Skip to main content

The causal response of avian communities to suburban development: a quasi-experimental, longitudinal study

Urban Ecosystems volume 19, pages 1597–1621 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

Correlations between urbanization and biodiversity are well known, but the causes driving such associations are lacking. We used a long-term, quasi-experimental approach to study the responses of avian communities to suburban and exurban development around Seattle, WA, USA. We measured indices of bird abundance, reproduction, and survival for 12 years at many locations, including 5 forest ‘reserves,’ 10 existing ‘developments,’ and 11 ‘changing’ sites where ongoing development converted forests to single-family residential neighborhoods. In the first few years of clearing, building, and occupation of new neighborhoods by humans avian communities shifted from those typical of second-growth forest to those more characteristic of developments. During this time avian diversity increased and numerical dominance by abundant birds declined. Species that adapted and exploited development reproduced more successfully there than did forest-dependent species that avoided development. Adults of species that thrived in developments attained equal annual survival across reserved to developed landscapes, while species that avoided neighborhoods tended to survive poorly outside of reserves. The humans living in our study areas frequently fed birds and provided nest boxes. These actions were positively correlated with increases in secondary cavity nesting and seed eating birds. Humans also maintained outdoor cats and 11 % of humans both fed birds and let their cats outside. These actions were negatively correlated with the abundance of birds regularly using feeders. We suggest that a key management goal in urban ecosystems is the maintenance of avian diversity because a diverse avifauna engages a diversity of humans.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  • Alberti MA, Marzluff JM (2004) Ecological resilience in urban ecosystems: linking urban patterns to human and ecological functions. Urban Ecosyst 7:241–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti MA, Botsford E, Cohen A (2001) Quantifying the urban gradient: linking urban planning and ecology. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 89–116

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alberti MA, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, ZumBrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for urban ecology. Bioscience 53:1169–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich JW, Coffin RW (1980) Breeding bird populations from forest to suburbia after thirty-seven years. Am Birds 34:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Battin J (2004) When good animals love bad habitats: ecological traps and the conservation of animal populations. Conserv Biol 18:1482–1491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley T (2011) Biophilic cities, integrating nature into urban design and planning. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (1996) Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecol Appl 6:506–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair RB (2004) The effects of urban sprawl on birds at multiple levels of biological organization. Ecology and Society 9 (5):2. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss5/art2

  • Blewett CM, Marzluff JM (2005) Effects of urban sprawl on snags and the abundance and productivity of cavity-nesting birds. Condor 107:677–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock CE, Jones ZF, Bock JH (2008) The oasis effect: response of birds to exurban development in a southwestern savanna. Ecol Appl 18:1093–1106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brittingham MC, Temple SA (1988) Impacts of supplemental feeding on survival rates of black-capped chickadees. Ecology 69:581–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (2001) Introduction to distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland ST, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Laake JL, Borchers DL, Thomas L (eds) (2004) Advanced distance sampling. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert AM, Bishop CA, Elliot RD, Krebs EA, Kydd TM, Machtans CS, Robertson GJ (2013) A synthesis of human-related avian mortality in Canada. Avian Conserv Ecol 8(2):11

    Google Scholar 

  • Catterall CP (2009) Responses of faunal assemblages to urbanization: global research paradigms and an avian case study. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 129–155

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain DE, Cannon AR, Toms MP, Leech DI, Hatchwell BJ, Gaston KJ (2009) Avian productivity in urban landscapes: a review and meta-analysis. Ibis 151:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoferson LL, Morrison ML (2001) Integrating methods to determine breeding and nesting status of three western songbirds. Wildl Soc Bull 29:688–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimäki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki M-L, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenization by urbanization: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127:336–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Marzluff JM (2011) Coupled relationships between humans and animals in urban areas. In: Niemela J (ed) Handbook of urban ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 135–147

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Marzluff JM (2012) Attitudes and actions toward birds in urban areas: human cultural differences influence bird behavior. Auk 129:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Marzluff JM, Kübler S, Meffert P (2011) New directions in urban avian ecology: reciprocal connections between birds and humans in cities. In: Endlicher W, Hostert P, Kowarik I, Kulke E, Lossau J, Marzluff JM, van der Meer E, Mieg H, Nutzmann G, Schulz M, Wessolek G (eds) Perspectives in Urban Ecology: studies of ecosystems and interactions between humans and nature in the metropolis of Berlin. Springer, New York, pp 167–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clucas B, Rabotyagov S, Marzluff JM (2015) How much is that birdie in my backyard? A cross-continental economic evaluation of native urban songbirds. Urban Ecoystems Online First

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cramp S (1980) Changes in the breeding birds of inner London since 1900. Proc Int Ornithol Congress 17:1316–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Crooks KR, Soulé ME (1999) Mesopredator release and avifaunal extinctions in a fragmented system. Nature 400:563–566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis RA, Gole C, Roberts JD (2013) Impacts of urbanization on the native avifauna of Perth, Western Australia. Urban Ecosyst 16:427–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw ED (1992) Data quality in mail, telephone and face to face surveys. T.T-Pubilkaties, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Covet D, Lee A, Jiguet F (2007) Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv Biol 21:741–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson JL, Bonney R (2012) Citizen science: public participation in environmental research. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly RE, Marzluff JM (2004) Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv Biol 18:733–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly RE, Marzluff JM (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosyst 9:99–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll MF (1977) The ten commandments of statistical inference. Am Math Mon 84:628

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn EH, Tessaglia-Hymes DL (1999) Birds at your feeder: a guide to feeding habits, behavior, distribution, and abundance. W. W Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn RR, Gavin MC, Sanchez MC, Solomon JN (2006) The pigeon paradox: dependence of global conservation on urban nature. Conserv Biol 20:1814–1816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CE, Abrams E, Reitsma R, Roux K, Salmonsen L, Marra PP (2005) The Neighborhood Nestwatch program: participant outcomes of a citizen-science ecological research project. Conserv Biol 19:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faeth SH, Warren PS, Shochat E, Marussich WA (2005) Trophic dynamics in urban communities. Bioscience 55:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farwell LS, Marzluff JM (2012) A new bully on the block: does urbanization promote Bewick’s wren (Thryomanes bewickii) aggressive exclusion of Pacific wrens (Troglogytes pacificus)? Biol Conserv 161:128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher RA (1925) Theory of statistical estimation. Proc Camb Philos Soc 22:700–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ (2008) Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib 14:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RA, Irvine KN, Davies ZG, Armsworth PR, Gaston KJ (2012) Interactions between people and birds in urban landscapes. Stud Avian Biol 45:249–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlbach FR (2005) Native Texas avifauna altered by suburban entrapment and method for easily assessing natural avifaunal value. Bull Tex Ornithol Soc 38:35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC Jr, Cimprich DA (1990) Supplementary food improves the nutritional condition of wintering woodland birds: evidence from ptilochronology. Orn Scand 21:277–281

  • Hahs A, McDonnell M (2008) The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landsc Ecol 23:1143–1155

  • Hansen AJ, Knight RL, Marzluff JM, Powell S, Brown K, Hernandez P, Jones K (2005) Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: patterns, mechanisms, research needs. Ecol Appl 15:1893–1905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski IA, Gilpin ME (eds) (1997) Metapopulation biology: ecology, genetics, and evolution. Academic, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepinstall JA, Alberti MA, Marzluff JM (2008) Predicting land cover change and avian community responses in rapidly urbanizing environments. Landsc Ecol 23:1257–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepinstall JA, Marzluff JM, Alberti MA (2012) Predicting avian community response to increasing urbanization. Stud Avian Biol 45:223–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochachka WM, Dhondt AA (2000) Density-dependent decline of host abundance resulting from a new infectious disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:5303–5306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetler M, Drake D (2009) Conservation subdivisions: a wildlife perspective. Landsc Urban Plan 90:95–101 IBM (2010) IBM SPSS Statistics. V. 19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Bird Census Committee (1970) An international standard for a mapping method in bird census work recommended by the International Bird Census Committee. Audubon Field Notes 24:722–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DH (2008) In defense of indices: The case of bird surveys. J Wildl Manag 72:857–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RF, Selander RK (1964) House sparrows: rapid evolution of races in North America. Science 144:548–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgensen A, Gobster PH (2010) Shades of green: measuring the ecology of urban green space in the context of human health and well-being. Nature +. Culture 5:338–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature: a psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR (2012) Birthright: people and nature in the modern world. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo FE (2003) The role of arboriculture in a healthy social ecology. J Arboric 2:148–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Laake J, Rexstad E (2008) RMark-an alternative approach to building linear models in Mark. (http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/rmark/)

  • Lepczyk CA, Mertig AG, Liu J (2004) Assessing landowner activities related to birds across rural-to-urban landscapes. Environ Manag 33:110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepczyk CA, Warren PS, Machabée L, Kinzig AP, Mertig AG (2012) Who feeds the birds? Stud Avian Biol 45:267–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman SB, Warren PB, Gan H, Shochat E (2012) Linking foraging decisions to residential yard bird composition. PLoS One 7(8):e43497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JG, Dietz T, Carpenter SR et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Blair RB (2011) Reduced density and nest survival of ground-nesting songbirds relative to earthworm invasions in northern hardwood forests. Conserv Biol 25:983–992

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Will T, Marra PP (2013) The impact of free-ranging cats on wildlife in the United States. Nat Commun 4:1396. doi:10.1038/ncomms2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Loss SR, Will T, Loss SS, Marra PP (2014) Bird-building collisions in the United States: estimates of annual mortality and species vulnerability. Condor 116:8–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacGrgor-Fors I, Morales-Perez L, Schondube JE (2012) From forests to cities: effects of urbanization on tropical birds. Stud Avian Biol 45:33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, Brown P, St Leger L (2005) Healthy nature healthy people: ‘Contact with nature’ as an upstream health promotion intervention for populations. Health Promot Int 21:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2001) Worldwide urbanization and its affects on birds. Pages 19–47. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian conservation and ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 19–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosyst 8:155–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2012) Urban evolutionary ecology. Stud Avian Biol 45:287–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM (2014) Welcome to subirdia. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Angell T (2005) Cultural coevolution: how the human bond with crows and ravens extends theory and raises new questions. J Ecol Anthropol 9:67–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bradley GA (2003) Ecological restoration in the settled-wildland interface. In: Friederici P (ed) Ecological restoration of southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 353–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Ewing K (2001) Restoration of fragmented landscapes for the conservation of birds: A general framework and specific recommendations for urbanizing landscapes. Restor Ecol 9:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Miller ML (2014) Crows and crow feeders: observations on interspecific semiotics. In: Witzany G (ed) Biocommunication of animals. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 191–211

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Rodewald AD (2008) Conserving biodiversity in urbanizing areas: nontraditional views from a bird’s perspective. Cities Environ 1:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly RE (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian conservation and ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 1–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Withey JC, Whittaker KA, Oleyar MD, Unfried TM, Rullman S, DeLap J (2007) Consequences of habitat utilization by nest predators and breeding songbirds across multiple scales in an urbanizing landscape. Condor 109:516–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Endlicher W, Alberti MA, Bradley G, Ryan C, ZumBrunnen C, Simon U (eds) (2008) Urban Ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MA, Citroen R, McCall SC (2008) Allometric scaling and Bayesian priors for annual survival of birds and mammals. Am Nat 172:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7(1):5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menge BA, Sutherland JP (1987) Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. Am Nat 130:730–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milder JC (2007) A framework for understanding conservation development and its ecological implications. Bioscience 57:757–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR (2005) Biodiversity conservation and the extinction of experience. Trends Ecol Evol 20:430–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Hobbs RJ (2002) Conservation where people live and work. Conserv Biol 16:330–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara Y, Hashimoto H (2009) Spatial pattern and process in urban animal communities. In: McDonnell MJ, Hahs AK, Breuste JH (eds) Ecology of cities and towns: a comparative approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 197–214

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oleyar MD, Greve AI, Withey JC, Bjorn AM (2008) An integrated approach to evaluating urban forest functionality. Urban Ecosyst 11:289–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paker YY, Yom-Tov Y, Alon-Mozes T, Barnea A (2013) The effect of plant richness and urban garden structure on bird species richness, diversity and community structure. Landsc Urban Plan 122:186–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palumbi SR (2001) The evolution explosion: how humans cause rapid evolutionary change. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn T (1997) Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington. Northwest Sci 71:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralph CJ, Geupel GR, Pyle P, Martin TE, Desante DF (1993) Handbook of Field Methods for Monitoring Landbirds. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany. General Technical Report PSW-GTR-144

  • Recher HF, Serventy DF (1991) Long term changes in the relative abundances of birds in Kings Park, Perth, Western Australia. Conserv Biol 5:90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Reynolds J, Harrison THE, Bearhop S (2008a) Winter feeding of birds increases productivity in the subsequent breeding season. Biol Lett 4:220–223

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Robb GN, McDonald RA, Chamberlain DE, Bearhop S (2008b) Food for thought: supplementary feeding as a driver of ecological change in avian populations. Front Ecol Environ 6:476–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DH, Wainer H (2002) On the past and future of null hypothesis significance testing. J Wildl Manag 66:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth management responses and implications for conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 71:51–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald AD, Shustack DP (2008) Urban flight: understanding individual and population-level responses of Nearctic-Neotropical migratory birds to urbanization. J Anim Ecol 77:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolshausen G, Segelbacher G, Hobson KA, Schaefer HM (2009) Contemporary evolution of reproductive isolation and phenotypic divergence in sympatry along a migratory divide. Curr Biol 19:2097–2101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Root T (1988) Environmental factors associated with avian distributional boundaries. J Biogeogr 15:489–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstock S, Anderson D, Giesen K, Leukering T, Carter M (2002) Landbird counting techniques: Current practices and an alternative. Auk 119:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rullman S, Marzluff JM (2014) Raptor presence along an urban-wildland gradient: influences of prey abundance and land-cover. J Raptor Res, 48:xxx

  • Ryder TB, Reitsma R, Evans B, Marra PP (2010) Quantifying avian nest survival along an urbanization gradient using citizen and scientist generated data. Ecol Appl 20:419–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shochat E, Warren PS, Faeth SH, McIntyre NE, Hope D (2006) From pattern to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 21:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SB, McKay JE, Richardson JK, Murphy MT (2012) Edges, trails, and reproductive performance of spotted towhees in urban greenspaces. Stud Avian Biol 45:167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas L, Laake JL, Strindberg S, Marques FFC, Buckland ST, Borchers DL, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Hedley SL, Pollard JH, Bishop JRB, Marques TA [online] (2006) Distance 5.0. Release 1. Research Unit for Wildlife. Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. <http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance > (1 September 2007)

  • Thompson W (2002) Towards reliable bird surveys: Accounting for individuals present but not detected. Auk 119:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toms M (2003) The BTO/CJ garden birdwatch book. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanization and the separation of humans from nature. Bioscience 54:585–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unfried TM, Hauser L, Marzluff JM (2013) Effects of urbanization on song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population connectivity. Conserv Genet 14:41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vickery PD, Hunter ML Jr, Wells JV (1992) Use of a new reproductive index to evaluate relationship between habitat quality and breeding success. Auk 109:697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigallon SM, Marzluff JM (2005) Abundance, nest sites, and nesting success of Steller’s jays along a gradient of urbanization in western Washington. Northwest Sci 79:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277:494–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker RH (1967) Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol Rev 42:207–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2009) Species-specific survival and relative habitat use in an urban landscape during the postfledging period. Auk 126:288–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker KA, Marzluff JM (2012) Post-fledging mobility in an urban landscape. Stud Avian Biol 45:183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Withey JC, Marzluff JM (2005) Dispersal by juvenile American Crows influences population dynamics across a gradient of urbanization. Auk 122:206–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Withey JC, Marzluff JM (2009) Multi-scale use of lands providing anthropogenic resources by American Crows in an urbanizing landscape. Landsc Ecol 24:281–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh PJ (2004) Rapid evolution of a sexually selected trait following population establishment in a novel habitat. Evolution 58:166–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tina (Rohila) Blewett, Heather Cornell, Roarke Donnelly, Laura Farwell, Jeff Hepinstall, Cara Ianni, Sonja Kübler, Peter Meffert, Lin Robinson, Stan Rullman, Ben Shryock, Jorge Tomasevic, Thomas Unfried, Kara Whittaker, and John Withey helped collect the data we present. Michael Abs, Marina Alberti, Gordon Bradley, Wilfried Endlicher, Kern Ewing, Ingo Kowarik, Maciej Luniak, Marc Miller, Maresi Nerad, Clare Ryan, Eric Shulenberger, Ute Simon, Gerd Wessolek, and Craig ZumBrunnen broadened our understanding of the urban world. Their collaboration enabled successful proposals that funded our joint research from the U.S. National Science Foundation (DEB-9875041, IGERT-0114351, BCS 0120024, and BCS 0508002), the German Research Foundation (RTG Graduiertenkolleg 780), and the University of Washington (Rachel Wood’s Endowed Graduate Program).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    John M. Marzluff, Barbara Clucas, M. David Oleyar & Jack DeLap

Authors
  1. John M. Marzluff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Clucas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. David Oleyar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jack DeLap
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. Marzluff.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marzluff, J.M., Clucas, B., Oleyar, M.D. et al. The causal response of avian communities to suburban development: a quasi-experimental, longitudinal study. Urban Ecosyst 19, 1597–1621 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0483-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-015-0483-3

Keywords

  • Urban Birds
  • Diversity
  • Survivorship
  • Reproduction
  • Nesting success
  • Abundance
  • Survey technique
  • Seattle
  • Urbanization gradient
  • domestic cat
  • bird feeder
  • human action