Decomposition of tree leaf litter on pavement: implications for urban water quality
- 1.1k Downloads
Leaf litter may be an important source of nutrients to stormwater and ultimately contribute to eutrophication of surface waters associated with urbanization. Thus, understanding decomposition and nutrient release from leaf litter that falls on impervious surfaces is important for stormwater management. However, few studies have examined leaf litter decomposition in the unique urban environment of the street gutter. We compared decomposition of leaf litter of five street tree species in a parking lot gutter in St. Paul, Minnesota, USA. In contrast to our expectations, comparisons with past studies revealed that litter decomposed more rapidly in the gutter than in nearby natural areas. And decomposition rates were as rapid as those measured in other urban settings (forests and streams), with most species losing 80 % of their initial mass after 1 year. Litter of most species had retained more than half of its initial N and P after 1 year. However, in contrast to N, litter P dynamics largely were uncoupled from litter mass dynamics, with litter P increasing and decreasing unpredictably over the year. Short-term (24 h) laboratory studies revealed that litter had the potential to lose a high fraction of its initial P, with high variation among species (from 27 to 88 %), and a smaller fraction of its initial N (<10 %) via leaching. Thus, street tree species may differ in their potential contributions to nutrients that are released during decomposition. Our results suggest that careful selection of street tree species and timely removal of litterfall have significant potential to reduce nutrient fluxes from streets to storm drains, particularly for P.
KeywordsLeaf litter decomposition Nitrogen Phosphorus Street tree Urban
We thank Karin Sather and John Brockgreitens for useful discussion and help in the laboratory and Claire Baglien, Ayeza Jamil, Cathleen Nguyen, Grace Park, Madhvi Patel, and Jennifer Pederson for assistance. This research was supported by an Environmental Protection Agency Section 319(h) Program grant and a University of Minnesota Discovery Grant.
- Barten JM (2005) Stormwater management for shoreline and “near” shoreline homeowners. LakeLine 25:21–24Google Scholar
- Cornwell WK, Cornelissen JHC, Amatangelo K, Dorrepaal E, Eviner VT, Godoy O, Hobbie SE, Hoorens B, Kurokawa H, Peréz-Harguindeguy N, Quested HM, Santiago LS, Wardle DA, Wright IJ, Aerts R, Allison SD, van Bodegom P, Brovkin V, Chatain A, Callaghan TV, Díaz S, Garnier E, Gurvich DE, Kazakou E, Klein JA, Read J, Reich PB, Soudzilovskaia NA, Vaieretti MV, Westoby M (2008) Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. Ecol Lett 11:1065–1071PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dorney JR (1986) Leachable and total phosphorus in urban street tree leaves. Water Air Soil Pollut 28:439–443Google Scholar
- Imberger SJ, Walsh CJ, Grace MR (2008) More microbial activity, not abrasive flow or shredder abundance, accelerates breakdown of labile leaf litter in urban streamsGoogle Scholar
- McBrayer JF, Cromack K Jr (1980) Effect of snow-pack on oak-litter breakdown and nutrient release in a Minnesota forest. Pedobiol 20:47–54Google Scholar
- Ostertag R (2010) Foliar nitrogen and phosphorus accumulation responses after fertilization: An example from nutrient-limited Hawaiian forests. Plant and Soil 334 (85–98)Google Scholar
- Petrone KC (2010) Catchment export of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus across an agro-urban land use gradient, Swan-Canning River system, southwestern Australia. JGR 115. doi: 10.1029/2009JG001051
- Selbig WR, Bannerman RT (2007) Evaluation of street sweeping as a stormwater-quality-management tool in three residential basins in Madison, Wisconsin. U.S. Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
- Waschbusch RJ, Selbig WR, Bannerman RT (1999) Sources of phosphorus in stormwater and street dirt from two urban residential basins in Madison, Wisconsin, 1994–1995. Water Resources Investigations Report 99–4021. U.S. Geological Survey, Middleton, WIGoogle Scholar