Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diet of Florida coyotes in a protected wildland and suburban habitat

  • Published:
Urban Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coyotes (Canis latrans) arrived to Florida (USA) in the 1960s and are currently found throughout most of the state. The purpose of this study was to determine if the diet of Florida coyotes differed between suburban and wildland habitat types or across seasons. Fresh coyote fecal samples were collected from wildland and suburban habitats in Pinellas County, Florida (USA; 27°54′N, 82°41′W) from May 2005 to March 2007. Diet items in the 49 wildland and 71 suburban samples were identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level by gross morphological characteristics and medullary configurations of dorsal guard hairs. A Poisson regression was utilized to determine the main and interactive effects of habitat and season on the number of different food items per sample. Coyotes in the wildland habitat had greater diet diversity than suburban coyotes. In addition, anthropogenic waste was recovered over twice as often from coyote fecal samples collected in the suburban habitat. In the wildland habitat, vegetative matter (96%), Insecta (53%), and Rodentia (45%) were recovered most often, as opposed to berries (56%) and Lagomorpha (32%) in the suburban habitat. In both habitats, vegetative matter, berries, and Lagomorpha were recovered most often from coyote fecal samples, whereas Odocoileus virginianus, Lagomorpha, and berries varied the most between wet and dry seasons. This study suggests that as urbanization increases, diet diversity for the coyote will likely decrease and consumption of anthropogenic items will likely increase. As a result of this, human–coyote conflicts may become more common—particularly in counties, like Pinellas, that are undergoing urbanization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Azevedo FC, Lester V, Gorsuch W, Lariviere S, Wirsing AJ, Murray DL (2006) Dietary breadth and overlap among five sympatric prairie carnivores. J Zool 269:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Dobshinsky A (2007) An alternative future: Florida in the 21st Century 2020 2040 2060. University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia

  • Chen E, Gerber JF (1990) Climate. In: Myers RL, Ewel JJ (eds) Ecosystems in Florida. University of Central Florida Press, Orlando, pp 11–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossett RL, Elliott CL (1991) Winter food habits of red foxes and coyotes in central Kentucky. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 45:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A, Barnett A (2008) An introduction to generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall: Boca Raton (FL)

  • Fedriani JM, Fuller TK, Sauvajot RM (2001) Does availability of anthropogenic food enhance densities of omnivorous mammals? An example with coyotes in southern California. Ecography 24:325–331

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) (2004) Florida’s endangered species, threatened species, and species of special concern. http://myfwc.com/imperiledspecies/pdf/Endangered-ThreatenedSpecial-Concern-2004.pdf

  • Gompper ME, Goodman RM, Kays RW, Ray JC, Fiorello CV, Wade SE (2003) A survey of the parasites of coyotes (Canis latrans) in New York based on fecal analysis. J Wildl Dis 39:712–717

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grinder M, Krausman PR (2001) Home range, habitat use, and nocturnal activity of coyotes in an urban environment. J Wildl Manage 65:887–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingle S, Pellis SM, Wilson WF (2005) Interspecific variation in antipredator behaviour leads to differential vulnerability of mule deer and white-tailed deer fawns early in life. J Anim Ecol 74:1140–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (2001) A historical perspective on urban bird research: trends, terms, and approaches. In: Marzluff JM, Bowman R, Donnelly R (eds) Avian ecology and conservation in an urbanizing world. Kluwer, Norwell, pp 2–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCown W, Scheick B (2007) The coyote in Florida. Fish and Wildlife Research Institute. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (myfwc.com). Tallahassee, Florida

  • Prugh LR (2005) Coyote prey selection and community stability during a decline in food supply. Oikos 110:253–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn T (1997) Coyote (Canis latrans) food habits in three urban habitat types of western Washington. Northwest Sci 71:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stratman MR, Pelton MR (1997) Food habits of coyotes in Northwestern Florida. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 51:269–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton DH, Sunquist ME, Main MB (2004) Ecological separation within newly sympatric populations of coyotes and bobcats in South-Central Florida. J Mammal 85:973–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Census Bureau (USCB) (2009) http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states

  • Wagner GD, Hill EP (1994) Evaluation of southeastern coyote diets during the wild turkey reproductive season. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 48:173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins L, Langworthy M, Rathbun CD, Sullivan R (1982) Identification of the dorsal guard hairs of some of Florida mammals. Technical Report prepared for the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

  • Wilson DE (2005) Mammal species of the world: a taxonomic and geographic reference. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooding JB, Hill EP, Sumner PW (1984) Coyote food habits in Mississippi and Alabama. Proc Annu Conf Southeast Assoc Fish Wildl Agencies 38:182–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Jay Jones, Catherine Hughes, and Michelle Dachsteiner for their assistance in the field and laboratory. We express appreciation to Dr. Bruce Rinker and the staff at Brooker Creek Preserve for providing access to the Preserve, use of an ATV, and for being an integral part of this study. We are grateful for the assistance of Pinellas County Animal Control, specifically Kenny Mitchell, Dr. Welch Agnew, and Richard Stahl. Lastly we would like to express our sincere thanks to Pinellas County for funding this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melissa M. Grigione.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grigione, M.M., Burman, P., Clavio, S. et al. Diet of Florida coyotes in a protected wildland and suburban habitat. Urban Ecosyst 14, 655–663 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0159-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-011-0159-6

Keywords

Navigation