Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 171–182 | Cite as

Butterflies in the city: a review of urban diurnal Lepidoptera

  • Lorena Ramírez-Restrepo
  • Ian MacGregor-ForsEmail author
Article

Abstract

Human migration to urban centers has resulted in diverse environmental disturbances that affect biodiversity. Although urbanization has been highlighted as one of the main drivers of biodiversity endangerment, this topic is still poorly studied in many countries. In order to establish the status quo of the ecology of butterflies in urban centers, we gathered publications focused on urban butterflies (Lepidoptera). We compiled a total of 173 studies from 37 countries and more than 110 urban areas, including published papers and theses (1956–2015). Most papers (69 %) addressed ecological topics, 14 % were focused on biological conservation, and 17 % corresponded to species lists. In summary, most studies revealed a negative impact of urbanization intensity on butterfly diversity (richness and abundance). In fact, we found studies reporting local extinctions due to urbanization, highlighting the causes related to them. The study of charismatic urban wildlife groups, such as butterflies, is a promising field, as there are still important gaps in our comprehension of the ecological patterns and processes that occur in urban areas. Undoubtedly, understanding the response of butterflies to urbanization will aid in the development of urban biodiversity management, planning, and conservation strategies worldwide, which together with knowledge of other wildlife groups and socioeconomic variables, will lead us to more sustainable, livable, and biodiverse cities.

Keywords

Papilionoidea Hesperioidea Urbanization Urban ecology Literature review 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are most grateful to Profs. Gonzalo Halffter Salas and Sergio Guevara Sada for their ideas, which greatly enhanced our manuscript, as well as Prof. Nancy McIntyre and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Dr. Keith Willmott for proofreading the manuscript. This study was partially funded by the Dirección General del Instituto de Ecología, A.C. through the “Proyectos de Investigación de Alto Valor Estratégico para la Sociedad” (project: “Patrones ecológicos y percepción social de la diversidad biológica que habita en la ciudad de Xalapa: Un enfoque multidisciplinario”). LRR was supported with Ph.D. scholarships from CONACYT (213179/244461 Convocatoria 290649), and an Educational Condonable Credit by COLCIENCIAS (Convocatoria 568-2012).

References

  1. Alberti M (2008) Advances in urban ecology. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, Zumbrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aronson MFJ, La Sorte FA, Nilon CH, Katti M, Goddard MA, Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Williams NSG, Cilliers S, Clarckson B, Dobbs C, Dolan R, Heldblom M, Klotz S, Louwe Koojimans J, Kühn I, MacGregor-Fors I, McDonnell M, Mörtberg U, Pyšek P, Siebert S, Sushinsky J, Werner P, Winter M (2014) A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 281:20133330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bergerot B, Julliard R, Baguette M (2010) Metacommunity dynamics: decline of functional relationship along a habitat fragmentation gradient. PLoS One 5:e11294PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergerot B, Fontaine B, Julliard R, Baguette M (2011) Landscape variables impact the structure and composition of butterfly assemblages along an urbanization gradient. Landscape Ecol 26:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergerot B, Merck T, Van Dyck H, Baguette M (2012) Habitat fragmentation impacts mobility in a common and widespread woodland butterfly: do sexes respond differently? BMC Ecol 12:5PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bergerot B, Tournant P, Moussus JP, Stevens VM, Julliard R, Baguette M, Foltête JC (2013) Coupling inter-patch movement models and landscape graph to assess functional connectivity. Popul Ecol 55:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkowitz A, Nilon CH, Hollweg KS (2003) Understanding urban ecosystems. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Blair RB, Launer AE (1997) Butterfly diversity and human land use: species assemblages along an urban gradient. Biol Conserv 80:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogiani PA, Aranda R, Machado CDOF (2012) Riqueza de borboletas (Lepidoptera) em um fragmento urbano de cerrado em Mato Grosso do Sul, Brasil. EntomoBrasilis 5:93–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolotov IN (2002) Diurnal lepidopterans (Lepidoptera, Rhopalocera) of Arkhangelsk and its surroundings. Zool Zh 81:457–462Google Scholar
  12. Bolotov IN (2004) Long-term changes in the fauna of diurnal lepidopterans (Lepidoptera, Diurna) in the Northern Taiga Subzone of the Western Russian Plain. Russ J Ecol 35:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonfantti D, Ribeiro LA, Moraes CM, Casagrande M, Mielke E, Hendrik Mielke OH (2011) Butterflies’s richness in two urban parks in Curitiba, Parana, Brazil. Biota Neotropica 11:247–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown KS Jr, Freitas VAL (2002) Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. J Insect Conserv 6:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cadenasso ML, Pickett STA, Schwarz K (2007) Spatial heterogeneity in urban ecosystems: reconceptualizing land cover and a framework for classification. Front Ecol Environ 5:80–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carvalho MC, Queiroz PCD, Ruszczyk A (1998) Protandry and female size-fecundity variation in the tropical butterfly Brassolis sophorae. Oecologia 116:98–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chowdhury S, Soren R (2011) Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) fauna of East Calcutta wetlands, West Bengal, India. Check List 7:700–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark PJ, Reed JM, Chew FS (2007) Effects of urbanization on butterfly species richness, guild structure, and rarity. Urban Ecosyst 10:321–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clements JC (2012) First record of the fiery skipper, Hylephila phyleus Drury (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae) from New Brunswick, Canada. J Acadian Entomol Soc 8:59–60Google Scholar
  20. Corke D (1999) Are honeydew/sap-feeding butterflies (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) affected by particulate air-pollution? J Insect Conserv 3:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape Urban Plann 69:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cruz-Sáenz D, Lazcano D (2012) Biological and ecological aspects of Xantusia sanchezi, an endangered lizard in an oak forest in the state of Jalisco, Mexico. Rev Mex Biodivers 83:129132Google Scholar
  23. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Daniels JC (2009) Cooperative conservation efforts to help recover an endangered South Florida butterfly. Insect Conserv Div 2:62–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Di Mauro D, Dietz T, Rockwood L (2007) Determining the effect of urbanization on generalist butterfly species diversity in butterfly gardens. Urban Ecosyst 10:427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dover J, Rowlingson B (2005) The western Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops halyaetus): factors affecting adult butterfly distribution within native banksia bushland in an urban setting. Biol Conserv 122:599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dover JW, Dennis RLH, Atkins L (2009) The western Jewel butterfly (Hypochrysops halyaetus: Lycaenidae) II: factors affecting oviposition within native banksia bushland in an urban setting. J Insect Conserv 13:487–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Elias M, Joron M, Willmott KR, Silva-Brandão KL, Kaiser V, Arias CF, Gómez-Piñeres LM, Uribe S, Brower AV, Freitas AVL, Jiggins CD (2009) Out of the Andes: patterns of diversification in clearwing butterflies. Molec Ecol 18:1716–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eremeeva NI, Sushchev DV (2005) Structural changes in the fauna of pollinating insects in urban landscapes. Russ J Ecol 36:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Evans JP (2011) Resilience, ecology and adaptation in the experimental city. T I Brit Geogr 36:223–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fattorini S (2011a) Insect extinction by urbanization: a long term study in Rome. Biol Conserv 144:370–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fattorini S (2011b) Insect rarity, extinction and conservation in urban Rome (Italy): a 120-year-long study of tenebrionid beetles. Insect Conserv Div 4:307–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fisher B, Christopher T (2007) Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecol Econ 62:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fleming TH, Serrano D, Nassar J (2005) Dynamics of a subtropical population of the zebra longwing butterfly Heliconius charithonia (Nymphalidae). Fla Entomol 88:169–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fragkias M, Lobo J, Strumsky D, Seto KC (2013) Does size matter? Scaling of CO2 emissions and US urban areas. PLoS One 8:e64727PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Frankie GW, Ehler L (1978) Ecology of insects in urban environments. Annu Rev Entomol 23:367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Garden J, Mcalpine C, Peterson ANN, Jones D, Possingham H (2006) Review of the ecology of Australian urban fauna: a focus on spatially explicit processes. Austral Ecol 31:126–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Garratt MP, Breeze TD, Jenner N, Polce C, Biesmeijer JC, Potts SG (2014) Avoiding a bad apple: insect pollination enhances fruit quality and economic value. Agric Ecosyst Environ 184:34–40PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gaston KJ (2010) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Govers HAJ (2011) Lepidoptera monitored in the city of Utrecht (district Tuindorp) in the period of 1976-2001. Proc Neth Entomol Soc Meet 22:87–94Google Scholar
  41. Greeney HF, Dyer LA, Smilanich AM (2012) Feeding by lepidopteran larvae is dangerous : a review of caterpillars’ chemical, physiological, morphological, and behavioral defenses against natural enemies. ISJ Invert Surviv J 9:7–34Google Scholar
  42. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. Bioscience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Haaland C (2014) Abundances and movement of the scarce copper butterfly (Lycaena virgaureae) on future building sites at a settlement fringe in southern Sweden. J Insect Conserv 19:255–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Gude PH, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, and research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haroon FP (2015) Diversity of butterflies Fauna in tehsil Tangi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. World J Zool 10:302–309Google Scholar
  47. Hernández Baz F (1993) La fauna de mariposas (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera) de Xalapa, Veracruz, México. La Ciencia y El Hombre 14:55–88 [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  48. Hogsden KL, Hutchinson TC (2004) Butterfly assemblages along a human disturbance gradient in Ontario, Canada. Can J Zool 82:739–748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Johki Y (2012) Flower-visiting behavior of butterflies in the urban environment, with reference to the ecological city planning. Showa Women’s University Graduate School Bulletin 21:145–154Google Scholar
  50. Johki Y (2013) Flower-visiting behavior of butterflies in an urban environment II. Comparisons of the results of field observations from 2010 and 2011. Human Sociol Bull 868:94–104Google Scholar
  51. Jones L, Leather R (2012) Invertebrates in urban areas: a review. Eur J Entomol 109:463–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kadlec T, Benes J, Jarosik V, Konvicka M (2008) Revisiting urban refuges: changes of butterfly and burnet fauna in Prague reserves over three decades. Landscape Urban Plann 85:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Kanaujia A, Kumar A, Kushwaha S, Kumar A (2015) Diversity of odonates (dragonflies and damselflies) and lepidopteron (butterflies) fauna of Nawabganj bird sanctuary, Unnao District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Adv Biores 6:72–78Google Scholar
  54. Kellert SR (1993) Values and perceptions of invertebrates. Conserv Biol 7:845–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kitahara M, Fujii K (1997) An island biogeographical approach to the analysis of butterfly community patterns in newly designed parks. Res Popul Ecol 39:23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Knapp S, Kühn I, Mosbrugger V, Klotz S (2008) Do protected areas in urban and rural landscapes differ in species diversity? Biodiv Conserv 17:1595–1612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Koi S, Daniels J (2015) New and revised life history of the Florida hairstreak Eumaeus atala (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) with notes on its current conservation status. Fla Entomol 98:1134–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kowarik I (2011) Novel urban ecosystems, biodiversity, and conservation. Environ Pollut 159:1974–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kremen C, Merenlender AM, Murphy DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conserv Biol 8:388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kronforst MR, Fleming TH (2001) Lack of genetic differentiation among widely spaced subpopulations of a butterfly with home range behavior. Heredity 86:243–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kunte K (2000) Butterfly diversity of Pune City along the human impact gradient. J Ecological Soc 13(14):40–45Google Scholar
  62. Lazzeri MG, Bar ME, Damborsky MP (2011) Diversidad del orden Lepidoptera (Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea) de la ciudad Corrientes, Argentina. Rev Biol Trop 59:299–308Google Scholar
  63. Lee CM, Park JW, Kwon T-S, et al. (2015) Diversity and density of butterfly communities in urban green areas: an analytical approach using GIS. Zool Stud 54:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2010) Natural, not urban, barriers define population structure for a coastal endemic butterfly. Conserv Genet 11:2311–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leidner AK, Haddad NM (2011) Combining measures of dispersal to identify conservation strategies in fragmented landscapes. Conserv Biol 25:1022–1031PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lemes R, Ritter CD, Barros De Morais BA (2008) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea e Papilionoidea) visitantes florais no Jardim Botânico da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brasil. Biotemas 21:91–98 [In Portuguese]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lemes R, Carvalho APS, Ribeiro TC, Morais ABB (2015) Butterflies from urban green areas in Santa Maria, southern Brazil (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea). SHILAP-Rev Lepidopt 43:95–111Google Scholar
  68. Lizée MH, Bonardo R, Mauffrey JF, Bertaudiere-Montes V, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2011a) Relative importance of habitat and landscape scales on butterfly communities of urbanizing areas. C R Biol 334:74–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lizée M, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2011b) Monitoring urban environments on the basis of biological traits. Ecol Indic 11:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lizée MH, Manel S, Mauffrey JF, Tatoni T, Deschamps-Cottin M (2012) Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species–area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landscape Ecol 27:159–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. López-López S (2011) Efectos de la urbanización sobre las comunidades de aves y lepidópteros de la ciudad de Morelia. Morelia, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, Bsc Thesis [In Spanish]Google Scholar
  72. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  73. MacGregor-Fors I, Ortega-Álvarez R (2013) Ecología Urbana - Experiencias en América Latina. Retrieved from – http://www1.inecol.edu.mx/libro_ecologia_urbana.
  74. MacGregor-Fors I, Avendaño-Reyes S, Bandala VM, Chacón-Zapata S, Díaz-Toribio MH, González-García F, Lorea-Hernández F, Martínez-Gómez J, Montes de Oca E, Montoya L, Pineda E, Ramírez-Restrepo L, Rivera-García E, Utrera Barillas E, Escobar F (2015) Multi-taxonomic diversity patterns in a neotropical green city: a rapid biological assessment. Urban Ecosyst 18:663–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Matsumoto K (2015) Habitat specificity of butterflies along urban environmental gradients in Tama City, Tokyo. Entomol Sci 18:509–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Matteson KC, Langellotto G (2009) Bumble bee abundance in New York City community gardens: implications for urban agriculture. Cities Environ 2:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Matteson KC, Langellotto G (2012) Evaluating community gardens as habitat for an urban butterfly evaluating community gardens as habitat for an urban butterfly. Cities Environ 10:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Matteson KC, Grace JB, Minor ES (2013) Direct and indirect effects of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos 122:682–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1990) Ecosystem structure and function along urban-rural gradients: an unexploited opportunity for ecology. Ecology 71:1232–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) (2009) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  81. McIntyre NE (2000) Ecology of urban arthropods: a review and a call to action. Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:825–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness : a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mielke OHH, Carneiro E, Casagrande MM (2012) Brazil : 70 years of records with special reference to faunal composition of Vila Velha State Park. Rev Bras Entomol 56:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Minno MC, Minno M (2005) Butterflies in a Gainesville, Florida garden. Southern Lepidopterists’ News 27:19–21Google Scholar
  87. Montgomery MR (2008) The urban transformation of the developing world. Science 319:761–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Moreno CE, Sánchez-Rojas G, Escobar F, Pineda E (2007) Shortcuts for biodiversity evaluation: a review of terminology and recommendations for the use of target groups, bioindicators and surrogates. IJEnvH 1:71–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Murphy DD, Weiss SB (1988) Ecological studies and the conservation of the bay Checkerspot butterfly, Euphydrias editha bayensis. Biol Conserv 46:183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Murugesan M, Arun PR, Prusty BAK (2013) The butterfly community of an urban wetland system - a case study of Oussudu bird sanctuary, Puducherry, India. J Threat Taxa 5:4672–4678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Nelson GS, Nelson SM (2001) Bird and butterfly communities associated with two types of urban riparian areas. Urban Ecosyst 5:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Nielsen AB, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch CK (2013) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosyst 17:305–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nishida K, Nakamura I, Morales CO (2009) Plants and butterflies of a small urban preserve in the Central Valley of Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 57:31–67Google Scholar
  95. Núñez Bustos E (2008) Las especies urbanas de Rhopalocera de la Reserva Ecológica Costanera Sur, ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea y Papilionoidea). SHILAP-Rev Lepidopt 36:435–447Google Scholar
  96. Öckinger E, Dannestam Å, Smith HG (2009) The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landscape Urban Plann 93:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Ohwaki A, Nakamura K, Tanabe SI (2008) Effects of anthropogenic disturbances on the butterfly assemblage in an urban green area: the changes from 1990 to 2005. Ecol Res 23:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Ortega-Álvarez R, MacGregor-Fors I (2009) Living in the big city: effects of urban land-use on bird community structure, diversity, and composition. Landscape Urban Plann 90:189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Owen DF (1971) Species diversity in butterflies in a tropical garden. Biol Conserv 3:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Owen J, Owen DF (1975) Suburban gardens: England’s most important nature reserve? Environ Cons 2:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Pereira HA, Silva JR, Marques GDV, Germanos E, Camargo AJA, Stefani V (2011) Inventory of diurnal lepidoptera (Insecta: Lepidoptera) in a semideciduous mesophitic forest of a urban fragment. Bioscience Journal 27:839–848Google Scholar
  102. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren PS (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manag 92:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Posa CMR, Sodhi NS (2006) Effects of anthropogenic land use on forest birds and butterflies in Subic Bay, Philippines. Biol Conserv 129:256–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Potter A, LeBuhn G (2015) Pollination service to urban agriculture in San Francisco, CA. Urban Ecosyst 18:885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Rahayu SE, Basukriadi A (2012) The richness and diversity of butterflies (Lepidoptera; Rhopalocera) in the urban forest of Muhammad Sabki, Jambi Province, Indonesia. Biospecies 5:40–48Google Scholar
  106. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Halffter G (2013) Butterfly diversity in a regional urbanization mosaic in two Mexican cities. Landscape Urban Plann 115:39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Chacón de Ulloa P, Constantino LM (2007) Diversidad de mariposas diurnas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea y Hesperioidea) en Santiago de Cali, Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Rev Colomb Entomol 33:54–63Google Scholar
  108. Ramírez-Restrepo L, Cultid-Medina CA, MacGregor-Fors I (2015) How many butterflies are there in a city of circa half a million people? Sustainability 7:8587–8597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Ramos-Elorduy J, Moreno JMP, Vázquez AI, Landero I, Oliva-Rivera H, Camacho VHM (2011) Edible Lepidoptera in Mexico: geographic distribution, ethnicity, economic and nutritional importance for rural people. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Rao RSP, Girish MKS (2007) Road kills: assessing insect casualties using flagship taxon. Curr Sci 92:830–837Google Scholar
  111. Rosenzweig ML (2003) Reconciliation ecology and the future of species diversity. Oryx 37:194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Rouquette JR, Dallimer M, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ, Maltby L, Warren PH (2013) Species turnover and geographic distance in an urban river network. Divers Distrib 19:1429–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ruszczyk A (1986a) Distribution and abundance of butterlies in the urbanization zones of Porto Alegre, Brazil. J Res Lepidoptera 25:157–178Google Scholar
  114. Ruszczyk A (1986b) Ecologia Urbana de borboletas, I. O gradiente de urbanização Ea fauna de Porto Alegre, RS. Rev Bras Biol 46:675–688Google Scholar
  115. Ruszczyk A (1986c) Mortality of Papilio scamander scamander (Lep., Papilionidae) pupae in four districts of Porto Alegre (S. Brazil) and the causes of superabundance of some butterflies in urban areas. Rev Bras Biol 46:567–579Google Scholar
  116. Ruszczyk A (1996) Spatial patterns in pupal mortality in urban palm caterpillars. Oecologia 107:356–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Ruszczyk A, Carvalho JMC (1993) Malfunction of ecdysis and female biased mortality in urban Brassolis sophorae (Nymphalidae: Brassolinae). J Lepid Soc 47:134–139Google Scholar
  118. Ruszczyk A, Mellender de Araujo A (1992) Gradients in butterfly species diversity in an urban area in Brazil. J Lepid Soc 46:255–264Google Scholar
  119. Ruszczyk A, Nascimiento ES (1999) Biologia dos adultos de Methona themisto (Hübner, 1818) Lepioptera, Nymphalidae, Ithomiinae) en pracas públicas de Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Rev Bras Biol 59:577–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Ruszczyk A, Ribeiro JC (1998) Mortalidade dos parasitóides Spilochalcis morleyi (hymenoptera, Chalcididae) E Xanthozona melanopyga (Diptera, Tachinidae) em pupas feminas e masculonas de Brassolis sophorae (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). Rev Bras Biol 58:633–637 [In Portuguese]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Ruszczyk A, Silva CF (1997) Butterflies select microhabitats on building walls. Landscape Urban Plann 38:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Ruszczyk A, Motta PC, Barros RL, Araújo AM (2004) Ecological correlates of polyphenism and gregarious roosting in the grass yellow butterfly Eurema elathea (Pieridae). Braz J Biol 64:151–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sackis GD, Morais ABBD (2008) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea e Papilionoidea) do campus da Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul. Biota Neotrop 8:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Saha M, Sarkar I, Barik L, Das RP, Dey SR (2015) Butterfly diversity of Berhampore girls’ college campus, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India: a preliminary assessment. The Beats of Natural Sciences 2:1–12Google Scholar
  125. Salgado-Neto G, Di Mare RA (2009) Morfometria e mortalidade em pupas e adultos de Brassolis astyra (Nymphalidae, Morphinae). Inheringia, Ser Zool 99:194–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Schlegel J, Breuer G, Rupf R (2015) Local insects as flagship species to promote nature conservation? A survey among primary school children on their attitudes toward invertebrates. Anthrozoös 28:229–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Shapiro AM (2002) The Californian urban butterfly fauna is dependent on alien plants. Divers Distrib 8:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Shapiro AM, Shapiro AR (1973) The ecological associations of the butterflies of Staten Island. J Res Lepidoptera 12:65–128Google Scholar
  129. Shochat E (2007) Credit or debit? Resource input changes population dynamics of city- slicker birds. Oikos 106:622–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Shochat E, Lerman SB, Anderies JM, Warren PS, Faeth SH, Nilon CH (2010) Invasion, competition, and biodiversity loss in urban ecosystems. Bioscience 60:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Shwartz A, Muratet A, Simon L, Julliard R (2013) Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biol Conserv 157:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Silva ARM, Landa GG, Vitalino RF (2007) Borboletas (Lepidoptera) de um fragmento de Mata urbano em Minas Gerais, Brasil. Lundiana 8:137–142Google Scholar
  134. Silva ARM, Castro COD, Mafia PO, Mendonça MOC, Alves TCC, Beirão MDV (2012) Borboletas frugívoras (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) de uma área Urbana (Área de Proteção especial Manancial Cercadinho) in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Biota Neotrop 12:292–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Sing K-W, Dong H, Wang W-Z, Wilson JJ (2016a) Can butterflies cope with city life? Butterfly diversity in a young megacity in Southern China. Genome. doi: 10.1139/gen–2015–0192 Google Scholar
  136. Sing K-W, Jusoh WFA, Hashim NR, Wilson J-J (2016b) Urban parks: Refuges for tropical butterflies in Southeast Asia? Urban Ecosyst. doi: 10.1007/s11252–016–0542–4 Google Scholar
  137. Snep RPH, Opdam PFM, Baveco JM, Wallis DeVries MF, Timmermans W, Kwak RGM, Kuypers V (2006) How peri-urban areas can strengthen animal populations within cities: a modeling approach. Biol Conserv 127:345–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Soares GR, Paiva OAA, Silva ARM (2012) Borboletas (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea e Hesperioidea) de um parque urbano em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Biota Neotrop 12:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Soga M, Gaston KJ (2016) Extinction of experience: the loss of human-nature interactions. Fron Ecol Environ 14:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Soga M, Koike S (2012a) Patch isolation only matters for specialist butterflies but patch area affects both specialist and generalist species. J For Res-Jpn 18:270–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Soga M, Koike S (2012b) Relative importance of quantity, quality and isolation of patches for butterfly diversity in fragmented urban forests. Ecol Res 27:265–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Soga M, Koike S (2013) Mapping the potential extinction debt of butterflies in a modern city: implications for conservation priorities in urban landscapes. Anim Conserv 16:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. Soga M, Yamaura Y, Koike S, Gaston KJ (2014a) Land sharing vs. land sparing: does the compact city reconcile urban development and biodiversity conservation? J Appl Ecol 51:1378–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. Soga M, Yamaura Y, Koike S, Gaston KJ (2014b) Woodland remnants as an urban wildlife refuge: a cross-taxonomic assessment. Biodivers Conserv 23:649–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Soga M, Kawahara T, Fukuyama K, et al. (2015) Landscape versus local factors shaping butterfly communities in fragmented landscapes: does host plant diversity matter? J Insect Conserv 19:781–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Takami Y, Koshio C, Ishii M, Fujii H, Hidaka T, Shimizu I (2004) Genetic diversity and structure of urban populations of Pieris butterflies assessed using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Molec Ecol 13:245–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Tam KC, Bonebrake TC (2016) Butterfly diversity, habitat and vegetation usage in Hong Kong urban parks. Urban Ecosyst. doi: 10.1007/s11252–015–0484–2 Google Scholar
  148. Tesařová M, Fric Z, Veselý P, Konvička M, Fuchs R (2013) European checkerspots (Melitaeini: Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) are not aposematic - the point of view of great tits (Parus major). Ecol Entomol 38:155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  149. Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 360:339–357Google Scholar
  150. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Tiitsaar A, Kaasik A, Teder T (2013) The effects of seasonally variable dragonfly predation on butterfly assemblages. Ecology 94:200–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. Tilden JW (1956) San Francisco’s vanishing butterflies. Lepidoptera News 10:3–4Google Scholar
  153. Tiple AD, Khurad AM, Dennis RLH (2011) Butterfly larval host plant use in a tropical urban context: life history associations, herbivory, and landscape factors. J Insect Sci 11:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. United Nations (2008) World urbanization prospects: the 2007 revision, data tables and highlights. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  156. United Nations (2014) World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision, highlights. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  157. United Nations Development Program (1996) Human development report 1996. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  158. Valtonen A, Saarinen K, Jantunen J (2006) Effect of different mowing regimes on butterflies and diurnal moths on road verges. Anim Biodivers Conserv 29:133–148Google Scholar
  159. Vanini F, Bonato V, Freitas AVL (1999) Polyphenism and population biology of Eurema elathea (Pieridae) in a disturbed environment in tropical Brazil. J Lepid Soc 53:159–168Google Scholar
  160. Viloria ÁL (1993) Lista preliminar y comentarios sobre los Rhopalocera (Lepidoptera) de la zona protectora y área metropolitana de la ciudad de Maracaibo, estado Zulia, Venezuela. Anartia 2:1–17Google Scholar
  161. Williams MR (2009) Butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented urban landscape, south-West Western Australia: patterns of species richness. Pac Conserv Biol 15:32–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Williams MR (2011) Habitat resources, remnant vegetation condition and area determine distribution patterns and abundance of butterflies and day-flying moths in a fragmented urban landscape, south-West Western Australia. J Insect Conserv 15:37–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Yamamoto M (1977) A comparison of butterfly assemblages in and near Sapporo City, northern Japan. J Fac Sci Hokkaido Univ 20:621–646Google Scholar
  164. Yamamoto K, Natuhara Y (2005) The change of butterfly assemblages after artificial gap formation in an urban park. J Japan Inst Landsc Arch 68:585–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Young C (2008) Butterfly activity in a residential garden. Urban Habitats 5:84–102Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Red de Ambiente y SustentabilidadInstituto de Ecología A.C.XalapaMexico

Personalised recommendations