Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 109–129 | Cite as

Urban growth patterns and growth management boundaries in the Central Puget Sound, Washington, 1986–2007

  • Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman
  • Stephan Coe
  • Lucy R. Hutyra


Many regions of the globe are experiencing rapid urban growth, the location and intensity of which can have negative effects on ecological and social systems. In some locales, planners and policy makers have used urban growth boundaries to direct the location and intensity of development; however the empirical evidence for the efficacy of such policies is mixed. Monitoring the location of urban growth is an essential first step in understanding how the system has changed over time. In addition, if regulations purporting to direct urban growth to specific locales are present, it is important to evaluate if the desired pattern (or change in pattern) has been observed. In this paper, we document land cover and change across six dates (1986, 1991, 1995, 1999, 2002, and 2007) for six counties in the Central Puget Sound, Washington State, USA. We explore patterns of change by three different spatial partitions (the region, each county, 2000 U.S. Census Tracks), and with respect to urban growth boundaries implemented in the late 1990’s as part of the state’s Growth Management Act. Urban land cover increased from 8 to 19% of the study area between 1986 and 2007, while lowland deciduous and mixed forests decreased from 21 to 13% and grass and agriculture decreased from 11 to 8%. Land in urban classes outside of the urban growth boundaries increased more rapidly (by area and percentage of new urban land cover) than land within the urban growth boundaries, suggesting that the intended effect of the Growth Management Act to direct growth to within the urban growth boundaries may not have been accomplished by 2007. Urban sprawl, as estimated by the area of land per capita, increased overall within the region, with the more rural counties within commuting distance to cities having the highest rate of increase observed. Land cover data is increasingly available and can be used to rapidly evaluate urban development patterns over large areas. Such data are important inputs for policy makers, urban planners, and modelers alike to manage and plan for future population, land use, and land cover changes.


Land cover change Spatial patterns Urban growth Urban growth boundary Growth management Urban-rural interface Sprawl 


  1. Alberti M, Booth D, Hill K, Coburn B, Avolio C, Coe S et al (2007) The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: an empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins. Landscape and Urban Planning 80:345–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti M, Marzluff JM, Shulenberger E, Bradley G, Ryan C, ZumBrunnen C (2003) Integrating humans into ecology: opportunities and challenges for studying urban ecosystems. Bioscience 53:1169–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bento AM, Franco SF, Kaffine D (2006) The efficiency and distributional impacts of alternative anti-sprawl policies. Journal of Urban Economics 59:121–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatta B, Saraswati S, Bandyopadhyay D (2010a) Quantifying the degree-of-freedom, degree-of-sprawl, and degree-of-goodness of urban growth from remote sensing data. Applied Geography 30:96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhatta B, Saraswati S, Bandyopadhyay D (2010b) Urban sprawl measurement from remote sensing data. Applied Geography 30:731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boentje JP, Blinnikov MS (2007) Post-Soviet forest fragmentation and loss in the Green Belt around Moscow, Russia (1991–2001): a remote sensing perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 82:208–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, Theobald DM (2005) Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecological Applications 15:1851–1863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson T, Dierwechter Y (2007) Effects of urban growth boundaries on residential development in Pierce County, Washington. The Professional Geographer 59:209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen S, Zeng S, Xie C (2000) Remote sensing and GIS for urban growth analysis in China. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 66:593–598Google Scholar
  10. Cho S-H, Poudyal N, Lambert DM (2008) Estimating spatially varying effects of urban growth boundaries on land development and land value. Land Use Policy 25:320–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ding C, Knaap GJ, Hopkins LD (1999) Managing urban growth with urban growth boundaries: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Urban Economics 46:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnelly R, Marzluff J (2006) Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosystems 9:99–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Epstein J, Payne K, Kramer E (2002) Techniques for mapping suburban sprawl. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68:913–918Google Scholar
  14. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gosnell H, Kline JD, Chrostek G, Duncan J (2011) Is Oregon’s land use planning program conserving forest and farm land? a review of the evidence. Land Use Policy 28:185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grimm NB, Grove JM, Pickett STA, Redman CL (2000) Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems. BioScience 50:571–584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen A, Neilson R, Dale V, Flather C, Iverson L, Currie D et al (2001) Global change in forests: responses of species, communities, and biomes. Bioscience 51:765–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvey T, Works MA (2002) Urban sprawl and rural landscapes: perceptions of landscape as amenity in Portland, Oregon. Local Environment 7:381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hepinstall-Cymerman J, Coe S, Alberti M (2009) Using urban landscape trajectories to develop a multi-temporal land cover database to support ecological modeling. Remote Sensing 1:1353–1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hepinstall JA, Alberti M, Marzluff JM (2008) Predicting land cover change and avian community responses in rapidly urbanizing environments. Landscape Ecology 28:1257–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hepinstall JA, Marzluff JM, Alberti M (2009) Modeling bird responses to predicted changes in land cover in an urbanizing region models for planning wildlife conservation in large landscapes. Academic, San Diego, pp 625–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Herold M, Couclelis H, Clarke KC (2005) The role of spatial metrics in the analysis and modeling of urban land use change. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 29:369–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Herold M, Goldstein NC, Clarke KC (2003) The spatiotemporal form of urban growth: measurement, analysis and modeling. Remote Sensing of Environment 86:286–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hobbs R, Wu J (2007) Perspectives and prospects of landscape ecology. Key topics in landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Houghton RA (1994) The worldwide extent of land-use change. BioScience 44:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Imhoff ML, Bounoua L, Ricketts T, Loucks C, Harriss R, Lawrence WT (2004) Global patterns in consumption of net primary production. Nature 429:870–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ji CY, Lin P, Li X, Liu Q, Wang S (2001) Monitoring urban expansion with remote sensing in China. International Journal of Remote Sensing 22:1441–1455Google Scholar
  28. Ji W, Ma J, Twibell RW, Underhill K (2006) Characterizing urban sprawl using multi-stage remote sensing images and landscape metrics. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 30:861–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jun M-J, Hur J-W (2001) Commuting costs of “leap-frog” newtown development in Seoul. Cities 18:151–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kline JD (2005) Forest and farmland conservation effects of Oregon’s (USA) land-use planning program. Environmental Management 35:368–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline JD, Alig RJ (1999) Does land use planning slow the conversion of forest and farm lands? Growth and Change 30:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kunstler JH (1994) The geography of nowhere: the rise and decline of America’s man-made landscape. Touchstone, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Li F, Liu X, Hu D, Wang R, Yang W, Li D et al (2009) Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: a case study for China’s Jining City. Landscape and Urban Planning 90:134–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lo CP, Yang X (2002) Drivers of lan-use/land-cover changes and dynamics modeling for the Atlanta, Georgia Metropolitan Area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 68:1073–1082Google Scholar
  35. Lu D, Weng Q (2006) Use of impervious surface in urban land-use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment 102:146–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lunetta RS, Balogh ME (1999) Application of multi-date landsat 5 TIM Imagery for wetland identification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 65:1303–1310Google Scholar
  37. Marzluff JM (2005) Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 8:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marzluff JM, Withy JC, Whittaker KA, Oleyar MD, Unfried TM, Rullman S et al (2007) Consequences of habitat utilization by nest predators and breeding songbirds across multiple scales in an urbanizing landscape. Condor 109:516–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC, Ene E (2002) FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. University of Massachusetts, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  40. Meyer WB, Turner BL II (1992) Human population growth and global land-use/cover change. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:39–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Millward H (2006) Urban containment strategies: a case-study appraisal of plans and policies in Japanese, British, and Canadian cities. Land Use Policy 23:473–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson AC, Moore T (1993) Assessing urban growth management: the case of Portland, Oregon, the USA’s largest urban growth boundary. Land Use Policy 10:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Oetter DR, Cohen WB, Berterretche M, Maiersperger TK, Kennedy RE (2001) Land cover mapping in an agricultural setting using multiseasonal thematic mapper data. Remote Sensing of Environment 76:139–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pearson SM, Turner MG, Drake JB (1999) Landscape change and habitat availability in the Southern Appalachian Highlands and Olympic Peninsula. 9: 1288–1304Google Scholar
  45. Powell SL, Cohen WB, Yang Z, Pierce JD, Alberti M (2008) Quantification of impervious surface in the Snohomish water resources inventory area of Western Washington from 1972 to 2006. Remote Sens Environ 112:1895–1908Google Scholar
  46. Radeloff VC, Hammer RB, Stewart SI (2005) Rural and suburban sprawl in the U.S. Midwest from 1940 to 2000 and its relation to forest fragmentation. Conservation Biology 19:793–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Real Estate Research Corp (1974) The costs of sprawl: environmental and economic costs of alternative residential development patterns at the urban fringe. U.S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. Robinson L, Newell JP, Marzluff JM (2005) Twenty-five years of sprawl in the Seattle region: growth managment responses and implications for conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 71:51–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sudhira HS, Ramachandra TV, Jagadish KS (2004) Urban sprawl: metrics, dynamics and modelling using GIS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 5:29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sutton PC (2003) A scale-adjusted measure of “urban sprawl” using nighttime satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ 86:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tang Z, Engel BA, Pijanowski BC, Lim KJ (2005) Forecasting land use change and its environmental impact at a watershed scale. Journal of Environmental Management 76:35–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Theobald DM (2001) Land-use dynamics beyond the American urban fringe. Geographical Review 91:544–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tomalty R (2002) Growth management in the Vancouver region. Local Environment 7:431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Torrens P (2008) A toolkit for measuring sprawl. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy 1:5–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tregoning H, Agyeman J, Shenot C (2002) Sprawl, smart growth and sustainability. Local Environment 7:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Troyer ME (2002) A spatial approach for integrating and analyzing indicators of ecological and human condition. Ecological Indicators 2:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Waddell P (2002) UrbanSim: modeling urban development for land use, transportation and environmental planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 68:297–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yang L, Xian G, Klaver JM, Deal B (2003) Urban land-cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 69:1003–1010Google Scholar
  59. Yang X, Lo CP (2002) Using a time series of satellite imagery to detect land use and land cover changes in the Atlanta, Georgia Metropolitan area. International Journal of Remote Sensing 23:1775–1798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yuan F, Sawaya KE, Loeffelholz BC, Bauer ME (2005) Land cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing. Remote Sens Environ 98:317–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman
    • 1
  • Stephan Coe
    • 2
  • Lucy R. Hutyra
    • 3
  1. 1.Warnell School of Forestry & Natural ResourcesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.Puget Sound Regional CouncilSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Geography & EnvironmentBoston UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations