Advertisement

Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp 369–385 | Cite as

Decomposition of tree leaf litter on pavement: implications for urban water quality

  • Sarah E. HobbieEmail author
  • Lawrence A. Baker
  • Christopher Buyarski
  • Daniel Nidzgorski
  • Jacques C. Finlay
Article

Abstract

Leaf litter may be an important source of nutrients to stormwater and ultimately contribute to eutrophication of surface waters associated with urbanization. Thus, understanding decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter that falls on impervious surfaces is important for stormwater management. However, few studies have examined leaf litter decomposition in the unique urban environment of the street gutter. We compared decomposition of leaf litter of five street tree species in a parking lot gutter in St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. In contrast to our expectations, comparisons with past studies revealed that litter decomposed more rapidly in the gutter than in nearby natural areas. And decomposition rates were as rapid as those measured in other urban settings (forests and streams), with most species losing 80 % of their initial mass after 1 year. Litter of most species had retained more than half of its initial N and P after 1 year. However, in contrast to N, litter P dynamics largely were uncoupled from litter mass dynamics, with litter P increasing and decreasing unpredictably over the year. Short-term (24 h) laboratory studies revealed that litter had the potential to lose a high fraction of its initial P, with high variation among species (from 27 to 88 %), and a smaller fraction of its initial N (<10 %) via leaching. Thus, street tree species may differ in their potential contributions to nutrients that are released during decomposition. Our results suggest that careful selection of street tree species and timely removal of litterfall have significant potential to reduce nutrient fluxes from streets to storm drains, particularly for P.

Keywords

Leaf litter decomposition Nitrogen Phosphorus Street tree Urban 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Karin Sather and John Brockgreitens for useful discussion and help in the laboratory and Claire Baglien, Ayeza Jamil, Cathleen Nguyen, Grace Park, Madhvi Patel, and Jennifer Pederson for assistance. This research was supported by an Environmental Protection Agency Section 319(h) Program grant and a University of Minnesota Discovery Grant.

References

  1. Adair EC, Hobbie SE, Hobbie RK (2010) Single-pool exponential decomposition models: potential pitfalls in their use in ecological studies. Ecology 91(4):1225–1236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barten JM (2005) Stormwater management for shoreline and “near” shoreline homeowners. LakeLine 25:21–24Google Scholar
  3. Carreiro MM, Howe K, Parkhurst DF, Pouyat RV (1999) Variation in quality and decomposability of red oak leaf litter along an urban–rural gradient. Biol Fertil Soils 30:258–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleveland CC, Liptzin D (2007) C: N: P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass? Biogeochemistry 85(3):235–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Peréz-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cotrufo MF, De Santo AV, Alfani A, Bartoli G, De Cristofaro A (1995) Effects of urban heavy metal pollution on organic matter decompositio in Quercus ilex L. woods. Environ Pollut 89:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowen WF, Lee GF (1973) Leaves as a source of phosphorus. Environ Sci Technol 7:853–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Mott WR, Gulati RD, Siewertsen K (1998) Effects of phosphorus-deficient diets on the carbon and phosphorus balance of Daphnia magna. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1147–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorney JR (1986) Leachable and total phosphorus in urban street tree leaves. Water Air Soil Pollut 28:439–443Google Scholar
  10. Fritze H (1988) Influence of urban air pollution on needle litter decomposition and nutrient release. Scand J For Res 3:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hernández DL, Hobbie SE (2008) Effects of fire frequency on oak litter decomposition and nitrogen dynamics. Oecologia 158:535–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hobbie SE (2008) Nitrogen effects on litter decomposition: a five-year experiment in eight temperate grassland and forest sites. Ecology 89:2633–2644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Imberger SJ, Walsh CJ, Grace MR (2008) More microbial activity, not abrasive flow or shredder abundance, accelerates breakdown of labile leaf litter in urban streamsGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaushal SS, Belt KT (2012) The urban watershed continuum: evolving spatial and temporal dimensions. Urban Ecosyst 15(2):409–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Manzoni S, Trofymow JA, Jackson RB, Porporato A (2010) Stoichiometric controls on carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus dynamics in decomposing litter. Ecol Monogr 80:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McArthur MD, Richardson JS (2002) Microbial utilization of dissolved organic carbon leached from riparian litterfall. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 59:1668–1676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McBrayer JF, Cromack K Jr (1980) Effect of snow-pack on oak-litter breakdown and nutrient release in a Minnesota forest. Pedobiol 20:47–54Google Scholar
  18. McComb AJ, Qiu S, Bell RW, Davis JA (2007) Catchment litter: a phosphorus source mobilized during seasonal rainfall. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 77:179–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA, Groffman P, Bohlen P, Pouyat RV, Zipperer WC, Parmelee RW, Carreiro MM, Medley K (1997) Ecosystem processes along an urban-to-rural gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melillo JM, Aber JD, Muratore JF (1982) Nitrogen and lignin control of hardwood leaf litter decomposition dynamics. Ecology 63:621–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meyer JL, Wallace JB, Eggert SL (1998) Leaf litter as a source of dissolved organic carbon in streams. Ecosystems 1:240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Newcomer TA, Kaushal SS, Mayer PM, Shields AR, Canuel EA, Groffman PM, Gold AJ (2012) Influence of natural and novel organic carbon sources on denitrification in forest, degraded urban, and restored streams. Ecol Monogr 82(4):449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nowak DJ, Greenfield EJ (2012) Tree and impervious cover change in U.S. cities. Urban For Urban Green 11:21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ostertag R (2010) Foliar nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation responses after fertilization: An example from nutrient-limited Hawaiian forests. Plant and Soil 334 (85–98)Google Scholar
  25. Parton WA, Silver WL, Burke IC, Grassens L, Harmon ME, Currie WS, King JY, Adair EC, Brandt LA, Hart SC, Fasth B (2007) Global-scale similarities in nitrogen release patterns during long-term decomposition. Science 315:361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pavao-Zuckerman MA, Coleman DC (2005) Decomposition of chestnut oak (Quercus prinus) leaves and nitrogen mineralization in an urban environment. Biol Fertil Soils 41:343–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Petrone KC (2010) Catchment export of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus across an agro-urban land use gradient, Swan-Canning River system, southwestern Australia. JGR 115. doi: 10.1029/2009JG001051
  28. Pouyat RV, Carreiro MM (2003) Controls on mass loss and nitrogen dynamics of oak leaf litter along an urban–rural land-use gradient. Oecologia 135:288–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Pouyat RV, McDonnell MJ, Pickett STA (1997) Litter decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in oak stands along an urban–rural land use gradient. Urban Ecosyst 1:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qiu S, McComb AJ, Bell RW (2002) Phosphorus-leaching from litterfall in wetland catchments of the Swan Coastal Plain, southwestern Australia. Hydrobiologia 472:95–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Selbig WR, Bannerman RT (2007) Evaluation of street sweeping as a stormwater-quality-management tool in three residential basins in Madison, Wisconsin. U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  32. Slack KV, Feltz HR (1968) Tree leaf control on low flow water quality in a small Virgina stream. Environ SciTechnol 2(2):126–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Staaf H, Berg B (1981) Accumulation and release of plant nutrients in decomposing Scots pine needle litter. Long-term decomposition in a Scots pine forest II. Can J Bot 60:1561–1568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Swan CM, Healey B, Richardson DC (2008) The role of native riparian tree species in decomposition of invasive tree of heaven (Ailanthus altissima) leaf litter in an urban stream. Ecoscience 15(1):27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uselman SM, Qualls RG, Lilienfein J (2012) Quality of soluble organic C, N, and P produced by different types and species of litter: Root litter versus leaf litter. Soil Biol Biochem 54:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wallace TA, Ganf GG, Brookes JD (2008) A comparison of phosphorus and DOC leachates from different types of leaf litter in an urban environment. Freshw Biol 53:1902–1913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waschbusch RJ, Selbig WR, Bannerman RT (1999) Sources of phosphorus in stormwater and street dirt from two urban residential basins in Madison, Wisconsin, 1994–1995. Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4021. U.S. Geological Survey, Middleton, WIGoogle Scholar
  38. Wieder RK, Lang GE (1982) A critique of the analytical methods used in examining decomposition data obtained from litter bags. Ecology 63:1636–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Hobbie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lawrence A. Baker
    • 2
  • Christopher Buyarski
    • 1
  • Daniel Nidzgorski
    • 1
  • Jacques C. Finlay
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ecology, Evolution and BehaviorUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA
  2. 2.Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations