Skip to main content
Log in

Rediscovering the value of urban rivers

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rivers commonly serve as defining, founding features of human settlements, yet urbanisation has degraded them, often to the extent that they no longer provide the services to society from which the settlements developed. Urban river restoration has expanded in recent years and part of this can be attributed to the increased recognition of the interconnected benefits that restored ecosystems can provide to society. This paper reviews the impact of urbanisation on rivers and the ecosystem services that they provide, and explores the ecosystem approach to restoration. Techniques and tools for the practical application of the ecosystem services approach in conservation are considered, with reference to case studies. There is a need to internalise ecosystem service insights into pragmatic, transparent and readily-used and understood planning tools, based on the capacities of a range of ecosystem services in river corridors. This is necessary if we are to avoid the continued erosion of critical resources such as rivers, rediscovering their multiple values to society, and to accelerate the translation of these sustainability concepts into applied tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams WM, Perrow MR (1999) Scientific and institutional constraints on the restoration of European floodplains. In: Marriott SB and Alexander J (eds) Floodplains: interdisciplinary approaches. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 163: 89–97

  • Baron JS, Poff NL, Ammgermeier PL et al (2002) Meeting ecological and societal needs for freshwater. Ecol Appl 12(5):1247–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton NJ (1992) The lost rivers of London: a study of their effects upon London and Londoners, and the effects of London and Londoners on them. Historical Publications Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Beavan L, Sadler J, Pinder C (2001) The invertebrate fauna of a physically modified urban river. Hydrobiologia 445(1–3):97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker DJ, Dunbar MJ (2004) Application of physical habitat simulation (phabsim) modelling to modified urban river channels. River Res Appl 20(2):167–183. doi:10.1002/rra.742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick MA, Dobberfuhl DR, Benke AC, Huryn AD, Suberkropp K, Thiele JE (2006) Urbanization affects stream ecosystem function by altering hydrology, chemistry, and biotic richness. Ecol Appl 16:1796–1807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chin A (2006) Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79:460–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford NJ (2007) River restoration: paradigms, paradoxes and the urban dimension. Sustain Safe Water Supplies 7(2):57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily G (1997) Nature's services: societal dependance on natural ecosystems. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Defra (2007) An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. Available online: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-countryside/pdf/natural-environ/eco-valuing.pdf

  • Diamond J (2004) Collapse: how societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Diederichs N, Markewicz T, Mander M, Martens A, Zama Ngubane S (2002) eThekwini catchments: a strategic tool for management. eThekwini Municipality, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufour S, Piegay H (2009) From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Res Appl 25(5):568–581. doi:10.1002/rra.1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden S, Tunstall S (2006) Ecological versus social restoration? Environ Plann C: Gov Policy 24:661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eftec (2007) Policy Appraisal and the Environment: An Introduction to the Valuation of Ecosystem Services – Wareham Managed Realignment Case Study. Report prepared for the Environment Agency by Economics For The Environment Consultancy Ltd (Eftec), London

  • Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B (2007) Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ 63(4):714–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Heinemeyer A, Jackson SF, Parnell M, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2009) Ecosystem service benefits of contrasting conservation strategies in a human-dominated region. Proc R Soc B, Biol Sci 276(1669):2903–2911. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.0528.PMCID:PMC2817206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmore AJ, Kaushal SS (2008) Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Front Ecol Environ 6:308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everard M (2009a) The business of biodiversity. WIT, Ashurst

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard M (2009b) Ecosystem services case studies. Science Report SCHO0409BPVM-E-E. Environment Agency, Bristol. (http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/SCHO0409BPVM-E-E.pdf)

  • Everard M (2010) Ecosystem services assessment of sea trout restoration work on the River Glaven, North Norfolk. Environment Agency Evidence report SCHO0110BRTZ-E-P. Environment Agency, Bristol. (http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/SCHO0110BRTZ-e-e.pdf)

  • Everard M (in press) Value creation from aquatic ecosystem management. Proceedings of the York rivers conference, September 2010

  • Everard M, Jevons S (2010) Ecosystem services assessment of buffer zone installation on the upper Bristol Avon, Wiltshire. Environment Agency Evidence report SCHO0210BRXW-e-e.pdf. Environment Agency, Bristol. Available online: http://publications.environment-agency.gov.uk/pdf/SCHO0210BRXW-e-e.pdf

  • Everard M, Kataria G (2010) The proposed Pancheshwar Dam, India/Nepal: A preliminary ecosystem services assessment of likely outcomes. An IES research report. Available online: http://www.ies-uk.org.uk/resources/papers/pancheshwar_dam_report.pdf

  • Everard M, Bramley M, Tatem K, Appleby T, Watts W (2009) Flood management: from defence to sustainability. Environ Liabil 2:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Shuker L, Gurnell A (in press) The Mayes Brook restoration in Mayesbrook Park, East London: an ecosystem services assessment. Environment Agency Evidence report. Environment Agency, Bristol.

  • Findlay SJ, Taylor MP (2006) Why rehabilitate urban river systems? Area 38(3):312–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzhugh TW, Richter BD (2004) Quenching urban thirst: growing cities and their impacts on freshwater ecosystems. Bioscience 54(8):741–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Jansson A, Larsson J, Costanza R (1997) Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaves P, Egan D, Harrison K, Robinson R (2009) Valuing ecosystem services in the East of England. East of England Environment Forum, East of England Regional Assembly and Government Office, East England

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleick PH (2000) The changing water paradigm: a look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int 25:127–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Groffman PM, Bain DJ, Band LE et al (2003) Down by the riverside: urban riparian ecology. Front Ecol Environ 1(6):315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurnell AM, Lee MT, Souch C (2007) Urban rivers: hydrology, geomorphology, ecology and opportunities for change. Geog Compass 1(5):1118–1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitzhusen FJ (2007) Economic valuation of river systems. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • House M, Ellise J, Herricks E, Huitved-Jacobsen T, Seager J (1993) Urban drainage—impacts on receiving water quality. Water Sci Technol 27:117–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65:412–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jim CY, Chen WY (2009) Ecosystem services and valuation of urban forests in China. Cities 26(4):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston P, Everard M, Santillo D, Robèrt K-H (2007) Commentaries: reclaiming the definition of sustainability. Environ Sci Pollut R 14:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RD (1979) Urbanisation and stream quality impairment. Water Res Bull 15:948–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner DN (1990) Groundwater recharge in urban areas. Hydrological Processes and Water Management in Urban Areas. Proceedings of the Duisberg Symposium, April 1988. IAHS Publication No. 198, 1990

  • Loomis J, Kent P, Strange E, Fausch K, Covich A (2000) Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecol Econ 33:103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maltby LL, Paetzold A, Warren PH (2010) Sustaining industrial activity and ecological quality: the potential role of an ecosystem services approach. In: Batty LC, Hallberg KB (eds) Ecology of industrial pollution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 327–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JL, Paul MJ, Taulbee WK (2005) Stream ecosystem function in urbanizing landscapes. J North Am Benthol Soc 24(3):602–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems & human well-being: synthesis. Island, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam-choon K (2005) Ecological restoration and revegetation works in Korea. Landscape Ecol Eng 1:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niemelä J, Saarela R-R, Söderman T, Kopperoinen L, Yli-Pelkonen V, Väre S, Kotze DJ (2010) Using the ecosystem services approach for better planning and conservation of urban green spaces: a Finland case study. Biodivers Conserv 19:3225–3243. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9888-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan PA, Guthrie N (1998) River rehabilitation in an urban environment: examples from the Mersey Basin, North West England. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 8:685–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2010) Paying for biodiversity: Enhancing the Cost-Effectiveness of Payments for Ecosystem Services. OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264090279-en

  • Paetzold A, Warren PH, Maltby LL (2010) A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecol Compl 7(3):273–281. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul MJ, Meyer JL (2001) Streams in the urban landscape. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:333–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts G, Heathcote J, Martin D (2001) Urban rivers: our inheritance and future. IWA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickett S, Cadenasso M, Grove J (2001) Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:127–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy AH, Freeman MC, Freeman BJ, Wenger SJ, Ensign WE, Meyer JL (2006) Importance of riparian forests in urban catchments contingent on sediment and hydrologic regimes. Environ Manage 37:523–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg JH, Settele J (2010) Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecol Complex 7(3):327–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suren AM (2000) Effects of urbanisation. In Collier KJ, Winterbourn MJ (eds) New Zealand Stream Invertebrates: Ecology and Implications for Management. NZ Limnol Soc, Hamilton, pp. 260–288

  • Taylor KG, Owens PN (2009) Sediments in urban river basins: a review of sediment-contaminant dynamics in an environmental system conditioned by human activities. J Soils Sediments 9(4):281–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp JH, Flotemersch JE, Delong MD (2010) Linking ecosystem services, rehabilitation and river hydromorphology. Bioscience 60(1):67–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tratalos J, Fuller RA, Warren PH, Davies RG, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 83(4):308–317. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzoulas K, Korpela K, Venn S, Yli-Pelkonen V, Kaźmierczak A, Niemela J, James P (2007) Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan 81(3):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA (2007) State of the world population 2007: unleashing the potential of urban growth. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan RP (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 24(3):706–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton I (1653) The Compleat Angler. [Available in many impressions.]

  • Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Bannerman R, Emmons E (2000) Watershed urbanisation and changes in fish communities in south-eastern Wisconsin streams. J Am Water Resour Assoc 36:1173–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild TC, Bernet JF, Westling EL, Lerner DN (2010) Deculverting: reviewing the evidence on the ‘daylighting’ and restoration of culverted rivers. Water and Environment Journal. doi:10.1111/j.1747-6593.2010.00236.x

  • Whitford V, Ennos AR, Handley JF (2001) City form and natural process: indicators for the ecological performance of urban areas and their implication to Merseyside, UK. LandscUrban Plan 57:91–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman MG (1967) A cycle of sedimentation and erosion in urban river channels. Geog Ann A 49:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woods B, Ballard R, Kellagher et al. (2007) The SUDS manual. CIRIA Report C697, Construction Industry Research and Information Association, London

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thanks Bill Watts (Environment Agency) whose contribution to the paper includes economic expertise but also reflections back on many new insights.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Everard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Everard, M., Moggridge, H.L. Rediscovering the value of urban rivers. Urban Ecosyst 15, 293–314 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0174-7

Keywords

Navigation