Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating a campus nitrogen budget for Auburn University, Alabama, USA

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript


Prompted by recent sustainability trends, some institutions and municipalities have begun quantifying their local impact on the nitrogen (N) cycle. To better understand the N budget at Auburn University (AU), we measured N inputs and outputs in four subsystems (near surface atmosphere, human metabolism, animal metabolism, and landscape) utilizing methods established by Savanick et al. (2007) for the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (UM). The total AU input of 245.7 Mg N yr−1 and total output 217.5 Mg N yr−1 was made up of the balance of subsystem inputs and outputs (near surface atmosphere 174 Mg N yr−1 input, 174 Mg N yr−1 output; human metabolism 22.8 Mg N yr−1 input, 20.5 Mg N yr−1 output; animal metabolism 39.2 Mg N yr−1 input, 20.9 Mg N yr−1 output; landscape 9.7 Mg N yr−1 input, 2.1 Mg N yr−1 output). We compared these results with N balances for UM and the University of Virginia (UVA) (Leach et al. 2013) and found that larger campus area was associated with higher commuter emissions, colder average temperatures were associated with more on-campus energy emissions, presence of agriculture and veterinary schools were associated with larger animal metabolism N flux, and campuses greater urban density or crop presence tended to have greater landscape N flux. We found that overall N flux for each campus was similar when normalized per capita (7–11 kg N cap−1 yr−1). This study provides insight towards reaching sustainability goals at AU and other institutions and can inform decisions regarding pollution reduction plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others


Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge all AU personnel who devoted time and expertise to this study. We would specifically like to thank Angela Chandler, Horse Center Manager, AU Horse Center; Mike Colley, AU Large Animal Vet Clinic Manager, AU College of Veterinary Medicine; William Handley, Building Manager, AU School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences; Joseph Hess, Professor and Extension Specialist; Steven Johnson, Interim Superintendent, AU Landscape Services; Mike Kensler, Director, Office of Sustainability; Glenn Loughridge, AU Director of Campus Dining; Ken Martin, AU Energy Manager; Frank Owsley, Associate Professor and Extension Specialist, AU Animal Science Department; Joseph Mitchell Pate, Director of Ag Research/Ext. Center, AU Poultry Science; George Richburg, Agricultural Assistant, AU Beef Complex; and Emily Scammel, President, AU Campus Kitchens Project. We would additionally like to thank the Alabama Cooperative Extension system, as well as the AU Facilities Management staff, the AU Parking Services staff, and the AU Tiger Transit staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna Schurman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brodbeck, A.B., LeCompte, J.S., Meder, A.L. et al. Evaluating a campus nitrogen budget for Auburn University, Alabama, USA. Urban Ecosyst 18, 1187–1211 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: