Skip to main content

Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities

Urban Ecosystems volume 18, pages 857–870 (2015)Cite this article

Abstract

As urbanization accelerates, urban biodiversity conservation is becoming a great concern for the maintenance of urban ecosystem functions. In particular, forest bird communities in urban areas have been recognized as a conservation target because of their functions in food webs and ecosystem services. But our understanding of which local- and landscape-scale factors influence native bird communities within urban green spaces is still insufficient to provide managers with information for effectively planning biodiversity management programs. Here we examine how local habitat characteristics, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity influence the diversity of forest bird communities in 44 small forest patches (0.5–20.0 ha) embedded in an urbanized landscape. Patch size exerted a positive influence on the diversity of most bird functional groups, and it had the greatest effects on total abundance and species richness. The second most important factor was human disturbance. Remnant patches with lower levels of human disturbance had higher diversity than newly established patches where intense human activities occurred more frequently. In addition, vegetation complexity and habitat connectivity were positively related to total species richness and abundance, respectively, but they were less important. Management strategies for the conservation of urban forest birds, therefore, should consider not only local improvements in habitat structure – through increased patch size, reduced human disturbance, and increased vegetation complexity – but also the maintenance of habitat connectivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren H (1994) Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos 71:355–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton K (2014) MuMIn: multi-model inference. R Package Version 1.10.5. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2014

  • Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe SH (2000) Bird census techniques, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein DT, Fernández-Juricic E, Zollner PA, Garity SC (2005) Inter-specific variation in avian responses to human disturbance. J Appl Ecol 42:943–953. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01071.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Saura S (2010) Ranking individual habitat patches as connectivity providers: integrating network analysis and patch removal experiments. Ecol Model 221:2393–2405. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker L, Brooker M, Cale P (1999) Animal dispersal in fragmented habitat: measuring habitat connectivity, corridor use, and dispersal mortality. Conserv Ecol 3:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn A, Urban D, Keitt T (2000) Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory. J Environ Manag 59:265–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K, Anderson D (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr RM, Jones R (1968) The influence of parkland habitat management on birds in Delaware. T N Am Wildl Nat Res 33:299–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbó-Ramírez P, Zuria I (2011) The value of small urban greenspaces for birds in a Mexican city. Landsc Urban Plann 100:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (1992) Statistical models in S. Chapman and Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevan A, Sutherland M (1991) Hierarchical partitioning. Am Stat 45:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi CY, Nam HY, Hur WH, Lee WS, Kim HJ, Hwang GY (2006) Edge preference of forest-dwelling birds in the temperate deciduous forests. J Ecol Field Biol 29:191–203 (in Korean with English abstract)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D, Lee A, Jiguet F (2007) Functional homogenization effect of urbanization on bird communities. Conserv Biol 21:741–751

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drinnan IN (2005) The search for fragmentation thresholds in a southern Sydney suburb. Biol Conserv 124:339–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 151:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000a) Avifaunal use of wooded streets in an urban landscape. Conserv Biol 14:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2000b) Local and regional effects of pedestrians on forest birds in a fragmented landscape. Condor 102:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E (2004) Spatial and temporal analysis of the distribution of forest specialists in an urban-fragmented landscape (Madrid, Spain): implications for local and regional bird conservation. Landsc Urban Plann 69:17–32

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers Conserv 10:2023–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Juricic E, Tellería JL (2000) Effects of human disturbance on spatial and temporal feeding patterns of Blackbird Turdus merula in urban parks in Madrid, Spain. Bird Study 47:13–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RTT (2014) Urban ecology: science of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2010) Valuing common species. Science 327:154–155

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez A, Lawton J, Gilbert F, Blackburn T, Evans-Freke I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics, abundance, and distribution in a microecosystem. Science 281:2045–2047

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haas CA (1995) Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conserv Biol 9:845–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husté A, Selmi S, Boulinier T (2006) Bird communities in suburban patches near Paris: determinants of local richness in a highly fragmented landscape. Ecoscience 13:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikuta LA, Blumstein DT (2003) Do fences protect birds from human disturbance? Biol Conserv 112:447–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston RF (2001) Synanthropic birds of North America. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly RE (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic, Norwell, Massachusetts, pp 49–67

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi KK, Bhatt D, Thapliyal A (2012) Avian diversity and its association with vegetation structure in different elevational zones of Nainital district (Western Himalayan) of Uttarakhand. Int J Biodivers Conserv 4:364–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr JR, Roth RR (1971) Vegetation structure and avian diversity in several New World areas. Am Nat 105:423–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J (2003) Forest fragmentation effects from urban expansion in Seoul and its satellite cites. Master degree thesis, Seoul National University (in Korean with English abstract)

  • Kong F, Yin H, Nakagoshi N (2007) Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space: a case study in Jinan City, China. Landsc Urban Plann 79:240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Forest Service (KFS) (2012) Statistical yearbook of forestry. 468 p (in Korean)

  • Korean Statistical Information Service (KSIS) (2005) The 2005 population and housing census of Korea (in Korean)

  • Koskimies P (1989) Birds as a tool in environmental monitoring. Ann Zool Fenn 26:153–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster RK, Rees WE (1979) Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats. Can J Zool 57:2358–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee W, Park C-R (1995) Analysis of changes on the forest environment and the bird community in terms of guild. Korean J Environ Ecol 18:397–408 (in Korean with English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Dale MR, Fortin MJ, Gurevitch J, Hohn M, Myers D (2002) The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. Ecography 25:601–615

  • Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. 2nd english edn. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons KG, Brigham CA, Traut BH, Schwartz MW (2005) Rare species and ecosystem functioning. Conserv Biol 19:1019–1024. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00106.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Nally R (2002) Multiple regression and inference in ecology and conservation biology: further comments on identifying important predictor variables. Biodivers Conserv 11:1397–1401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martensen AC, Pimentel RG, Metzger JP (2008) Relative effects of fragment size and connectivity on bird community in the Atlantic Rain Forest: implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 141:2184–2192. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.008

  • Melles S, Glenn S, Martin K (2003) Urban bird diversity and landscape complexity: species-environment associations along a multiscale habitat gradient. Conserv Ecol 7:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Island Press

  • Miller JR, Cale P (2000) Behavioral mechanisms and habitat use by birds in a fragmented agricultural landscape. Ecol Appl 10:1732–1748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minor E, Urban D (2010) Forest bird communities across a gradient of urban development. Urban Ecosyst 13:51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Connell TJ, Jackson LE, Brooks RP (2000) Bird guilds as indicators of ecological condition in the central Appalachians. Ecol Appl 10:1706–1721. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1706:bgaioe]2.0.co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park CR, Lee WS (2000) Relationship between species composition and area in breeding birds of urban woods in Seoul, Korea. Landsc Urban Plann 51:29–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purevdorj T, Tateishi R, Ishiyama T, Honda Y (1998) Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. Int J Remote Sens 19:3519–3535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 11 Sep 2014

  • Roberts D (2013) Labdsv: ordination and multivariate analysis for ecology. R package version 1.6-1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/labdsv/index.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2014

  • Sadler J, Bates A, Hale J, James P (2010) Bringing cities alive: the importance of urban green spaces for people and biodiversity. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–260

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Pascual-Hortal L (2007) A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study. Landsc Urban Plann 83:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saura S, Rubio L (2010) A common currency for the different ways in which patches and links can contribute to habitat availability and connectivity in the landscape. Ecography 33:523–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Seoul Metropolitan Government (SMG) (2010) The city biotope map of Seoul, Korea

  • Shanahan DF, Miller C, Possingham HP, Fuller RA (2011) The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol Conserv 144:722–729. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwartz A, Muratet A, Simon L, Julliard R (2013) Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biol Conserv 157:285–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Korea (KOSTAT) (2012) Population projections for provinces: 2010–2040. Korea

  • Steffan-Dewenter I (2003) Importance of habitat area and landscape context for species richness of bees and wasps in fragmented orchard meadows. Conserv Biol 17:1036–1044

  • Tilghman NG (1987) Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landsc Urban Plann 14:481–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban D, Keitt T (2001) Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective. Ecology 82:1205–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh C, Mac Nally R (2013) Hier.Part: hierarchical Partitioning, R package version 1.0-4. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/hier.part/index.html. Accessed 11 Sep 2014

  • Zhou D, Chu LM (2012) How would size, age, human disturbance, and vegetation structure affect bird communities of urban parks in different seasons? J Ornithol 153:1101–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the advice on bird fieldwork offered by Ms. Hyunsook Yang. We also thank GoWoon Kim (Seoul National University) for English correction of the manuscript and Bumsuk Seo (University of Bayreuth) and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (No. 2011–0024289).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Planning, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea

    Wanmo Kang & Dowon Lee

  2. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, M/C 066, 845 W. Taylor Street, Chicago, IL, SES 3346, USA

    Emily S. Minor

  3. Forest Ecology Division, Korea Forest Research Institute, Hoegi-ro 57, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, 130-712, Republic of Korea

    Wanmo Kang & Chan-Ryul Park

Authors
  1. Wanmo Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emily S. Minor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chan-Ryul Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dowon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dowon Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kang, W., Minor, E.S., Park, CR. et al. Effects of habitat structure, human disturbance, and habitat connectivity on urban forest bird communities. Urban Ecosyst 18, 857–870 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0433-5

Keywords

  • Avian diversity
  • Human disturbance
  • Management practices
  • Urban forests
  • Urbanization