Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A methodological contribution to use of Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) as a tool for monitoring contamination of urbansoils with road salt

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of Ground-Penetrating Radar as a tool for monitoring urban soils contaminated with road salt was tested. Data obtained from GPR measurements were compared with the results of laboratory analyses of soil samples collected during selected measurements and evaluated in relation to weather (esp. temperature and precipitation sums) prevailing prior to the individual measurements. It was proved that GPR technology can be used to indicate presence of road salt in soil to a certain extent. However, the radar also reacted sensitively to other irregularities within soil horizons such as type of soil freezing and thawing, changes in soil moisture content and probably also varying activity of soil biota. Further research is necessary to screen out these influences in order to improve practical applicability of this technology in research of soil salinity in urban environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ae N, Arihara J, Okada K, Srinivasan A (eds) (2001) Plant nutrient acquisition. New perspectives, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Asprion U, Aigner T (1999) Towards realistic aquifer models: three-dimensional georadar surveys of quaternary gravel deltas (Singen basin, SW Germany). Sediment Geol 129:281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckström M, Karlsson S, Bäckman L, Folkeson L, Bo L (2004) Mobilisation of heavy metals by deicing salts in a roadside environment. Water Res 38:720–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bastviken D, Thomsen F, Svensson T, Karlsson S, Sandén P, Shaw G, Matucha M, Öberg G (2007) Chloride retention in forest soil by microbial uptake and by natural chlorination of organic matter. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 71:3182–3192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bollag J, Stotzky G (1990) Soil Biochemistry. Volume 6. Martin Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellaro S, Imposa S, Barone F, Chiavetta F, Gresta S, Mulargia F (2008) Georadar and passive seismic survey in the roman amphitheatre of Catania (Sicily). J Cult Herit 9:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cekstere G, Osvalde A (2013) A study of chemical characteristics of soil in relation to street trees status in Riga (Latvia). Urban For Urban Gree 12:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Day SD, Wick AF, Strahm BD, Wiseman PE, Daniels WL (2013) Changes in soil carbon pools and microbial biomass from urban land development and subsequent post: development soil rehabilitation. Soil Biol Biochem 66:38–44

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cranny A, Harris NR, White NM, Barrett-Lennard E, Coles N, Rivers M, Smettem K, Wu J (2012) Screen-printed potentiometric sensors for chloride measurement in soils. Procedia Eng 47:1157–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cresser MS, Killham K, Edwards T (1993) Soil chemistry and its implications. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dai HL, Zhang KL, Xu XL, Yu HY (2012) Evaluation on the effects of deicing chemicals on soil and water environment. Procedia Environ Sci 13:2122–2130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman AJ, Hall AJ, Kavvas ML, Oki T, Pomeroy JW (eds) (2001) Soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and large-scale hydrological models, 1st edn. International Association of Hydrological Sciences, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle J, Zhu Q, Zhang J, Guo L, Lin H (2012) Geophysical investigations of soil – Landscape architecture and its impacts on subsurface flow. In: Hydropedology: Synergistic integration of soil science and hydrology, 1st edn. Academic Press, pp 413–447

  • Golley FB (1993) A history of the ecosystem concept in ecology: More than the sum of the parts, 1st edn. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Green SM, Machin R, Cresser MS (2008) Effect of long-term changes in soil chemistry induced by road salt applications on N-transformations in roadside soils. Environ Pollut 152:20–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gryndler M, Rohlenová J, Kopecký J, Matucha M (2008) Chloride concentration affects soil microbial community. Chemosphere 71:1401–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JR, Day SD, Kane B (2008) Nitrogen fertilization during planting and establishment of the urban forest: a collection of five studies. Urban For Urban Gree 7:195–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley W, Uffindell L, Plumb A, Rawlinson HA, Putwain P, Dickinson NM (2008) Assessing biological indicators for remediated anthropogenic urban soils. Sci Total Environ 405:358–369

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Holliger K, Maurer H (2004) Effects of stochastic heterogeneity on ray-based tomographic inversion of crosshole georadar amplitude data. J Appl Geophys 56:177–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard KWF, Maier H (2007) Road de-icing salt as a potential constraint on urban growth in the greater Toronto area, Canada. J Contam Hydrol 91:146–170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huisman JA, Sperl C, Bouten W, Verstraten JM (2001) Soil water content measurements at different scales: accuracy of time domain reflectometry and ground-penetrating radar. J Hydrol 245:48–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO/DIS 10390 (1992) Soil quality - Determination of pH. International Organization for Standardization

  • IUSS Working Group WRB (2006) World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006, 2nd edn. World Soil Resources Report 103, FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, Whitehead P, Siegel DI, Findlay S (2011) Salting our landscape: an integrated catchment model using readily accessible data to assess emerging road salt contamination to streams. Environ Pollut 159:1257–1265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra YP, Maynard DG (1991) Methods manual for forest soil and plant analysis. Information report NOR-X-319. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta. Ministry of Supply and Services, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy Econ 5:173–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai WL, Kou SC, Poon CS (2012) Unsaturated zone characterization in soil through transient wetting and drying using GPR joint time: frequency analysis and grayscale images. J Hydrol 452–453:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder S, Paasche H, Tronicke J, Niederleithinger E, Vienken T (2010) Zonal cooperative inversion of crosshole P-wave, S-wave, and georadar traveltime data sets. J Appl Geophys 72:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz K, Lal R (2009) Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environ International 35:1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark A, Jansson PE (2009) Generic soil descriptions for modelling water and chloride dynamics in the unsaturated zone based on Swedish soils. Geoderma 150:85–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1999) Spatial prediction of soil properties using environmental correlation. Geoderma 89:67–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mummery D, Battaglia M, Beadle CL, Turnbull CRA, McLeod R (1999) An application of terrain and environmental modeling in a large-scale forestry experiment. Forest Ecol Manag 118:149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando L (2003) Semiquantitative evaluation of massive rock quality using ground penetrating radar. J Appl Geophys 52:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlando L, Soldovieri F (2008) Two different approaches for georadar data processing: a case study in archaeological prospecting. J Appl Geophys 64:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal NC, Siry J, Bowker JM (2011) Urban forests and carbon markets: Buyers’ perspectives. J Forest 109:378–385

  • Pozdnyakova L, Pozdnyakov A, Zhang R (2001) Application of geophysical methods to evaluate hydrology and soil properties in urban areas. Urban Water 3:205–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rejšek K (1999) Forest soil science. In Czech, 1st edn. Mendel University, Brno

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose CW (2004) An introduction to the environmental physics of soil, water and watersheds, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze ED, Beck E, Müller-Hohenstein K (2005) Plant Ecology, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwamborn G, Heinzel J, Schirrmeister L (2008) Internal characteristics of ice-marginal sediments deduced from georadar profiling and sediment properties (Brøgger Peninsula, Svalbard). Geomorphology 95:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KA, Cresser MS (2004) Soil and environmental analysis : modern instrumental techniques, 3rd edn. Martin Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Steelman CM, Endres AL (2009) Evolution of high-frequency ground-penetrating radar direct ground wave propagation during thin frozen soil layer development. Cold Reg Sci Technol 57:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Ettema C (2003) An overview of spatial sampling procedures and experimental design of spatial studies for ecosystem comparisons. Agric Ecosys Environ 94:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szalai S, Lemperger I, Pattantyús-Ábrahám M, Szarka L (2011) The standardized pricking probe surveying and its use in archaeology. J Archaeol Sci 38:175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K, Preetz H, Igel J (2011) Soil properties and performance of landmine detection by metal detector and ground-penetrating radar: soil characterisation and its verification by a field test. J Appl Geophys 73:368–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinelli C, Ribolini A, Bianucci G, Bini M, Landini W (2012) Ground penetrating radar and palaeontology: the detection of sirenian fossil bones under a sunflower field in Tuscany (Italy). Comptes Rendus Palevol 11:445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Putten WH (1997) Plant-soil feedback as a selective forece. Trends Ecol Evol 12:169–170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vičanová M, Toman F, Masíček T, Oppeltová P (2011) Comparative study of soil infiltration capacity at selected sites. Infrastruktura Ecol Rural Areas 12:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrščaj B, Poggio L, Marsan FA (2008) A method for soil environmental quality evaluation for management and planning in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 88:81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbíral J, Honsa I, Malý S, Ciznar D (2011) Soil analysis, Part III, 2nd edn. In Czech. Central Institute for Supervising and Testing in Agriculture, Brno

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by project CZ.1.07/2.400/31.0032 (EE2.4.31.0032EE) ABIONET - The Platform for A Cooperation in A Landscape Formation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klement Rejšek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rejšek, K., Hruška, J., Kuba, L. et al. A methodological contribution to use of Ground-Penetrating Radar (GPR) as a tool for monitoring contamination of urbansoils with road salt. Urban Ecosyst 18, 169–188 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0391-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-014-0391-y

Keywords

Navigation