Abstract
The global spread of urban development and concomitant reduction in wilderness areas can both pressure and entice wild animals to adapt to the urban environment. As wildlife moves into metropolitan areas, however, they come into contact with residents who have become increasingly disconnected from natural environments and have little to no experience in dealing with wild animals. While many large carnivores actively avoid urban areas, North America’s coyote (Canis latrans) has proved remarkably adept at utilizing the highly altered habitat of the modern city. Yet while the coyote’s behavioural adaptations to urban areas have been relatively well researched, fewer studies have focused on human-coyote interactions in cities. Given that human attitudes, fears, knowledge and resulting behaviours often underpin human-wildlife conflicts, the following study investigates and compares the human aspects of coyote conflict in two cities with large populations of both people and coyotes: Chicago and Los Angeles. Data were collected via email surveys sent to residents of Cook and Los Angeles Counties. The survey instrument included questions on residents’ opinions, fears, knowledge, personal experiences with urban coyotes and behaviours affecting them. The general goal of the study was to investigate the potential for human-coyote coexistence in urban environments. The following research revealed great variation in attitudes towards coyotes, with animal lovers being as much a part of the problem as those with a paralyzing fear of wildlife. Consequently, finding acceptable solutions may pose a significant challenge to urban wildlife managers and reconciliation ecologists.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While the definition of the terms ‘nature’ and ‘natural’ may be controversial, they are used colloquially in this paper to denote areas relatively unaffected by human activity.
References
Adams L (2005) Urban wildlife ecology and conservation: A brief history of the discipline. Urban Ecosyst 8(2):139–156
Allen E (2013) Newton warns of coyotes, as complaints ease. The Boston Globe. http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/regionals/west/2013/12/08/newton-police-issue-coyote-alert-but-say-overall-complaints-have-dropped/yvVJ9BfU4JueefVerQaTXP/story.html. Accessed 25 January 2014
Baker PJ, Harris S (2007) Urban mammals: what does the future hold? An analysis of the factors affecting patterns of use of residential gardens in Great Britain. Mammal Rev 37(4):297–315
Baker RO, Timm RM (1998) Management of conflicts between urban coyotes and humans in southern California. Proceedings of the 18th Vertebrate Pest Conference
Bateman PW, Fleming PA (2012) Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. J Zool 287(1):1–23
Bekoff M, Gese EM (2003) Coyote (Canis latrans). USDA National Wildlife Research Center – Staff Publications 224
Centers for Disease Control (2003) Nonfatal dog bite-related injuries treated in hospital emergency departments – US, 2001. MMWR 52(26):605–610
Cook County Coyote Project website (n.d.) Coyote Attacks http://www.urbancoyoteresearch.com/Coyote_Attacks.htm. Accessed 1 February 2013
Curtin S (2009) Wildlife tourism: the intangible, psychological benefis of human-wildlife encounters. Curr Issues Tour 12(5–6):451–474
Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50(7):593–601
Dasmann RF (1966) Aesthetics of the natural environment. In Remarks at the Ohio State University, Natural Resources Institute Symposium (May 24, 1966).
Dearborn DC, Kark S (2010) Motivations for conserving urban biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24(2):432–440
Decker DJ, Chase LC (1997) Human dimensions of living with wildlife: A management challenge for the 21st century. Wildl Soc B 25(4):788–795
Don Carlos AW, Bright AD, Teel TL, Vaske JJ (2009) Human–black bear conflict in urban areas: An integrated approach to management response. Hum Dimens Wildl 14(3):174–184
Draheim M, Patterson K, Rockwood L, Guagnano G, Parsons E (2013) Attitudes of college undergraduates towards coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban landscape: management and public outreach implications. Animals 3(1):1–18
Fedriani JM, Fuller TK, Sauvajot RM (2001) Does availability of anthropogenic food enhance densities of omnivorous mammals? An example with coyotes in Southern California. Ecography 24(3):325–331
Feldhamer GA, Thompson BC, Chapman JA (eds) (2003) Wild mammals of North America: biology, management, and conservation. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD
Forest Preserve District of Cook County website (n.d.) Coyotes in Cook County: Frequently asked questions http://fpdcc.com/coyotes-faq/. Accessed 1 February 2013
Fox CH (2006) Coyotes and humans: Can we coexist? Paper presented at the 22nd Vertebrate Pest Conference
Fox CH, Papouchis CM, Hirsch K, Lamont G (2005) Coyotes in our midst: coexisting with an adaptable and resilient carnivore. Animal Protection Institute, Sacramento
Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Devine-Wright P, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394
Gehrt, SD (2011) Urban coyote ecology and management. The Cook County, Illinois, Coyote Project. http://urbancoyoteresearch.com/. Accessed 9 September 2012
Gehrt SD, Anchor C, White LA (2009) Home range and landscape use of coyotes in a metropolitan landscape: conflict or coexistence? J Mammal 90(5):1045–1057
Gehrt SD, Riley SP, Cypher BL (2010) The urban ecosystem. In: Gehrt SD, Riley SPD, Cypher BL (eds) Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 3–10
Gill D (1970) The coyote and the sequential occupants of the Los Angeles Basin. Am Anthropol 72(4):821–826
Grigione M, Burman P, Clavio S, Harper S, Manning D, Sarno R (2011) Diet of Florida coyotes in a protected wildland and suburban habitat. Urban Ecosyst 14(4):655–663
Grinder MI, Krausman PR (2001) Home range, habitat use, and nocturnal activity of coyotes in an urban environment. J Wildl Manag 65(4):887–898
Hawkin P (1993) The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. Harpers Business, New York
Hook RA, Robinson WL (1982) Attitudes of Michigan citizens toward predators. In: Harrington FH, Paquet PC (eds) Wolves of the world: perspectives of behavior, ecology and conservation. Noyes Publications, Park Ridge, NJ, pp. 382–386
Hunziker M, Egli E, Wallner A (1998) Return of predators: reasons for existence or lack of public acceptance. KORA Ber 3:25–30
Kellert SR (1985) Public perceptions of predators, particularly the wolf and coyote. Biol Conserv 31(2):167–189
Keniger LE, Gaston KJ, Irvine KN, Fuller RA (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(3):913–935
König A (2008) Fears, attitudes and opinions of suburban residents with regards to their urban foxes. Eur J Wildl Res 54(1):101–109
MacCracken JG (1982) Coyote foods in a Southern California suburb. Wildl Soc B 10(3):280–281
Mader T (2007) Wolf attacks on humans. Abundant Wildlife Society of North America. http://www.gccga.com/Wolf-Attacks-on-Humans-11pgs.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2013
Manfredo MJ, Dayer AA (2004) Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Hum Dimens Wildl 9(4):1–20
Manfredo MJ, Decker DJ, Duda MD (1998) What is the future for human dimensions of wildlife? Paper presented at the Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference.
Mankin PC, Warner RE, Anderson WL (1999) Wildlife and the Illinois public: A benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. Wildl Soc B 27(2):465–472
McClennen N, Wigglesworth RR, Anderson SH, Wachob DG (2001) The effect of suburban and agricultural development on the activity patterns of coyotes (Canis latrans). Am Midl Nat 146(1):27–36
McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52(10):883–890
McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127(3):247–260
Mech LD (1995) The challenge and opportunity of recovering wolf populations. Conserv Biol 9(2):270–278
Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20(8):430–434
Morey PS, Gese EM, Gehrt SD (2007) Spatial and temporal variation in the diet of coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area. Am Midl Nat 158(1):147–161
Nabhan G, Trimble S (1994) The geography of childhood: why children need wild places. Beacon Press, Boston, MA
Pyle RM (2002) Eden in a vacant lot: special places, species, and kids in the neighborhood of life. In: Kahn PH, Kellert SR (eds) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 305–327
Reiter DK, Brunson MW, Schmidt RH (1999) Public attitudes toward wildlife damage management and policy. Wildl Soc B 27(3):746–758
Riley SPD, Sauvajot RM, Fuller TK, York EC, Kamradt DA, Bromley C, Wayne RK (2003) Effects of urbanization and habitat fragmentation on bobcats and coyotes in Southern California. Conserv Biol 17(2):566–576
Rosenzweig ML (2003) Win-win ecology: how the earth’s species can survive in the midst of the human enterprise. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK
Ryan P (1997) Coyotes and practitioners. PULSE, Southern California Veterinary Medical Association, pp. 8–9
Schmidt RH, Timm RM (2007) Bad dogs: Why do coyotes and other canids become unruly? Wildlife damage management conferences – proceedings. Paper 71
Smith M (2013) Boy, 3, attacked by animal near park on West Side. Chicago Tribune. http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2013-11-15/news/chi-family-boy-3-attacked-by-animal-near-park-on-west-side-20131115_1_urban-coyotes-nuisance-coyotes-bob-bluett. Accessed 20 June 2015
Thompson J, Shirreffs L, McPhail I (2003) Dingoes on Fraser Island: tourism dream or management nightmare. Hum Dimens Wildl 8(1):37–47
Timm RM, Baker RO (2007) A history of urban coyote problems. Paper presented at the Wildlife Damage Management Conferences – Proceedings.
Timm RM, Baker RO, Bennett JR, Coolahan CC (2004) Coyote attacks: an increasing suburban problem. Proceedings of the Twenty-First Vertebrate Pest Conference. Paper 1
United States Census Bureau (2012a) State and County Quickfacts: Los Angeles County, California http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/06/06037.html. Accessed 25 January 2013
United States Census Bureau (2012b) State and County Quickfacts: Cook County, Illinois http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/17/17031.html. Accessed 25 January 2013
Webber K (1997) Urban coyotes (Canis latrans) in the lower mainland. Public perceptions and education. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia
Wechselberger M, Rigg R, Beťková S (2005) An investigation of public opinion about the three species of large carnivores in Slovakia: Brown bear (Ursus arctos), wolf (Canis lupus) and lynx (Lynx lynx). Slovak Wildlife Society, Liptovský Hrádok, Slovakia. x + 89 pp.
White LA, Gehrt SD (2009) Coyote attacks on humans in the United States and Canada. Hum Dimens Wildl 14(6):419–432
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elliot, E.E., Vallance, S. & Molles, L.E. Coexisting with coyotes (Canis latrans) in an urban environment. Urban Ecosyst 19, 1335–1350 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0544-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-016-0544-2