Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 481–498 | Cite as

The impact of urbanisation on avian species: The inextricable link between people and birds

  • Lucy TaylorEmail author
  • Charlotte Taylor
  • Adrian Davis


This study investigates the impact of urbanisation on birdlife in a major city. Line transects and point counts were used to survey birds in three habitat types: parkland, residential areas and business/industrial areas. Abundance, richness and diversity of assemblages were determined for all bird species and for those birds native to the area. Behaviours of birds, and of human residents in relation to birds, in these urban areas were documented, including all instances of avian aggression. Bird species, including a subset of native bird species, have greater abundance and richness in parklands. Overall species diversity is greatest in residential habitat types, but native diversity is greatest in parklands. Introduced species are most abundant in business/industrial habitat types. The most frequent aggressive encounters were initiated by noisy miners Manorina melanocephalas, one of the four most common species throughout all habitat types (other common species include the rainbow lorikeet Trichoglossus haematodus, rock dove Columba livia and common myna Sturnus tristis). Other behaviours involved birds utilising food and roost resources and were classified as being caused by active and passive human behaviours. These outcomes indicate that local changes to the environment can impact the bird species by providing different food and roost resources. Human residents and local governments have a range of tools to modify the diversity of urban areas. Further research is needed to determine alternative definitions of modification, such as defining it as open space, and investigating the health of the avian populations in urban areas.


Urban ecosystem Urbanisation Biodiversity Wildlife diversity Introduced species 



The authors express gratitude to the local government areas, City of Sydney and Marrickville Councils, who provided mapping information and advice throughout the study. The base map for ArcGIS was provided by Geoscience Australia (2005).


  1. Arnold KE (2000) Group mobbing behaviour and nest defence in a cooperatively breeding Australian bird. Ethology 106(5):385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Meteorology (2011) Accessed 8 May 2011
  3. Bakkes JA, van den Born GJ, Helder JC, Swart RJ, Hope CW, Parker JDE (1994) An overview of environmental indicators: state of the art and perspectives. United Nations Environment Program, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA (1993) Bird census techniques. Academic Press Limited, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Birds in backyards: history of Sydney’s birds. (2005) Birds in Backyards and Birds Australia. Accessed 2 May 2011
  6. Blewett CM, Marzluff JM (2005) Effects of urban sprawl on snags and the abundance and productivity of cavity-nesting birds. Condor 107(3):678–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buckland ST, Marsden SJ, Green RE (2008) Estimating bird abundance: making methods work. Bird Conservation International 2008(18):S91–S108Google Scholar
  8. Case TJ (1996) Global patterns in the establishment and distribution of exotic birds. Biol Conserv 78:69–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Catterall CP (2004) Birds, garden plants and suburban bushlots: where good intentions meet unexpected outcomes. In: Burgin S, Lunney D (eds) Urban wildlife: more than meets the eye. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  10. Christidis L, Boles WE (2007) Systematics and taxonomy of Australian birds. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  11. City of Sydney (2012) Greening Sydney Plan. Accessed 12 October 2012
  12. Clergeau P, Croci S, Jokimaki J, Kaisanlahti-Jokimaki M-L, Dinetti M (2006) Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biol Conserv 127:336–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clergeau P, Jokimaki J, Savard J-PL (2001a) Are urban bird communities influenced by the bird diversity of adjacent landscapes? J Appl Ecol 2001(38):1122–1134Google Scholar
  14. Clergeau P, Mennechez G, Sauvage A, Lemoine A (2001b) Human perception and appreciation of birds: a motivation for wildlife conservation in urban environments of France. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clergeau P, Savard J-PL, Mennechez G, Falardeau G (1998) Bird abundance and diversity along an urban–rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. Condor 100(3):413–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006) Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biol Conserv 2006(133):326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeFries RS, Foley JA, Asner GP (2004) Land-use choices: balancing human needs and ecosystem function. Frontiers in Ecology 2(5):249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Drinnan IN (2005) The search for fragmentation thresholds in a Southern Sydney suburb. Biol Conserv 124:339–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Etienne RS (2005) A new sampling formula for neutral biodiversity. Ecol Lett 2005(8):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans KL, Newson SE, Gaston KJ (2009) Habitat influences on urban avian assemblages. Ibis 2009(151):19–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuller RA, Warren PH, Armsworth PR, Barbosa O, Gaston KJ (2008) Garden bird feeding predicts the structure of urban avian assemblages. Divers Distrib 2008(14):131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haskell DG (2003) Diminishing songbirds. In: Spray SL, McGlothlin KL (eds) Loss of biodiversity. Rowman and Littlefield, Oxford, pp 55–74Google Scholar
  23. Jackson LE (2003) The relationship of urban design to human health and condition. Landscape and urban planning 64:191–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jones D (2002) Book review- Canberra birds: a report on the first 18 years of the garden bird survey. Emu 102:389–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones D (2011) An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu 111:i–viiCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leveau CM, Leveau LM (2005) Avian community response to urbanization in the Pampean region, Argentina. Ornitologia Neotropical 16:503–510Google Scholar
  27. Lowe K, Taylor C, Major R (2011) Do Common Mynas significantly compete with native birds in urban environments? Journal of Ornithology:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10336-011-0674-5
  28. Luck GW, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2003) Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends in ecology and Evolution 18(7):331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Luck GW, Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Imhoff M (2004) Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. PNAS 101(1):182–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Major RE, Parsons H (2010) What do museum specimans tell us about the impact of urbanisation? A comparison of the recent and historical bird communities of Sydney. Emu 2010(110):92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. BioScience 52(10):883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. TREE 14(11):450–453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Melles SJ (2005) Urban bird diversity as an indicator of human social diversity and economic inequality in Vancouver, British Columbia. Urban habitats 3(1):25–47Google Scholar
  34. Niemela J (1999) Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers Conserv 1999(8):119–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parsons H, French K, Major RE (2003) The influence of remnant bushland on the composition of suburban bird assemblages in Australia. Landscape and urban planning 66:43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parsons H, Major RE, French K (2006) Species interactions and habitat associations of birds inhabiting urban areas of Sydney, Australia. Austral Ecology 2006(31):217–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Remsen JV (1994) Use and misuse of bird lists in community ecology and conservation. Auk 111(1):225–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Savard J-PL, Clergeau P, Mennechez G (2000) Biodiversity concepts and urban ecosystems. Landscape and urban planning 28:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shukuroglou P, McCarthy MA (2006) Modelling the occurance of rainbow lorikeets (Trichoglossus haematodus) in Melbourne. Austral Ecology 2006(31):240–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of Diversity. Nature 163:688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith J, Lill A (2008) Importance of eucalypts in exploitation of urban parks by rainbow and musk lorikeets. Emu 2008(108):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The dangers of feeding lorikeets (2008). SydneyGoogle Scholar
  43. Turner WR, Nakamura T, Dinetti M (2004) Global urbanisation and the separation of humans from nature. BioScience 54(6):585–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Heezik Y, Smyth A, Mathieu R (2008) Diversity of native and exotic birds acoss an urban gradient in a New Zealand city. Landscape and urban planning 2008(87):223–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van Kooten GC, Bulte EH, Sinclair ARE (2000) Introduction: Conserving biological diversity. In: van Kooten GC, Bulte EH, Sinclair ARE (eds) Conserving nature’s diversity. Ashgate, Aldershot, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  46. Watson DM (2004) Comparative evaluation of new approaches to survey birds. Wildl Res 2004(31):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White JG, Antos MJ, Fitzsimons JA, Palmer GC (2005) Non-uniform bird assemblages in urban environments: the influence of streetscape vegetation. Landscape and urban planning 71:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of ScienceUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Rm 410, Heydon-Laurence building (A08) The University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations