Urban Ecosystems

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 223–235 | Cite as

The importance of urban backgardens on plant and invertebrate recruitment: a field microcosm experiment



Private backgardens in cities have the capacity to enhance ecological function and connectivity. The importance of increased habitat availability was tested experimentally using microcosms with soil or with soil and vegetation added into Toronto backgardens. Local attributes of the backgardens were recorded, and within the microcosms, recruitment of seeds, plants, and winged and wingless invertebrates were recorded. Natural recruitment by all organisms was significant into the microcosms in the 20 backgardens tested. Invertebrate abundance and diversity, incidental seed recruitment, and aboveground vegetation growth was enhanced regardless of whether only bare soil was added or soil with vegetation. The number of woody plants (non-herbaceous plants with hard lignified tissues or woody parts e.g., stems and are adapted to survive from one year to the next i.e., through winter) in the backgardens predicted seed recruitment and number of plant species predicted winged invertebrate abundance. Hence, simple augmentation of private backgardens—even at an ecologically small-scale—can enhance the capacity of urban systems to provide appropriate habitats for organisms within a difficult matrix for many species.


Dispersal Backgarden Habitat Microcosm Invertebrate Seeds 


  1. Aizen MA, Feinsinger P (1994) Habitat fragmentation, native insect pollinators, and feral honey bees in Argentine “Chaco Serrano”. Ecol Appl 4:378–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (1995) Biodiversity: The UK Steering Group Report. Volume 2: Action Plans. HMSO, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Âs S (1999) Invasion of matrix species in small habitat patches. Conservation Ecology [online] 3(1):1. Available from the Internet. URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art1/
  4. Bowden J, Dean GJW (1977) The distribution of flying insects in and near a tall hedgerow. J Appl Ecol 14:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne LB (2007) Habitat structure: a fundamental concept and framework for urban soil ecology. Urban Ecosyst 10:255–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne LB, Bruns MA (2004) The effects of lawn management on soil microarthropods. Journal Agric Urban Entomol 21:150–156Google Scholar
  7. Byrne LB, Bruns MA, Kim KC (2008) Ecosystem properties of urban land covers at the aboveground-belowground interface. Ecosystems 11:1065–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chace JF, Walsh JJ (2006) Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 74:46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Churkina G (2008) Modeling the carbon cycle of urban systems. Ecol Model 216(2):107–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corbet SA, Bee J, Dasmahapatra K, Gale S, Gorringe E, La Ferla B, Moorhouse T, Trevail A, van Bergen Y, Vorontsova M (2001) Native or exotic? Double or single? Evaluating plants for pollinator-friendly gardens. Ann Bot 87:219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daniels GD, Kirkpatrick JB (2006) Does variation in garden characteristics influence the conservation of birds in suburbia? Biol Conserv 133:326–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Davidowitz G, Rosenzweig ML (1998) The latitudinal gradient of species diversity among North American grasshoppers within a single habitat: a test of the spatial heterogeneity hypothesis. J Biogeogr 25:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Day TD (1995) Bird species composition and abundance in relation to native plants in urban gardens, Hamilton, New Zealand. Notornis 42:175–186Google Scholar
  15. Duelli P, Obrist MK, Schmatz DR (1999) Biodiversity evaluation in agricultural landscape: above-ground insects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:33–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dufour A, Gadallah F, Wagner HH, Guisan A, Buttler A (2006) Plant species richness and environmental heterogeneity in a mountain landscape: effects of variability and spatial configuration. Ecography 29:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100(1):65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forman RTT, Baudry J (1984) Hedgerows and hedgerow networks in landscape ecology. Environ Manage 8(6):495–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Frankie GW, Thorp RW, Schindler M, Hernandez J, Ertter B, Rizzardi M (2005) Ecological patterns of bees and their host ornamental flowers in two northern California cities. J Kans Entomol Soc 78:227–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ghazoul J (2006) Floral diversity and the facilitation of pollination. J Ecol 94:295–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S, Theuray N, Lindley SJ (2008) Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Landsc Urban Plan 87:210–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Golden DM, Crist TO (1999) Experimental effects of habitat fragmentation on old-field canopy insects: community, guild and species responses. Oecologia 118:371–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenstone MH (1984) Determinants of web spider species diversity: vegetation structural diversity versus prey availability. Oecologia 62:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gruebler MU, Morand M, Naef-Daenzer B (2008) A predictive model of the diversity of airborne insects in agricultural environments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1–3:75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Halaj J, Ross DW, Moldenke AR (2000) Importance of habitat structure to the arthropod food-web in Douglas-fir canopies. Oikos 90:139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirsch M, Pfaff S, Wolters V (2003) The influence of matrix type on flower visitors of Centaurea jacea L. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hodgkison S, Hero JM, Warnken J (2007) The efficacy of small-scale conservation efforts, as assessed on Australian golf courses. Biol Conserv 135(4):576–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huston MA (1999) Local processes and regional patterns: appropriate scales for understanding variation in the diversity of plants and animals. Oikos 86:393–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jules ES, Shahani P (2003) A broader ecological context to habitat fragmentation: why matrix habitat is more important that we thought. J Veg Sci 14:459–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karl TR, Diaz HF, Kukla G (1988) Urbanization: its detection and effect in the United States climate record. J Climate 1:1099–1123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kevan PG (1999) Pollinators as indicators of the state of the environment: species, activity and diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1–3:373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW (2002) Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:16812–16816CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez P, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawton JH (1983) Plant architecture and the diversity of phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 28:23–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis T (1969a) The distribution of flying insects near a low hedgerow. J Appl Ecol 6:443–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lewis T (1969b) The diversity of the insect fauna in a hedgerow and neighbouring fields. J Appl Ecol 6:453–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landscape Ecol 22:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loureiro S, Newton A, Icely J (2005) Effects of nutrient enrichments on primary production in the Ria Formosa coastal lagoon (Southern Portugal). Hydrobiologia 550:29–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lundholm JT, Larson DW (2003) Relationships between spatial environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity on a limestone pavement. Ecography 26:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Makino TT, Ohashi K, Sakai S (2007) How do floral display size and density of surrounding flowers influence the likelihood of bumble bee revisitation to a plant? Func Ecol 21:87–95Google Scholar
  41. Manyin T, Rowe CL (2006) Chronic exposure of Leptocheirus plumulosus to Baltimore Harbor sediment: Bioenergetic and population-level effects. Mar Environ Res 62(2):116–130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Maudsley MJ (2000) A review of the ecology and conservation of hedgerow invertebrates in Britain. J Environ Manag 60:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCoy ED, Bell SS (1991) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Muschinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 3–27Google Scholar
  44. McKinney ML (2002) Urbanization, biodiversity, and conservation. Bioscience 52:883–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKinney ML (2006) Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv 127:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moran PAP (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps. J R Stat Soc B 10:243–251Google Scholar
  48. Moran PAP (1950) Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37:17–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Murtaugh PA (2007) Simplicity and complexity in ecological data analysis. Ecology 88:56–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Palmer MW (1992) The coexistence of species in fractal landscapes. Am Nat 139:375–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pieper S, Weigmann G (2008) Interactions between isopods and collembolans modulate the mobilization and transport of nutrients from urban soils. Appl Soil Ecol 39(2):109–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Potts SG, Bulliamy B, Dafni A, Ne’Eman G, Willmer P (2003) Linking bees and flowers: how do floral communities structure pollinator communities. Ecology 84(10):2628–2642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Quinn GP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 537 ppGoogle Scholar
  55. Ricketts TH (2001) The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am Nat 158:87–99CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Romero-Alcaraz E, Avila JM (2000) Landscape heterogeneity in relation to variation in epigaeic beetle diversity of a Mediterranean ecosystem. Implications for conservation. Biodivers Conserv 9:985–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rudd H, Vala J, Schaefer VH (2002) The importance of backyard habitat in a comprehensive biodiversity conservation strategy: a connectivity analysis of urban green spaces. Restor Ecol 10(2):368–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smith RM, Warren PH, Thompson K, Gaston KJ (2005) Urban domestic gardens (VI): environmental correlates of invertebrate species richness. Biodivers Conserv 15:2415–2438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2006) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodivers Conserv 15:2515–2545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Snodgrass JW, Casey RE, Joseph D, Simon JA (2008) Microcosm investigations of stormwater pond sediment toxicity to embryonic and larval amphibians: variation in sensitivity among species. Environ Pollut 154(2):291–297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Southwood TRE, Brown VK, Reader PM (1979) The relationships of plant and insect diversities in succession. Biol J Linn Soc 12:327–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Statzner B, Moss B (2004) Linking ecological function, biodiversity and habitat: a mini-review focusing on older ecological literature. Basic Appl Ecol 5:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Steinberg DA, Pouyat RV, Parmelee RW, Groffman PM (1997) Earthworm abundance and nitrogen mineralization rates along an urban-rural land use gradient. Soil Biol Biochem 29(3–4):427–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Steiner NC, Kohler W (2003) Effects of landscape patterns on species richness: a modelling approach. Agric Ecosyst Environ 98:353–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stone B Jr (2008) Urban sprawl and air quality in large US cities. J Environ Manag 86:688–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Shwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92Google Scholar
  67. Thompson K, Austin KC, Smith RM, Warren PH, Angold PG, Gaston KJ (2003) Urban domestic gardens (I): putting small-scale plant diversity in context. J Veg Sci 14:71–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thompson K, Hodgson JG, Smith RM, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2004) Urban domestic gardens (III): composition and diversity of lawn floras. J Veg Sci 15:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tscharntke T, Gathmann A, Steffan-Dewenter I (1998) Bioindication using trapnesting bees and wasps and their natural enemies: community structure and interactions. J Appl Ecol 35:708–719Google Scholar
  70. Vandermeer J, Carvajal R (2001) Metapopulation dynamics and the quality of the matrix. Am Nat 158(3):211–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2002) Quality of agroecological matrix in a tropical montane landscape: ants in coffee plantations in southern Mexico. Conserv Biol 16(1):174–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Verhoef HA (1996) The role of soil microcosms in the study of ecosystem processes: microcosms. Ecology 77(3):685–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Vivian-Smith G (1997) Microtopographic heterogeneity and floristic diversity in experimental wetland communities. J Ecol 85:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Walton BM, Tsatiris D, Rivera-Sostre M (2006) Salamanders in forest-floor food webs: invertebrate species composition influences top-down effects. Pedobiologia 50(4):313–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Webb NR (1989) Studies on the invertebrate fauna of fragmented heathland in Dortset, UK, and the implications for conservation. Biol Conserv 47:153–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westphal C, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003) Mass flowering crops enhance pollinator densities at a landscape scale. Ecol Lett 6:961–965CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations