Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera

Abstract

Human migration to urban centers has resulted in diverse environmental disturbances that affect biodiversity. Although urbanization has been highlighted as one of the main drivers of biodiversity endangerment, this topic is still poorly studied in many countries. In order to establish the status quo of the ecology of butterflies in urban centers, we gathered publications focused on urban butterflies (Lepidoptera). We compiled a total of 173 studies from 37 countries and more than 110 urban areas, including published papers and theses (1956–2015). Most papers (69 %) addressed ecological topics, 14 % were focused on biological conservation, and 17 % corresponded to species lists. In summary, most studies revealed a negative impact of urbanization intensity on butterfly diversity (richness and abundance). In fact, we found studies reporting local extinctions due to urbanization, highlighting the causes related to them. The study of charismatic urban wildlife groups, such as butterflies, is a promising field, as there are still important gaps in our comprehension of the ecological patterns and processes that occur in urban areas. Undoubtedly, understanding the response of butterflies to urbanization will aid in the development of urban biodiversity management, planning, and conservation strategies worldwide, which together with knowledge of other wildlife groups and socioeconomic variables, will lead us to more sustainable, livable, and biodiverse cities.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarckson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Heldblom M, Klotz S, Louwe Koojimans J, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 281:20133330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergerot B, Julliard R, Baguette M (2010) Metacommunity dynamics: decline of functional relationship along a habitat fragmentation gradient. PLoS One 5:e11294

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergerot B, Fontaine B, Julliard R, Baguette M (2011) Landscape variables impact the structure and composition of butterfly assemblages along an urbanization gradient. Landscape Ecol 26:83–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergerot B, Merck T, Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2012) Habitat fragmentation impacts mobility in a common and widespread woodland butterfly: do sexes respond differently? BMC Ecol 12:5

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergerot B, Tournant P, Moussus JP, Stevens VM, Julliard R, Baguette M, Foltête JC (2013) Coupling inter-patch movement models and landscape graph to assess functional connectivity. Popul Ecol 55:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkowitz A, Nilon CH, Hollweg KS (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bogiani PA, Aranda R, Machado CDOF (2012) Riqueza de borboletas (Lepidoptera) em um fragmento urbano de cerrado em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. EntomoBrasilis 5:93–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolotov IN (2002) Diurnal lepidopterans (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Arkhangelsk and its surroundings. Zool Zh 81:457–462

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bolotov IN (2004) Long-term changes in the fauna of diurnal lepidopterans (Lepidoptera, Diurna) in the Northern Taiga Subzone of the Western Russian Plain. Russ J Ecol 35:117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bonfantti D, Ribeiro LA, Moraes CM, Casagrande M, Mielke E, Hendrik Mielke OH (2011) Butterflies’s richness in two urban parks in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 11:247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown KS Jr, Freitas VAL (2002) Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. J Insect Conserv 6:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carvalho MC, Queiroz PCD, Ruszczyk A (1998) Protandry and female size-fecundity variation in the tropical butterfly Brassolis sophorae. Oecologia 116:98–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chowdhury S, Soren R (2011) Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) fauna of East Calcutta wetlands, West Bengal, India. Check List 7:700–703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark PJ, Reed JM, Chew FS (2007) Effects of urbanization on butterfly species richness, guild structure, and rarity. Urban Ecosyst 10:321–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Clements JC (2012) First record of the fiery skipper, Hylephila phyleus Drury (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) from New Brunswick, Canada. J Acadian Entomol Soc 8:59–60

    Google Scholar 

  20. Corke D (1999) Are honeydew/sap-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) affected by particulate air-pollution? J Insect Conserv 3:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape Urban Plann 69:385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cruz-Sáenz D, Lazcano D (2012) Biological and ecological aspects of Xantusia sanchezi, an endangered lizard in an oak forest in the state of Jalisco, Mexico. Rev Mex Biodivers 83:129132

    Google Scholar 

  23. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Daniels JC (2009) Cooperative conservation efforts to help recover an endangered South Florida butterfly. Insect Conserv Div 2:62–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Mauro D, Dietz T, Rockwood L (2007) Determining the effect of urbanization on generalist butterfly species diversity in butterfly gardens. Urban Ecosyst 10:427–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dover J, Rowlingson B (2005) The western Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops halyaetus): factors affecting adult butterfly distribution within native banksia bushland in an urban setting. Biol Conserv 122:599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dover JW, Dennis RLH, Atkins L (2009) The western Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops halyaetus: Lycaenidae) II: factors affecting oviposition within native banksia bushland in an urban setting. J Insect Conserv 13:487–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elias M, Joron M, Willmott KR, Silva-Brandão KL, Kaiser V, Arias CF, Gómez-Piñeres LM, Uribe S, Brower AV, Freitas AVL, Jiggins CD (2009) Out of the Andes: patterns of diversification in clearwing butterflies. Molec Ecol 18:1716–1729

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Eremeeva NI, Sushchev DV (2005) Structural changes in the fauna of pollinating insects in urban landscapes. Russ J Ecol 36:259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Evans JP (2011) Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. T I Brit Geogr 36:223–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fattorini S (2011a) Insect extinction by urbanization: a long term study in Rome. Biol Conserv 144:370–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fattorini S (2011b) Insect rarity, extinction and conservation in urban Rome (Italy): a 120-year-long study of tenebrionid beetles. Insect Conserv Div 4:307–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fisher B, Christopher T (2007) Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecol Econ 62:93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Fleming TH, Serrano D, Nassar J (2005) Dynamics of a subtropical population of the zebra longwing butterfly Heliconius charithonia (Nymphalidae). Fla Entomol 88:169–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fragkias M, Lobo J, Strumsky D, Seto KC (2013) Does size matter? Scaling of CO2 emissions and US urban areas. PLoS One 8:e64727

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Frankie GW, Ehler L (1978) Ecology of insects in urban environments. Annu Rev Entomol 23:367–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Garden J, Mcalpine C, Peterson ANN, Jones D, Possingham H (2006) Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral Ecol 31:126–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Garratt MP, Breeze TD, Jenner N, Polce C, Biesmeijer JC, Potts SG (2014) Avoiding a bad apple: insect pollination enhances fruit quality and economic value. Agric Ecosyst Environ 184:34–40

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gaston KJ (2010) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  40. Govers HAJ (2011) Lepidoptera monitored in the city of Utrecht (district Tuindorp) in the period of 1976-2001. Proc Neth Entomol Soc Meet 22:87–94

    Google Scholar 

  41. Greeney HF, Dyer LA, Smilanich AM (2012) Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous : a review of caterpillars’ chemical, physiological, morphological, and behavioral defenses against natural enemies. ISJ Invert Surviv J 9:7–34

    Google Scholar 

  42. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haaland C (2014) Abundances and movement of the scarce copper butterfly (Lycaena virgaureae) on future building sites at a settlement fringe in southern Sweden. J Insect Conserv 19:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Haroon FP (2015) Diversity of butterflies Fauna in tehsil Tangi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. World J Zool 10:302–309

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hernández Baz F (1993) La fauna de mariposas (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. La Ciencia y El Hombre 14:55–88 [In Spanish]

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hogsden KL, Hutchinson TC (2004) Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Can J Zool 82:739–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Johki Y (2012) Flower-visiting behavior of butterflies in the urban environment, with reference to the ecological city planning. Showa Women’s University Graduate School Bulletin 21:145–154

    Google Scholar 

  50. Johki Y (2013) Flower-visiting behavior of butterflies in an urban environment II. Comparisons of the results of field observations from 2010 and 2011. Human Sociol Bull 868:94–104

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jones L, Leather R (2012) Invertebrates in urban areas: a review. Eur J Entomol 109:463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kadlec T, Benes J, Jarosik V, Konvicka M (2008) Revisiting urban refuges: changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape Urban Plann 85:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Kanaujia A, Kumar A, Kushwaha S, Kumar A (2015) Diversity of odonates (dragonflies and damselflies) and lepidopteron (butterflies) fauna of Nawabganj bird sanctuary, Unnao District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Adv Biores 6:72–78

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kellert SR (1993) Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conserv Biol 7:845–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1997) An island biogeographical approach to the analysis of butterfly community patterns in newly designed parks. Res Popul Ecol 39:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Knapp S, Kühn I, Mosbrugger V, Klotz S (2008) Do protected areas in urban and rural landscapes differ in species diversity? Biodiv Conserv 17:1595–1612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Koi S, Daniels J (2015) New and revised life history of the Florida hairstreak Eumaeus atala (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) with notes on its current conservation status. Fla Entomol 98:1134–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Kremen C, Merenlender AM, Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conserv Biol 8:388–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Kronforst MR, Fleming TH (2001) Lack of genetic differentiation among widely spaced subpopulations of a butterfly with home range behavior. Heredity 86:243–250

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Kunte K (2000) Butterfly diversity of Pune City along the human impact gradient. J Ecological Soc 13(14):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  62. Lazzeri MG, Bar ME, Damborsky MP (2011) Diversidad del orden Lepidoptera (Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea) de la ciudad Corrientes, Argentina. Rev Biol Trop 59:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  63. Lee CM, Park JW, Kwon T-S, et al. (2015) Diversity and density of butterfly communities in urban green areas: an analytical approach using GIS. Zool Stud 54:4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2010) Natural, not urban, barriers define population structure for a coastal endemic butterfly. Conserv Genet 11:2311–2320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2011) Combining measures of dispersal to identify conservation strategies in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 25:1022–1031

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Lemes R, Ritter CD, Barros De Morais BA (2008) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea e Papilionoidea) visitantes florais no Jardim Botânico da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Biotemas 21:91–98 [In Portuguese]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lemes R, Carvalho APS, Ribeiro TC, Morais ABB (2015) Butterflies from urban green areas in Santa Maria, southern Brazil (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). SHILAP-Rev Lepidopt 43:95–111

    Google Scholar 

  68. Lizée MH, Bonardo R, Mauffrey JF, Bertaudiere-Montes V, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2011a) Relative importance of habitat and landscape scales on butterfly communities of urbanizing areas. C R Biol 334:74–84

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lizée M, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2011b) Monitoring urban environments on the basis of biological traits. Ecol Indic 11:353–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Lizée MH, Manel S, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species–area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landscape Ecol 27:159–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. López-López S (2011) Efectos de la urbanización sobre las comunidades de aves y lepidópteros de la ciudad de Morelia. Morelia, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Bsc Thesis [In Spanish]

    Google Scholar 

  72. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  73. MacGregor-Fors I, Ortega-Álvarez R (2013) Ecología Urbana - Experiencias en América Latina. Retrieved from – http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/libro_ecologia_urbana.

  74. MacGregor-Fors I, Avendaño-Reyes S, Bandala VM, Chacón-Zapata S, Díaz-Toribio MH, González-García F, Lorea-Hernández F, Martínez-Gómez J, Montes de Oca E, Montoya L, Pineda E, Ramírez-Restrepo L, Rivera-García E, Utrera Barillas E, Escobar F (2015) Multi-taxonomic diversity patterns in a neotropical green city: a rapid biological assessment. Urban Ecosyst 18:663–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Matsumoto K (2015) Habitat specificity of butterflies along urban environmental gradients in Tama City, Tokyo. Entomol Sci 18:509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Matteson KC, Langellotto G (2009) Bumble bee abundance in New York City community gardens: implications for urban agriculture. Cities Environ 2:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Matteson KC, Langellotto G (2012) Evaluating community gardens as habitat for an urban butterfly evaluating community gardens as habitat for an urban butterfly. Cities Environ 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Matteson KC, Grace JB, Minor ES (2013) Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos 122:682–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) (2009) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  81. McIntyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:825–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness : a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Mielke OHH, Carneiro E, Casagrande MM (2012) Brazil : 70 years of records with special reference to faunal composition of Vila Velha State Park. Rev Bras Entomol 56:59–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Minno MC, Minno M (2005) Butterflies in a Gainesville, Florida garden. Southern Lepidopterists’ News 27:19–21

    Google Scholar 

  87. Montgomery MR (2008) The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 319:761–764

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Moreno CE, Sánchez-Rojas G, Escobar F, Pineda E (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity evaluation: a review of terminology and recommendations for the use of target groups, bioindicators and surrogates. IJEnvH 1:71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Murphy DD, Weiss SB (1988) Ecological studies and the conservation of the bay Checkerspot butterfly, Euphydrias editha bayensis. Biol Conserv 46:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Murugesan M, Arun PR, Prusty BAK (2013) The butterfly community of an urban wetland system - a case study of Oussudu bird sanctuary, Puducherry, India. J Threat Taxa 5:4672–4678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Nelson GS, Nelson SM (2001) Bird and butterfly communities associated with two types of urban riparian areas. Urban Ecosyst 5:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2013) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17:305–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Nishida K, Nakamura I, Morales CO (2009) Plants and butterflies of a small urban preserve in the Central Valley of Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 57:31–67

    Google Scholar 

  95. Núñez Bustos E (2008) Las especies urbanas de Rhopalocera de la Reserva Ecológica Costanera Sur, ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea). SHILAP-Rev Lepidopt 36:435–447

    Google Scholar 

  96. Öckinger E, Dannestam Å, Smith HG (2009) The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landscape Urban Plann 93:31–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Ohwaki A, Nakamura K, Tanabe SI (2008) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the butterfly assemblage in an urban green area: the changes from 1990 to 2005. Ecol Res 23:697–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2009) Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape Urban Plann 90:189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Owen DF (1971) Species diversity in butterflies in a tropical garden. Biol Conserv 3:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Owen J, Owen DF (1975) Suburban gardens: England’s most important nature reserve? Environ Cons 2:53–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Pereira HA, Silva JR, Marques GDV, Germanos E, Camargo AJA, Stefani V (2011) Inventory of diurnal lepidoptera (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in a semideciduous mesophitic forest of a urban fragment. Bioscience Journal 27:839–848

    Google Scholar 

  102. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren PS (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manag 92:331–362

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Posa CMR, Sodhi NS (2006) Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biol Conserv 129:256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Potter A, LeBuhn G (2015) Pollination service to urban agriculture in San Francisco, CA. Urban Ecosyst 18:885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Rahayu SE, Basukriadi A (2012) The richness and diversity of butterflies (Lepidoptera; Rhopalocera) in the urban forest of Muhammad Sabki, Jambi Province, Indonesia. Biospecies 5:40–48

    Google Scholar 

  106. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Halffter G (2013) Butterfly diversity in a regional urbanization mosaic in two Mexican cities. Landscape Urban Plann 115:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Chacón de Ulloa P, Constantino LM (2007) Diversidad de mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea y Hesperioidea) en Santiago de Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Rev Colomb Entomol 33:54–63

    Google Scholar 

  108. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Cultid-Medina CA, MacGregor-Fors I (2015) How many butterflies are there in a city of circa half a million people? Sustainability 7:8587–8597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Ramos-Elorduy J, Moreno JMP, Vázquez AI, Landero I, Oliva-Rivera H, Camacho VHM (2011) Edible Lepidoptera in Mexico: geographic distribution, ethnicity, economic and nutritional importance for rural people. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Rao RSP, Girish MKS (2007) Road kills: assessing insect casualties using flagship taxon. Curr Sci 92:830–837

    Google Scholar 

  111. Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  112. Rouquette JR, Dallimer M, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ, Maltby L, Warren PH (2013) Species turnover and geographic distance in an urban river network. Divers Distrib 19:1429–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Ruszczyk A (1986a) Distribution and abundance of butterlies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre, Brazil. J Res Lepidoptera 25:157–178

    Google Scholar 

  114. Ruszczyk A (1986b) Ecologia Urbana de borboletas, I. O gradiente de urbanização Ea fauna de Porto Alegre, RS. Rev Bras Biol 46:675–688

    Google Scholar 

  115. Ruszczyk A (1986c) Mortality of Papilio scamander scamander (Lep., Papilionidae) pupae in four districts of Porto Alegre (S. Brazil) and the causes of superabundance of some butterflies in urban areas. Rev Bras Biol 46:567–579

    Google Scholar 

  116. Ruszczyk A (1996) Spatial patterns in pupal mortality in urban palm caterpillars. Oecologia 107:356–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Ruszczyk A, Carvalho JMC (1993) Malfunction of ecdysis and female biased mortality in urban Brassolis sophorae (Nymphalidae: Brassolinae). J Lepid Soc 47:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  118. Ruszczyk A, Mellender de Araujo A (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J Lepid Soc 46:255–264

    Google Scholar 

  119. Ruszczyk A, Nascimiento ES (1999) Biologia dos adultos de Methona themisto (Hübner, 1818) Lepioptera, Nymphalidae, Ithomiinae) en pracas públicas de Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev Bras Biol 59:577–583

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Ruszczyk A, Ribeiro JC (1998) Mortalidade dos parasitóides Spilochalcis morleyi (hymenoptera, Chalcididae) E Xanthozona melanopyga (Diptera, Tachinidae) em pupas feminas e masculonas de Brassolis sophorae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Rev Bras Biol 58:633–637 [In Portuguese]

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Ruszczyk A, Silva CF (1997) Butterflies select microhabitats on building walls. Landscape Urban Plann 38:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Ruszczyk A, Motta PC, Barros RL, Araújo AM (2004) Ecological correlates of polyphenism and gregarious roosting in the grass yellow butterfly Eurema elathea (Pieridae). Braz J Biol 64:151–164

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  123. Sackis GD, Morais ABBD (2008) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea e Papilionoidea) do campus da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul. Biota Neotrop 8:151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Saha M, Sarkar I, Barik L, Das RP, Dey SR (2015) Butterfly diversity of Berhampore girls’ college campus, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India: a preliminary assessment. The Beats of Natural Sciences 2:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  125. Salgado-Neto G, Di Mare RA (2009) Morfometria e mortalidade em pupas e adultos de Brassolis astyra (Nymphalidae, Morphinae). Inheringia, Ser Zool 99:194–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. Schlegel J, Breuer G, Rupf R (2015) Local insects as flagship species to promote nature conservation? A survey among primary school children on their attitudes toward invertebrates. Anthrozoös 28:229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Shapiro AM (2002) The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers Distrib 8:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  128. Shapiro AM, Shapiro AR (1973) The ecological associations of the butterflies of Staten Island. J Res Lepidoptera 12:65–128

    Google Scholar 

  129. Shochat E (2007) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city- slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  131. Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience 60:199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Shwartz A, Muratet A, Simon L, Julliard R (2013) Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biol Conserv 157:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Silva ARM, Landa GG, Vitalino RF (2007) Borboletas (Lepidoptera) de um fragmento de Mata urbano em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Lundiana 8:137–142

    Google Scholar 

  134. Silva ARM, Castro COD, Mafia PO, Mendonça MOC, Alves TCC, Beirão MDV (2012) Borboletas frugívoras (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) de uma área Urbana (Área de Proteção especial Manancial Cercadinho) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Biota Neotrop 12:292–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Sing K-W, Dong H, Wang W-Z, Wilson JJ (2016a) Can butterflies cope with city life? Butterfly diversity in a young megacity in Southern China. Genome. doi:10.1139/gen–2015–0192

    Google Scholar 

  136. Sing K-W, Jusoh WFA, Hashim NR, Wilson J-J (2016b) Urban parks: Refuges for tropical butterflies in Southeast Asia? Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252–016–0542–4

    Google Scholar 

  137. Snep RPH, Opdam PFM, Baveco JM, Wallis DeVries MF, Timmermans W, Kwak RGM, Kuypers V (2006) How peri-urban areas can strengthen animal populations within cities: a modeling approach. Biol Conserv 127:345–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Soares GR, Paiva OAA, Silva ARM (2012) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea) de um parque urbano em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 12:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  139. Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Fron Ecol Environ 14:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  140. Soga M, Koike S (2012a) Patch isolation only matters for specialist butterflies but patch area affects both specialist and generalist species. J For Res-Jpn 18:270–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Soga M, Koike S (2012b) Relative importance of quantity, quality and isolation of patches for butterfly diversity in fragmented urban forests. Ecol Res 27:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Soga M, Koike S (2013) Mapping the potential extinction debt of butterflies in a modern city: implications for conservation priorities in urban landscapes. Anim Conserv 16:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  143. Soga M, Yamaura Y, Koike S, Gaston KJ (2014a) Land sharing vs. land sparing: does the compact city reconcile urban development and biodiversity conservation? J Appl Ecol 51:1378–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. Soga M, Yamaura Y, Koike S, Gaston KJ (2014b) Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: a cross-taxonomic assessment. Biodivers Conserv 23:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. Soga M, Kawahara T, Fukuyama K, et al. (2015) Landscape versus local factors shaping butterfly communities in fragmented landscapes: does host plant diversity matter? J Insect Conserv 19:781–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Takami Y, Koshio C, Ishii M, Fujii H, Hidaka T, Shimizu I (2004) Genetic diversity and structure of urban populations of Pieris butterflies assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Molec Ecol 13:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Tam KC, Bonebrake TC (2016) Butterfly diversity, habitat and vegetation usage in Hong Kong urban parks. Urban Ecosyst. doi:10.1007/s11252–015–0484–2

    Google Scholar 

  148. Tesařová M, Fric Z, Veselý P, Konvička M, Fuchs R (2013) European checkerspots (Melitaeini: Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) are not aposematic - the point of view of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Entomol 38:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 360:339–357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  150. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Tiitsaar A, Kaasik A, Teder T (2013) The effects of seasonally variable dragonfly predation on butterfly assemblages. Ecology 94:200–207

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Tilden JW (1956) San Francisco’s vanishing butterflies. Lepidoptera News 10:3–4

    Google Scholar 

  153. Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH (2011) Butterfly larval host plant use in a tropical urban context: life history associations, herbivory, and landscape factors. J Insect Sci 11:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision, data tables and highlights. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  156. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  157. United Nations Development Program (1996) Human development report 1996. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  158. Valtonen A, Saarinen K, Jantunen J (2006) Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Anim Biodivers Conserv 29:133–148

    Google Scholar 

  159. Vanini F, Bonato V, Freitas AVL (1999) Polyphenism and population biology of Eurema elathea (Pieridae) in a disturbed environment in tropical Brazil. J Lepid Soc 53:159–168

    Google Scholar 

  160. Viloria ÁL (1993) Lista preliminar y comentarios sobre los Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) de la zona protectora y área metropolitana de la ciudad de Maracaibo, estado Zulia, Venezuela. Anartia 2:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  161. Williams MR (2009) Butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented urban landscape, south-West Western Australia: patterns of species richness. Pac Conserv Biol 15:32–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Williams MR (2011) Habitat resources, remnant vegetation condition and area determine distribution patterns and abundance of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented urban landscape, south-West Western Australia. J Insect Conserv 15:37–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Yamamoto M (1977) A comparison of butterfly assemblages in and near Sapporo City, northern Japan. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ 20:621–646

    Google Scholar 

  164. Yamamoto K, Natuhara Y (2005) The change of butterfly assemblages after artificial gap formation in an urban park. J Japan Inst Landsc Arch 68:585–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Young C (2008) Butterfly activity in a residential garden. Urban Habitats 5:84–102

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Profs. Gonzalo Halffter Salas and Sergio Guevara Sada for their ideas, which greatly enhanced our manuscript, as well as Prof. Nancy McIntyre and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Dr. Keith Willmott for proofreading the manuscript. This study was partially funded by the Dirección General del Instituto de Ecología, A.C. through the “Proyectos de Investigación de Alto Valor Estratégico para la Sociedad” (project: “Patrones ecológicos y percepción social de la diversidad biológica que habita en la ciudad de Xalapa: Un enfoque multidisciplinario”). LRR was supported with Ph.D. scholarships from CONACYT (213179/244461 Convocatoria 290649), and an Educational Condonable Credit by COLCIENCIAS (Convocatoria 568-2012).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian MacGregor-Fors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramírez-Restrepo, L., MacGregor-Fors, I. Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera. Urban Ecosyst 20, 171–182 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0579-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Papilionoidea
  • Hesperioidea
  • Urbanization
  • Urban ecology
  • Literature review