Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Habitat richness and tree species richness of roundabouts: effects on site selection and the prevalence of arboreal caterpillars

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between the habitat and tree species richness of roundabouts and the abundance and species richness of tree-dwelling caterpillars, and thus the potential of urban roundabouts to support breeding populations. Total tree species number on sites was related to an increase in caterpillar abundance and a greater number of habitats was associated with a higher number of caterpillar species. An increase in the total number of trees was not correlated with a greater abundance of tree-feeding Lepidoptera; nor were native trees found to support proportionally more caterpillar species than all tree species, including introduced. This could be due to differences in species accumulation, the prevalence of generalist species or a statistical sampling effect. The occupancy and average abundance of caterpillar species was generally low, which does not support the theory that Lepidoptera in urban areas tend towards mono-dominance. It may, however, represent the presence of ‘accidental’ species on roundabouts. Habitat management and planting to increase tree species diversity and density on roundabouts has the potential to increase the species diversity and abundance of arboreal Lepidoptera, and increase abundance of butterfly and moth urban populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angold PG, Sadler JP, Hill MO, Pullin A, Rushton S, Austin K, Smal E, Wood B, Wadsworth R, Sanderson R, Thompson K (2006) Biodiversity in urban habitat patches. Sci Total Environ 360:196–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arrhenius O (1921) Species and area. J Anim Ecol 9:95–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1999) Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity. Ecol Appl 9:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 8:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonebrake TC, Cooper DS (2014) A Hollywood drama of butterfly extirpation and persistence over a century of urbanization. J Insect Conserv 18:683–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown KS, Freitas AVL (2002) Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. J Inst Conserv 6:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter DJ, Hargreaves B (1986) Field guide for caterpillars of Britain and Europe. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinery M (1976) A field guide to the insects of Britain and northern Europe. Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Denys C, Schmidt H (1998) Insect communities on experimental mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris L.) plots along an urban gradient. Oecologia 113:269–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Mauro D, Dietz T, Rockwood L (2007) Determining the effect of urbanization on generalist butterfly species diversity in butterfly gardens. Urban Ecosyst 10:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eremeeva NI, Sushchev DV (2005) Stuctural changes in the fauna of pollinating insects in urban landscape. Russ J Ecol 36:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans K, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth SH, Kane TC (1978) Urban Biogeography – city parks as Islands for Diptera and Coleoptera. Oecologia 32:127–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RM, Smith GM, Sanderson JM, Hill RA, Thomson AG, Cox R, Brown NJ, Clarke RT, Rothery P, Gerard FF (2000) Countryside Survey 2000 Module 7. Land Cover Map 2000. Final Report CSLCM/Final. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Monks Wood

    Google Scholar 

  • Giuliano WM, Accamando WK, McAdams EJ (2004) Lepidoptera-habitat relationships in urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 7:361–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2009) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy PB, Dennis RLH (1999) The impact of urban development on butterflies within a city region. Biodivers Conserv 8:1261–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helden AJ, Leather SR (2004) Biodiversity on urban roundabouts – Hemiptera, management and the species-area relationship. Basic Appl Ecol 5:367–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helden AJ, Leather SR (2005) The Hemiptera of Bracknell as an example of biodiversity within an urban environment. Br J Entomol Nat Hist 18:233–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Helden AJ, Stamp GC, Leather SR (2012) Urban biodiversity: comparison of insect assembalges on native and non-native trees. Urban Ecosyst 15:611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihaka R, Gentleman R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput Graph Stat 5:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EL, Leather SR (2012) Invertebrates in urban areas: a review. Eur J Entomol 109:463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser A, Merckx T, Van Dyck H (2016) The Urban Heat Island and its spatial scale dependente impact on survival and development in butterflies of different thermal sensitivity. Ecol Evol 6:4129–4140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly CK, Southwood TRE (1984) Species richness and resource availability: a phylogenetic analysis of insects associated with trees. PNAS 96:8013–8016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy CEJ, Southwood TRE (1984) The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a re-analysis. J Anim Ecol 53:455–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH (1983) Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:23–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather SR (1991) Feeding specialisation and host distribution of British and Finnish Prunus feeding macrolepidoptera. Oikos 60:40–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather SR, Helden AJ (2005) Roundabouts: our neglected nature reserves? Biologist 52:102–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, Leger LST (2005) Healthy nature healthy people: “contact with nature” as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int 21:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A, Wilkinson J (1988) Trees of Britain and Northern Europe. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemela J (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers Conserv 8:119–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ockinger E, Dannestam A, Smitth HG (2009) The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landsc Urban Plan 93:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter J (1997) The colour identification guide to caterpillars of the British Isles. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Restrepo LR, Halffter G (2013) Butterfly diversity in a regional urbanization mosaic in two Mexican cities. Landsc Urban Plan 115:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickman JK, Connor EF (2003) The effect of urbanization on the quality of remnant habitats for leaf-mining Lepidoptera on Quercus agrifolia. Ecography 26:777–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries L, Debinski DM, Wieland ML (2001) Conservation value of Roadside Prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conserv Biol 15:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarinen K, Valtonen A, Jantunen J, Saarnio S (2005) Butterflies and diurnal moths along road verges: doess road type affect diversity and abundance? Biol Conserv 123:503–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffers BR, Edwards DP, Diesmos A, Williams SE, Evans TA (2014) Microhabitats reduce animal’s exposure to climate extremes. Glob Chang Biol 20:495–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt BC, Roland J (2006) Moth diversity in a fragmented habitat: importance of functional groups and landscape scale in the boreal forest. Ann Entomol Soc Am 99:1110–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sing K-W, Juosh WFA, Hashim NR, Wilson J-J (2016) Urban parks: refuges for tropical butterflies in Southeast Asia? Urban Ecosyst 19:1131–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner (2000) Colour Identification Guide to Moths of the British Isles (Macrolepidoptera). Viking Books, Middlesex, UK

  • Southwood TRE (1961) The number of species of insect associated with various trees. J Anim Ecol 30:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takami Y, Koshio C, Ishii M, Fujii H, Hidaka T, Shimizu I (2004) Genetic diversity and structure of urban populations of Pieris butterflies assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Mol Ecol 13:245–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tam CT, Bonebrake TC (2016) Butterfly diversity, habitat and vegetation usage in Hong Kong urban parks. Urban Ecosyst 19:721–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman T, Lewington R (2004) Field guide for butterflies of Britain and Europe. HarperCollins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay I, Thomas D, Blondel J, Perret P, Lambrecht MM (2005) The effect of habitat quality and forgaing patterns on provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus. Ibis 147:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H, Van Strien AJ, Maes D, Van Sway CAM (2009) Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use. Conserv Biol 23:957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore C, Crouch TE, Slotow RH (2002) Conservation of biodiversity in urban environments: Invertebrates on structurally enhanced road islands. Afr Entomol 10:113–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolda H, Marek J, Spitzer K, Noval I (1994) Diversity and variability of Lepidoptera populations in urban Brno, Czech Republic. J Eur Entomol 91:213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood BC, Pullin AS (2002) Persistence of species in a fragmented urban landscape: the importance of dispersal ability and habitat availability for grassland butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 11:1451–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapparoli M (1997) Urban development and insect biodiversity of the Rome area, Italy. Landsc Urban Plan 38:77–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK

    Cecily Goodwin, Bruce Keep & Simon R. Leather

  2. Environment & Sustainability Unity, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK

    Cecily Goodwin

  3. Crop & Environment Sciences, Harper Adams University, Edgmond, Newport, TF10 8NB, UK

    Simon R. Leather

Authors
  1. Cecily Goodwin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bruce Keep
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Simon R. Leather
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon R. Leather.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goodwin, C., Keep, B. & Leather, S.R. Habitat richness and tree species richness of roundabouts: effects on site selection and the prevalence of arboreal caterpillars. Urban Ecosyst 20, 889–895 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0644-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-017-0644-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation