Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 1139–1163 | Cite as

Defining and measuring the social-ecological quality of urban greenspace: a semi-systematic review

  • Ashlea J. HunterEmail author
  • Gary W. Luck
Article

Abstract

Various disciplines have examined the role of urban greenspace in delivering a wide array of social-ecological values to urban residents. This semi-systematic review of 50 studies assesses how links between the social and ecological qualities of urban greenspace have been measured to establish social-ecological values, and what qualities researchers have used to define greenspace type. Our review identified that differences in the definition and measurement of greenspace and its ecological and social qualities can have a profound impact on interpretations of greenspace value. We argue that it is critical to acknowledge the heterogeneity among different greenspace types, and to use suitable metrics of greenspace ecological and social quality accordingly. We present a heterarchical typology of greenspace qualities (rather than a hierarchical typology of urban greenspaces) that can be used to define greenspace type and identify research clusters, gaps and emerging lines of inquiry into the social-ecological values of greenspace.

Keywords

Typology Urban ecology Greenspace values Environmental psychology Park Garden 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by an Australian Postgraduate Award and a Charles Sturt University, Institute for Land, Water and Society Scholarship to Ashlea Hunter. The contribution of Gary Luck was supported by an Australian Research Council Future Fellowship (FT0990436). Thanks to Jonathon Howard and two referees for constructive comments on the review.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

11252_2015_456_MOESM1_ESM.docx (86 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 85 kb)

References

  1. Abraham A, Sommerhalder K, Abel T (2010) Landscape and well-being: a scoping study on the health-promoting impact of outdoor environments. Int J Public Health 55(1):59–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson E (2006) Urban landscapes and sustainible cities. Ecol Soc 11(1):34–41Google Scholar
  3. Andersson E, Barthel S, Ahrne K (2007) Measuring social-ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecol Appl 17(5):1267–1278CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Barbosa O, Tratalos JA, Armsworth PR, Davies RG, Fuller RA, Johnson P, Gaston KJ (2007) Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 83(2–3):187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barthel S, Colding J, Elmqvist T, Folke C (2005) History and Local Management of a Biodiversity-Rich, Urban Cultural Landscape. Ecol Soc 10(2)Google Scholar
  6. Beilin R, Hunter A (2011) Co-constructing the sustainable city: how indicators help us “grow” more than just food in community gardens. Local Environ 16(6):523–538. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2011.555393 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bell S, Montarzino A, Travlou P (2007) Mapping research priorities for green and public urban space in the UK. Urban For Urban Green 6(2):103–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social-ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertoncini A, Machon N, Pavoine S, Muratet A (2012) Local gardening practices shape urban lawn floristic communities. Landsc Urban Plan 105(1–2):53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bowler D, Buyung-Ali L, Knight T, Pullin A (2010) A systematic review of evidence for the added benefits to health of exposure to natural environments. BMC Public Health 10(1):456PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Brady R, Tobias T, Eagles P, Ohrner R, Micak J, Veale B, Dorney R (1979) A typology for the urban ecosystem and its relationship to larger biogeographical landscape units. Urban Ecol 4:11–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bratman GN, Hamilton JP, Daily GC (2012) The impacts of nature experience on human cognitive function and mental health. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1249(1):118–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruni CM, Fraser J, Schultz PW (2008) The value of zoo experiences for connecting people with nature. Visitor Studies 11(2):139–150. doi: 10.1080/10645570802355489 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bryman A (2008) Social research methods, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron RWF, Blanuša T, Taylor JE, Salisbury A, Halstead AJ, Henricot B, Thompson K (2012) The domestic garden – Its contribution to urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry; Urban Greening 11(2):129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carrus G, Scopelliti M, Lafortezza R, Colangelo G, Ferrini F, Salbitano F, Sanesi G (2015) Go greener, feel better? The positive effects of biodiversity on the well-being of individuals visiting urban and peri-urban green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 134(0):221–228. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cilliers S, Cilliers J, Lubbe R, Siebert S (2013) Ecosystem services of urban green spaces in African countries—perspectives and challenges. Urban Ecosystems 16(4):681–702. doi: 10.1007/s11252-012-0254-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colding J, Lundberg J, Folke C (2006) Incorporating green-area user groups in urban ecosystem management. Ambio 35(5):8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dallimer M, Tang Z, Bibbly P, Brindely P, Gaston K, Davies Z (2011) Temporal changes in greenspace in a highly urbanized region. Biol Lett 23(5):763–766. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dallimer M, Irvine K, Skinner A, Davies Z, Rouquette J, Maltby L, Gaston K (2012) Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. Bioscience 62(1):47. doi: 10.1525/bio.2012.62.l.9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doick KJ, Sellers G, Castan-Broto V, Silverthorne T (2009) Understanding success in the context of brownfield greening projects: the requirement for outcome evaluation in urban greenspace success assessment. Urban Forestry; Urban Greening 8(3):163–178. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freeman C, Buck O (2003) Development of an ecological mapping methodology for urban areas in New Zealand. Landsc Urban Plan 63(3):161–173. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00188-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuller R, Gaston K (2009) The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol Lett 5(3):352–355. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0010 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuller R, Irvine K, Devine-Wright P, Warren P, Gaston K (2007) Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol Lett 3(4):390–394. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0149 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 14(2):395–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Öhrström E (2007) Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: the potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landsc Urban Plan 83(2–3):115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gill N, Waitt G, Head L (2009) Local engagements with urban bushland: moving beyond bounded practice for urban biodiversity management. Landsc Urban Plan 93(3–4):184–193. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gobster PH (2001) Visions of nature: conflict and compatibility in urban park restoration. Landsc Urban Plan 56(1–2):35–51. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2046(01)00164-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grahn P, Stigsdotter UK (2010) The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landsc Urban Plan 94(3–4):264–275. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.10.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Guitart D, Pickering C, Byrne J (2012) Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban Forestry Urban Greening(0). doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.06.007Google Scholar
  31. Haq S (2011) Urban green spaces and an integrative approach to sustainable environment. J Environ Prot 2:601–608. doi: 10.4236/jep.2011.25069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartig T, Korpela K, Evans GW, Gärling T (1997) A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing Plann Res 14(4):175–194. doi: 10.1080/02815739708730435 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. International wellbeing & Group (2006) Personal Wellbeing Index: Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin UniversityGoogle Scholar
  34. Jim CY, Chen SS (2003) Comprehensive greenspace planning based on landscape ecology principles in compact Nanjing city, China. Landsc Urban Plan 65(3):95–116. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00244-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jim CY, Chen WY (2006) Perception and attitude of residents toward urban green spaces in Guangzhou (China). Environ Manag 38(3):338–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jorgensen A, Gobster PH (2010) Shades of green: measuring the ecology of urban green space in the context of human health and well-being. Nature Cult 5(3):338–363. doi: 10.3167/nc.2010.050307 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jorgensen A, Hitchmough J, Calvert T (2002) Woodland spaces and edges: their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landsc Urban Plan 60(3):135–150. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00052-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaplan S (1995) The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J Environ Psychol 15(3):169–182. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan R, Kaplan S (1989) The experience of nature. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Kendal D, Williams KJH, Williams NSG (2012) Plant traits link people's plant preferences to the composition of their gardens. Landsc Urban Plan 105(1–2):34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Keniger L, Gaston K, Irvine K, Fuller R (2013) What are the benefits of interacting with nature? Int J Environ Res Public Health, 9(1). doi: 10.3390/ijerph90x000xGoogle Scholar
  42. Kinzig AP, Warren P, Martin C, Hope D, Katti M (2005) The Effects of Human Socioeconomic Status and Cultural Characteristics on Urban Patterns of Biodiversity. Ecol Soc, 10(1)Google Scholar
  43. Knecht C (2004) Urban Nature and Well-Being: Some Empirical Support and Design Implications. Berkeley Planning J, 17(1)Google Scholar
  44. Konijnendijk C, Annerstedt M, Nielsen A, Maruthaveeran S (2013) Benefits of Urban Parks: A systematic review. A Report for IFPRA (pp. 1–70): The International Federation of Parks and Recreation AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  45. Koohsari M (2011) Access to public open sapce: is distribution equitable across different socio-economic areas. J Urban Environ Eng 5(2):67–72. doi: 10.4090/juee.2011.v5n2.067072 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lee ACK, Maheswaran R (2011) The health benefits of urban green spaces: a review of the evidence. J Public Health 33(2):212–222. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdq068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Ierodiaconou D, Kremer P (2010) Perceived and objectively measured greenness of neighbourhoods: are they measuring the same thing? Landsc Urban Plan 95(1–2):28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2009.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luck G, Smallbone L, O’Brien R (2009) Socio-economics and vegetation change in urban ecosystems: patterns in space and time. Ecosystems 12(4):604–620. doi: 10.1007/s10021-009-9244-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luck G, Davidson P, Boxall D, Smallbone L (2011) Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv Biol 25(4):816–826. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01685.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Luck G, Smallbone L, Sheffield K (2012) Environmental and socio-economic factors related to urban bird communities. Austral Ecol 38(1):111–120. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2012.02383.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maas J, Verheij R, Groenewegen P, de Vries S, Spreeuwenberg P (2006) Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation? J Epidemiol Community Health 60(7):587–592. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.043125 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Maccoby M (2000) Creating network competence. Res Techn Manage 43(3):59Google Scholar
  53. Magle S, Hunt V, Vernon M, Crooks K (2012) Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol Conserv 155:23–32. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mitchell R, Popham F (2007) Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England. J Epidemiol Community Health 61:681–683. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.053553 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mugerauer R (2010) Toward a theory of integrated urban ecology: complementing Pickett et al. Ecol Soc 15(4):31Google Scholar
  56. Muratet A, Pellegrini P, Dufour A-B, Arrif T, Chiron F (2015) Perception and knowledge of plant diversity among urban park users. Landsc Urban Plan 137(0):95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nielsen A, van den Bosch M, Maruthaveeran S, van den Bosch C (2014) Species richness in urban parks and its drivers: a review of empirical evidence. Urban Ecosystems 17(1):305–327. doi: 10.1007/s11252-013-0316-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nordh H, Ostby K (2013) Pocket parks for people – A study of park design and use. Urban For Urban Green 12(1):12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nordh H, Hartig T, Hagerhall CM, Fry G (2009) Components of small urban parks that predict the possibility for restoration. Urban For Urban Green 8(4):225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.06.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Özgüner H, Kendle AD (2006) Public attitudes towards naturalistic versus designed landscapes in the city of Sheffield (UK). Landsc Urban Plan 74(2):139–157. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2004.10.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Özgüner H, Eraslan Ş, Yilmaz S (2012) Public perception of landscape restoration along a degraded urban streamside. Land Degrad Dev 23(1):24–33. doi: 10.1002/ldr.1043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pacheco R, Vasconcelos HL (2007) Invertebrate conservation in urban areas: Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):193–199. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Groffman PM, Band LE, Boone CG, Wilson MA (2008) Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore ecosystem study. Bioscience 58(2):139–150. doi: 10.1641/B580208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Qin J, Zhou X, Sun C, Leng H, Lian Z (2013) Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents. Urban Forestry Urban Greening(0). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.005Google Scholar
  65. Richardson E, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Day P, Kingham S (2010) The association between green space and cause-specific mortality in urban New Zealand: an ecological analysis of green space utility. BMC Public Health 10:240. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-240 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Richardson EA, Mitchell R, Hartig T, de Vries S, Astell-Burt T, Frumkin H (2012) Green cities and health: a question of scale? J Epidemiol Community Health 66(2):160–165. doi: 10.1136/jech.2011.137240 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sander HA, Zhao C (2015) Urban green and blue: who values what and where? Land Use Policy 42(0):194–209. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Shackleton CM, Blair A (2013) Perceptions and use of public green space is influenced by its relative abundance in two small towns in South Africa. Landsc Urban Plan 113(0):104–112. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Skeggs S (1999) Various botanical and social factors and thier effects on an urban woodland in Reading, Berkshire. Arboricultural J 23(3):209–231. doi: 10.1080/03071375.1999.9747242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smardon RC (1988) Perception and aesthetics of the urban environment: review of the role of vegetation. Landsc Urban Plan 15(1–2):85–106. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(88)90018-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stigsdotter UK, Grahn P (2011) Stressed individuals’ preferences for activities and environmental characteristics in green spaces. Urban For Urban Green 10(4):295–304. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.07.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Summit J, McPherson EG (1998) Residential tree planting and care: a study of attitudes and behavior in Sacramento. Calif Arboriculture Urban Forestry 24(2):89–97Google Scholar
  73. Swanwick C (2009) Society’s attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 26(0):S62–S75. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Swanwick C, Dunnett N, Woolley H (2003) Nature, role and value of green space in towns and cities: an overview. Built Environ 29(2):94–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Ulrich R (1983) Aesthetic and Affective Response to Natural Environment. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behav Natural Environ (Vol. 6, pp. 85–125): Springer USGoogle Scholar
  76. Ulrich R (1984) View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science 224(4647):420–421. doi: 10.1126/science.6143402 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. UNDP (2013) International Human Development Indicators. Human Develop Reports. Retrieved 6/10/12, 2013, from http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/Google Scholar
  78. Unknown (2006) Green spaces, better places: final report of the urban green spaces taskforce In C. a. neighbourhoods (Ed.), (pp. 1–94). UKGoogle Scholar
  79. van Heezik YM, Dickinson KJM, Freeman C (2012) Closing the Gap: Communicating to Change Gardening Practices in Support of Native Biodiversity in Urban Private Gardens. Ecol Soc, 17(1). doi: 10.5751/es-04712-170134Google Scholar
  80. Villeneuve PJ, Jerrett MG, Su J, Burnett RT, Chen H, Wheeler AJ, Goldberg MS (2012) A cohort study relating urban green space with mortality in Ontario, Canada. Environ Res 115(0):51–58. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Wang H-F, Qiu J-X, Breuste J, Ross Friedman C, Zhou W-Q, Wang X-K (2013) Variations of urban greenness across urban structural units in Beijing, China. Urban Forestry Urban Greening(0). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.004Google Scholar
  82. Ward Thompson C, Roe J, Aspinall P, Mitchell R, Clow A, Miller D (2012) More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities: evidence from salivary cortisol patterns. Landsc Urban Plan 105(3):221–229. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.12.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ward CD, Parker CM, Shackleton CM (2010) The use and appreciation of botanical gardens as urban green spaces in South Africa. Urban For Urban Green 9(1):49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. White M, Smith A, Humphryes K, Pahl S, Snelling D, Depledge M (2010) Blue space: the importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scenes. J Environ Psychol 30(4):482–493. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilkinson N (2006) Factors influencing the small-scale distribution of house sparrows passer domesticus in a suburban environment. Bird Study 53:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental SciencesCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia
  2. 2.Institute for Land, Water and SocietyCharles Sturt UniversityAlburyAustralia

Personalised recommendations