Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Seed limitation and lack of downed wood, not invasive species, threaten conifer regeneration in an urban forest

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban forests provide valuable ecosystem services, but their long-term viability is often threatened by low tree recruitment due to seed and/or microsite limitation. Distinguishing between these two causes of low recruitment has important management implications, but has been little studied in urban environments. We tested for seed and microsite limitation in an urban forested park in Seattle, Washington, USA by adding conifer tree seeds and seedlings to experimental plots in which we manipulated microsite conditions by removing invasive ivy (Hedera spp.) and adding deadwood. We found that natural seed production was low, and adding seeds increased the number of observed seedlings. Furthermore, adding deadwood increased seedling survival, whereas removing Hedera did not have strong effects. Seed limitation is frequently addressed through management actions such as sowing seeds and transplanting seedlings, and our results suggest that such actions address a critical barrier to tree recruitment in urban forests. However, we also observed strong microsite limitation. At our study site, microsite limitation can be addressed primarily by adding deadwood and retaining coarse woody debris on site. Addressing microsite limitation may be a critical component of successful management efforts to improve tree recruitment in urban forests, and should not be overlooked. Furthermore, our study highlights the need for active monitoring and data analysis alongside management, since the most apparent threat (widespread cover of an invasive plant in this case) may not be the primary limit on suitable microsite conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker S (2011) Volunteer Forest Steward, Seattle Parks & Recreation. Personal communication

  • Beach EW, Halpern CB (2001) Controls on conifer regeneration in managed riparian forests: effects of seed source, substrate, and vegetation. Can J For Res

  • Beckett KP, Freer-Smith P, Taylor G (1998) Urban woodlands: their role in reducing the effects of particulate pollution. Environ Pollut

  • Biggerstaff MS, Beck CW (2007) Effects of English ivy (Hedera helix) on seed bank formation and germination. Am Midl Nat

  • Bode RF, Gilbert AB (2016) Seed predators, not herbivores, exert natural selection on solidago spp. in an urban archipelago. Environ Entomol. doi:10.1093/ee/nvv158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ

  • Bonner FT, Karrfalt RP (2008) The woody plant seed manual. Government Printing Office

  • Bowers MA, Breland B (1996) Foraging of gray squirrels on an urban–rural gradient: Use of the GUD to assess anthropogenic impact. Ecol Appl. doi:10.2307/2269597

    Google Scholar 

  • Broshot NE (2007) The influence of urbanization on forest stand dynamics in Northwestern Oregon. Urban Ecosyst

  • Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America: Volume 1. Conifers. U.S.D.A. Forest Service, Washington DC

  • Butaye J, Jacquemyn H, Honnay O, Hermy M (2002) The species pool concept applied to forests in a fragmented landscape: dispersal limitation versus habitat limitation. J Veg Sci

  • Carreiro MM (2008) Using the urban–rural gradient approach to determine the effects of land use on forest remnants. Ecol Plan Manag Urban For Int Perspect. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-71425-7_11

    Google Scholar 

  • Condit R, Pitman N, Leigh EG, Chave J, Terborgh J, Foster RB, Nunez P, Aguilar S, Valencia R, Villa G, Muller-Landau HC, Losos E, Hubbell SP (2002) Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Sci

  • Dalling JW, Hubbell SP, Silvera K (1998) Seed dispersal, seedling establishment and gap partitioning among tropical pioneer trees. J Ecol

  • Dávalos A, Nuzzo V, Blossey B (2015) Interactive effects of deer, earthworms and non-native plants on rare forest plant recruitment. Biol Conserv

  • Earthcorps (2015) Interactive Habitat Map. http://www.earthcorps.org/interactive-map.php Accessed 1 May 2015

  • Elman E, Salisbury N (2009) The State of Seattle’s Conifer Forests. Available at http://www.earthcorps.org/pdfs/resource/16/2009_State_of_Conifers.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2013.

  • Franklin JF, Moir WH, Hemstrom MA, Greene SE, Smith BG (1988) The Forest Communities of Mount Rainier National Park Washington, USA. U.S.A. National Park Service Scientific Monograph Series

  • Godefroid S, Piazza C, Rossi G, Buord S, Stevens A, Aguraiuja R, Cowell C, Weekley CW, Vogg G, Iriondo JM (2011) How successful are plant species reintroductions?. Biol Conserv

  • Harmon ME, Franklin JF (1989) Tree Seedlings on Logs in Picea-Tsuga Forests of Oregon and Washington. Ecol

  • Hutyra LR, Yoon B, Alberti M (2011) Terrestrial carbon stocks across a gradient of urbanization: a study of the Seattle, WA region. Global Chang Biol

  • Keeton W, Franklin J (2005) Do remnant old-growth trees accelerate rates of succession in mature Douglas-fir forests? Ecol Monogr. doi:10.1890/03-0626

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight TM, Steets JA, Vamosi JC, Mazer SJ, Burd M, Campbell DR, Dudash MR, Johnston MO, Mitchell RJ, Ashman T (2005) Pollen limitation of plant reproduction: pattern and process. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst

  • Kroiss SJ, HilleRisLambers J (2015) Recruitment limitation of long-lived conifers: implications for climate change responses. Ecol

  • Kruckeberg AR (1991) The natural history of Puget Sound country. University of Washington Press

  • Lobo N (2014) Conifer seed predation by terrestrial small mammals: A review of the patterns, implications, and limitations of top-down and bottom-up interactions. For Ecol Manag

  • Lomov B, Keith DA, Hochuli DF (2010) Pollination and plant reproductive success in restored urban landscapes dominated by a pervasive exotic pollinator. Landsc Urban Plan

  • Matlack GR (1994) Plant-Species Migration in a Mixed-History Forest Landscape in Eastern North-America. Ecol

  • Nagamitsu T, Kikuchi S, Hotta M, Kenta T, Hiura T (2014) Effects of Population Size, Forest Fragmentation, and Urbanization on Seed Production and Gene Flow in an Endangered Maple (Acer miyabei). Am Midl Nat

  • Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Dwyer JF (2002) Compensatory value of urban trees in the United States. J Arboric

  • Nowak DJ, Stein SM, Randler PB, Greenfield EJ, Comas SJ, Carr MA, Alig RJ (2010) Sustaining America’s Urban Trees and Forests General Technical Report NRS-62

  • O’Brien AM, Ettinger AK, HilleRisLambers J (2012) Conifer growth and reproduction in urban forest fragments: Predictors of future responses to global change? Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252-012-0250-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Pufal G, Klein A (2015) Spatial scale affects seed predation and dispersal in contrasting anthropogenic landscapes. Basic Appl Ecol

  • Pye JM (1988) Impact of ozone on the growth and yield of trees: a review. J Environ Qual

  • R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org

  • Seattle Department of Parks and Recreation-Urban Forestry Program (SDPR-UFP) (2002) Lincoln Park Vegetation Managerment Plan. Available at http://www.seattle.gov/parks/Horticulture/VMP/LincolnPark.htm

  • Shoup S, Whitcomb CE (1981) Interactions between trees and ground covers. J Arboric

  • Simard M, Bergeron Y, Sirois L (1998) Conifer seedling recruitment in a southeastern Canadian boreal forest: the importance of substrate. J Veg Sci

  • Stolte K (1996) The symptomology of ozone injury to pine foliage. In: Miller, PR; Stolte, KW; Duriscoe, DM; Pronos, J., tech coords, Evaluating ozone air pollution effects on pines in the western United States.Gen.Tech.Rep.PSW-GTR-155.Albany, CA: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station

  • Szewczyk J, Szwagrzyk J (1996) Tree regeneration on rotten wood and on soil in old-growth stand. Vegetation

  • Tenneson K (2013) The Residential Urban Forest: Linking structure, function and management

  • Thomas Jr LK (1980) The impact of three exotic plant species on a Potomac island. The impact of three exotic plant species on a Potomac island

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2014) World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision, Highlights ST/ESA/SER.A/352

  • Uriarte M, Bruna EM, Rubim P, Anciães M, Jonckheere I (2010) Effects of forest fragmentation on the seedling recruitment of a tropical herb: assessing seed vs. safe-site limitation. Ecol

  • U.S. Census Bureau 2012a) 2010 Census redistricting data (Public Law 94-171) Summary file. Washington State Office of Financial Management, Forecasting Division. Retrieved from http://www.ofm.wa.gov/pop/census2010/data.asp

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2012b) State and County QuickFacts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/index.html

  • Woodall C, Monleon-Moscardo VJ, Inventory F (2008) Sampling protocol, estimation, and analysis procedures for the down woody materials indicator of the FIA program

  • Zhong J, van der Kamp, Bart J (1999) Pathology of conifer seed and timing of germination in high-elevation subalpine fir and Engelmann spruce forests of the southern interior of British Columbia. Can J For Res

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank M. Abata, R.K.K. Ettinger, R.S. Ettinger, D. Ewing, J. Kane, K. Kane, M. Piper, and A. Wenke for field and greenhouse assistance, data, and advice. We thank S. Baker, R. Donovan, M. Mead, K. Robinson, and Seattle Parks & Recreation Department for their support and help with installing the experiment. We thank SilvaSeed and the Washington Department of Natural Resources for providing us with seeds and seedlings. Research was supported by the Garden Club of America Urban Forestry Fellowship, University of Washington Biology Department, and National Science Foundation (NSF Graduate Research Fellowship DGE-0718124 to A.E). Any opinion, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Washington, Garden Club of America or National Science Foundation.

Statement of authorship

A.E. conceived and designed the experiment, conducted the final analyses, and wrote the manuscript; B.L. and S.M. helped design and conduct the experiment, helped collect and analyze the data, and edited the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ailene K. Ettinger.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table S1

(DOCX 215 kb)

Table S2

(DOCX 20 kb)

Table S3

(DOCX 23 kb)

Figure S1

(DOCX 132 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ettinger, A.K., Lee, B.R. & Montgomery, S. Seed limitation and lack of downed wood, not invasive species, threaten conifer regeneration in an urban forest. Urban Ecosyst 20, 877–887 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0640-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0640-3

Keywords

Navigation