the Marche region (Italy). Biol Trace Elem Res 154:226–233CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Satta A, Verdinelli M, Ruiu L, Buffa F, Salis S, Sassu A, Floris I (2012) Combination of beehive matrices analysis and ant biodiversity to study heavy metal pollution impact in a post-mining area (Sardinia, Italy). Environ Sci Pollut Res 19:3977–3988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1988) Plant animal interactions and fruit production in a neotropical herb: a path analysis. Ecology 69:1128–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schindelin J et al (2012) Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 9:676–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh A, Prasad SM (2011) Reduction of heavy metal load in food chain: technology assessment. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 10:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stavert JR, Liñán-Cembrano G, Beggs JR, Howlett BG, Pattemore DE, Bartomeus I (2016) Hairiness: the missing link between pollinators and pollination. PeerJ 4:e2779CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. van der Steen JJM, de Kraker J, Grotenhuis T (2012) Spatial and temporal variation of metal concentrations in adult honeybees (Apis mellifera L.) Environ Monit Assess 184:4119–4126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, Fourth edn. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations